990 research outputs found

    Student-Centered Learning: Functional Requirements for Integrated Systems to Optimize Learning

    Get PDF
    The realities of the 21st-century learner require that schools and educators fundamentally change their practice. "Educators must produce college- and career-ready graduates that reflect the future these students will face. And, they must facilitate learning through means that align with the defining attributes of this generation of learners."Today, we know more than ever about how students learn, acknowledging that the process isn't the same for every student and doesn't remain the same for each individual, depending upon maturation and the content being learned. We know that students want to progress at a pace that allows them to master new concepts and skills, to access a variety of resources, to receive timely feedback on their progress, to demonstrate their knowledge in multiple ways and to get direction, support and feedback fromโ€”as well as collaborate withโ€”experts, teachers, tutors and other students.The result is a growing demand for student-centered, transformative digital learning using competency education as an underpinning.iNACOL released this paper to illustrate the technical requirements and functionalities that learning management systems need to shift toward student-centered instructional models. This comprehensive framework will help districts and schools determine what systems to use and integrate as they being their journey toward student-centered learning, as well as how systems integration aligns with their organizational vision, educational goals and strategic plans.Educators can use this report to optimize student learning and promote innovation in their own student-centered learning environments. The report will help school leaders understand the complex technologies needed to optimize personalized learning and how to use data and analytics to improve practices, and can assist technology leaders in re-engineering systems to support the key nuances of student-centered learning

    Assessing collaborative learning: big data, analytics and university futures

    Get PDF
    Traditionally, assessment in higher education has focused on the performance of individual students. This focus has been a practical as well as an epistemic one: methods of assessment are constrained by the technology of the day, and in the past they required the completion by individuals under controlled conditions, of set-piece academic exercises. Recent advances in learning analytics, drawing upon vast sets of digitally-stored student activity data, open new practical and epistemic possibilities for assessment and carry the potential to transform higher education. It is becoming practicable to assess the individual and collective performance of team members working on complex projects that closely simulate the professional contexts that graduates will encounter. In addition to academic knowledge this authentic assessment can include a diverse range of personal qualities and dispositions that are key to the computer-supported cooperative working of professionals in the knowledge economy. This paper explores the implications of such opportunities for the purpose and practices of assessment in higher education, as universities adapt their institutional missions to address 21st Century needs. The paper concludes with a strong recommendation for university leaders to deploy analytics to support and evaluate the collaborative learning of students working in realistic contexts

    Virtual learning environments and digital tools for implementing formative assessment of transversal skills in STEM

    Get PDF
    This publication is the fourth report in a series of reports part of the Assessment of Transversal Skills in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (ATS STEM) project. The report is written within the framework of the project ATS STEM (http://www.atsstem.eu/). Assessment of Transversal Skills in STEM is an innovative policy experimentation project being conducted across 8 EU countries and involving a partner network of 12 educational institutions

    Continuous Assessment in Agile Learning using Visualizations and Clustering of Activity Data to Analyze Student Behavior

    Get PDF
    abstract: Software engineering education today is a technologically advanced and rapidly evolving discipline. Being a discipline where students not only design but also build new technology, it is important that they receive a hands on learning experience in the form of project based courses. To maximize the learning benefit, students must conduct project-based learning activities in a consistent rhythm, or cadence. Project-based courses that are augmented with a system of frequent, formative feedback helps students constantly evaluate their progress and leads them away from a deadline driven approach to learning. One aspect of this research is focused on evaluating the use of a tool that tracks student activity as a means of providing frequent, formative feedback. This thesis measures the impact of the tool on student compliance to the learning process. A personalized dashboard with quasi real time visual reports and notifications are provided to undergraduate and graduate software engineering students. The impact of these visual reports on compliance is measured using the log traces of dashboard activity and a survey instrument given multiple times during the course. A second aspect of this research is the application of learning analytics to understand patterns of student compliance. This research employs unsupervised machine learning algorithms to identify unique patterns of student behavior observed in the context of a project-based course. Analyzing and labeling these unique patterns of behavior can help instructors understand typical student characteristics. Further, understanding these behavioral patterns can assist an instructor in making timely, targeted interventions. In this research, datasets comprising of studentโ€™s daily activity and graded scores from an under graduate software engineering course is utilized for the purpose of identifying unique patterns of student behavior.Dissertation/ThesisMasters Thesis Engineering 201

    Towards highly informative learning analytics

    Get PDF
    Among various trending topics that can be investigated in the field of educational technology, there is a clear and high demand for using artificial intelligence (AI) and educational data to improve the whole learning and teaching cycle. This spans from collecting and estimating the prior knowledge of learners for a certain subject to the actual learning process and its assessment. AI in education cuts across almost all educational technology disciplines and is key to many other technological innovations for educational institutions. The use of data to inform decision-making in education and training is not new, but the scope and scale of its potential impact on teaching and learning have silently increased by orders of magnitude over the last few years. The release of ChatGPT was another driver to finally make everyone aware of the potential effects of AI technology in the digital education system of today. We are now at a stage where data can be automatically harvested at previously unimagined levels of granularity and variety. Analysis of these data with AI has the potential to provide evidence-based insights into learnersโ€™ abilities and patterns of behaviour that, in turn, can provide crucial action points to guide curriculum and course design, personalised assistance, generate assessments, and the development of new educational offerings. AI in education has many connected research communities like Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), Educational Data Mining (EDM), or Learning Analytics (LA). LA is the term that is used for research, studies, and applications that try to understand and support the behaviour of learners based on large sets of collected data

    ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ค‘๊ตญ ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์ธ์‹

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์‚ฌ๋ฒ”๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ต์œกํ•™๊ณผ, 2021. 2. ์กฐ์˜ํ™˜.์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ต์œก ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ(AI)์˜ ๋„์ž…์ด ํฐ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์„ ๋Œ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ AI ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ ํ•™์Šต ๋ถ„์„์ด ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•œ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์€ ์ง€๊ธˆ๊ป ์‹คํ˜„๋˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์› ๋˜ ๋งž์ถคํ˜• ํ•™์Šต(personalized learning)๊ณผ ์ ์‘์  ํ•™์Šต(adaptive learning)์— ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๋ฐœ์ „ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ(AI-based education platform)์€ ํ•™์Šต์ž์˜ ํ–‰๋™ ์ถ”์  ๋“ฑ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ด๋“ค์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ง„๋‹จ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ ๋’ค ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ† ๋Œ€๋กœ ํ•™์Šต์ž์—๊ฒŒ ์ธ์ง€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์— ๋งž๋Š” ๋งž์ถคํ˜• ํ•™์Šต์ž์›๊ณผ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์€ ๊ต์‚ฌ์™€ ํ•™์ƒ์—๊ฒŒ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ํ•™์Šต ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ๋งž์ถคํ˜• ํ•™์Šต์— ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ์˜๋ฏธ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์„ ํ–‰ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋„ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿผ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์˜ ์ฐจ์›์—์„œ๋‚˜ ์—„๋ฐ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•ด์™”์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์ธ์‹๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋“œ๋ฌผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ต์‚ฌ๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ต์œก ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ต์œก ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ๊ต์œก ๋„์ž…์— ์žˆ์–ด ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์˜ ์ธ์‹๊ณผ ์˜๊ฒฌ์€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์˜ ์ธ์‹์„ ํƒ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์•„๋ž˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์งˆ์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์ค‘๊ตญ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ์ค‘ํ•™๊ต ๊ต์œก์— ํ™œ์šฉ ์žˆ์–ด ์–ด๋– ํ•œ ์žฅ์ ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜๋Š”๊ฐ€? ๋‘˜์งธ, ์ค‘๊ตญ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ๊ณผ ์ค‘ํ•™๊ต ๊ต์ˆ˜ ํ™œ๋™ ์š”์†Œ ๊ฐ„ ์–ด๋– ํ•œ ๋ชจ์ˆœ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜๋Š”๊ฐ€? ์…‹์งธ, ์ค‘๊ตญ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์„ ์ค‘ํ•™๊ต ๊ต์œก์— ๋„์ž…ํ•  ๋•Œ ๋ฌด์—‡์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜๋Š”๊ฐ€? ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ค‘๊ตญ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ์‹ฌ์ธต ๋ฉด๋‹ด์„ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฌธํ—Œ ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฉด๋‹ด ์งˆ๋ฌธ์ง€๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๋˜ ๋ˆˆ๋ฉ์ดํ‘œ์ง‘๋ฒ• (snowball sampling)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ค‘๊ตญ ์ค‘ํ•™๊ต ๊ต์‚ฌ 14๋ช…์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž๋กœ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ ์ •๋œ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ฐ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•ฝ 1์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ •๋„ ๋ฉด๋‹ด์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋…น์Œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฉด๋‹ด์ด ๋๋‚œ ํ›„ ๋…น์Œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์ „์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ฃผ์ œ๋ถ„์„์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฉด๋‹ด ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์ฝ”๋“œ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฉด๋‹ด ์ž๋ฃŒ ์†์—์„œ ์ฃผ์ œ๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฌธ์ œ 2๋ฒˆ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ํ™œ์šฉ๊ณผ ๊ต์ˆ˜ ํ•™์Šตํ™œ๋™ ๋‚ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์š”์†Œ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋ชจ์ˆœ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ™œ๋™์ด๋ก ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ํ‹€๋กœ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์ œ 1์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฃผ์ œ 4๊ฐœ, ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์ œ 2์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฃผ์ œ 6๊ฐœ, ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์ œ 3์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฃผ์ œ 4๊ฐœ๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์˜ ์žฅ์ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ฆ‰๊ฐ์ ์ธ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ ์ œ๊ณต, ๊ต์ˆ˜ํ•™์Šต ์ง€์›, ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์—…๋ฌด๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฐ์†Œ ๋“ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ต์ˆ˜ํ•™์Šต ์ž์›์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์•„์šธ๋Ÿฌ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์— ์žˆ์–ด ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ต์ˆ˜ํ•™์Šต ํ™œ๋™๊ณผ ์ƒ์ถฉ๋œ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์„ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์˜ ์ถ”์ฒœ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์ฐจ๋ณ„ํ™”๋œ ํ•™์ƒ๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ ์ž˜ ์ ์šฉ๋˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ธฐ์กด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ•™์Šต ์ž์›์„ ์ž˜ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋ถˆํŽธํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•  ๋•Œ ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์ง€์ ์žฌ์‚ฐ๊ถŒ์„ ๋ณดํ˜ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•œ ๊ทœ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ํ•™๋ถ€๋ชจ๋“ค์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ•™์Šต์ž์˜ ์ธํ„ฐ๋„ท ๋‚จ์šฉ๊ณผ ์‹œ๋ ฅ ์ €ํ•˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์šฐ๋ คํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ ์ค‘๊ตญ์˜ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ฌธํ™”์  ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ๊ต์œก ํŠน์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•™์ƒ๋“ค์˜ ๊ธ€์”จ ์“ฐ๊ธฐ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ•™๊ต ๋‚ด ์ „์ž๊ธฐ๊ธฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์ œํ•œ๋„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘์˜ ์ง€์†์„ฑ๊ณผ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์œ„์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋“ค์ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ทœ์น™ ๋งˆ๋ จ๊ณผ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์™„ํ™”๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์‹ค์ œ ์š”๊ตฌ์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ๊ณผ์ •์— ๊ต์œก ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€์™€ ๊ต์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ค‘๊ตญ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ธ์‹์„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ๊ต์ˆ˜ํ•™์Šต์—์„œ์˜ ์žฅ์ ๊ณผ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ ์„ ๋ฐํ˜”๋‹ค. ์•„์šธ๋Ÿฌ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ๊ต์œก ๋ถ„์•ผ์— ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ๋กœ ๋„์ž…๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๊ทœ์น™, ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ์ˆ , ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ต์œก ๊ณตํ•™์˜ ์ฐจ์›์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ทœ๋ฒ”๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๊ฐœ์„ ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ด ํ–ฅํ›„ ๊ต์œก ๋ถ„์•ผ์˜ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ๋„์ž…์— ํ™œ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค๋ฉด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ต์œก ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „์—๋„ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋œ๋‹ค.In recent years, the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) in education has attracted widespread attention. In particular, the AI-based education platform based on the combination of AI technology and learning analysis brings new light to the long-standing difficulties in personalized learning and adaptive learning. The AI-based education platform analyzes learners' characteristics by collecting their data and tracking their learning behavior. It then generates cognitive diagnosis for learners and provides them with personalized learning resources and adaptive feedback that match their cognitive level based on systematic analysis. With the help of the AI-based education platform, teachers and students can get real-time educational data and analysis result๏ผŒas well as the feedback and treatment corresponding to the results. Previous studies have already demonstrated and proved its positive significance to personalized learning. However, these studies mostly start from a model development perspective or in a rigorous laboratory environment. There has been little research on teachers' perceptions of AI-based education platform. As a direct user of AI educational technologies, teachers' perceptions and suggestions are vital for introducing AIEd in education. In this study, the researcher explored teachers' perceptions of using AI-based education platform in teaching. The study conducted qualitative research to address the following research questions: 1) How do Chinese teachers perceive the advantages of AI-based education platforms for teaching and learning in secondary school? 2) How do Chinese teachers perceive the contradictions between AI-based education platforms and the secondary school system? 3๏ผ‰How do Chinese teachers suggest applying AI-based education platforms in secondary school? And it referred to the in-depth online interview with Chinese teachers who had experience with AI-based education platform. Interview questions were constructed through the literature review, and 14 secondary school teachers were selected by the snowball sampling method. The interviews lasted for an average of one hour per teacher and were transcribed from the audio recordings to text documents when finished. Afterward, the data were analyzed using thematic analysis, including generating initial codes, searching and reviewing the categories, and deriving the themes finally. Notably, for research question two, the researcher used the activity theory framework to analyze the contradictions among the use of the AI-based education platform and the various elements of the teaching and learning activities. Finally, four themes for research question 1, six themes for research question 2, and four themes for research question 3 were derived. As for the advantages, teachers believe that AI-based education platforms can provide instant feedback, targeted and systematic teaching support, and reduce teachers' workload. At the same time, AI-based education platforms can also integrate teaching resources in different areas. Teachers also recognized that the AI-based education platforms might trigger contradictions in existing teaching activities. They are aware of the situation that the recommended model of the AI-based education platform is not suitable for all levels of students; that a large number of learning resources are not classified properly enough to meet the needs of teachers, and that there lack clear rules and regulations to protect teachers' intellectual property rights when using the platform. Besides, parents are also concerned about the potential risk of internet addiction and vision problems using AI-based education platforms. Moreover, the use of the AI-based education platform may also affect students' ability to write Chinese characters due to the socio-historical background and educational characteristics in China. Furthermore, the restricted use of electronic devices on campus may also impact the consistent and effective education data collection. Teachers believe that these problems can be solved by improving rules and AI technology. Moreover, to make the platform more in line with the actual teaching requirements, teachers and education experts can also be involved in the development process of AI-based education platform. This study explored how Chinese teachers perceive the AI-based education platform and found that the AI-based education platform was conducive to personalized teaching and learning. At the same time, this study put forward some suggestions from the perspective of rules, AI technology, and educational technology, hoping to provide a good value for the future large-scale introduction of AI-based education platforms in education.CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Problem Statement 1 1.2. Purpose of Research 7 1.3. Definition of Terms 8 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 10 2.1. AI in Education 10 2.1.1 AI for Learning and Teaching 10 2.1.2 AI-based Education Platform 14 2.1.3 Teachers' Perception on AI-based Education Platform 18 2.2. Activity Theory 20 CHAPTER 3. RESEARCH METHOD 23 3.1. Research Design 23 3.2. Participants 25 3.3. Instrumentation 26 3.3.1 Potential Value of AI System in Education 26 3.4. Data Collection 33 3.5. Data Analysis 34 CHAPTER 4. FINDINGS 36 4.1. Advantages of Using AI-based Education Platform 36 4.1.1 Instant Feedback 37 4.1.2 Targeted and Systematic Teaching Support 42 4.1.3 Educational Resources Sharing 46 4.1.4 Reducing Workload 49 4.2. Tensions of Using AI-based Education Platform 51 4.2.1 Inadequately Meet the Needs of Teachers 52 4.2.2 Failure to Satisfy Low and High Achievers 54 4.2.3 Intellectual Property Violation 56 4.2.4 Guardian's Concern 57 4.2.5 School Rules about the Use of Electronic Devices 58 4.2.6 Implication for Chinese Character Education 59 4.3. Suggestion of Using AI-based Education Platform 61 4.3.1 Improving Rules of Using the AI-based Education Platform 61 4.3.2 Improving Rules of Protecting Teachers Right 62 4.3.3 Improving AI Technology 64 4.3.4 Participatory Design 66 CHAPTER 5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 68 5.1. Discussion 68 5.2. Conclusion 72 REFERENCE 75 APPENDIX 1 98 APPENDIX 2 100 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 112Maste

    Score Reporting Research and Applications

    Get PDF
    Score reporting research is no longer limited to the psychometric properties of scores and subscores. Today, it encompasses design and evaluation for particular audiences, appropriate use of assessment outcomes, the utility and cognitive affordances of graphical representations, interactive report systems, and more. By studying how audiences understand the intended messages conveyed by score reports, researchers and industry professionals can develop more effective mechanisms for interpreting and using assessment data. Score Reporting Research and Applications brings together experts who design and evaluate score reports in both K-12 and higher education contexts and who conduct foundational research in related areas. The first section covers foundational validity issues in the use and interpretation of test scores; design principles drawn from related areas including cognitive science, human-computer interaction, and data visualization; and research on presenting specific types of assessment information to various audiences. The second section presents real-world applications of score report design and evaluation and of the presentation of assessment information. Across ten chapters, this volume offers a comprehensive overview of new techniques and possibilities in score reporting

    Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, Volume 7, Issue 1: APLU Special Issue on Implementing Adaptive Learning At Scale

    Get PDF
    The second of two Specials Issues of the CIEE journal to have been produced and guest edited by the Personalized Learning Consortium (PLC) of the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (APLU), featuring important research resulting from university initiatives to launch, implement and scale up the use of adaptive courseware and the strategies of adaptive learning

    Serious games for learning : a model and a reference architecture for efficient game development

    Get PDF

    Serious games for learning : a model and a reference architecture for efficient game development

    Get PDF
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore