Neighborhood diversity and the creative class in Chicago

Richard Florida\u27s creative class theory posits that highly skilled workers with creative- or knowledge-intensive occupations are particularly sensitive to ‘quality of place’, a key component of which is an open and tolerant attitude toward different peoples, cultures, and lifestyles. While diversity, as a proxy for tolerance, has proven to be a relatively weak pull-factor at the inter-metropolitan level, the potential role of neighborhood-level diversity in the residential location of creative class workers has yet to be explored empirically. In this study we use ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and geographically weighted regression (GWR) to test the hypothesis that there exists significant associations between particular types of neighborhood diversity (i.e., sexual orientation, language, race, and income) and the proportion of workers with specific creative class occupations. The results of our Chicago case study suggest a significant positive relationship between the creative class and the proportion of gay households and income diversity, but not racial or linguistic diversity. Overall, diversity appears to play a limited role in predicting where creative class workers reside, though the GWR analysis indicated substantial spatial variation in the strength of association between neighborhood diversity and creative class share across the study area

Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data in Temperate Forests

Forests are a crucial part of global ecosystems. Accurately estimating aboveground biomass (AGB) is important in many applications including monitoring carbon stocks, investigating forest degradation, and designing sustainable forest management strategies. Remote sensing techniques have proved to be a cost-effective way to estimate forest AGB with timely and repeated observations. This dissertation investigated the use of multiple remotely sensed datasets for forest AGB estimation in temperate forests. We compared the performance of Landsat and lidar data—individually and fused—for estimating AGB using multiple regression models (MLR), Random Forest (RF) and Geographically Weight Regression (GWR). Our approach showed MLR performed similarly to GWR and both were better than RF. Integration of lidar and Landsat inputs outperformed either data source alone. However, although lidar provides valuable three-dimensional forest structure information, acquiring comprehensive lidar coverage is often cost prohibitive. Thus we developed a lidar sampling framework to support AGB estimation from Landsat images. We compared two sampling strategies—systematic and classification-based—and found that the systematic sampling selection method was highly dependent on site conditions and had higher model variability. The classification-based lidar sampling strategy was easy to apply and provides a framework that is readily transferable to new study sites. The performance of Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 data for quantifying AGB in a temperate forest using RF regression was also tested. We modeled AGB using three datasets: Sentinel-2, Landsat 8, and a pseudo dataset that retained the spatial resolution of Sentinel-2 but only the spectral bands that matched those on Landsat 8. We found that while RF model parameters impact model outcomes, it is more important to focus attention on variable selection. Our results showed that the incorporation of red-edge information increased AGB estimation accuracy by approximately 6%. The additional spatial resolution improved accuracy by approximately 3%. The variable importance ranks in the RF regression model showed that in addition to the red- edge bands, the shortwave infrared bands were important either individually (in the Sentinel-2 model) or in band indices. With the growing availability of remote sensing datasets, developing tools to appropriately and efficiently apply remote sensing data is increasingly important

An assessment of tropical dryland forest ecosystem biomass and climate change impacts in the Kavango-Zambezi (KAZA) region of Southern Africa

The dryland forests of the Kavango-Zambezi (KAZA) region in Southern Africa are highly susceptible to disturbances from an increase in human population, wildlife pressures and the impacts of climate change. In this environment, reliable forest extent and structure estimates are difficult to obtain because of the size and remoteness of KAZA (519,912 km²). Whilst satellite remote sensing is generally well-suited to monitoring forest characteristics, there remain large uncertainties about its application for assessing changes at a regional scale to quantify forest structure and biomass in dry forest environments. This thesis presents research that combines Synthetic Aperture Radar, multispectral satellite imagery and climatological data with an inventory from a ground survey of woodland in Botswana and Namibia in 2019. The research utilised a multi-method approach including parametric and non-parametric algorithms and change detection models to address the following objectives: (1) To assess the feasibility of using openly accessible remote sensing data to estimate the dryland forest above ground biomass (2) to quantify the detail of vegetation dynamics using extensive archives of time series satellite data; (3) to investigate the relationship between fire, soil moisture, and drought on dryland vegetation as a means of characterising spatiotemporal changes in aridity. The results establish that a combination of radar and multispectral imagery produced the best fit to the ground observations for estimating forest above ground biomass. Modelling of the time-series shows that it is possible to identify abrupt changes, longer-term trends and seasonality in forest dynamics. The time series analysis of fire shows that about 75% of the study area burned at least once within the 17-year monitoring period, with the national parks more frequently affected than other protected areas. The results presented show a significant increase in dryness over the past 2 decades, with arid and semi-arid regions encroaching at the expense of dry sub-humid, particularly in the south of the region, notably between 2011-2019

Remote sensing technology applications in forestry and REDD+

Advances in close-range and remote sensing technologies are driving innovations in forest resource assessments and monitoring on varying scales. Data acquired with airborne and spaceborne platforms provide high(er) spatial resolution, more frequent coverage, and more spectral information. Recent developments in ground-based sensors have advanced 3D measurements, low-cost permanent systems, and community-based monitoring of forests. The UNFCCC REDD+ mechanism has advanced the remote sensing community and the development of forest geospatial products that can be used by countries for the international reporting and national forest monitoring. However, an urgent need remains to better understand the options and limitations of remote and close-range sensing techniques in the field of forest degradation and forest change. Therefore, we invite scientists working on remote sensing technologies, close-range sensing, and field data to contribute to this Special Issue. Topics of interest include: (1) novel remote sensing applications that can meet the needs of forest resource information and REDD+ MRV, (2) case studies of applying remote sensing data for REDD+ MRV, (3) timeseries algorithms and methodologies for forest resource assessment on different spatial scales varying from the tree to the national level, and (4) novel close-range sensing applications that can support sustainable forestry and REDD+ MRV. We particularly welcome submissions on data fusion

Estimating tropical forest above-ground biomass at the local scale using multi-source space-borne remote sensing data

Although forest biomass estimation has attracted a great number of studies using remote sensing data, its usage still contains high uncertainties. After transitioning from deforestation to reforestation under the development of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) programmes, young forests that are dominated by numerous small regenerating understory trees are found in many areas of many developing countries. However, the lack of analysis on the effect of this understory vegetation on total AGB is one the limitations of biomass studies. Moreover, it is always challenging to estimate the biomass of tropical forest due to its complex structure, high diversity of species, and dense canopy of understory trees. Taking into account these factors, this study, therefore, aims to investigate the effect of including understory trees in accuracy of AGB estimation in complex tropical heterogeneous forest at the local scale. The research conducted three consecutive experiments, using different remote sensing data sources, being: optical data, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data and the integration of optical and SAR data, across various forest types in different test site locations. The results provide comprehensive insights into the impact of small regenerating trees on improving AGB estimation. This major finding alone demonstrates that the role of small regenerating trees should not be automatically discounted, especially for tropical forest where a number of different tree layers is common. This is especially important in areas with a large number of small regenerating trees and where open canopy layers are young. The thesis reveals that the level of influence of small regenerating trees on each forest type is different. Therefore, the study recommends an approach to including small regenerating trees for each forest type. This thesis argues there is a need to develop local-specific allometric equations for both overstory and understory layers to improve the accuracy of biomass models. Methods required for collecting field data and calculating biomass for small regenerating trees should be considered carefully in terms of evaluating cost-effective biomass estimation for each ecological region and each species. This requirement is most critical for young forest sites where there are mixtures of mature trees and young regenerating trees

Remote Sensing of Plant Biodiversity

This Open Access volume aims to methodologically improve our understanding of biodiversity by linking disciplines that incorporate remote sensing, and uniting data and perspectives in the fields of biology, landscape ecology, and geography. The book provides a framework for how biodiversity can be detected and evaluated—focusing particularly on plants—using proximal and remotely sensed hyperspectral data and other tools such as LiDAR. The volume, whose chapters bring together a large cross-section of the biodiversity community engaged in these methods, attempts to establish a common language across disciplines for understanding and implementing remote sensing of biodiversity across scales. The first part of the book offers a potential basis for remote detection of biodiversity. An overview of the nature of biodiversity is described, along with ways for determining traits of plant biodiversity through spectral analyses across spatial scales and linking spectral data to the tree of life. The second part details what can be detected spectrally and remotely. Specific instrumentation and technologies are described, as well as the technical challenges of detection and data synthesis, collection and processing. The third part discusses spatial resolution and integration across scales and ends with a vision for developing a global biodiversity monitoring system. Topics include spectral and functional variation across habitats and biomes, biodiversity variables for global scale assessment, and the prospects and pitfalls in remote sensing of biodiversity at the global scale

Remote Sensing of Plant Biodiversity

At last, here it is. For some time now, the world has needed a text providing both a new theoretical foundation and practical guidance on how to approach the challenge of biodiversity decline in the Anthropocene. This is a global challenge demanding global approaches to understand its scope and implications. Until recently, we have simply lacked the tools to do so. We are now entering an era in which we can realistically begin to understand and monitor the multidimensional phenomenon of biodiversity at a planetary scale. This era builds upon three centuries of scientific research on biodiversity at site to landscape levels, augmented over the past two decades by airborne research platforms carrying spectrometers, lidars, and radars for larger-scale observations. Emerging international networks of fine-grain in-situ biodiversity observations complemented by space-based sensors offering coarser-grain imagery—but global coverage—of ecosystem composition, function, and structure together provide the information necessary to monitor and track change in biodiversity globally. This book is a road map on how to observe and interpret terrestrial biodiversity across scales through plants—primary producers and the foundation of the trophic pyramid. It honors the fact that biodiversity exists across different dimensions, including both phylogenetic and functional. Then, it relates these aspects of biodiversity to another dimension, the spectral diversity captured by remote sensing instruments operating at scales from leaf to canopy to biome. The biodiversity community has needed a Rosetta Stone to translate between the language of satellite remote sensing and its resulting spectral diversity and the languages of those exploring the phylogenetic diversity and functional trait diversity of life on Earth. By assembling the vital translation, this volume has globalized our ability to track biodiversity state and change. Thus, a global problem meets a key component of the global solution. The editors have cleverly built the book in three parts. Part 1 addresses the theory behind the remote sensing of terrestrial plant biodiversity: why spectral diversity relates to plant functional traits and phylogenetic diversity. Starting with first principles, it connects plant biochemistry, physiology, and macroecology to remotely sensed spectra and explores the processes behind the patterns we observe. Examples from the field demonstrate the rising synthesis of multiple disciplines to create a new cross-spatial and spectral science of biodiversity. Part 2 discusses how to implement this evolving science. It focuses on the plethora of novel in-situ, airborne, and spaceborne Earth observation tools currently and soon to be available while also incorporating the ways of actually making biodiversity measurements with these tools. It includes instructions for organizing and conducting a field campaign. Throughout, there is a focus on the burgeoning field of imaging spectroscopy, which is revolutionizing our ability to characterize life remotely. Part 3 takes on an overarching issue for any effort to globalize biodiversity observations, the issue of scale. It addresses scale from two perspectives. The first is that of combining observations across varying spatial, temporal, and spectral resolutions for better understanding—that is, what scales and how. This is an area of ongoing research driven by a confluence of innovations in observation systems and rising computational capacity. The second is the organizational side of the scaling challenge. It explores existing frameworks for integrating multi-scale observations within global networks. The focus here is on what practical steps can be taken to organize multi-scale data and what is already happening in this regard. These frameworks include essential biodiversity variables and the Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON). This book constitutes an end-to-end guide uniting the latest in research and techniques to cover the theory and practice of the remote sensing of plant biodiversity. In putting it together, the editors and their coauthors, all preeminent in their fields, have done a great service for those seeking to understand and conserve life on Earth—just when we need it most. For if the world is ever to construct a coordinated response to the planetwide crisis of biodiversity loss, it must first assemble adequate—and global—measures of what we are losing