158 research outputs found
The dynamic logic of stating and asking
Inquisitive dynamic epistemic logic (IDEL) extends standard public announcement logic incorporating ideas from inquisitive semantics. In IDEL, the standard public announcement action can be extended to a more general public utterance action, which may involve a statement or a question. While uttering a statement has the effect of a standard announcement, uttering a question typically leads to new issues being raised. In this paper, we investigate the logic of this general public utterance action. We find striking commonalities, and some differences, with standard public announcement logic. We show that dynamic modalities admit a set of reduction axioms, which allow us to turn any formula of IDEL into an equivalent formula of static inquisitive epistemic logic. This leads us to establish several complete axiomatizations of IDEL, corresponding to known axiomatizations of public announcement logic
The dynamic logic of stating and asking
Inquisitive dynamic epistemic logic (IDEL) extends standard public announcement logic incorporating ideas from inquisitive semantics. In IDEL, the standard public announcement action can be extended to a more general public utterance action, which may involve a statement or a question. While uttering a statement has the effect of a standard announcement, uttering a question typically leads to new issues being raised. In this paper, we investigate the logic of this general public utterance action. We find striking commonalities, and some differences, with standard public announcement logic. We show that dynamic modalities admit a set of reduction axioms, which allow us to turn any formula of IDEL into an equivalent formula of static inquisitive epistemic logic. This leads us to establish several complete axiomatizations of IDEL, corresponding to known axiomatizations of public announcement logic
De Re Updates
In this paper, we propose a lightweight yet powerful dynamic epistemic logic
that captures not only the distinction between de dicto and de re knowledge but
also the distinction between de dicto and de re updates. The logic is based on
the dynamified version of an epistemic language extended with the assignment
operator borrowed from dynamic logic, following the work of Wang and Seligman
(Proc. AiML 2018). We obtain complete axiomatizations for the counterparts of
public announcement logic and event-model-based DEL based on new reduction
axioms taking care of the interactions between dynamics and assignments.Comment: In Proceedings TARK 2021, arXiv:2106.1088
To Be Announced
In this survey we review dynamic epistemic logics with modalities for
quantification over information change. Of such logics we present complete
axiomatizations, focussing on axioms involving the interaction between
knowledge and such quantifiers, we report on their relative expressivity, on
decidability and on the complexity of model checking and satisfiability, and on
applications. We focus on open problems and new directions for research
Knowing Values and Public Inspection
We present a basic dynamic epistemic logic of "knowing the value". Analogous
to public announcement in standard DEL, we study "public inspection", a new
dynamic operator which updates the agents' knowledge about the values of
constants. We provide a sound and strongly complete axiomatization for the
single and multi-agent case, making use of the well-known Armstrong axioms for
dependencies in databases
The undecidability of arbitrary arrow update logic
Arbitrary Arrow Update Logic is a dynamic modal logic with a modality to quantify over arrow updates. Some properties of this logic have already been established, but until now it remained an open question whether the logic's satisfiability problem is decidable. Here, we show by a reduction of the tiling problem that the satisfiability problem of Arbitrary Arrow Update Logic is co-RE hard, and therefore undecidable
A first-order axiomatization of the theory of finite trees
We provide first-order axioms for the theories of finite trees with bounded branching and finite trees with arbitrary (finite) branching. The signature is chosen to express, in a natural way, those properties of trees most relevant to linguistic theories. These axioms provide a foundation for results in linguistics that are based on reasoning formally about such properties. We include some observations on the expressive power of these theories relative to traditional language complexity classes
- …