336 research outputs found
On a categorical framework for coalgebraic modal logic
AbstractA category of one-step semantics is introduced to unify different approaches to coalgebraic logic parametric in a contravariant functor that assigns to the state space its collection of predicates with propositional connectives. Modular constructions of coalgebraic logic are identified as colimits, limits, and tensor products, extending known results for predicate liftings. Generalised predicate liftings as modalities are introduced. Under common assumptions, the logic of all predicate liftings together with a complete axiomatisation exists for any type of coalgebras, and it is one-step expressive for finitary functors. Colimits and compositions of one-step expressive coalgebraic logics are shown to remain one-step expressive
Generic Trace Semantics via Coinduction
Trace semantics has been defined for various kinds of state-based systems,
notably with different forms of branching such as non-determinism vs.
probability. In this paper we claim to identify one underlying mathematical
structure behind these "trace semantics," namely coinduction in a Kleisli
category. This claim is based on our technical result that, under a suitably
order-enriched setting, a final coalgebra in a Kleisli category is given by an
initial algebra in the category Sets. Formerly the theory of coalgebras has
been employed mostly in Sets where coinduction yields a finer process semantics
of bisimilarity. Therefore this paper extends the application field of
coalgebras, providing a new instance of the principle "process semantics via
coinduction."Comment: To appear in Logical Methods in Computer Science. 36 page
Expressive Logics for Coinductive Predicates
The classical Hennessy-Milner theorem says that two states of an image-finite transition system are bisimilar if and only if they satisfy the same formulas in a certain modal logic. In this paper we study this type of result in a general context, moving from transition systems to coalgebras and from bisimilarity to coinductive predicates. We formulate when a logic fully characterises a coinductive predicate on coalgebras, by providing suitable notions of adequacy and expressivity, and give sufficient conditions on the semantics. The approach is illustrated with logics characterising similarity, divergence and a behavioural metric on automata
Strongly Complete Logics for Coalgebras
Coalgebras for a functor model different types of transition systems in a
uniform way. This paper focuses on a uniform account of finitary logics for
set-based coalgebras. In particular, a general construction of a logic from an
arbitrary set-functor is given and proven to be strongly complete under
additional assumptions. We proceed in three parts. Part I argues that sifted
colimit preserving functors are those functors that preserve universal
algebraic structure. Our main theorem here states that a functor preserves
sifted colimits if and only if it has a finitary presentation by operations and
equations. Moreover, the presentation of the category of algebras for the
functor is obtained compositionally from the presentations of the underlying
category and of the functor. Part II investigates algebras for a functor over
ind-completions and extends the theorem of J{\'o}nsson and Tarski on canonical
extensions of Boolean algebras with operators to this setting. Part III shows,
based on Part I, how to associate a finitary logic to any finite-sets
preserving functor T. Based on Part II we prove the logic to be strongly
complete under a reasonable condition on T
Coalgebra Learning via Duality
Automata learning is a popular technique for inferring minimal automata
through membership and equivalence queries. In this paper, we generalise
learning to the theory of coalgebras. The approach relies on the use of logical
formulas as tests, based on a dual adjunction between states and logical
theories. This allows us to learn, e.g., labelled transition systems, using
Hennessy-Milner logic. Our main contribution is an abstract learning algorithm,
together with a proof of correctness and termination
Categories for Dynamic Epistemic Logic
The primary goal of this paper is to recast the semantics of modal logic, and
dynamic epistemic logic (DEL) in particular, in category-theoretic terms. We
first review the category of relations and categories of Kripke frames, with
particular emphasis on the duality between relations and adjoint homomorphisms.
Using these categories, we then reformulate the semantics of DEL in a more
categorical and algebraic form. Several virtues of the new formulation will be
demonstrated: The DEL idea of updating a model into another is captured
naturally by the categorical perspective -- which emphasizes a family of
objects and structural relationships among them, as opposed to a single object
and structure on it. Also, the categorical semantics of DEL can be merged
straightforwardly with a standard categorical semantics for first-order logic,
providing a semantics for first-order DEL.Comment: In Proceedings TARK 2017, arXiv:1707.0825
Coalgebraic Geometric Logic: Basic Theory
Using the theory of coalgebra, we introduce a uniform framework for adding
modalities to the language of propositional geometric logic. Models for this
logic are based on coalgebras for an endofunctor on some full subcategory of
the category of topological spaces and continuous functions. We investigate
derivation systems, soundness and completeness for such geometric modal logics,
and we we specify a method of lifting an endofunctor on Set, accompanied by a
collection of predicate liftings, to an endofunctor on the category of
topological spaces, again accompanied by a collection of (open) predicate
liftings. Furthermore, we compare the notions of modal equivalence, behavioural
equivalence and bisimulation on the resulting class of models, and we provide a
final object for the corresponding category
Coalgebraic completeness-via-canonicity for distributive substructural logics
We prove strong completeness of a range of substructural logics with respect
to a natural poset-based relational semantics using a coalgebraic version of
completeness-via-canonicity. By formalizing the problem in the language of
coalgebraic logics, we develop a modular theory which covers a wide variety of
different logics under a single framework, and lends itself to further
extensions. Moreover, we believe that the coalgebraic framework provides a
systematic and principled way to study the relationship between resource models
on the semantics side, and substructural logics on the syntactic side.Comment: 36 page
A modular approach to defining and characterising notions of simulation
We propose a modular approach to defining notions of simulation, and modal logics which characterise them. We use coalgebras to model state-based systems, relators to define notions of simulation for such systems, and inductive techniques to define the syntax and semantics of modal logics for coalgebras. We show that the expressiveness of an inductively defined logic for coalgebras w.r.t. a notion of simulation follows from an expressivity condition involving one step in the definition of the logic, and the relator inducing that notion of simulation. Moreover, we show that notions of simulation and associated characterising logics for increasingly complex system types can be derived by lifting the operations used to combine system types, to a relational level as well as to a logical level. We use these results to obtain Baltag’s logic for coalgebraic simulation, as well as notions of simulation and associated logics for a large class of non-deterministic and probabilistic systems
- …