Interprocedural Type Specialization of JavaScript Programs Without Type Analysis

Dynamically typed programming languages such as Python and JavaScript defer type checking to run time. VM implementations can improve performance by eliminating redundant dynamic type checks. However, type inference analyses are often costly and involve tradeoffs between compilation time and resulting precision. This has lead to the creation of increasingly complex multi-tiered VM architectures. Lazy basic block versioning is a simple JIT compilation technique which effectively removes redundant type checks from critical code paths. This novel approach lazily generates type-specialized versions of basic blocks on-the-fly while propagating context-dependent type information. This approach does not require the use of costly program analyses, is not restricted by the precision limitations of traditional type analyses. This paper extends lazy basic block versioning to propagate type information interprocedurally, across function call boundaries. Our implementation in a JavaScript JIT compiler shows that across 26 benchmarks, interprocedural basic block versioning eliminates more type tag tests on average than what is achievable with static type analysis without resorting to code transformations. On average, 94.3% of type tag tests are eliminated, yielding speedups of up to 56%. We also show that our implementation is able to outperform Truffle/JS on several benchmarks, both in terms of execution time and compilation time.Comment: 10 pages, 10 figures, submitted to CGO 201

Proxy compilation for Java via a code migration technique

There is an increasing trend that intermediate representations (IRs) are used to deliver programs in more and more languages, such as Java. Although Java can provide many advantages, including a wider portability and better optimisation opportunities on execution, it introduces extra overhead by requiring an IR translation for the program execution. For maximum execution performance, an optimising compiler is placed in the runtime to selectively optimise code regions regarded as “hotspots”. This common approach has been effectively deployed in many implementation of programming languages. However, the computational resources demanded by this approach made it less efficient, or even difficult to deploy directly in a resourceconstrained environment. One implementation approach is to use a remote compilation technique to support compilation during the execution. The work presented in this dissertation supports the thesis that execution performance can be improved by the use of efficient optimising compilation by using a proxy dynamic optimising compiler. After surveying various approaches to the design and implementation of remote compilation, a proxy compilation system called Apus is defined. To demonstrate the effectiveness of using a dynamic optimising compiler as a proxy compiler, a complete proxy compilation system is written based on a research-oriented Java VirtualMachine (JVM). The proxy compilation system is discussed in detail, showing how to deliver remote binaries and manage a cache of binaries by using a code migration approach. The proxy compilation client shows how the proxy compilation service is integrated with the selective optimisation system to maximise execution performance. The results of empirical measurements of the system are given, showing the efficiency of code optimisation from either the proxy compilation service and a local binary cache. The conclusion of this work is that Java execution performance can be improved by efficient optimising compilation with a proxy compilation service by using a code migration technique

Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Domain-Specific Language Design and Implementation (DSLDI 2015)

The goal of the DSLDI workshop is to bring together researchers and practitioners interested in sharing ideas on how DSLs should be designed, implemented, supported by tools, and applied in realistic application contexts. We are both interested in discovering how already known domains such as graph processing or machine learning can be best supported by DSLs, but also in exploring new domains that could be targeted by DSLs. More generally, we are interested in building a community that can drive forward the development of modern DSLs. These informal post-proceedings contain the submitted talk abstracts to the 3rd DSLDI workshop (DSLDI'15), and a summary of the panel discussion on Language Composition

Guided Automatic Binary Parallelisation

For decades, the software industry has amassed a vast repository of pre-compiled libraries and executables which are still valuable and actively in use. However, for a significant fraction of these binaries, most of the source code is absent or is written in old languages, making it practically impossible to recompile them for new generations of hardware. As the number of cores in chip multi-processors (CMPs) continue to scale, the performance of this legacy software becomes increasingly sub-optimal. Rewriting new optimised and parallel software would be a time-consuming and expensive task. Without source code, existing automatic performance enhancing and parallelisation techniques are not applicable for legacy software or parts of new applications linked with legacy libraries. In this dissertation, three tools are presented to address the challenge of optimising legacy binaries. The first, GBR (Guided Binary Recompilation), is a tool that recompiles stripped application binaries without the need for the source code or relocation information. GBR performs static binary analysis to determine how recompilation should be undertaken, and produces a domain-specific hint program. This hint program is loaded and interpreted by the GBR dynamic runtime, which is built on top of the open-source dynamic binary translator, DynamoRIO. In this manner, complicated recompilation of the target binary is carried out to achieve optimised execution on a real system. The problem of limited dataflow and type information is addressed through cooperation between the hint program and JIT optimisation. The utility of GBR is demonstrated by software prefetch and vectorisation optimisations to achieve performance improvements compared to their original native execution. The second tool is called BEEP (Binary Emulator for Estimating Parallelism), an extension to GBR for binary instrumentation. BEEP is used to identify potential thread-level parallelism through static binary analysis and binary instrumentation. BEEP performs preliminary static analysis on binaries and encodes all statically-undecided questions into a hint program. The hint program is interpreted by GBR so that on-demand binary instrumentation codes are inserted to answer the questions from runtime information. BEEP incorporates a few parallel cost models to evaluate identified parallelism under different parallelisation paradigms. The third tool is named GABP (Guided Automatic Binary Parallelisation), an extension to GBR for parallelisation. GABP focuses on loops from sequential application binaries and automatically extracts thread-level parallelism from them on-the-fly, under the direction of the hint program, for efficient parallel execution. It employs a range of runtime schemes, such as thread-level speculation and synchronisation, to handle runtime data dependences. GABP achieves a geometric mean of speedup of 1.91x on binaries from SPEC CPU2006 on a real x86-64 eight-core system compared to native sequential execution. Performance is obtained for SPEC CPU2006 executables compiled from a variety of source languages and by different compilers.St John's Benefactor Scholarship ARM Sponsorshi

libVersioningCompiler: An easy-to-use library for dynamic generation and invocation of multiple code versions

We present libVersioningCompiler, a C++ library designed to support the dynamic generation of multiple versions of the same compute kernel in a HPC scenario. It can be used to provide continuous optimization, code specialization based on the input data or on workload changes, or otherwise to dynamically adjust the application, without the burden of a full dynamic compiler. The library supports multiple underlying compilers but specifically targets the llvm framework.We also provide examples of use, showing the overhead of the library, and providing guidelines for its efficient use

Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Domain-Specific Language Design and Implementation (DSLDI'15)

The goal of the DSLDI workshop is to bring together researchers and practitioners interested in sharing ideas on how DSLs should be designed, implemented, supported by tools, and applied in realistic application contexts. We are both interested in discovering how already known domains such as graph processing or machine learning can be best supported by DSLs, but also in exploring new domains that could be targeted by DSLs. More generally, we are interested in building a community that can drive forward the development of modern DSLs. These informal post-proceedings contain the submitted talk abstracts to the 3rd DSLDI workshop (DSLDI'15), and a summary of the panel discussion on Language Composition

Observable dynamic compilation

Managed language platforms such as the Java Virtual Machine rely on a dynamic compiler to achieve high performance. Despite the benefits that dynamic compilation provides, it also introduces some challenges to program profiling. Firstly, profilers based on bytecode instrumentation may yield wrong results in the presence of an optimizing dynamic compiler, either due to not being aware of optimizations, or because the inserted instrumentation code disrupts such optimizations. To avoid such perturbations, we present a technique to make profilers based on bytecode instrumentation aware of the optimizations performed by the dynamic compiler, and make the dynamic compiler aware of the inserted code. We implement our technique for separating inserted instrumentation code from base-program code in Oracle's Graal compiler, integrating our extension into the OpenJDK Graal project. We demonstrate its significance with concrete profilers. On the one hand, we improve accuracy of existing profiling techniques, for example, to quantify the impact of escape analysis on bytecode-level allocation profiling, to analyze object life-times, and to evaluate the impact of method inlining when profiling method invocations. On the other hand, we also illustrate how our technique enables new kinds of profilers, such as a profiler for non-inlined callsites, and a testing framework for locating performance bugs in dynamic compiler implementations. Secondly, the lack of profiling support at the intermediate representation (IR) level complicates the understanding of program behavior in the compiled code. This issue cannot be addressed by bytecode instrumentation because it cannot precisely capture the occurrence of IR-level operations. Binary instrumentation is not suited either, as it lacks a mapping from the collected low-level metrics to higher-level operations of the observed program. To fill this gap, we present an easy-to-use event-based framework for profiling operations at the IR level. We integrate the IR profiling framework in the Graal compiler, together with our instrumentation-separation technique. We illustrate our approach with a profiler that tracks the execution of memory barriers within compiled code. In addition, using a deoptimization profiler based on our IR profiling framework, we conduct an empirical study on deoptimization in the Graal compiler. We focus on situations which cause program execution to switch from machine code to the interpreter, and compare application performance using three different deoptimization strategies which influence the amount of extra compilation work done by Graal. Using an adaptive deoptimization strategy, we manage to improve the average start-up performance of benchmarks from the DaCapo, ScalaBench, and Octane suites by avoiding wasted compilation work. We also find that different deoptimization strategies have little impact on steady- state performance

On-stack replacement, distilled

On-stack replacement (OSR) is essential technology for adaptive optimization, allowing changes to code actively executing in a managed runtime. The engineering aspects of OSR are well-known among VM architects, with several implementations available to date. However, OSR is yet to be explored as a general means to transfer execution between related program versions, which can pave the road to unprecedented applications that stretch beyond VMs. We aim at filling this gap with a constructive and provably correct OSR framework, allowing a class of general-purpose transformation functions to yield a special-purpose replacement. We describe and evaluate an implementation of our technique in LLVM. As a novel application of OSR, we present a feasibility study on debugging of optimized code, showing how our techniques can be used to fix variables holding incorrect values at breakpoints due to optimizations