Character-level interaction in multimodal computer-assisted transcription of text images

“The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21257-4_85To date, automatic handwriting text recognition systems are far from being perfect and heavy human intervention is often required to check and correct the results of such systems. As an alternative, an interactive framework that integrates the human knowledge into the transcription process has been presented in previous works. In this work, multimodal interaction at character-level is studied. Until now, multimodal interaction had been studied only at whole-word level. However, character-level pen-stroke interactions may lead to more ergonomic and friendly interfaces. Empirical tests show that this approach can save significant amounts of user effort with respect to both fully manual transcription and non-interactive post-editing correction.Work supported by the Spanish Government (MICINN and “Plan E”) under the MITTRAL (TIN2009-14633-C03-01) research project and under the research programme Consolider Ingenio 2010: MIPRCV (CSD2007-00018), and by the Generalitat Valenciana under grant Prometeo/2009/014.Martín-Albo Simón, D.; Romero Gómez, V.; Toselli ., AH.; Vidal, E. (2011). Character-level interaction in multimodal computer-assisted transcription of text images. En Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis. Springer Verlag (Germany). 684-691. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21257-4S68469

Advances in Handwritten Keyword Indexing and Search Technologies

Many extensive manuscript collections are available in archives and libraries all over the world, but their textual contents remain practically inaccessible, buried under thousands of terabytes worth of high-resolution images. If perfect or sufficiently accurate text-image transcripts were available, textual content could be indexed directly for plaintext access using conventional information retrieval systems. But the results of fully automated transcriptions generally lack the level of accuracy needed for reliable text indexing and search purposes. Additionally, manual or even computer-assited transcription is entierely unsustainable when dealing with the extensive image collections typically considered for indexing. This paper explains how accurate indexing and search commands can be implemented directly on the digital images themselves without the need to explicitly resort to image transcripts. Results obtained using the proposed techniques on several relevant historical data sets are presented, clearly supporting the considerable potential of these technologies

Implementation of a Human-Computer Interface for Computer Assisted Translation and Handwritten Text Recognition

A human-computer interface is developed to provide services of computer assisted machine translation (CAT) and computer assisted transcription of handwritten text images (CATTI). The back-end machine translation (MT) and handwritten text recognition (HTR) systems are provided by the Pattern Recognition and Human Language Technology (PRHLT) research group. The idea is to provide users with easy to use tools to convert interactive translation and transcription feasible tasks. The assisted service is provided by remote servers with CAT or CATTI capabilities. The interface supplies the user with tools for efficient local edition: deletion, insertion and substitution.Ocampo Sepúlveda, JC. (2009). Implementation of a Human-Computer Interface for Computer Assisted Translation and Handwritten Text Recognition. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/14318Archivo delegad

Improving on-line handwritten recognition in interactive machine translation

[EN] On-line handwriting text recognition (HTR) could be used as a more natural way of interaction in many interactive applications. However, current HTR technology is far from developing error-free systems and, consequently, its use in many applications is limited. Despite this, there are many scenarios, as in the correction of the errors of fully-automatic systems using HTR in a post-editing step, in which the information from the specific task allows to constrain the search and therefore to improve the HTR accuracy. For example, in machine translation (MT), the on-line HTR system can also be used to correct translation errors. The HTR can take advantage of information from the translation problem such as the source sentence that is translated, the portion of the translated sentence that has been supervised by the human, or the translation error to be amended. Empirical experimentation suggests that this is a valuable information to improve the robustness of the on-line HTR system achieving remarkable results.The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant agreement no. 287576 (CasMaCat), from the EC (FEDER/FSE), and from the Spanish MEC/MICINN under the Active2Trans (TIN2012-31723) project. It is also supported by the Generalitat Valenciana under Grant ALMPR (Prometeo/2009/01) and GV/2010/067.Alabau Gonzalvo, V.; Sanchis Navarro, JA.; Casacuberta Nolla, F. (2014). Improving on-line handwritten recognition in interactive machine translation. Pattern Recognition. 47(3):1217-1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2013.09.035S1217122847

Review of Research on Speech Technology: Main Contributions From Spanish Research Groups

In the last two decades, there has been an important increase in research on speech technology in Spain, mainly due to a higher level of funding from European, Spanish and local institutions and also due to a growing interest in these technologies for developing new services and applications. This paper provides a review of the main areas of speech technology addressed by research groups in Spain, their main contributions in the recent years and the main focus of interest these days. This description is classified in five main areas: audio processing including speech, speaker characterization, speech and language processing, text to speech conversion and spoken language applications. This paper also introduces the Spanish Network of Speech Technologies (RTTH. Red Temática en Tecnologías del Habla) as the research network that includes almost all the researchers working in this area, presenting some figures, its objectives and its main activities developed in the last years

Transcribing a 17th-century botanical manuscript: Longitudinal evaluation of document layout detection and interactive transcription

[EN] We present a process for cost-effective transcription of cursive handwritten text images that has been tested on a 1,000-page 17th-century book about botanical species. The process comprised two main tasks, namely: (1) preprocessing: page layout analysis, text line detection, and extraction; and (2) transcription of the extracted text line images. Both tasks were carried out with semiautomatic pro- cedures, aimed at incrementally minimizing user correction effort, by means of computer-assisted line detection and interactive handwritten text recognition technologies. The contribution derived from this work is three-fold. First, we provide a detailed human-supervised transcription of a relatively large historical handwritten book, ready to be searchable, indexable, and accessible to cultural heritage scholars as well as the general public. Second, we have conducted the first longitudinal study to date on interactive handwriting text recognition, for which we provide a very comprehensive user assessment of the real-world per- formance of the technologies involved in this work. Third, as a result of this process, we have produced a detailed transcription and document layout infor- mation (i.e. high-quality labeled data) ready to be used by researchers working on automated technologies for document analysis and recognition.This work is supported by the European Commission through the EU projects HIMANIS (JPICH program, Spanish, grant Ref. PCIN-2015-068) and READ (Horizon-2020 program, grant Ref. 674943); and the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia (grant number SP20130189). This work was also part of the Valorization and I+D+i Resources program of VLC/CAMPUS and has been funded by the Spanish MECD as part of the International Excellence Campus program.Toselli, AH.; Leiva, LA.; Bordes-Cabrera, I.; Hernández-Tornero, C.; Bosch Campos, V.; Vidal, E. (2018). Transcribing a 17th-century botanical manuscript: Longitudinal evaluation of document layout detection and interactive transcription. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. 33(1):173-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqw064S173202331Bazzi, I., Schwartz, R., & Makhoul, J. (1999). An omnifont open-vocabulary OCR system for English and Arabic. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21(6), 495-504. doi:10.1109/34.771314Causer, T., Tonra, J., & Wallace, V. (2012). Transcription maximized; expense minimized? Crowdsourcing and editing The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham*. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 27(2), 119-137. doi:10.1093/llc/fqs004Ramel, J. Y., Leriche, S., Demonet, M. L., & Busson, S. (2007). User-driven page layout analysis of historical printed books. International Journal of Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR), 9(2-4), 243-261. doi:10.1007/s10032-007-0040-6Romero, V., Fornés, A., Serrano, N., Sánchez, J. A., Toselli, A. H., Frinken, V., … Lladós, J. (2013). The ESPOSALLES database: An ancient marriage license corpus for off-line handwriting recognition. Pattern Recognition, 46(6), 1658-1669. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2012.11.024Romero, V., Toselli, A. H., & Vidal, E. (2012). Multimodal Interactive Handwritten Text Transcription. Series in Machine Perception and Artificial Intelligence. doi:10.1142/8394Toselli, A. H., Romero, V., Pastor, M., & Vidal, E. (2010). Multimodal interactive transcription of text images. Pattern Recognition, 43(5), 1814-1825. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2009.11.019Toselli, A. H., Vidal, E., Romero, V., & Frinken, V. (2016). HMM word graph based keyword spotting in handwritten document images. Information Sciences, 370-371, 497-518. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.07.063Bunke, H., Bengio, S., & Vinciarelli, A. (2004). Offline recognition of unconstrained handwritten texts using HMMs and statistical language models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 26(6), 709-720. doi:10.1109/tpami.2004.1

Contex-aware gestures for mixed-initiative text editings UIs

This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Interacting with computers following peer review. The version of record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwu019[EN] This work is focused on enhancing highly interactive text-editing applications with gestures. Concretely, we study Computer Assisted Transcription of Text Images (CATTI), a handwriting transcription system that follows a corrective feedback paradigm, where both the user and the system collaborate efficiently to produce a high-quality text transcription. CATTI-like applications demand fast and accurate gesture recognition, for which we observed that current gesture recognizers are not adequate enough. In response to this need we developed MinGestures, a parametric context-aware gesture recognizer. Our contributions include a number of stroke features for disambiguating copy-mark gestures from handwritten text, plus the integration of these gestures in a CATTI application. It becomes finally possible to create highly interactive stroke-based text-editing interfaces, without worrying to verify the user intent on-screen. We performed a formal evaluation with 22 e-pen users and 32 mouse users using a gesture vocabulary of 10 symbols. MinGestures achieved an outstanding accuracy (<1% error rate) with very high performance (<1 ms of recognition time). We then integrated MinGestures in a CATTI prototype and tested the performance of the interactive handwriting system when it is driven by gestures. Our results show that using gestures in interactive handwriting applications is both advantageous and convenient when gestures are simple but context-aware. Taken together, this work suggests that text-editing interfaces not only can be easily augmented with simple gestures, but also may substantially improve user productivity.This work has been supported by the European Commission through the 7th Framework Program (tranScriptorium: FP7- ICT-2011-9, project 600707 and CasMaCat: FP7-ICT-2011-7, project 287576). It has also been supported by the Spanish MINECO under grant TIN2012-37475-C02-01 (STraDa), and the Generalitat Valenciana under grant ISIC/2012/004 (AMIIS).Leiva, LA.; Alabau, V.; Romero Gómez, V.; Toselli, AH.; Vidal, E. (2015). Contex-aware gestures for mixed-initiative text editings UIs. Interacting with Computers. 27(6):675-696. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwu019S675696276Alabau V. Leiva L. A. Transcribing Handwritten Text Images with a Word Soup Game. Proc. Extended Abstr. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI EA) 2012.Alabau V. Rodríguez-Ruiz L. Sanchis A. Martínez-Gómez P. Casacuberta F. On Multimodal Interactive Machine Translation Using Speech Recognition. Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI). 2011a.Alabau V. Sanchis A. Casacuberta F. Improving On-Line Handwritten Recognition using Translation Models in Multimodal Interactive Machine Translation. Proc. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (ACL) 2011b.Alabau, V., Sanchis, A., & Casacuberta, F. (2014). Improving on-line handwritten recognition in interactive machine translation. Pattern Recognition, 47(3), 1217-1228. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2013.09.035Anthony L. Wobbrock J. O. A Lightweight Multistroke Recognizer for User Interface Prototypes. Proc. Conf. Graph. Interface (GI). 2010.Anthony L. Wobbrock J. O. N-Protractor: a Fast and Accurate Multistroke Recognizer. Proc. Conf. Graph. Interface (GI) 2012.Anthony L. Vatavu R.-D. Wobbrock J. O. Understanding the Consistency of Users' Pen and Finger Stroke Gesture Articulation. Proc. Conf. Graph. Interface (GI). 2013.Appert C. Zhai S. Using Strokes as Command Shortcuts: Cognitive Benefits and Toolkit Support. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. Fact. Comput. Syst. (CHI) 2009.Bahlmann C. Haasdonk B. Burkhardt H. On-Line Handwriting Recognition with Support Vector Machines: A Kernel Approach. Proc. Int. Workshop Frontiers Handwriting Recognition (IWFHR). 2001.Bailly G. Lecolinet E. Nigay L. Flower Menus: a New Type of Marking Menu with Large Menu Breadth, within Groups and Efficient Expert Mode Memorization. Proc.Work. Conf. Adv. Vis. Interfaces (AVI) 2008.Balakrishnan R. Patel P. The PadMouse: Facilitating Selection and Spatial Positioning for the Non-Dominant Hand. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI). 1998.Bau O. Mackay W. E. Octopocus: A Dynamic Guide for Learning Gesture-Based Command Sets. Proc. ACM Symp. User Interface Softw. Technol. (UIST) 2008.Belaid A. Haton J. A syntactic approach for handwritten formula recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1984;6:105-111.Bosch V. Bordes-Cabrera I. Munoz P. C. Hernández-Tornero C. Leiva L. A. Pastor M. Romero V. Toselli A. H. Vidal E. Transcribing a XVII Century Handwritten Botanical Specimen Book from Scratch. Proc. Int. Conf. Digital Access Textual Cultural Heritage (DATeCH). 2014.Buxton W. The natural language of interaction: a perspective on non-verbal dialogues. INFOR 1988;26:428-438.Cao X. Zhai S. Modeling Human Performance of Pen Stroke Gestures. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI). 2007.Castro-Bleda M. J. España-Boquera S. Llorens D. Marzal A. Prat F. Vilar J. M. Zamora-Martinez F. Speech Interaction in a Multimodal Tool for Handwritten Text Transcription. Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI) 2011.Connell S. D. Jain A. K. Template-based on-line character recognition. Pattern Recognition 2000;34:1-14.Costagliola G. Deufemia V. Polese G. Risi M. A Parsing Technique for Sketch Recognition Systems. Proc. 2004 IEEE Symp. Vis. Lang. Hum. Centric Comput. (VLHCC). 2004.Culotta, A., Kristjansson, T., McCallum, A., & Viola, P. (2006). Corrective feedback and persistent learning for information extraction. Artificial Intelligence, 170(14-15), 1101-1122. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2006.08.001Deepu V. Madhvanath S. Ramakrishnan A. Principal Component Analysis for Online Handwritten Character Recognition. Proc. Int. Conf. Pattern Recognition (ICPR). 2004.Delaye A. Sekkal R. Anquetil E. Continuous Marking Menus for Learning Cursive Pen-Based Gestures. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. User Interfaces (IUI) 2011.Dimitriadis Y. Coronado J. Towards an art-based mathematical editor that uses on-line handwritten symbol recognition. Pattern Recognition 1995;8:807-822.El Meseery M. El Din M. F. Mashali S. Fayek M. Darwish N. Sketch Recognition Using Particle Swarm Algorithms. Proc. 16th IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process. (ICIP). 2009.Goldberg D. Goodisman A. Stylus User Interfaces for Manipulating Text. Proc. ACM Symp. User Interface Softw. Technol. (UIST) 1991.Goldberg D. Richardson C. Touch-Typing with a Stylus. Proc. INTERCHI'93 Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. 1993.Stevens, M. E. (1968). Selected pattern recognition projects in Europe. Pattern Recognition, 1(2), 103-118. doi:10.1016/0031-3203(68)90002-2Hardock G. Design Issues for Line Driven Text Editing/ Annotation Systems. Proc. Conf. Graph. Interface (GI). 1991.Hardock G. Kurtenbach G. Buxton W. A Marking Based Interface for Collaborative Writing. Proc.ACM Symp. User Interface Softw. Technol. (UIST) 1993.Hinckley K. Baudisch P. Ramos G. Guimbretiere F. Design and Analysis of Delimiters for Selection-Action Pen Gesture Phrases in Scriboli. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI). 2005.Hong J. I. Landay J. A. SATIN: A Toolkit for Informal Ink-Based Applications. Proc. ACM Symp. User Interface Softw. Technol. (UIST) 2000.Horvitz E. Principles of Mixed-Initiative User Interfaces. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI). 1999.Huerst W. Yang J. Waibel A. Interactive Error Repair for an Online Handwriting Interface. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI) 2010.Jelinek F. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 1998. Statistical Methods for Speech Recognition.Johansson S. Atwell E. Garside R. Leech G. The Tagged LOB Corpus, User's Manual. Norwegian Computing Center for the Humanities. 1996.Karat C.-M. Halverson C. Horn D. Karat J. Patterns of Entry and Correction in Large Vocabulary Continuous Speech Recognition Systems. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI). 1999.Kerrick, D. D., & Bovik, A. C. (1988). Microprocessor-based recognition of handprinted characters from a tablet input. Pattern Recognition, 21(5), 525-537. doi:10.1016/0031-3203(88)90011-8Koschinski M. Winkler H. Lang M. Segmentation and Recognition of Symbols within Handwritten Mathematical Expressions. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics Speech Signal Process. (ICASSP). 1995.Kosmala A. Rigoll G. On-Line Handwritten Formula Recognition Using Statistical Methods. Proc. Int. Conf. Pattern Recognition (ICPR) 1998.Kristensson P. O. Discrete and continuous shape writing for text entry and control. 2007. Ph.D. Thesis, Linköping University, Sweden.Kristensson P. O. Denby L. C. Text Entry Performance of State of the Art Unconstrained Handwriting Recognition: a Longitudinal User Study. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI). 2009.Kristensson P. O. Denby L. C. Continuous Recognition and Visualization of Pen Strokes and Touch-Screen Gestures. Proc. Eighth Eurograph. Symp. Sketch-Based Interfaces Model. (SBIM) 2011.Kristensson P. O. Zhai S. SHARK2: A Large Vocabulary Shorthand Writing System for Pen-Based Computers. Proc. ACM Symp. User Interface Softw. Technol. (UIST). 2004.Kurtenbach G. P. The design and evaluation of marking menus. 1991. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto.Kurtenbach G. P. Buxton W. Issues in Combining Marking and Direct Manipulation Techniques. Proc. ACM Symp. User Interface Softw. Technol. (UIST). 1991.Kurtenbach G. Buxton W. User Learning and Performance with Marking Menus. Proc. Extended Abstr. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI EA) 1994.Kurtenbach, G., Sellen, A., & Buxton, W. (1993). An Empirical Evaluation of Some Articulatory and Cognitive Aspects of Marking Menus. Human-Computer Interaction, 8(1), 1-23. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0801_1LaLomia M. User Acceptance of Handwritten Recognition Accuracy. Proc. Extended Abstr. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI EA). 1994.Leiva L. A. Romero V. Toselli A. H. Vidal E. Evaluating an Interactive–Predictive Paradigm on Handwriting Transcription: A Case Study and Lessons Learned. Proc. 35th Annu. IEEE Comput. Softw. Appl. Conf. (COMPSAC) 2011.Leiva L. A. Alabau V. Vidal E. Error-Proof, High-Performance, and Context-Aware Gestures for Interactive Text Edition. Proc. Extended Abstr. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI EA). 2013.Li Y. Protractor: A Fast and Accurate Gesture Recognizer. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI) 2010.Li W. Hammond T. Using Scribble Gestures to Enhance Editing Behaviors of Sketch Recognition Systems. Proc. Extended Abstr. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI EA). 2012.Liao C. Guimbretière F. Hinckley K. Hollan J. Papiercraft: a gesture-based command system for interactive paper. ACM Trans. Comput.–Hum. Interaction (TOCHI) 2008;14:18:1-18:27.Liu P. Soong F. K. Word Graph Based Speech Rcognition Error Correction by Handwriting Input. Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI). 2006.Long A. Landay J. Rowe L. Implications for a Gesture Design Tool. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI) 1999.Long A. C. Jr. Landay J. A. Rowe L. A. Michiels J. Visual Similarity of Pen Gestures. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI). 2000.MacKenzie, I. S., & Chang, L. (1999). A performance comparison of two handwriting recognizers. Interacting with Computers, 11(3), 283-297. doi:10.1016/s0953-5438(98)00030-7MacKenzie I. S. Tanaka-Ishii K. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.; 2007. Text Entry Systems: Mobility, Accessibility, Universality.MARTI, U.-V., & BUNKE, H. (2001). USING A STATISTICAL LANGUAGE MODEL TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OF AN HMM-BASED CURSIVE HANDWRITING RECOGNITION SYSTEM. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 15(01), 65-90. doi:10.1142/s0218001401000848Marti, U.-V., & Bunke, H. (2002). The IAM-database: an English sentence database for offline handwriting recognition. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, 5(1), 39-46. doi:10.1007/s100320200071Martín-Albo D. Romero V. Toselli A. H. Vidal E. Multimodal computer-assisted transcription of text images at character-level interaction. Int. J. Pattern Recogn. Artif. Intell. 2012;26:1-19.Marzinkewitsch R. Operating Computer Algebra Systems by Hand-Printed Input. Proc. Int. Symp. Symbolic Algebr. Comput. (ISSAC). 1991.Mas, J., Llados, J., Sanchez, G., & Jorge, J. A. P. (2010). A syntactic approach based on distortion-tolerant Adjacency Grammars and a spatial-directed parser to interpret sketched diagrams. Pattern Recognition, 43(12), 4148-4164. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2010.07.003Moyle M. Cockburn A. Analysing Mouse and Pen Flick Gestures. Proc. SIGCHI-NZ Symp. Comput.–Hum. Interact. (CHINZ). 2002.Nakayama Y. A Prototype Pen-Input Mathematical Formula Editor. Proc. AACE EdMedia 1993.Ogata J. Goto M. Speech Repair: Quick Error Correction Just by Using Selection Operation for Speech Input Interface. Proc. Eurospeech. 2005.Ortiz-Martínez D. Leiva L. A. Alabau V. Casacuberta F. Interactive Machine Translation using a Web-Based Architecture. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. User Interfaces (IUI) 2010.Ortiz-Martínez D. Leiva L. A. Alabau V. García-Varea I. Casacuberta F. An Interactive Machine Translation System with Online Learning. Proc. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. (ACL). 2011.Michael Powers, V. (1973). Pen direction sequences in character recognition. Pattern Recognition, 5(4), 291-302. doi:10.1016/0031-3203(73)90022-8Raab F. Extremely efficient menu selection: Marking menus for the Flash platform. 2009. Available at http://www.betriebsraum.de/blog/2009/07/21/efficient-gesture-recognition-and-corner-finding-in-as3/ (retrieved on May 2012).Revuelta-Martínez A. Rodríguez L. García-Varea I. A Computer Assisted Speech Transcription System. Proc. Eur. Chap. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. (EACL). 2012.Revuelta-Martínez, A., Rodríguez, L., García-Varea, I., & Montero, F. (2013). Multimodal interaction for information retrieval using natural language. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 35(5), 428-441. doi:10.1016/j.csi.2012.11.002Rodríguez L. García-Varea I. Revuelta-Martínez A. Vidal E. A Multimodal Interactive Text Generation System. Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interfaces Workshop Mach. Learn. Multimodal Interact. (ICMI-MLMI). 2010a.Rodríguez L. García-Varea I. Vidal E. Multi-Modal Computer Assisted Speech Transcription. Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interfaces Workshop Mach. Learn. Multimodal Interact. (ICMI-MLMI) 2010b.Romero V. Leiva L. A. Toselli A. H. Vidal E. Interactive Multimodal Transcription of Text Images using a Web-Based Demo System. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. User Interfaces (IUI). 2009a.Romero V. Toselli A. H. Vidal E. Using Mouse Feedback in Computer Assisted Transcription of Handwritten Text Images. Proc. Int. Conf. Doc. Anal. Recogn. (ICDAR) 2009b.Romero V. Toselli A. H. Vidal E. Study of Different Interactive Editing Operations in an Assisted Transcription System. Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI). 2011.Romero V. Toselli A. H. Vidal E. Vol. 80. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company; 2012. Multimodal Interactive Handwritten Text Transcription.Rubine, D. (1991). Specifying gestures by example. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 25(4), 329-337. doi:10.1145/127719.122753Rubine D. H. 1991b. The automatic recognition of gestures. Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University.Sánchez-Sáez R. Leiva L. A. Sánchez J. A. Benedí J. M. Interactive Predictive Parsing using a Web-Based Architecture. Proc. North Am. Chap. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 2010.Saund E. Fleet D. Larner D. Mahoney J. Perceptually-Supported Image Editing of Text and Graphics. Proc. ACM Symp. User Interface Softw. Technol. (UIST) 2003.Shilman M. Tan D. S. Simard P. CueTIP: a Mixed-Initiative Interface for Correcting Handwriting Errors. Proc. ACM Symp. User Interface Softw. Technol. (UIST). 2006.Signer B. Kurmann U. Norrie M. C. igesture: A General Gesture Recognition Framework. Proc. Int. Conf. Doc. Anal. Recogn. (ICDAR) 2007.Smithies S. Novins K. Arvo J. A handwriting-based equation editor. Proc. Conf. Graph. Interface (GI). 1999.Suhm, B., Myers, B., & Waibel, A. (2001). Multimodal error correction for speech user interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 8(1), 60-98. doi:10.1145/371127.371166Tappert C. C. Mosley P. H. Recent advances in pen computing. 2001. Technical Report 166, Pace University, available: http://support.csis.pace.edu.Toselli, A. H., Romero, V., Pastor, M., & Vidal, E. (2010). Multimodal interactive transcription of text images. Pattern Recognition, 43(5), 1814-1825. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2009.11.019Toselli A. H. Vidal E. Casacuberta F. , editors. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2011. Multimodal-Interactive Pattern Recognition and Applications.Tseng S. Fogg B. Credibility and computing technology. Commun. ACM 1999;42:39-44.Vatavu R.-D. Anthony L. Wobbrock J. O. Gestures as Point Clouds: A P Recognizer for User Interface Prototypes. Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI). 2012.Vertanen K. Kristensson P. O. Parakeet: A Continuous Speech Recognition System for Mobile Touch-Screen Devices. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. User Interfaces (IUI) 2009.Vidal E. Rodríguez L. Casacuberta F. García-Varea I. Mach. Learn. Multimodal Interact., Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Vol. 4892. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2008. Interactive Pattern Recognition.Wang X. Li J. Ao X. Wang G. Dai G. Multimodal Error Correction for Continuous Handwriting Recognition in Pen-Based User Interfaces. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. User Interfaces (IUI). 2006.Wang L. Hu T. Liu P. Soong F. K. Efficient Handwriting Correction of Speech Recognition Errors with Template Constrained Posterior (TCP). Proc. INTERSPEECH 2008.Wobbrock J. O. Wilson A. D. Li Y. Gestures without Libraries, Toolkits or Training: A $1 Recognizer for User Interface Prototypes. Proc. ACM Symp. User Interface Softw. Technol. (UIST). 2007.Wolf C. G. Morrel-Samuels P. The use of hand-drawn gestures for text editing. Int. J. Man–Mach. Stud. 1987;27:91-102.Zeleznik R. Miller T. Fluid Inking: Augmenting the Medium of Free-Form Inking with Gestures. Proc. Conf. Graph. Interface (GI). 2006.Yong Zhang, McCullough, C., Sullins, J. R., & Ross, C. R. (2010). Hand-Drawn Face Sketch Recognition by Humans and a PCA-Based Algorithm for Forensic Applications. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 40(3), 475-485. doi:10.1109/tsmca.2010.2041654Zhao S. Balakrishnan R. Simple vs. Compound Mark Hierarchical Marking Menus. Proc. ACM Symp. User Interface Softw. Technol. (UIST) 2004

Integración de Redes Neuronales en tareas de Reconocimiento de Escritura Manuscrita

[ES] Este proyecto consiste en adaptar la librería de redes neuronales desarrollada por el director en un sistema de reconocimiento de escritura manuscrita basada en modelos ocultos de Markov. El objetivo principal es integrar una red neuronal con el objetivo de mejorar los resultados anteriores. La función de la red neuronal es estimar las probabilidades de emisión de los modelos de Markov, anteriormente modeladas con mixturas de gaussianas. El proyecto incluye un análisis del problema y el diseño del sistema de reconocimiento. También se expone el desarrollo de los programas que implementan dicho sistema de reconocimiento. Por último, contiene los detalles de los múltiples experimentos realizados para obtener resultados que permitan comparar la técnica anterior con la nueva.[EN] This project consists in adapt a neuronal network library developed by the director in a handwritten text recognition text based on Markov’s hidden models The main goal is adapt a neural network in order to improve the previoys results. The function of the neural network is providing the emission probabilities of the states in the Markov’s model, previously obtained by a Gaussian mixture. This project includes an analysis of the problem and the handwritten recognition system design. Also, the developments of the programs that implement this recognition system are exposed. At the end, multiple experiments are performed in order to obtain results for comparing this technique with the previous one.Puigcerver Ibañez, J. (2016). Integración de Redes Neuronales en tareas de Reconocimiento de Escritura Manuscrita. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/68994.TFG

Escritoire: A Multi-touch Desk with e-Pen Input for Capture, Management and Multimodal Interactive Transcription of Handwritten Documents

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19390-8_53A large quantity of documents used every day are still handwritten. However, it is interesting to transform each of these documents into its digital version for managing, archiving and sharing. Here we present Escritoire, a multi-touch desk that allows the user to capture, transcribe and work with handwritten documents. The desktop is continuously monitored using two cameras. Whenever the user makes a specific hand gesture over a paper, Escritoire proceeds to take an image. Then, the capture is automatically preprocesses, obtaining as a result an improved representation. Finally, the text image is transcribed using automatic techniques and finally the transcription is displayed on Escritoire.This work was partially supported by the Spanish MEC under FPU scholarship (AP2010-0575), STraDA research project (TIN2012-37475-C02-01) and MITTRAL research project (TIN2009-14633-C03-01); the EU’s 7th Framework Programme under tranScriptorium grant agreement (FP7/2007-2013/600707).Martín-Albo Simón, D.; Romero Gómez, V.; Vidal Ruiz, E. (2015). Escritoire: A Multi-touch Desk with e-Pen Input for Capture, Management and Multimodal Interactive Transcription of Handwritten Documents. En Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis. Springer. 471-478. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19390-8_53S471478Andrew, A.: Another efficient algorithm for convex hulls in two dimensions. Inf. Process. Lett. 9(5), 216–219 (1979)Bosch, V., Toselli, A.H., Vidal, E.: Statistical text line analysis in handwritten documents. In: Proceedings of ICFHR (2012)Eisenstein, J., Puerta, A.: Adaptation in automated user-interface design. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (2000)Jelinek, F.: Statistical Methods for Speech Recognition. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)Kalman, R.E.: A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Trans. ASME-J. Basic Eng. 82(Series D), 35–45 (1960)Keysers, D., Shafait, F., Breuel, T.M.: Document image zone classification - a simple high-performance approach. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision Theory (2007)Kozielski, M., Forster, J., Ney, H.: Moment-based image normalization for handwritten text recognition. In: Proceedings of ICFHR (2012)Lampert, C.H., Braun, T., Ulges, A., Keysers, D., Breuel, T.M.: Oblivious document capture and real-time retrieval. In: International Workshop on Camera Based Document Analysis and Recognition (2005)Liang, J., Doermann, D., Li, H.: Camera based analysis of text and documents a survey. Int. J. Doc. Anal. Recogn. 7(2–3), 84–104 (2005)Liwicki, M., Rostanin, O., El-Neklawy, S.M., Dengel, A.: Touch & write: a multi-touch table with pen-input. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (2010)Marti, U.V., Bunke, H.: Text line segmentation and word recognition in a system for general writer independent handwriting recognition. In: Proceedings of ICDAR (2001)Martín-Albo, D., Romero, V., Toselli, A.H., Vidal, E.: Multimodal computer-assisted transcription of text images at character-level interaction. Int. J. Pattern Recogn. Artif. Intell. 26(5), 19 (2012)Martín-Albo, D., Romero, V., Vidal, E.: Interactive off-line handwritten text transcription using on-line handwritten text as feedback. In: Proceedings of ICDAR (2013)Mitra, S., Acharya, T.: Gesture recognition: a survey. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B Cybern. 37(3), 311–324 (2007)Terry, M., Mynatt, E.D.: Recognizing creative needs in user interface design. In: Proceedings of C&C (2002)Toselli, A.H., Juan, A., Keysers, D., González, J., Salvador, I., Ney, H., Vidal, E., Casacuberta, F.: Integrated handwriting recognition and interpretation using finite-state models. Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell. 18(4), 519–539 (2004)Toselli, A.H., Romero, V., Pastor, M., Vidal, E.: Multimodal interactive transcription of text images. Pattern Recognit. 43(5), 1814–1825 (2010)Toselli, A.H., Romero, V., Vidal, E.: Computer assisted transcription of text images and multimodal interaction. In: Popescu-Belis, A., Stiefelhagen, R. (eds.) MLMI 2008. LNCS, vol. 5237, pp. 296–308. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Wachs, J.P., Kolsch, M., Stern, H., Edan, Y.: Vision-based hand-gesture applications. Commun. ACM. 54(2), 60–71 (2011)Wobbrock, J.O., Morris, M.R., Wilson, A.D.: User-defined gestures for surface computing. In: Proceedings of CHI (2009