Minimally Invasive Procedures in Periodontology: An Overview.

Minimally invasive dentistry has been defined as a concept that preserves both the hard tissues (dentition) and the supporting soft tissue structures (gingiva and periodontal tissues) and includes both non-surgical and surgical techniques and procedures. The implementation of minimally invasive procedures such as Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS), Minimally Invasive Periodontal Surgery (MIPS), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (MIST), Modified Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (M-MIST) have also been developed to minimise the surgical trauma experienced by the patient and to reduce the duration of the surgical procedure. These procedures included minimal incisions and flap reflection and careful handling of the hard and soft tissues as well as the use of instruments such as operating microscopes, magnifying lenses, microsurgical instruments, and materials. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the current use of minimally invasive techniques and procedures in the nonsurgical and surgical management of periodontal disease(s)

The impact of new surgical techniques on geographical unwarranted variation: The case of benign hysterectomy

Since the 1980s, the international literature has reported variations for healthcare services,especially for elective ones. Variations are positive if they reflect patient preferences, while ifthey do not, they are unwarranted, and thus avoidable. Benign hysterectomy is among the mostfrequent elective surgical procedures in developed countries, and, in recent years, it has beenincreasingly delivered through minimally invasive surgical techniques, namely laparoscopic orrobotic. The question therefore arises over what the impact of these new surgical techniques onavoidable variation is. In this study we analyze the extent of unwarranted geographical variation oftreatment rates and of the adoption of minimally invasive procedures for benign hysterectomy in anItalian regional healthcare system. We assess the impact of the surgical approach on the provision ofbenign hysterectomy, in terms of efficiency (by measuring the average length of stay) and efficacy (bymeasuring the post-operative complications). Geographical variation was observed among regionalhealth districts for treatment rates and waiting times. At a provider level, we found differences forthe minimally invasive approach. We found a positive and significant association between rates andthe percentage of minimally invasive procedures. Providers that frequently adopt minimally invasiveprocedures have shorter average length of stay, and when they also perform open hysterectomies,fewer complications

Innovation in surgical oncology

Surgical techniques change through a continuous process of innovation. In recent years, there has been an increased use of minimally invasive surgical techniques for the treatment of malignant tumours. These minimally invasive surgical procedures have advantages for the patient, including less pain and complications following the surgery and a faster recovery. In the UMCG, a new minimally invasive surgical technique for the removal of the adrenal glands has been introduced; the ‘posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy’, which turned out to be a better option than the conventional adrenal surgery. Patients have less pain after the surgery and there are fewer complications. This new operating technique has been implemented safely in four international centres, with a learning curve of 24 to 42 procedures. In addition, the ‘minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy’ is introduced, in which the inguinal glands are removed through an endoscopic procedure in melanoma patients with lymph node metastases. This procedure proved to be an attractive alternative to the open technique, with less serious complications and without the need for a surgical re-intervention. When starting a new minimally invasive surgical procedure, the implementation process must be well prepared to ensure safety and ultimately improve the outcome of patients. However, innovation should not be the purpose, but only a way to improve the outcome of these oncological patients

Bilateral mini-thoracotomy for combined minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass and mitral valve repair

Consistent evidence recognizes minimally invasive valve surgery as the top-tier surgical approach for heart valve pathology. Conversely, the overall adoption of minimally invasive coronary surgery remains low. Notwithstanding, excellent clinical outcomes have been recently reported, further consolidating a technique that addresses major concerns associated with the traditional approach for the most frequently performed cardiac operation, including sternal dehiscence (i.e., sternal sparing), stroke (i.e., no-touch aorta), but that also guarantees a reduced resort to blood transfusions, diminished pain, and faster recovery. More to the point, the suitability of minimally invasive strategies for combined coronary and valve procedures remains debatable. Almost no reports of such combined procedures are available in literature and the very few published experiences appear scarce and heterogeneous about the surgical access (i.e., single versus bilateral mini-thoracotomy). However, bilateral mini-thoracotomy has been proposed as a feasible and safe strategy for different cardiac operations like surgical ablation and left ventricular assist device implantation, but also for isolated multivessel minimally invasive coronary surgery. Here we describe feasibility of combined minimally invasive mitral valve and coronary surgery performed through bilateral mini-thoracotomy and we report outcomes of our initial series of 3 cases

Innovations in cardiovascular care: historical perspective, contemporary practice, recent trends and future directions

Abstract Cardiovascular diseases continue to be a major cause of mortality and morbidity in the world population. First open heart procedure was performed by Gibbon in 1953, since then many advancements have been introduced to the field of cardiac surgery. Minimally invasive techniques were introduced, which include minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), off-pump technique, minimally invasive valve surgery or transcatheter techniques to implant stentless or sutureless valves. The hybrid strategy to address coronary disease combines catheterisation procedures with standard surgical techniques. Cardiac imaging has also progressed to provide three-dimensional images of the heart, enabling surgeons to plan procedures with greater accuracy. Left ventricular assist devices can be used in patients suffering from cardiogenic shock or awaiting heart transplantation. Total artificial heart can be used for biventricular mechanical support. As technology becomes increasingly used for patient management, the future surgeon needs to be trained in minimally invasive surgical techniques

Comparison of Intraoperative Nociception and Postoperative Acute Pain After Traditional or Minimally Invasive Ovariohysterectomy in Dogs

Background: Many variations of ovariohysterectomy techniques have been described, including the traditional one and minimally invasive procedures. Non-laparoscopic Snook hook technique is an alternative for performing minimally invasive ovariohysterectomy. Few studies have been carried out in order to assess pain in animals submitted to minimally invasive surgeries, especially involving one of the most performed surgical procedures in veterinary practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical duration, intraoperative nociception and acute postoperative pain after traditional ovariohysterectomy or minimally invasive non-laparoscopic technique in dogs using Snook hook. The hypothesis is that non-laparoscopic minimally invasive ovariohysterectomy would be faster and less painful than the conventional technique.Material, Methods & Results: Thirty dogs were divided into Traditional Group (TG = 15) and Minimally Invasive Group (MIG = 15). Heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, body temperature, oxyhemoglobin saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration (ETCO2) and end-tidal isoflurane concentration were evaluated before the surgery to start (M0), during incision (M1), clamping of the first ovarian pedicle (M2), second ovarian pedicle (M3), uterine cervix (M4), abdominal suture (M5) and at the end of surgery (M6). The modified Glasgow Pain Scale was used for acute postoperative pain assessment and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to assess the sensitivity of surgical wound. The level of significance established for all statistical analyzes was 5%. Statistical differences were not observed between groups considering total surgical time and postoperative acute pain intensity (P > 0.05), in spite of MIG having shorter duration of surgery. There was no statistical difference between groups considering all intraoperative parameters except respiratory rate (TG < MIG; P < 0.05) and ETCO2 (MIG < TG; P < 0.05) at the moment of traction of the first ovarian pedicle (M2). Pain assessment by VAS showed statistical difference 24h after the end of surgery (TG < MIG) (P < 0.05). Discussion: Both procedures were similar regarding intraoperative nociception and acute postoperative pain. It is possible that the sensation of pain in both procedures was blocked by the effectiveness of analgesics, once they might cause an inhibition of painful behaviors limiting a possible difference in pain identification. Higher respiratory stress observed in MIG at M2 and higher pain score by VAS noted in MIG 24 h after the end of surgery can be justified by greater traction of ovarian pedicle, due to limited surgical access of minimally invasive technique. Minimally invasive ovariohysterectomy non-laparoscopic seems to be potentially faster, probably due to the smaller size of the abdominal incision, which takes less time to be closed. In the present study, both techniques were performed by an experienced surgeon, providing safe procedures, nevertheless it is important to emphasize that iatrogenic injury can be caused by surgeons not proficient in the Snook hook technique, considering the limited visualization of anatomical abdominal structures. Data obtained indicate that traditional ovariohysterectomy and non-laparoscopic Snook hook technique promote similar intraoperative nociception and acute postoperative pain, however minimally invasive procedure is potentially faster and with less surgical trauma

Adhesive Hydrogels for Maxillofacial Tissue Regeneration Using Minimally Invasive Procedures

Minimally invasive surgical procedures aiming to repair damaged maxillofacial tissues are hampered by its small, complex structures and difficult surgical access. Indeed, while arthroscopic procedures that deliver regenerative materials and/or cells are common in articulating joints such as the knee, there are currently no treatments that surgically place cells, regenerative factors or materials into maxillofacial tissues to foster bone, cartilage or muscle repair. Here, hyaluronic acid (HA)-based hydrogels are developed, which are suitable for use in minimally invasive procedures, that can adhere to the surrounding tissue, and deliver cells and potentially drugs. By modifying HA with both methacrylate (MA) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (Dopa) groups using a completely aqueous synthesis route, it is shown that MA-HA-Dopa hydrogels can be applied under aqueous conditions, gel quickly using a standard surgical light, and adhere to tissue. Moreover, upon oxidation of the Dopa, human marrow stromal cells attach to hydrogels and survive when encapsulated within them. These observations show that when incorporated into HA-based hydrogels, Dopa moieties can foster cell and tissue interactions, ensuring surgical placement and potentially enabling delivery/recruitment of regenerative cells. The findings suggest that MA-HA-Dopa hydrogels may find use in minimally invasive procedures to foster maxillofacial tissue repair.</p

Towards an anthropomorphic design of minimally invasive instrumentation for soft tissue robotic surgery

Minimally invasive procedures, such as laparoscopy, have significantly decreased blood loss, postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay. Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) has offered refined accuracy and more ergonomic instruments for surgeons, further minimizing trauma to the patient [1]. On the other hand, training surgeons in minimally invasive surgical procedures is becoming increasingly long and arduous [2]. In this paper, we outline the rationale of a novel design of instruments for robotic surgery with increased dexterity that will provide more natural manipulation of soft tissues. The proposed system will not only reduce the training time for surgeons but also improve the ergonomics of the procedure. © 2012 Springer-Verlag