Cooperation and Storage Tradeoffs in Power-Grids with Renewable Energy Resources

One of the most important challenges in smart grid systems is the integration of renewable energy resources into its design. In this work, two different techniques to mitigate the time varying and intermittent nature of renewable energy generation are considered. The first one is the use of storage, which smooths out the fluctuations in the renewable energy generation across time. The second technique is the concept of distributed generation combined with cooperation by exchanging energy among the distributed sources. This technique averages out the variation in energy production across space. This paper analyzes the trade-off between these two techniques. The problem is formulated as a stochastic optimization problem with the objective of minimizing the time average cost of energy exchange within the grid. First, an analytical model of the optimal cost is provided by investigating the steady state of the system for some specific scenarios. Then, an algorithm to solve the cost minimization problem using the technique of Lyapunov optimization is developed and results for the performance of the algorithm are provided. These results show that in the presence of limited storage devices, the grid can benefit greatly from cooperation, whereas in the presence of large storage capacity, cooperation does not yield much benefit. Further, it is observed that most of the gains from cooperation can be obtained by exchanging energy only among a few energy harvesting sources

Ready To Roll: Southeastern Pennsylvania's Regional Electric Vehicle Action Plan

On-road internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles are responsible for nearly one-third of energy use and one-quarter of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in southeastern Pennsylvania.1 Electric vehicles (EVs), including plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and all-electric vehicles (AEVs), present an opportunity to serve a significant portion of the region's mobility needs while simultaneously reducing energy use, petroleum dependence, fueling costs, and GHG emissions. As a national leader in EV readiness, the region can serve as an example for other efforts around the country."Ready to Roll! Southeastern Pennsylvania's Regional EV Action Plan (Ready to Roll!)" is a comprehensive, regionally coordinated approach to introducing EVs and electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) into the five counties of southeastern Pennsylvania (Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia). This plan is the product of a partnership between the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC), the City of Philadelphia, PECO Energy Company (PECO; the region's electricity provider), and Greater Philadelphia Clean Cities (GPCC). Additionally, ICF International provided assistance to DVRPC with the preparation of this plan. The plan incorporates feedback from key regional stakeholders, national best practices, and research to assess the southeastern Pennsylvania EV market, identify current market barriers, and develop strategies to facilitate vehicle and infrastructure deployment

A robust vehicle to grid aggregation framework for electric vehicles charging cost minimization and for smart grid regulation

In this paper, we propose an optimal hierarchical bi-directional aggregation algorithm for the electric vehicles (EVs) integration in the smart grid (SG) using Vehicle to Grid (V2G) technology through a network of Charging Stations (CSs). The proposed model forecasts the power demand and performs Day-ahead (DA) load scheduling in the SG by optimizing EVs charging/discharging tasks. This method uses EVs and CSs as the voltage and frequency stabilizing tools in the SG. Before penetrating EVs in the V2G mode, this algorithm determines the on arrival EVs State of Charge (SOC) at CS, obtains projected park/departure time information from EV owners, evaluates their battery degradation cost prior to charging. After obtaining all necessary data, it either uses EV in the V2G mode to regulates the SG or charge it according to the owner request but, it ensure desired SOC on departure. The robustness of the proposed algorithm has been tested by using IEEE-32 Bus-Bars based power distribution in which EVs are integrated through five CSs. Two intense case studies have been carried out for the appropriate performance validation of the proposed algorithm. Simulations are performed using electricity pricing data from PJM and to test the EVs behaviour 3 types of EVs having different specifications are penetrated. Simulation results have proved that the proposed model is capable of integrating EVs in the voltage and frequency stabilization and it also simultaneously minimizes approximately $1500 in term of charging cost for EVs contributing in the V2G mode each day. Particularly, during peak hours this algorithm provides effective grid stabilization services.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Planning and flexible operation of storage systems in power grids: from transmission to distribution networks

The first part of the thesis has been devoted to the transmission planning with high penetration of renewable energy sources. Both stationary and transportable battery energy storage (BES, BEST) systems have been considered in the planning model, so to obtain the optimal set of BES, BEST and transmission lines that minimizes the total cost in a power network. First, a coordinated expansion planning model with fixed transportation cost for BEST devices has been presented; then, the model has been extended to a planning formulation with a distance-dependent transportation cost for the BEST units, and its tractability has been proved through a case study based on a 190-bus test system. The second part of this thesis is then devoted to the analysis of planning and management of renewable energy communities (RECs). Initially, the planning of photovoltaic and BES systems in a REC with an incentive-based remuneration scheme according to the Italian regulatory framework has been analysed, and two planning models, according to a single-stage, or a multi-stage approach, have been proposed in order to provide the optimal set of BES and PV systems allowing to achieve the minimum energy procurement cost in a given REC. Further, the second part of this thesis is devoted to the study of the day-ahead scheduling of resources in renewable energy communities, by considering two types of REC. The first one, which we will refer to as “cooperative community”, allows direct energy transactions between members of the REC; the second type of REC considered, which we shall refer to as “incentive-based”, does not allow direct transactions between members but includes economic revenues for the community shared energy, according to the Italian regulation framework. Moreover, dispatchable renewable energy generation has been considered by including producers equipped with biogas power plants in the community

An Overview of Modeling Approaches Applied to Aggregation-Based Fleet Management and Integration of Plug-in Electric Vehicles †

The design and implementation of management policies for plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) need to be supported by a holistic understanding of the functional processes, their complex interactions, and their response to various changes. Models developed to represent different functional processes and systems are seen as useful tools to support the related studies for different stakeholders in a tangible way. This paper presents an overview of modeling approaches applied to support aggregation-based management and integration of PEVs from the perspective of fleet operators and grid operators, respectively. We start by explaining a structured modeling approach, i.e., a flexible combination of process models and system models, applied to different management and integration studies. A state-of-the-art overview of modeling approaches applied to represent several key processes, such as charging management, and key systems, such as the PEV fleet, is then presented, along with a detailed description of different approaches. Finally, we discuss several considerations that need to be well understood during the modeling process in order to assist modelers and model users in the appropriate decisions of using existing, or developing their own, solutions for further applications

Electric Vehicles for Public Transportation in Power Systems: A Review of Methodologies

[EN] The market for electric vehicles (EVs) has grown with each year, and EVs are considered to be a proper solution for the mitigation of urban pollution. So far, not much attention has been devoted to the use of EVs for public transportation, such as taxis and buses. However, a massive introduction of electric taxis (ETs) and electric buses (EBs) could generate issues in the grid. The challenges are different from those of private EVs, as their required load is much higher and the related time constraints must be considered with much more attention. These issues have begun to be studied within the last few years. This paper presents a review of the different approaches that have been proposed by various authors, to mitigate the impact of EBs and ETs on the future smart grid. Furthermore, some projects with regard to the integration of ETs and EBs around the world are presented. Some guidelines for future works are also proposed.This research was funded by the project SIS.JCG.19.03 of Universidad de las Americas, Ecuador.Clairand-Gómez, J.; Guerra-Terán, P.; Serrano-Guerrero, JX.; González-Rodríguez, M.; Escrivá-Escrivá, G. (2019). Electric Vehicles for Public Transportation in Power Systems: A Review of Methodologies. Energies. 12(16):1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12163114S1221216Emadi, A. (2011). Transportation 2.0. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 9(4), 18-29. doi:10.1109/mpe.2011.941320Fahimi, B., Kwasinski, A., Davoudi, A., Balog, R., & Kiani, M. (2011). Charge It! IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 9(4), 54-64. doi:10.1109/mpe.2011.941321Yilmaz, M., & Krein, P. T. (2013). Review of Battery Charger Topologies, Charging Power Levels, and Infrastructure for Plug-In Electric and Hybrid Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 28(5), 2151-2169. doi:10.1109/tpel.2012.2212917Tagliaferri, C., Evangelisti, S., Acconcia, F., Domenech, T., Ekins, P., Barletta, D., & Lettieri, P. (2016). Life cycle assessment of future electric and hybrid vehicles: A cradle-to-grave systems engineering approach. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 112, 298-309. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2016.07.003Zackrisson, M., Fransson, K., Hildenbrand, J., Lampic, G., & O’Dwyer, C. (2016). Life cycle assessment of lithium-air battery cells. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 299-311. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.104Wu, Y., Yang, Z., Lin, B., Liu, H., Wang, R., Zhou, B., & Hao, J. (2012). Energy consumption and CO2 emission impacts of vehicle electrification in three developed regions of China. Energy Policy, 48, 537-550. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.060Shen, W., Han, W., Chock, D., Chai, Q., & Zhang, A. (2012). Well-to-wheels life-cycle analysis of alternative fuels and vehicle technologies in China. Energy Policy, 49, 296-307. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.038Wang, R., Wu, Y., Ke, W., Zhang, S., Zhou, B., & Hao, J. (2015). Can propulsion and fuel diversity for the bus fleet achieve the win–win strategy of energy conservation and environmental protection? Applied Energy, 147, 92-103. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.107Clement-Nyns, K., Haesen, E., & Driesen, J. (2010). The Impact of Charging Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles on a Residential Distribution Grid. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 25(1), 371-380. doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2009.2036481Shafiee, S., Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M., & Rastegar, M. (2013). Investigating the Impacts of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles on Power Distribution Systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 4(3), 1351-1360. doi:10.1109/tsg.2013.2251483Pieltain Fernandez, L., Gomez San Roman, T., Cossent, R., Mateo Domingo, C., & Frias, P. (2011). Assessment of the Impact of Plug-in Electric Vehicles on Distribution Networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 26(1), 206-213. doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2010.2049133Lucas, A., Bonavitacola, F., Kotsakis, E., & Fulli, G. (2015). Grid harmonic impact of multiple electric vehicle fast charging. Electric Power Systems Research, 127, 13-21. doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2015.05.012Turker, H., Bacha, S., Chatroux, D., & Hably, A. (2012). Low-Voltage Transformer Loss-of-Life Assessments for a High Penetration of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs). IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 27(3), 1323-1331. doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2012.2193423Kempton, W., & Tomić, J. (2005). Vehicle-to-grid power fundamentals: Calculating capacity and net revenue. Journal of Power Sources, 144(1), 268-279. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.12.025Guille, C., & Gross, G. (2009). A conceptual framework for the vehicle-to-grid (V2G) implementation. Energy Policy, 37(11), 4379-4390. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.053Geng, Z., Conejo, A. J., Chen, Q., Xia, Q., & Kang, C. (2017). Electricity production scheduling under uncertainty: Max social welfare vs. min emission vs. max renewable production. Applied Energy, 193, 540-549. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.051Verbruggen, A., Fischedick, M., Moomaw, W., Weir, T., Nadaï, A., Nilsson, L. J., … Sathaye, J. (2010). Renewable energy costs, potentials, barriers: Conceptual issues. Energy Policy, 38(2), 850-861. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.036Oda, T., Aziz, M., Mitani, T., Watanabe, Y., & Kashiwagi, T. (2018). Mitigation of congestion related to quick charging of electric vehicles based on waiting time and cost–benefit analyses: A japanese case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 36, 99-106. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.024Arkin, E. M., Carmi, P., Katz, M. J., Mitchell, J. S. B., & Segal, M. (2019). Locating battery charging stations to facilitate almost shortest paths. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 254, 10-16. doi:10.1016/j.dam.2018.07.019Gallardo-Lozano, J., Milanés-Montero, M. I., Guerrero-Martínez, M. A., & Romero-Cadaval, E. (2012). Electric vehicle battery charger for smart grids. Electric Power Systems Research, 90, 18-29. doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2012.03.015Aziz, M., Oda, T., & Ito, M. (2016). Battery-assisted charging system for simultaneous charging of electric vehicles. Energy, 100, 82-90. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.069Mehboob, N., Restrepo, M., Canizares, C. A., Rosenberg, C., & Kazerani, M. (2019). Smart Operation of Electric Vehicles With Four-Quadrant Chargers Considering Uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 10(3), 2999-3009. doi:10.1109/tsg.2018.2816404García-Villalobos, J., Zamora, I., San Martín, J. I., Asensio, F. J., & Aperribay, V. (2014). Plug-in electric vehicles in electric distribution networks: A review of smart charging approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 38, 717-731. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.040Richardson, D. B. (2013). Electric vehicles and the electric grid: A review of modeling approaches, Impacts, and renewable energy integration. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, 247-254. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.042Haidar, A. M. A., Muttaqi, K. M., & Sutanto, D. (2014). Technical challenges for electric power industries due to grid-integrated electric vehicles in low voltage distributions: A review. Energy Conversion and Management, 86, 689-700. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2014.06.025Mwasilu, F., Justo, J. J., Kim, E.-K., Do, T. D., & Jung, J.-W. (2014). Electric vehicles and smart grid interaction: A review on vehicle to grid and renewable energy sources integration. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 501-516. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.031Habib, S., Kamran, M., & Rashid, U. (2015). Impact analysis of vehicle-to-grid technology and charging strategies of electric vehicles on distribution networks – A review. Journal of Power Sources, 277, 205-214. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.020Tan, K. M., Ramachandaramurthy, V. K., & Yong, J. Y. (2016). Integration of electric vehicles in smart grid: A review on vehicle to grid technologies and optimization techniques. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 720-732. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.012Raslavičius, L., Azzopardi, B., Keršys, A., Starevičius, M., Bazaras, Ž., & Makaras, R. (2015). Electric vehicles challenges and opportunities: Lithuanian review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 786-800. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.076Rahman, I., Vasant, P. M., Singh, B. S. M., Abdullah-Al-Wadud, M., & Adnan, N. (2016). Review of recent trends in optimization techniques for plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicle charging infrastructures. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 1039-1047. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.353Faddel, S., Al-Awami, A., & Mohammed, O. (2018). Charge Control and Operation of Electric Vehicles in Power Grids: A Review. Energies, 11(4), 701. doi:10.3390/en11040701Ercan, T., Onat, N. C., & Tatari, O. (2016). Investigating carbon footprint reduction potential of public transportation in United States: A system dynamics approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 1260-1276. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.051Kwan, S. C., & Hashim, J. H. (2016). A review on co-benefits of mass public transportation in climate change mitigation. Sustainable Cities and Society, 22, 11-18. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2016.01.004Kolbe, K. (2019). Mitigating urban heat island effect and carbon dioxide emissions through different mobility concepts: Comparison of conventional vehicles with electric vehicles, hydrogen vehicles and public transportation. Transport Policy, 80, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.05.007Zalakeviciute, R., Rybarczyk, Y., López-Villada, J., & Diaz Suarez, M. V. (2018). Quantifying decade-long effects of fuel and traffic regulations on urban ambient PM 2.5 pollution in a mid-size South American city. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 9(1), 66-75. doi:10.1016/j.apr.2017.07.001Dell’ Olio, L., Ibeas, A., & Cecin, P. (2011). The quality of service desired by public transport users. Transport Policy, 18(1), 217-227. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.005Mahmoud, M., Garnett, R., Ferguson, M., & Kanaroglou, P. (2016). Electric buses: A review of alternative powertrains. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 673-684. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.019Nissan Leafhttps://www.nissan.co.uk/vehicles/new-vehicles/leaf/range-charging.htmlIntroducing the Fully Charged 2020 Kia Soul EVhttps://www.kia.com/us/en/content/vehicles/upcoming-vehicles/2020-soul-eve6https://en.byd.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/e6_cutsheet.pdfTesla Model Shttps://www.tesla.com/modelsBushttps://en.byd.com/bus/40-electric-motor-coach/Urbino Electrichttps://www.solarisbus.com/en/vehicles/zero-emissions/urbino-electricVolvo 7900 Electrichttps://www.volvobuses.co.uk/en-gb/our-offering/buses/volvo-7900-electric/specifications.htmlCollin, R., Miao, Y., Yokochi, A., Enjeti, P., & von Jouanne, A. (2019). Advanced Electric Vehicle Fast-Charging Technologies. Energies, 12(10), 1839. doi:10.3390/en12101839Yang, Y., El Baghdadi, M., Lan, Y., Benomar, Y., Van Mierlo, J., & Hegazy, O. (2018). Design Methodology, Modeling, and Comparative Study of Wireless Power Transfer Systems for Electric Vehicles. Energies, 11(7), 1716. doi:10.3390/en11071716Bi, Z., Song, L., De Kleine, R., Mi, C. C., & Keoleian, G. A. (2015). Plug-in vs. wireless charging: Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions for an electric bus system. Applied Energy, 146, 11-19. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.031Siqi Li, & Mi, C. C. (2015). Wireless Power Transfer for Electric Vehicle Applications. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 3(1), 4-17. doi:10.1109/jestpe.2014.2319453Musavi, F., & Eberle, W. (2014). Overview of wireless power transfer technologies for electric vehicle battery charging. IET Power Electronics, 7(1), 60-66. doi:10.1049/iet-pel.2013.0047Wang, Z., Wei, X., & Dai, H. (2015). Design and Control of a 3 kW Wireless Power Transfer System for Electric Vehicles. Energies, 9(1), 10. doi:10.3390/en9010010Sarker, M. R., Pandzic, H., & Ortega-Vazquez, M. A. (2015). Optimal Operation and Services Scheduling for an Electric Vehicle Battery Swapping Station. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 30(2), 901-910. doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2014.2331560Adegbohun, F., von Jouanne, A., & Lee, K. (2019). Autonomous Battery Swapping System and Methodologies of Electric Vehicles. Energies, 12(4), 667. doi:10.3390/en12040667OPPChargeCommon Interface for Automated Charging of Hybrid Electric and Electric Commercial Vehicleshttps://www.oppcharge.org/dok/OPPCharge Specification 2nd edition 20190421.pdfFast Charging of Electric Vehicleshttps://www.oppcharge.orgJiang, C. X., Jing, Z. X., Cui, X. R., Ji, T. Y., & Wu, Q. H. (2018). Multiple agents and reinforcement learning for modelling charging loads of electric taxis. Applied Energy, 222, 158-168. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.164Fraile-Ardanuy, J., Castano-Solis, S., Álvaro-Hermana, R., Merino, J., & Castillo, Á. (2018). Using mobility information to perform a feasibility study and the evaluation of spatio-temporal energy demanded by an electric taxi fleet. Energy Conversion and Management, 157, 59-70. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.11.070Rao, R., Cai, H., & Xu, M. (2018). Modeling electric taxis’ charging behavior using real-world data. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(6), 452-460. doi:10.1080/15568318.2017.1388887Litzlbauer, M. (2015). Technische Machbarkeitsanalyse einer rein elektrisch betriebenen Taxiflotte. e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, 132(3), 172-177. doi:10.1007/s00502-015-0296-3Liao, B., Li, L., Li, B., Mao, J., Yang, J., Wen, F., & Salam, M. A. (2016). Load modeling for electric taxi battery charging and swapping stations: Comparison studies. 2016 IEEE 2nd Annual Southern Power Electronics Conference (SPEC). doi:10.1109/spec.2016.7846135Zou, Y., Wei, S., Sun, F., Hu, X., & Shiao, Y. (2016). Large-scale deployment of electric taxis in Beijing: A real-world analysis. Energy, 100, 25-39. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.062Asamer, J., Reinthaler, M., Ruthmair, M., Straub, M., & Puchinger, J. (2016). Optimizing charging station locations for urban taxi providers. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 85, 233-246. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.01.014Yang, J., Dong, J., & Hu, L. (2017). A data-driven optimization-based approach for siting and sizing of electric taxi charging stations. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 77, 462-477. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2017.02.014Jiang, C., Jing, Z., Ji, T., & Wu, Q. (2018). Optimal location of PEVCSs using MAS and ER approach. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 12(20), 4377-4387. doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.1907Pan, A., Zhao, T., Yu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Deploying Public Charging Stations for Electric Taxis: A Charging Demand Simulation Embedded Approach. IEEE Access, 7, 17412-17424. doi:10.1109/access.2019.2894780Chen Lianfu, Zhang, W., Huang, Y., & Zhang, D. (2014). Research on the charging station service radius of electric taxis. 2014 IEEE Conference and Expo Transportation Electrification Asia-Pacific (ITEC Asia-Pacific). doi:10.1109/itec-ap.2014.6941081Yang, Y., Zhang, W., Niu, L., & Jiang, J. (2015). Coordinated Charging Strategy for Electric Taxis in Temporal and Spatial Scale. Energies, 8(2), 1256-1272. doi:10.3390/en8021256Niu, L., & Zhang, D. (2015). Charging Guidance of Electric Taxis Based on Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization. The Scientific World Journal, 2015, 1-9. doi:10.1155/2015/354952Yang, Z., Guo, T., You, P., Hou, Y., & Qin, S. J. (2019). Distributed Approach for Temporal–Spatial Charging Coordination of Plug-in Electric Taxi Fleet. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(6), 3185-3195. doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2879515Rossi, F., Iglesias, R., Alizadeh, M., & Pavone, M. (2020). On the Interaction Between Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems and the Power Network: Models and Coordination Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, 7(1), 384-397. doi:10.1109/tcns.2019.2923384Liang, Y., Zhang, X., Xie, J., & Liu, W. (2017). An Optimal Operation Model and Ordered Charging/Discharging Strategy for Battery Swapping Stations. Sustainability, 9(5), 700. doi:10.3390/su9050700XU, X., YAO, L., ZENG, P., LIU, Y., & CAI, T. (2015). Architecture and performance analysis of a smart battery charging and swapping operation service network for electric vehicles in China. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 3(2), 259-268. doi:10.1007/s40565-015-0118-yJing, Z., Fang, L., Lin, S., & Shao, W. (2014). Modeling for electric taxi load and optimization model for charging/swapping facilities of electric taxi. 2014 IEEE Conference and Expo Transportation Electrification Asia-Pacific (ITEC Asia-Pacific). doi:10.1109/itec-ap.2014.6941160Wang, Y., Ding, W., Huang, L., Wei, Z., Liu, H., & Stankovic, J. A. (2018). Toward Urban Electric Taxi Systems in Smart Cities: The Battery Swapping Challenge. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(3), 1946-1960. doi:10.1109/tvt.2017.2774447You, P., Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., Low, S. H., & Sun, Y. (2016). Optimal Charging Schedule for a Battery Switching Station Serving Electric Buses. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 31(5), 3473-3483. doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2015.2487273Yang, Z., Sun, L., Chen, J., Yang, Q., Chen, X., & Xing, K. (2014). Profit Maximization for Plug-In Electric Taxi With Uncertain Future Electricity Prices. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 29(6), 3058-3068. doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2014.2311120Yang, Z., Sun, L., Ke, M., Shi, Z., & Chen, J. (2014). Optimal Charging Strategy for Plug-In Electric Taxi With Time-Varying Profits. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 5(6), 2787-2797. doi:10.1109/tsg.2014.2354473Yang, J., Xu, Y., & Yang, Z. (2017). Regulating the Collective Charging Load of Electric Taxi Fleet via Real-Time Pricing. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 32(5), 3694-3703. doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2016.2643685Du, R., Liao, G., Zhang, E., & Wang, J. (2018). Battery charge or change, which is better? A case from Beijing, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, 698-711. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.021Yang, J., Dong, J., Lin, Z., & Hu, L. (2016). Predicting market potential and environmental benefits of deploying electric taxis in Nanjing, China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 49, 68-81. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2016.08.037You, P., Low, S. H., Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., & Lingkun Fu. (2016). Real-time recommendation algorithm of battery swapping stations for electric taxis. 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM). doi:10.1109/pesgm.2016.7741620Dai, Q., Cai, T., Duan, S., & Zhao, F. (2014). Stochastic Modeling and Forecasting of Load Demand for Electric Bus Battery-Swap Station. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 29(4), 1909-1917. doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2014.2308990Mohamed, M., Farag, H., El-Taweel, N., & Ferguson, M. (2017). Simulation of electric buses on a full transit network: Operational feasibility and grid impact analysis. Electric Power Systems Research, 142, 163-175. doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2016.09.032Zhang, X. (2018). Short-Term Load Forecasting for Electric Bus Charging Stations Based on Fuzzy Clustering and Least Squares Support Vector Machine Optimized by Wolf Pack Algorithm. Energies, 11(6), 1449. doi:10.3390/en11061449Ding, H., Hu, Z., & Song, Y. (2015). Value of the energy storage system in an electric bus fast charging station. Applied Energy, 157, 630-639. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.058Qin, N., Gusrialdi, A., Paul Brooker, R., & T-Raissi, A. (2016). Numerical analysis of electric bus fast charging strategies for demand charge reduction. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 386-396. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.014Huimiao Chen, Zechun Hu, Zhiwei Xu, Jiayi Li, Honggang Zhang, Xue Xia, … Mingwei Peng. (2016). Coordinated charging strategies for electric bus fast charging stations. 2016 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC). doi:10.1109/appeec.2016.7779677Chen, H., Hu, Z., Zhang, H., & Luo, H. (2018). Coordinated charging and discharging strategies for plug-in electric bus fast charging station with energy storage system. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 12(9), 2019-2028. doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.0636Gao, Y., Guo, S., Ren, J., Zhao, Z., Ehsan, A., & Zheng, Y. (2018). An Electric Bus Power Consumption Model and Optimization of Charging Scheduling Concerning Multi-External Factors. Energies, 11(8), 2060. doi:10.3390/en11082060Cheng, Y., & Tao, J. (2018). Optimization of A Micro Energy Network Integrated with Electric Bus Battery Swapping Station and Distributed PV. 2018 2nd IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2). doi:10.1109/ei2.2018.8582236Sebastiani, M. T., Luders, R., & Fonseca, K. V. O. (2016). Evaluating Electric Bus Operation for a Real-World BRT Public Transportation Using Simulation Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(10), 2777-2786. doi:10.1109/tits.2016.2525800Wang, Y., Huang, Y., Xu, J., & Barclay, N. (2017). Optimal recharging scheduling for urban electric buses: A case study in Davis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 100, 115-132. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2017.01.001Liu, Z., Song, Z., & He, Y. (2018). Planning of Fast-Charging Stations for a Battery Electric Bus System under Energy Consumption Uncertainty. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672(8), 96-107. doi:10.1177/0361198118772953Leou, R.-C., & Hung, J.-J. (2017). Optimal Charging Schedule Planning and Economic Analysis for Electric Bus Charging Stations. Energies, 10(4), 483. doi:10.3390/en10040483Bak, D.-B., Bak, J.-S., & Kim, S.-Y. (2018). Strategies for Implementing Public Service Electric Bus Lines by Charging Type in Daegu Metropolitan City, South Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3386. doi:10.3390/su10103386Chen, Z., Yin, Y., & Song, Z. (2018). A cost-competitiveness analysis of charging infrastructure for electric bus operations. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 93, 351-366. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.06.006Cheng, Y., Wang, W., Ding, Z., & He, Z. (2019). Electric bus fast charging station resource planning consid

Energy and cost management in shared heterogeneous network deployments

Pla de Doctorat industrial de la Generalitat de CatalunyaDuring the recent years, a huge augmentation of the data traffic volume has been noticed, while a further steep increase is expected in the following years. As a result, questions have been raised over the years about the energy consumption needs of the wireless telecommunication networks, their carbon dioxide emissions and their operational expenses. Aiming at meeting the high traffic demands with flat energy consumption and flat incurred expenses, mobile network operators (MNOs) have opted to improve their position (i) by deploying heterogeneous networks (HetNets), which are consisted of macrocell base stations (MBSs) and small cell base stations (SBSs) and (ii) by sharing their infrastructure. However, questions could be raised about the extend to which HetNet densification is of aid. Given that network planning is executed according to high traffic load volumes, BS underutilisation during low-traffic hours cannot be neglected. Similarly, the aggregated energy needs of multiple SBSs equals the ones of an energy hungry MBS, having thus a respectable share of the net energy consumption. In this context, a set of research opportunities have been identified. This thesis provides contribution toward the achievement of a greener and more cost efficient operation of HetNet deployments, where multiple stakeholders develop their activity and where energy support can have the form of various alternate schemes, including renewable energy (RE) sources. Depending on the network energy support, i.e., whether RE sources are used in the network or not, the main body of this thesis is divided in two research directions. The first part of the thesis uses the technology of switching off strategies in order to explore their efficiency in terms of both energy and costs in a HetNet. The HetNet is assumed to be a roaming-based cooperative activity of multiple MNOs that is powered exclusively by grid energy. A switching off and a cost allocation scheme are proposed, using as criteria the BS type, the BS load and the roaming cost for traffic offloading. The performance of the proposed schemes is evaluated with respect to energy efficiency, cost savings and fairness, using computer-based simulations. The second part of the thesis explores energy and cost management issues in energy harvesting (EH) HetNet deployments where EH-BSs use an EH system (EHS), an energy storage system (ESS) and the smart grid (SG) as energy procurement sources. The EH-HetNet is assumed a two-tier network deployment of EH-MBSs that are passively shared among an MNO set and EH-SBSs that are provided to MNOs by an infrastructure provider. Taking into consideration the infrastructure location and the variety of stakeholders involved in the network deployment, approaches of RE exchange (REE) are proposed as a cooperative RE sharing for the shared EH-MBSs, based on bankruptcy theory, and a non-cooperative, aggregator-assisted RE trading, based on double auctions, for the EH-SBSs. The performance of the proposed schemes is evaluated in terms of the hours of independence of the studied system from the SG, the fairness regulated by the provided solution and the economical payoffs extracted for the stakeholdersDurante los últimos años, se ha notado un aumento enorme del volumen de tráfico de datos, mientras que se espera un nuevo aumento en los próximos años. Como resultado, se han planteado preguntas sobre las necesidades de consumo de energía de las redes inalámbricas de telecomunicaciones, sus emisiones de dióxido de carbono y sus gastos operativos. Con el objetivo de satisfacer las altas demandas de tráfico con consumo de energía constante y con gastos incurridos constantes, además de utilizar soluciones basadas en la nube, los operadores de redes móviles (MNOs) han optado por mejorar su posición (i) desplegando redes heterogéneas (HetNets), que consisten en estaciones base de macro-células (MBSs) y estaciones base de células pequeñas (SBSs), y (ii) compartiendo su infraestructura. Sin embargo, podrían plantearse preguntas sobre hasta qué punto la densificación de una HetNet es de ayuda. Dado que la planificación de la red se ejecuta de acuerdo con los volúmenes de carga de tráfico más elevados, no se puede descuidar la subutilización de las estaciones base (BS) durante las horas de poco tráfico. De manera similar, las necesidades de energía agregadas de múltiples SBSs son iguales a las de una MBS que consume mucha energía, teniendo así una parte respetable del consumo neto de energía. En este contexto, se ha identificado un conjunto de oportunidades de investigación. Esta tesis contribuye al logro de una operación más ecológica y rentable de las implementaciones de HetNet, donde múltiples partes interesadas desarrollan su actividad y donde el apoyo energético puede tener la forma de varios esquemas alternativos, incluidas las fuentes de energía renovables (RE). Dependiendo del soporte de energía de red, es decir, si las fuentes de RE se usan en la red o no, el cuerpo principal de esta tesis se divide en dos direcciones de investigación. La primera parte de la tesis utiliza la tecnología de las estrategias de apagado con el objetivo de explorar su eficiencia en términos de energía y gastos en una HetNet. Se asume que la HetNet es una actividad cooperativa basada en la itinerancia de múltiples MNO que se alimenta exclusivamente de energía de la red. Se propone un esquema de desconexión y de asignación de costes, que utiliza como criterios el tipo de BS, la carga de BS y el coste de la itinerancia para la descarga de tráfico. El rendimiento de los esquemas propuestos se evalúa con respecto a la eficiencia energética, el ahorro de costes y la equidad, usando simulaciones en computadora. La segunda parte de la tesis explora los problemas de gestión de energía y de costes en las implementaciones de HetNet donde las estaciones base recolectan energía usando un sistema EH (EHS), un sistema de almacenamiento de energía (ESS) y la red eléctrica inteligente (SG) como sistemas de adquisición de energía. Se asume que el EH-HetNet es una implementación de redes de dos niveles donde los EH-MBSs se comparten pasivamente entre un conjunto de MNOs y EH-SBSs se proporcionan a los MNOs de un proveedor de infraestructura. Teniendo en cuenta la ubicación de la infraestructura y la variedad de partes interesadas e involucradas en el despliegue de la red, se proponen enfoques de intercambio de RE (REE) como un intercambio cooperativo de RE para los EH-MBS compartidos, basado en la teoría de bancarrota, y un no cooperativo comercio de RE para los EH-SBSs, que es asistido por un agregador y basado en las subastas dobles. El rendimiento de los esquemas propuestos se evalúa en términos de las horas de independencia del sistema estudiado con respecto al SG, la imparcialidad regulada por la solución proporcionada y los beneficios económicos extraídos para las interesadas.Postprint (published version