Optimising airline maintenance scheduling decisions

Airline maintenance scheduling (AMS) studies how plans or schedules are constructed to ensure that a fleet is efficiently maintained and that airline operational demands are met. Additionally, such schedules must take into consideration the different regulations airlines are subject to, while minimising maintenance costs. In this thesis, we study different formulations, solution methods, and modelling considerations, for the AMS and related problems to propose two main contributions. First, we present a new type of multi-objective mixed integer linear programming formulation which challenges traditional time discretisation. Employing the concept of time intervals, we efficiently model the airline maintenance scheduling problem with tail assignment considerations. With a focus on workshop resource allocation and individual aircraft flight operations, and the use of a custom iterative algorithm, we solve large and long-term real-world instances (16000 flights, 529 aircraft, 8 maintenance workshops) in reasonable computational time. Moreover, we provide evidence to suggest, that our framework provides near-optimal solutions, and that inter-airline cooperation is beneficial for workshops. Second, we propose a new hybrid solution procedure to solve the aircraft recovery problem. Here, we study how to re-schedule flights and re-assign aircraft to these, to resume airline operations after an unforeseen disruption. We do so while taking operational restrictions into account. Specifically, restrictions on aircraft, maintenance, crew duty, and passenger delay are accounted for. The flexibility of the approach allows for further operational restrictions to be easily introduced. The hybrid solution procedure involves the combination of column generation with learning-based hyperheuristics. The latter, adaptively selects exact or metaheuristic algorithms to generate columns. The five different algorithms implemented, two of which we developed, were collected and released as a Python package (Torres Sanchez, 2020). Findings suggest that the framework produces fast and insightful recovery solutions

OPTIMIZATION APPROACHES TO AIRLINE INDUSTRY CHALLENGES: Airline Schedule Planning and Recovery

The airline industry has a long history of developing and applying optimization approaches to their myriad of scheduling problems, including designing flight schedules that maximize profitability while satisfying rules related to aircraft maintenance; generating cost-minimizing, feasible work schedules for pilots and flight attendants; and identifying implementable, low-cost changes to aircraft and crew schedules as disruptions render the planned schedule inoperable. The complexities associated with these problems are immense, including long-and short-term planning horizons; and multiple resources including aircraft, crews, and passengers, all operating over shared airspace and airport capacity. Optimization approaches have played an important role in overcoming this complexity and providing effective aircraft and crew schedules. Historical optimization-based approaches, however, often involve a sequential process, first generating aircraft schedules and then generating crew schedules. Decisions taken in the first steps of the process limit those that are possible in subsequent steps, resulting in overall plans that, while feasible, are typically sub-optimal. To mitigate the myopic effects of sequential solutions, researchers have developed extended models that begin to integrate som

An Optimisation Framework for Airline Fleet Maintenance Scheduling with Tail Assignment Considerations

Fierce competition between airlines has led to the need of minimising the operating costs while also ensuring quality of service. Given the large proportion of operating costs dedicated to aircraft maintenance, cooperation between airlines and their respective maintenance provider is paramount. In this research, we propose a framework to develop commercially viable and maintenance feasible flight and maintenance schedules. Such framework involves two multi-objective mixed integer linear programming (MMILP) formulations and an iterative algorithm. The first formulation, the airline fleet maintenance scheduling (AMS) with violations, minimises the number of maintenance regulation violations and the number of not airworthy aircraft; subject to limited workshop resources and current maintenance regulations on individual aircraft flying hours. The second formulation, the AMS with tail assignment (TA) allows aircraft to be assigned to different flights. In this case, subject to similar constraints as the first formulation, six lexicographically ordered objective functions are minimised. Namely, the number of violations, maximum resource level, number of tail reassignments, number of maintenance interventions, overall resource usage, and the amount of maintenance required by each aircraft at the end of the planning horizon. The iterative algorithm ensures fast computational times while providing good quality solutions. Additionally, by tracking aircraft and using precise flying hours between maintenance opportunities, we ensure that the aircraft are airworthy at all times. Computational tests on real flight schedules over a 30-day planning horizon show that even with multiple airlines and workshops (16000 flights, 529 aircraft, 8 maintenance workshops) our solution approach can construct near-optimal maintenance schedules within minutes

Maintenance scheduling in rolling stock circulations in rapid transit networks

The railway routing problem determines specific paths for each individual train, given its type and composition and considering possible maintenance locations and durations. The objective is to minimize operating costs and penalties related to waiting times and maintenance all while considering train scheduling and maintenance constraints. The model is solved using Branch and Bound and Column Generation approaches. In the paper the different approaches are compared for different planning horizons and model parameter settings. The computational tests have been run in a real RENFE network