Patients and Nurses Attitudes to Hysterectomy and Postoperative Pain Management

Over 500,000 hysterectomies are performed yearly in the United States, and they often result in a moderate to severe amount of pain. Nurses play a significant role in postoperative pain management. However, studies have shown that despite technological advances and nurses\u27 theoretical knowledge of pain, postoperative pain management remains a challenge among healthcare providers. The purpose of this study was to examine how nurses\u27 and patients\u27 attitude towards abdominal hysterectomy can impact postoperative pain management and hospital length of stay after a hysterectomy. Informed by the theory of reasoned action, the study examined the differences in the nurses\u27 and patients\u27 attitudes to abdominal hysterectomy and postoperative pain management. It also examined the correlation between attitudes toward postoperative pain management and hospital length of stay after a hysterectomy. A convenience sample of 147 participants were recruited from a self-administered online survey. Using the SPSS software, data was analyzed by an independent t test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression. No statistical difference was found between patients and nurses\u27 attitudes toward abdominal hysterectomy. However, a significant difference was found between the attitudes of each group toward postoperative pain management. There was also a strong negative correlation between attitudes to postoperative pain management and hospital length of stay. This study may aide nurses on ongoing pain management education for both new and seasoned nurses in practice. It will also help hospitals with pre- and postoperative patient education, which will lead to better collaboration with their nurse caregivers. Finally, this study will add to the existing body of research

The provision of tuberculosis patient care: A sociological perspective on primary health care nurses in the Qwa-Qwa district of the Free State

Tuberculosis is one of the major health tragedies facing South Africa. It is estimated that nearly two-thirds of the population of the country are infected with the tuberculosis bacterium and 160 000 South Africans from all walks of life become ill with tuberculosis every year (Department of Health, 1997: 4). An innovative approach is needed to fight the problem of tuberculosis. In view of the important role played by primary health care nurses with regard to the care of patients with tuberculosis, the overall aim of the study is to contribute to an improvement of tuberculosis patient care, inter alia, by attending to the problems pertaining to the provision of tuberculosis patient care at the government clinics in the Qwa-Qwa district of the Free State. The study attempts to describe the difficulties that primary health care nurses at the government clinics in Qwa-Qwa experience in the provision of tuberculosis patient care, and how their attitudes towards patients affect their service. The nurses need to be informed about how their attitudes influence their service. The perceptions of primary health care nurses in this matter are ascertained to assess their personal experience in their routine care of tuberculosis patients. The results of this research study indicate the following obstacles for primary health care nurses to render effective tuberculosis patient care at the government clinics in Qwa-Qwa: · Lack of knowledge, training and skills amongst some of the nurses in the treatment of tuberculosis, · Poor access to tuberculosis information, which include the procedures that protect nurses from tuberculosis infection; · Poor management system for nurses in tuberculosis patient care; · Lack of key health resources related to tuberculosis treatment; · Fear of the consequences of contracting tuberculosis by some of the nurses, and; · Negative attitudes of some nurses towards tuberculosis patients as well as towards their work.Dissertation (MA (Sociology))--University of Pretoria, 2005.Sociologyunrestricte

Are medical ethicists out of touch? Practitioner attitudes in the US and UK towards decisions at the end of life

To assess whether UK and US health care professionals share the views of medical ethicists about medical futility, withdrawing/withholding treatment, ordinary/extraordinary interventions, and the doctrine of double effect. A 138-item attitudinal questionnaire completed by 469 UK nurses studying the Open University course on "Death and Dying" was compared with a similar questionnaire administered to 759 US nurses and 687 US doctors taking the Hastings Center course on "Decisions near the End of Life". Practitioners accept the relevance of concepts widely disparaged by bioethicists: double effect, medical futility, and the distinctions between heroic/ordinary interventions and withholding/withdrawing treatment. Within the UK nurses' group a "rationalist" axis of respondents who describe themselves as having "no religion" are closer to the bioethics consensus on withholding and withdrawing treatment. Professionals' beliefs differ substantially from the recommendations of their professional bodies and from majority opinion in bioethics. Bioethicists should be cautious about assuming that their opinions will be readily accepted by practitioners

An Exploration of the Role of Substance Misuse Nurses in Scotland

Executive Summary Background With the increase of drug misuse over the past two decades, the role of the Substance Misuse Nurse has increased dramatically. Research on the role of nurses working in this field is minimal and there is little known about what they do, what they think about their clients and their role, and how they approach treatment. A pilot study on substance misuse nurses in Grampian indicated that nurses may be key gatekeepers to specialist services and some nurses appeared to have an important role in clinical decision making. However, clinical decision making and other key aspects of nurse practice may vary across services in different geographical areas. This research was designed to gain a better understanding of the role of the substance misuse nurse in Scotland. Aims and Objectives The aim of this research was to describe and analyse the role of substance misuse nurses working with drug misusers in Scotland. The objectives were: • to identify the population of specialist nurses working directly in the management of illicit drug users in Scotland and gain baseline data on their demography, caseload, services provided and level of interaction with other health professionals; • to compare their attitudes to drug misusers with those of other health professionals; • to explore their beliefs about the effectiveness of different treatment options; • to examine their role in the initial client assessment and subsequent management; • to describe their interaction with the client; • to explore their relationship with other professionals. Methods Mixed quantitative and qualitative methods were used. The population of Substance Misuse Nurses and midwives working specifically with drug misusers across Scotland were identified and posted a comprehensive questionnaire. The questionnaire covered issues including qualifications, training, attitudes and beliefs about treatment and aspects of practice such as caseloads, services provided and relationships with other health and social professionals. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with a sub-sample of nurses including a range of gender, experience, and NHS areas. Interviews covered nurses’ assessment and decision making regarding treatment and relationships with other professionals. Observations of specialist nurse and client consultations allowed for some insight into the general structure of the consultation, the setting where the consultation took place and the roles of nurse and client in assessment and treatment planning. Characteristics of SMS nurses and services • A scoping exercise indentified 272 nurses. Of these 244 were sent a questionnaire (the remainder having left or being on sick leave). Of these, 79% responded. • Seventy percent (70%) were Grade G or above indicating a senior level workforce. • Most nurses were employed in substance misuse services (48%) or, similarly, drug and alcohol services (30%). • Formal training (university certificate/diploma) in substance misuse had been undertaken by 40% of nurses, induction training (i.e. at the start of employment) by 62% of nurses. • The median caseload was 38 clients. • The majority of consultations took place in clinical consultation rooms but this was not observed to influence the consultation. • Nurses reported that the average length of a consultation was 38 minutes. All of the observed consultations were scheduled for 30 minutes but half over-ran. Motivation, attitudes and beliefs • The challenging nature of working with drug misusers was a positive motivating factor for nurses working in this field. • Seventy-seven percent (77%) of nurses considered working with drug misusers to be rewarding, although 79% also considered that this population were not easy to deal with. Opinion was split about whether drug misusers could be manipulative in consultations. Initial assessment of clients • Waiting times for assessment were generally an issue of concern to nurses. • A detailed assessment was almost always conducted at the first consultation. • An SMR24 was almost always completed at the first consultation. • Interviews and observation of nurse-client consultations found that the approach to assessment seemed consistent across geographical areas. • Assessment included: brief physical examination, urine sampling, detailed exploration of drug use, exploration of physical problems, discussion of social and family support, housing and employment status and history of involvement in the criminal justice system. • Consultations were often brought to a close by discussing treatment expectations. • Initial assessment could take place over more than one appointment and several appointments could be required before a treatment plan was implemented. Making treatment decisions • Clients were actively encouraged to participate in treatment decisions. • Although 84% of nurses reported they were expected to follow a treatment protocol only 44% said they always did (for any treatment). • Eighty-six percent (86%) of nurses had seen the National Clinical Guidelines (DoH, 1999), and those who were interviewed felt that these provided a good framework for treatment, although they were perhaps lacking in detail. • Nurses reported that they often consulted widely with other health professionals but, most frequently, with the client, before making a treatment decision. • A third of nurses reported writing prescriptions for a doctor to sign. • Seventy percent (70%) of respondents felt nurses should be able write prescriptions but only if they were experienced nurses with appropriate training. Comparing beliefs of nurses with those of GPs and pharmacists Nurses were asked some questions which had been asked of GPs and pharmacists in previous national surveys conducted in 2000. This allowed for comparisons to be made: • When making treatment decisions nurses were less influenced than GPs by the attitude and behaviour of drug misusers. • When making treatment decisions nurses were more influenced than GPs by societal factors such as reducing the transmission of infectious disease. • Nurses were less likely than GPs to favour detoxification as a treatment approach, although 83% of nurses agreed that a community based detoxification programme was an effective tool for the treatment of drug misuse. • Nurses were more confident than GPs about their ability to successfully manage polydrug users. • Nurses and GPs were split in their beliefs about the effectiveness of dihydrocodeine. • Nurses believed more strongly than pharmacists that maintenance prescribing could stop the use of illicit drugs. • Fewer nurses than pharmacists believed that controlled drug dispensing should take place in central clinics rather than community pharmacies. Multidisciplinary working • Over half of nurses considered their relationship with pharmacists, GPs, health visitors/community nurses, hospital doctors and social workers to be good. • Opportunities to discuss services with local policy makers were considered insufficient. • Relationships with GPs seemed positive because nurses felt GPs valued their specialist knowledge. • Nurses had frequent contact with pharmacists and respected the difficulties of a pharmacist’s work. • Relationships with social services were variable. Some nurses felt undervalued by their social work colleagues, or felt there was a lack of joint planning for individual client care. • Nurses were clear about what circumstances should lead to a break in confidentiality between services and of how to go about this. • Integrated drug services were seen as potentially beneficial but there were specific concerns about the implications for clients of sharing information with other agencies and practical concerns about the size of joint assessment tools. Health and Safety at work • Sixty-four percent (64%) of nurses reported that they had been physically or verbally abused by clients, and half of those who had been subject to abuse felt current safety provision in their service was insufficient. Nurses in most areas said that the safety of staff was considered to be a high service priority, but there was evidence from interviews this was still lacking in some areas. • Greater use of personal alarms and alarms in consultation rooms, use of mobile phones, and specialised training were suggested as ways of improving safety. • Nurses said that the majority of their consultations take place in clinics/consultation rooms rather than clients’ homes. • The feeling was commonly expressed among interviewees that their work could be stressful, and this was seen as due to paperwork, excessive caseloads and working in isolation. Discussion of Findings This study provides baseline information which can be used to inform individual nurses, services, policy makers and researchers. Some individual nurses reading this report might find an element that is simply describing what they already know. This is inevitable but it is hoped individual nurses will still find interest in the views and practice of others within their profession. The value of this report is that it has quantified these findings on a national basis, providing robust data for workforce planning and needs assessment. It has not been possible to compare findings, and thus the practice of substance misuse nurses in Scotland, with other areas or countries because there is no comparable published work. It is also not possible to give guidelines or examples of ‘good practice’ as this would have involved data collection from clients and other professionals which was outwith this study’s remit. This study has found a reassuring consistence of practice across Scotland. Although many substance misuse nurses work in some degree of isolation there is an apparently high level of discussion and consultation with other service colleagues which provides support. The role of the nurse in the initial assessment and treatment plan is critical. Nevertheless, decisions regarding treatment plans were made largely between nurses and clients, with nurses making use of service protocols/guidelines. Some might question whether a nurse is the most appropriate person to undertake these tasks. Ability to conduct physical examination, some knowledge of pharmacology, mental health and psychology as well as an ability to explore the wider social context is required. On reflection a nurse, with mental health qualifications seems to have the most appropriate skills for this. There is a willingness by nurses to take on the role of prescribing albeit in a limited capacity, and only by very experienced nurses with appropriate training. Currently, a minority of nurses reported writing prescriptions to be signed by doctors, which is possible for doctors with handwriting exemptions. This raises issues about clinical governance. In signing the prescription a GP is still taking responsibility even though s/he may know little about the patient’s current condition. An important strand of a substance misuse nurse’s practice is ongoing support or counselling for clients. This raises issues about models of counselling followed and nurses’ competencies in doing this. The nature or model of counselling used by nurses was not explicitly covered in this research and further exploration of counselling would be an area for future research. Relationships with other professionals, were generally reported to be good. Nurses generally believed GPs valued their role. Comparison of attitudes of substance misuse nurses with earlier surveys of pharmacists and GPs indicates they are more positive in general and about treatment outcomes in particular. Nurses viewed the challenging aspect of working with drug misusers more positively than pharmacists and GPs. Nurses were less positive about their ability to influence policy. Currently substance misuse nurses have little input at policy level. At a local level, through Drug and Alcohol Action Teams (DAATs) this could improve the feeling of ownership towards service developments related to the Joint Future agenda. Service managers are currently the key link between nurses and DAATs. Perhaps a service nurse with more client contact should also attend to provide client feedback. At a national level greater nursing input into policy could give this specialist group a greater feeling of professional cohesion as well as keeping policy makers informed. Concerns about health and safety at work need to be considered at a national professional level as well as locally. Whether these issues should be addressed through the involvement of an organisation such as the Association of Nurses in Substance Abuse (ANSA) or an appointed individual is for discussion. Recommendations • All substance misuse nurses should receive induction training prior to commencing their post. Greater time should be protected to allow participation in training. • There should be further exploration of what models of counselling, if any, are followed to assess whether current training is adequate. • Appointment scheduling may need review as there was evidence that consultation time was routinely underestimated. Frequency of missed appointments needs to be considered at the same time. • Staffing of substance misuse nurses should be expanded in order to reduce: excessive caseloads; lengthy waiting lists; insufficient cover for holidays, training and absences; and occupational stress. • Nurses could be involved in GP training to share their experience of managing difficult cases such as poly-drug users and widen GPs perspective of the social benefits of drug misuse treatment. • Nurses should be kept aware of developments on integrated care for drug misusers. This would allow them to understand the principles behind integrated care and be aware of how their service fits into the overall plan. • Extending the role of senior substance misuse nurses to include the prescribing of controlled drugs should be considered. • A clearer job title should be given to nurses working in substance misuse so that they may be easily identified and representable at both DAAT and Scottish Executive level, e.g. Specialist Nurse in Substance Misuse. • Efforts should be made to improve substance misuse nurses’ opportunities to influence policy. • All substance misuse nurses should be provided with appropriate on going training, procedures and practices to allow them to carry out their work safely

Patient and Provider Perspectives on How Trust Influences Maternal Vaccine Acceptance Among Pregnant Women in Kenya

Background Pregnant women and newborns are at high risk for infectious diseases. Altered immunity status during pregnancy and challenges fully vaccinating newborns contribute to this medical reality. Maternal immunization is a strategy to protect pregnant women and their newborns. This study aimed to find out how patient-provider relationships affect maternal vaccine uptake, particularly in the context of a lower middle- income country where limited research in this area exists. Methods We conducted semi-structured, in-depth narrative interviews of both providers and pregnant women from four sites in Kenya: Siaya, Nairobi, Mombasa, and Marsabit. Interviews were conducted in either English or one of the local regional languages. Results We found that patient trust in health care providers (HCPs) is integral to vaccine acceptance among pregnant women in Kenya. The HCP-patient relationship is a fiduciary one, whereby the patients’ trusts is primarily rooted in the provider’s social position as a person who is highly educated in matters of health. Furthermore, patient health education and provider attitudes are crucial for reinstating and fostering that trust, especially in cases where trust was impeded by rumors, community myths and misperceptions, and religious and cultural factors. Conclusion Patient trust in providers is a strong facilitator contributing to vaccine acceptance among pregnant women in Kenya. To maintain and increase immunization trust, providers have a critical role in cultivating a positive environment that allows for favorable interactions and patient health education. This includes educating providers on maternal immunizations and enhancing knowledge of effective risk communication tactics in clinical encounters

Mixed methods evaluation of an educational intervention to change mental health nurses' attitudes to people diagnosed with borderline personality disorder

Aims and objectives: To evaluate and explore mental health nurses’ responses to and experience of an educational intervention to improve attitudes towards people with a diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder. Report findings are concordant with relevant EQUATOR guidelines (STROBE and COREQ).Background: Attitudes towards people with a diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder are poorer than for people with other diagnoses. There is limited evidence about what might improve this situation. One intervention with reportedly good effect uses an underlying biosocial model of borderline personality disorder. No previous intervention has been co-produced with an expert-by-experience. We developed and delivered a 1-day intervention comprising these elements.Design: A mixed-methods design was used comprising prospective uncontrolled cohort intervention and qualitative elements. Participants were mental health nursing staff working in inpatient and community settings in one NHS Board in Scotland, UK.Methods: Measurement of cognitive and emotional attitudes to people with a borderline personality diagnosis at pre- and post- intervention (N =28) and at 4-month follow-up. Focus groups were used to explore participants’ experiences of the intervention (N =11).Results: Quantitative evaluation revealed some sustained changes consistent with expected attitudinal gains in relation to the perceived treatment characteristics of this group, the perception of their suicidal tendencies, and negative attitudes in general. Qualitative findings revealed some hostility towards the underpinning biosocial model and positive appreciation for the involvement of an expert-by-experience. Conclusions: Sustained benefits of an educational intervention for people working with people diagnosed with BPD in some but not all areas. Participants provided contrasting messages about what they think will be useful.Relevance to clinical practice: The study provides further evidence for incorporation of a biosocial model into staff training as well as the benefits of expert-by-experience co-production. Mental health nurses, however, believe that more well-resourced services are the key to improving care. <br/

The challenges of communicating research evidence in practice: perspectives from UK health visitors and practice nurses

&lt;p&gt;Background: Health practitioners play a pivotal role in providing patients with up-to-date evidence and health information. Evidence-based practice and patient-centred care are transforming the delivery of healthcare in the UK. Health practitioners are increasingly balancing the need to provide evidence-based information against that of facilitating patient choice, which may not always concur with the evidence base. There is limited research exploring how health practitioners working in the UK, and particularly those more autonomous practitioners such as health visitors and practice nurses working in community practice settings, negotiate this challenge. This research provides a descriptive account of how health visitors and practice nurses negotiate the challenges of communicating health information and research evidence in practice.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Methods: A total of eighteen in-depth telephone interviews were conducted in the UK between September 2008 and May 2009. The participants comprised nine health visitors and nine practice nurses, recruited via adverts on a nursing website, posters at a practitioner conference and through recommendation. Thematic analysis, with a focus on constant comparative method, was used to analyse the data.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Results: The data were grouped into three main themes: communicating evidence to the critically-minded patient; confidence in communicating evidence; and maintaining the integrity of the patient-practitioner relationship. These findings highlight some of the daily challenges that health visitors and practice nurses face with regard to the complex and dynamic nature of evidence and the changing attitudes and expectations of patients. The findings also highlight the tensions that exist between differing philosophies of evidence-based practice and patient-centred care, which can make communicating about evidence a daunting task.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Conclusions: If health practitioners are to be effective at communicating research evidence, we suggest that more research and resources need to be focused on contextual factors, such as how research evidence is negotiated, appraised and communicated within the dynamic patient-practitioner relationship.&lt;/p&gt

Mental health nurses’ attitudes, behaviour, experience and knowledge regarding adults with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder:systematic, integrative literature review

Aims and objectives To establish whether mental health nurses responses to people with borderline personality disorder are problematic and, if so, to inform solutions to support change. Background There is some evidence that people diagnosed with borderline personality disorder are unpopular among mental health nurses who respond to them in ways which could be counter-therapeutic. Interventions to improve nurses’ attitudes have had limited success. Design Systematic, integrative literature review. Methods Computerised databases were searched from inception to April 2015 for papers describing primary research focused on mental health nurses’ attitudes, behaviour, experience, and knowledge regarding adults diagnosed with borderline personality disorder. Analysis of qualitative studies employed metasynthesis; analysis of quantitative studies was informed by the theory of planned behaviour. Results Forty studies were included. Only one used direct observation of clinical practice. Nurses’ knowledge and experiences vary widely. They find the group very challenging to work with, report having many training needs, and, objectively, their attitudes are poorer than other professionals’ and poorer than towards other diagnostic groups. Nurses say they need a coherent therapeutic framework to guide their practice, and their experience of caregiving seems improved where this exists. Conclusions Mental health nurses’ responses to people with borderline personality disorder are sometimes counter-therapeutic. As interventions to change them have had limited success there is a need for fresh thinking. Observational research to better understand the link between attitudes and clinical practice is required. Evidence-based education about borderline personality disorder is necessary, but developing nurses to lead in the design, implementation and teaching of coherent therapeutic frameworks may have greater benefits. Relevance to clinical practice There should be greater focus on development and implementation of a team-wide approach, with nurses as equal partners, when working with patients with borderline personality disorder

Harm-reduction approaches for self-cutting in inpatient mental health settings:development and preliminary validation of the Attitudes to Self-cutting Management (ASc-Me) Scale

IntroductionHarm-reduction approaches for self-harm in mental health settings have been under-researched.AimTo develop a measure of the acceptability of management approaches for self-cutting in mental health inpatient settings.MethodsStage one: scale items were generated from relevant literature and staff/service user consultation. Stage two: A cross-sectional survey and statistical methods from classical test theory informed scale development.Results/FindingsAt stage one N=27 staff and service users participated. At stage two N=215 people (n=175 current mental health practitioners and n=40 people with experience of self-cutting as a UK mental health inpatient) completed surveys. Principal components analysis revealed a simple factor structure such that each method had a unique acceptability profile. Reliability, construct validity, and internal consistency were acceptable. The harm-reduction approaches 'advising on wound-care' and 'providing a first aid kit' were broadly endorsed; 'providing sterile razors' and 'maintaining a supportive nursing presence during cutting' were less acceptable but more so than seclusion and restraint.DiscussionThe Attitudes to Self-cutting Management scale is a reliable and valid measure that could inform service design and development.Implications for practiceNurses should discuss different options for management of self-cutting with service users. Harm reduction approaches may be more acceptable than coercive measures. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p

Acute care nurses' attitudes, behaviours and perceived barriers towards discharge risk screening and discharge planning

University of Technology, Sydney. Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Health.Background: Patient safety and economic imperatives have made discharge planning for patients in acute care increasingly important in the last two decades. Indeed patients have more complex health care needs, shorter lengths of stay and longer recovery times. Discharge planning therefore must start early in the patient’s admission to ensure there is enough time to manage each patient’s discharge appropriately. Nurses have a pivotal role in discharge planning and early assessment for discharge. However, few studies have measured nurses’ compliance with elements of discharge planning or their attitudes towards discharge planning. Aim: The aim of this research was to identify nurses’ discharge planning behaviours, in particular compliance with discharge risk screening (DRS) policy, their attitudes towards discharge planning and the factors influencing their behaviours. Methods: A cross sectional descriptive design was used comprising two components, the first of which was an audit of one hundred patients’ medical records for DRS compliance. The second component was a self-report survey, which was in part informed by the audit results, of 94% of nurses who worked in the setting. Results: Nurses’ compliance with DRS, as observed in the audit and self-report survey, was low (between 24.2% and 33%). Patients admitted with a medical diagnosis (OR = .1 95% Confidence Interval .03 - .37) or surgical diagnosis (OR = .13 95% CI .03 - .06) were significantly less likely to have their DRS completed than patients with a respiratory diagnosis and there was a trend for patients admitted on weekdays to be less likely to have DRS completed (OR = .31, 95% I .08 – 1.2). Nurses had an overall positive attitude to the DRS and discharge planning and their screening was mostly accurate. Furthermore, nurses who complied with DRS policy had a more positive attitude (mean 37.14, SD 3.6) than those who did not (mean 34.77, SD 4.2) (P = .03) and were more likely to start discharge planning early. Nurses identified that the major barriers to DRS and discharge planning were the busyness of the ward on weekdays and patient characteristics. These factors hindered compliance with the DRS policy and discharge planning. Other findings suggest that nurses’ discharge planning knowledge and behaviours were inconsistent, that they were uncertain of their role, and the relationship between medical officers and nurses may have influenced their behaviours. Conclusion: This study determined that nurses do not often comply with DRS policy and therefore starting discharge planning early is hampered. The study suggests that there is a link between nurses’ attitudes, DRS compliance and starting discharge planning early. The implications for nurses’ practice include the need to develop clear guidelines, criteria or processes for discharge planning, which incorporate agreed upon roles for all members of the multidisciplinary team, in particular the nurses’ role. There is also a need to investigate a systematic, methodical approach to discharge planning that includes early screening, using the DRS and involvement of nurses in the development of guidelines and implementation of the systematic approach. Further investigation of nurses’ attitudes toward the DRS and discharge planning is recommended, as this was the only nurse characteristic in this study that was found to be linked to their behaviours