Web spider defense technique in wireless sensor networks

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are currently widely used in many environments. Some of them gather many critical data, which should be protected from intruders. Generally, when an intruder is detected in the WSN, its connection is immediately stopped. But this way does not let the network administrator gather information about the attacker and/or its purposes. In this paper, we present a bioinspired system that uses the procedure taken by the web spider when it wants to catch its prey. We will explain how all steps performed by the web spider are included in our system and we will detail the algorithm and protocol procedure. A real test bench has been implemented in order to validate our system. It shows the performance for different response times, the CPU and RAM consumption, and the average and maximum values for ping and tracert time responses using constant delay and exponential jitter.This work has been partially supported by the "Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion", through the "Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2008-2011" in the "Subprograma de Proyectos de Investigacion Fundamental", Project TEC2011-27516.Cánovas Solbes, A.; Lloret, J.; Macias Lopez, EM.; Suarez Sarmiento, A. (2014). Web spider defense technique in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. 2014:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/348606S172014Bri, D., Garcia, M., Lloret, J., & Dini, P. (2009). Real Deployments of Wireless Sensor Networks. 2009 Third International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications. doi:10.1109/sensorcomm.2009.69Sendra, S., Lloret, J., Garcia, M., & Toledo, J. F. (2011). Power Saving and Energy Optimization Techniques for Wireless Sensor Neworks (Invited Paper). Journal of Communications, 6(6). doi:10.4304/jcm.6.6.439-459Xie, M., Han, S., Tian, B., & Parvin, S. (2011). Anomaly detection in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 34(4), 1302-1325. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2011.03.004Yu, Y., Li, K., Zhou, W., & Li, P. (2012). Trust mechanisms in wireless sensor networks: Attack analysis and countermeasures. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(3), 867-880. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2011.03.005Zhu, W. T., Zhou, J., Deng, R. H., & Bao, F. (2012). Detecting node replication attacks in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(3), 1022-1034. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2012.01.002Maleh, Y., & Ezzati, A. (2013). A Review of Security Attacks and Intrusion Detection Schemes in Wireless Sensor Network. International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks, 5(6), 79-90. doi:10.5121/ijwmn.2013.5606Alrajeh, N. A., Khan, S., & Shams, B. (2013). Intrusion Detection Systems in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Review. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 9(5), 167575. doi:10.1155/2013/167575Sun, B., Osborne, L., Xiao, Y., & Guizani, S. (2007). Intrusion detection techniques in mobile ad hoc and wireless sensor networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 14(5), 56-63. doi:10.1109/mwc.2007.4396943Fatema, N., & Brad, R. (2013). Attacks and Counterattacks on Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Ad hoc, Sensor & Ubiquitous Computing, 4(6), 1-15. doi:10.5121/ijasuc.2013.4601Ankala, R. P., Kavitha, D., & Haritha, D. (2011). MOBILE AGENT BASED ROUTING in MANETS –ATTACKS & DEFENCES. Network Protocols and Algorithms, 3(4). doi:10.5296/npa.v3i4.1351Hylsberg Jacobsen, R., Zhang, Q., & Skjødeberg Toftegaard, T. (2011). Bioinspired Principles for Large-Scale Networked Sensor Systems: An Overview. Sensors, 11(4), 4137-4151. doi:10.3390/s110404137Kofahi, N. (2013). An Empirical Study to Compare the Performance of some Symmetric and Asymmetric Ciphers. International Journal of Security and Its Applications, 7(5), 1-16. doi:10.14257/ijsia.2013.7.5.01Sisodia, M. S., & Raghuwanshi, V. (2011). Anomaly Base Network Intrusion Detection by Using Random Decision Tree and Random Projection: A Fast Network Intrusion Detection Technique. Network Protocols and Algorithms, 3(4). doi:10.5296/npa.v3i4.1342Zhijie, H., & Ruchuang, W. (2012). Intrusion Detection for Wireless Sensor Network Based on Traffic Prediction Model. Physics Procedia, 25, 2072-2080. doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2012.03.352Al-Gharabally, N., El-Sayed, N., Al-Mulla, S., & Ahmad, I. (2009). Wireless honeypots. Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Information Science, Technology and Applications - ISTA ’09. doi:10.1145/1551950.1551969Gopinath V.Success analysis of deception in wireless sensor networks [M.S. thesis]2010Oklahoma State UniversityZhongshan Zhang, Keping Long, Jianping Wang, & Dressler, F. (2014). On Swarm Intelligence Inspired Self-Organized Networking: Its Bionic Mechanisms, Designing Principles and Optimization Approaches. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(1), 513-537. doi:10.1109/surv.2013.062613.00014Rathore, H., & Jha, S. (2013). Bio-inspired machine learning based Wireless Sensor Network security. 2013 World Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing. doi:10.1109/nabic.2013.6617852Alrajeh, N. A., & Lloret, J. (2013). Intrusion Detection Systems Based on Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 9(10), 351047. doi:10.1155/2013/351047Amirkolaei M. K.Enhancing bio-inspired intrusion response in Ad-hoc networks [Ph.D. thesis]August 2013Edinburgh, UKEdinburgh Napier Universityhttp://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/6533/Muraleedharan, R., & Osadciw, L. A. (2009). An intrusion detection framework for Sensor Networks using Honeypot and Swarm Intelligence. Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services. doi:10.4108/icst.mobiquitous2009.7084Hortos, W. S. (2012). Bio-inspired, cross-layer protocol design for intrusion detection and identification in wireless sensor networks. 37th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks -- Workshops. doi:10.1109/lcnw.2012.6424040Benahmed, K., Merabti, M., & Haffaf, H. (2012). Inspired Social Spider Behavior for Secure Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Mobile Computing and Multimedia Communications, 4(4), 1-10. doi:10.4018/jmcmc.2012100101Herberstein, M. E. (Ed.). (2009). Spider Behaviour. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511974496Ficco, M. (2010). Achieving Security by Intrusion-Tolerance Based on Event Correlation. Network Protocols and Algorithms, 2(3). doi:10.5296/npa.v2i3.42

Spider monkey optimization routing protocol for wireless sensor networks

Uneven energy consumption (UEC) is latent trouble in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) that feature a multiple motion pattern and a multi-hop routing. UEC often splits the network, reduces network life, and leads to performance degradation. Sometimes, improving energy consumption is more complicated because it does not reduce energy consumption only, but it also extends network life. This makes energy consumption balancing critical to WSN design calling for energy-efficient routing protocols that increase network life. Some energy-saving protocols have been applied to make the energy consumption among all nodes inside the network equilibrate in the expectancy and end power in almost all nodes simultaneously. This work has suggested a protocol of energy-saving routing named spider monkey optimization routing protocol (SMORP), which aims to probe the issue of network life in WSNs. The proposed protocol reduces excessive routing messages that may lead to the wastage of significant energy by recycling frequent information from the source node into the sink. This routing protocol can choose the optimal routing path. That is the preferable node can be chosen from nodes of the candidate in the sending ways by preferring the energy of maximum residual, the minimum traffic load, and the least distance to the sink. Simulation results have proved the effectiveness of the proposed protocol in terms of decreasing end-to-end delay, reducing energy consumption compared to well-known routing protocols

Algorithms based on spider daddy long legs for finding the optimal route in securing mobile ad hoc networks

Mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) are wireless networks that are subject to severe attacks, such as the black hole attack. One of the goals in the research is to find a method to prevent black hole attacks without decreasing network throughput or increasing routing overhead. The routing mechanism in define uses route requests (RREQs; for discovering routes) and route replies (RREPs; for receiving paths). However, this mechanism is vulnerable to attacks by malicious black hole nodes. The mechanism is developed to find the shortest secure path and to reduce overhead using the information that is available in the routing tables as an input to propose a more complex nature-inspired algorithm. The new method is called the Daddy Long-Legs Algorithm (PGO-DLLA), which modifies the standard AODV and optimizes the routing process. This method avoids dependency exclusively on the hop counts and destination sequence numbers (DSNs) that are exploited by malicious nodes in the standard AODV protocol. The experiment by performance metrics End-to-End delay and packet delivery ratio are compared in order to determine the best effort traffic. The results showed the PGO-DLLA improvement of the shortest and secure routing from black hole attack in MANET. In addition, the results indicate better performance than the related works algorithm with respect to all metrics excluding throughput which AntNet is best in routing when the pause time be more than 40 seconds. PGODLLA is able to improve the route discovery against the black hole attacks in AODV. Experiments in this thesis have shown that PGO-DLLA is able to reduce the normalized routing load, end-to-end delay, and packet loss and has a good throughput and packet delivery ratio when compared with the standard AODV protocol, BAODV protocol, and the current related protocols that enhance the routing security of the AODV protocols

Systems and algorithms for wireless sensor networks based on animal and natural behavior

In last decade, there have been many research works about wireless sensor networks (WSNs) focused on improving the network performance as well as increasing the energy efficiency and communications effectiveness. Many of these new mechanisms have been implemented using the behaviors of certain animals, such as ants, bees, or schools of fish.These systems are called bioinspired systems and are used to improve aspects such as handling large-scale networks, provide dynamic nature, and avoid resource constraints, heterogeneity, unattended operation, or robustness, amongmanyothers.Therefore, thispaper aims to studybioinspired mechanisms in the field ofWSN, providing the concepts of these behavior patterns in which these new approaches are based. The paper will explain existing bioinspired systems in WSNs and analyze their impact on WSNs and their evolution. In addition, we will conduct a comprehensive review of recently proposed bioinspired systems, protocols, and mechanisms. Finally, this paper will try to analyze the applications of each bioinspired mechanism as a function of the imitated animal and the deployed application. Although this research area is considered an area with highly theoretical content, we intend to show the great impact that it is generating from the practical perspective.Sendra, S.; Parra Boronat, L.; Lloret, J.; Khan, S. (2015). Systems and algorithms for wireless sensor networks based on animal and natural behavior. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. 2015:1-19. doi:10.1155/2015/625972S1192015Iram, R., Sheikh, M. I., Jabbar, S., & Minhas, A. A. (2011). Computational intelligence based optimization in wireless sensor network. 2011 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies. doi:10.1109/icict.2011.5983561Lloret, J., Bosch, I., Sendra, S., & Serrano, A. (2011). A Wireless Sensor Network for Vineyard Monitoring That Uses Image Processing. Sensors, 11(6), 6165-6196. doi:10.3390/s110606165Lloret, J., Garcia, M., Bri, D., & Sendra, S. (2009). A Wireless Sensor Network Deployment for Rural and Forest Fire Detection and Verification. Sensors, 9(11), 8722-8747. doi:10.3390/s91108722Dasgupta, P. (2008). A Multiagent Swarming System for Distributed Automatic Target Recognition Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 38(3), 549-563. doi:10.1109/tsmca.2008.918619Quwaider, M., & Biswas, S. (2012). Delay Tolerant Routing Protocol Modeling for Low Power Wearable Wireless Sensor Networks. Network Protocols and Algorithms, 4(3). doi:10.5296/npa.v4i3.2054Sendra, S., Lloret, J., Garcia, M., & Toledo, J. F. (2011). Power Saving and Energy Optimization Techniques for Wireless Sensor Neworks (Invited Paper). Journal of Communications, 6(6). doi:10.4304/jcm.6.6.439-459Liu, M., & Song, C. (2012). Ant-Based Transmission Range Assignment Scheme for Energy Hole Problem in Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 8(12), 290717. doi:10.1155/2012/290717Riva, G., & Finochietto, J. M. (2012). Pheromone-based In-Network Processing for Wireless Sensor Network Monitoring Systems. Network Protocols and Algorithms, 4(4). doi:10.5296/npa.v4i4.2206Garcia, M., Sendra, S., Lloret, J., & Canovas, A. (2011). Saving energy and improving communications using cooperative group-based Wireless Sensor Networks. Telecommunication Systems, 52(4), 2489-2502. doi:10.1007/s11235-011-9568-3Kim, J.-Y., Sharma, T., Kumar, B., Tomar, G. S., Berry, K., & Lee, W.-H. (2014). Intercluster Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Network in Dense Environment. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 10(4), 457402. doi:10.1155/2014/457402Dressler, F., & Akan, O. B. (2010). A survey on bio-inspired networking. Computer Networks, 54(6), 881-900. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2009.10.024Atakan, B., & Akan, O. B. (2006). Immune System Based Distributed Node and Rate Selection in Wireless Sensor Networks. 2006 1st Bio-Inspired Models of Network, Information and Computing Systems. doi:10.1109/bimnics.2006.361806Di Pietro, R., & Verde, N. V. (2011). Introducing epidemic models for data survivability in Unattended Wireless Sensor Networks. 2011 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks. doi:10.1109/wowmom.2011.5986165Marwaha, S., Indulska, J., & Portmann, M. (2009). Biologically Inspired Ant-Based Routing in Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET): A Survey. 2009 Symposia and Workshops on Ubiquitous, Autonomic and Trusted Computing. doi:10.1109/uic-atc.2009.95Jha, V., Khetarpal, K., & Sharma, M. (2011). A survey of nature inspired routing algorithms for MANETs. 2011 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology. doi:10.1109/icectech.2011.5942042Fernandez-Marquez, J. L., Di Marzo Serugendo, G., Montagna, S., Viroli, M., & Arcos, J. L. (2012). Description and composition of bio-inspired design patterns: a complete overview. Natural Computing, 12(1), 43-67. doi:10.1007/s11047-012-9324-yCamilo, T., Carreto, C., Silva, J. S., & Boavida, F. (2006). An Energy-Efficient Ant-Based Routing Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 49-59. doi:10.1007/11839088_5Selvakennedy, S., Sinnappan, S., & Shang, Y. (2006). T-ANT: A Nature-Inspired Data Gathering Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. Journal of Communications, 1(2). doi:10.4304/jcm.1.2.22-29Almshreqi, A. M. S., Ali, B. M., Rasid, M. F. A., Ismail, A., & Varahram, P. (2012). An improved routing mechanism using bio-inspired for energy balancing in wireless sensor networks. The International Conference on Information Network 2012. doi:10.1109/icoin.2012.6164367Chen, G., Guo, T.-D., Yang, W.-G., & Zhao, T. (2006). An improved ant-based routing protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks. 2006 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing. doi:10.1109/colcom.2006.361893Okdem, S., & Karaboga, D. (2006). Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Ant Colony Optimization. First NASA/ESA Conference on Adaptive Hardware and Systems (AHS’06). doi:10.1109/ahs.2006.63Salehpour, A.-A., Mirmobin, B., Afzali-Kusha, A., & Mohammadi, S. (2008). An energy efficient routing protocol for cluster-based wireless sensor networks using ant colony optimization. 2008 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology. doi:10.1109/innovations.2008.4781748Wen, Y., Chen, Y., & Pan, M. (2008). Adaptive ant-based routing in wireless sensor networks using Energy*Delay metrics. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 9(4), 531-538. doi:10.1631/jzus.a071382Liao, W.-H., Kao, Y., & Wu, R.-T. (2011). Ant colony optimization based sensor deployment protocol for wireless sensor networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 6599-6605. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.079Pavai, K., Sivagami, A., & Sridharan, D. (2009). Study of Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks. 2009 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Control, and Telecommunication Technologies. doi:10.1109/act.2009.133Juan, L., Chen, S., & Chao, Z. (2007). Ant System Based Anycast Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks. 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing. doi:10.1109/wicom.2007.603Wang, C., & Lin, Q. (2008). Swarm intelligence optimization based routing algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks. 2008 International Conference on Neural Networks and Signal Processing. doi:10.1109/icnnsp.2008.4590326Jiang, H., Wang, M., Liu, M., & Yan, J. (2012). A quantum-inspired ant-based routing algorithm for WSNs. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 16th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD). doi:10.1109/cscwd.2012.6221881Okazaki, A. M., & Frohlich, A. A. (2011). Ant-based Dynamic Hop Optimization Protocol: A routing algorithm for Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks. 2011 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Wkshps). doi:10.1109/glocomw.2011.6162356Hui, X., Zhigang, Z., & Xueguang, Z. (2009). A Novel Routing Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Ant Colony Optimization. 2009 International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology. doi:10.1109/esiat.2009.460AbdelSalam, H. S., & Olariu, S. (2012). BEES: BioinspirEd backbonE Selection in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 23(1), 44-51. doi:10.1109/tpds.2011.100Da Silva Rego, A., Celestino, J., dos Santos, A., Cerqueira, E. C., Patel, A., & Taghavi, M. (2012). BEE-C: A bio-inspired energy efficient cluster-based algorithm for data continuous dissemination in Wireless Sensor Networks. 2012 18th IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICON). doi:10.1109/icon.2012.6506592Neshat, M., Sepidnam, G., Sargolzaei, M., & Toosi, A. N. (2012). Artificial fish swarm algorithm: a survey of the state-of-the-art, hybridization, combinatorial and indicative applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 42(4), 965-997. doi:10.1007/s10462-012-9342-2Antoniou, P., Pitsillides, A., Blackwell, T., & Engelbrecht, A. (2009). Employing the flocking behavior of birds for controlling congestion in autonomous decentralized networks. 2009 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. doi:10.1109/cec.2009.4983153Ruihua, Z., Zhiping, J., Xin, L., & Dongxue, H. (2011). Double cluster-heads clustering algorithm for wireless sensor networks using PSO. 2011 6th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications. doi:10.1109/iciea.2011.5975688Kulkarni, R. V., Venayagamoorthy, G. K., & Cheng, M. X. (2009). Bio-inspired node localization in wireless sensor networks. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. doi:10.1109/icsmc.2009.5346107Kulkarni, R. V., & Venayagamoorthy, G. K. (2010). Bio-inspired Algorithms for Autonomous Deployment and Localization of Sensor Nodes. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 40(6), 663-675. doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2010.2049649Xin Song, Cuirong Wang, Wang, J., & Bin Zhang. (2010). A hierarchical routing protocol based on AFSO algorithm for WSN. 2010 International Conference On Computer Design and Applications. doi:10.1109/iccda.2010.5541265Gao, X. Z., Wu, Y., Zenger, K., & Huang, X. (2010). A Knowledge-Based Artificial Fish-Swarm Algorithm. 2010 13th IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering. doi:10.1109/cse.2010.49Wang, L., & Ma, L. (2011). A hybrid artificial fish swarm algorithm for Bin-packing problem. Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Electronic & Mechanical Engineering and Information Technology. doi:10.1109/emeit.2011.6022829Yiyue, W., Hongmei, L., & Hengyang, H. (2012). Wireless Sensor Network Deployment Using an Optimized Artificial Fish Swarm Algorithm. 2012 International Conference on Computer Science and Electronics Engineering. doi:10.1109/iccsee.2012.453Yang, X.-S. (2010). A New Metaheuristic Bat-Inspired Algorithm. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 65-74. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12538-6_6Goyal, S., & Patterh, M. S. (2013). Performance of BAT Algorithm on Localization of Wireless Sensor Network. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS & TECHNOLOGY, 6(3), 351-358. doi:10.24297/ijct.v6i3.4481Krishnanand, K. N., & Ghose, D. (2006). Glowworm swarm based optimization algorithm for multimodal functions with collective robotics applications. Multiagent and Grid Systems, 2(3), 209-222. doi:10.3233/mgs-2006-2301Apostolopoulos, T., & Vlachos, A. (2011). Application of the Firefly Algorithm for Solving the Economic Emissions Load Dispatch Problem. International Journal of Combinatorics, 2011, 1-23. doi:10.1155/2011/523806Liao, W.-H., Kao, Y., & Li, Y.-S. (2011). A sensor deployment approach using glowworm swarm optimization algorithm in wireless sensor networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12180-12188. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.053Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., & Zhang, K. (2012). A clustering scheme for Reachback Firefly Synchronicity in wireless sensor networks. 2012 3rd IEEE International Conference on Network Infrastructure and Digital Content. doi:10.1109/icnidc.2012.6418705Zungeru, A. M., Ang, L.-M., & Seng, K. P. (2012). Termite-Hill. International Journal of Swarm Intelligence Research, 3(4), 1-22. doi:10.4018/jsir.2012100101KumarE, S., S. M., K., & Kumar B. P., V. (2014). Clustering Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks based on Rhesus Macaque (Macaca mulatta) Animal's Social Behavior. International Journal of Computer Applications, 87(8), 20-27. doi:10.5120/15229-3754Breza, M., & McCann, J. A. (2008). Lessons in Implementing Bio-inspired Algorithms on Wireless Sensor Networks. 2008 NASA/ESA Conference on Adaptive Hardware and Systems. doi:10.1109/ahs.2008.72Aziz, N. A. B. A., Mohemmed, A. W., & Sagar, B. S. D. (2007). Particle Swarm Optimization and Voronoi diagram for Wireless Sensor Networks coverage optimization. 2007 International Conference on Intelligent and Advanced Systems. doi:10.1109/icias.2007.4658528Falcon, R., Li, X., Nayak, A., & Stojmenovic, I. (2012). A harmony-seeking firefly swarm to the periodic replacement of damaged sensors by a team of mobile robots. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). doi:10.1109/icc.2012.6363859Antoniou, P., & Pitsillides, A. (2010). A bio-inspired approach for streaming applications in wireless sensor networks based on the Lotka–Volterra competition model. Computer Communications, 33(17), 2039-2047. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2010.07.020Benahmed, K., Merabti, M., & Haffaf, H. (2012). Inspired Social Spider Behavior for Secure Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Mobile Computing and Multimedia Communications, 4(4), 1-10. doi:10.4018/jmcmc.2012100101Alrajeh, N. A., & Lloret, J. (2013). Intrusion Detection Systems Based on Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 9(10), 351047. doi:10.1155/2013/351047Hussain, S., Matin, A. W., & Islam, O. (2007). Genetic Algorithm for Hierarchical Wireless Sensor Networks. Journal of Networks, 2(5). doi:10.4304/jnw.2.5.87-97Hussain, S., Matin, A. W., & Islam, O. (2007). Genetic Algorithm for Energy Efficient Clusters in Wireless Sensor Networks. Fourth International Conference on Information Technology (ITNG’07). doi:10.1109/itng.2007.97Ferentinos, K. P., & Tsiligiridis, T. A. (2007). Adaptive design optimization of wireless sensor networks using genetic algorithms. Computer Networks, 51(4), 1031-1051. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2006.06.013Jia, J., Chen, J., Chang, G., & Tan, Z. (2009). Energy efficient coverage control in wireless sensor networks based on multi-objective genetic algorithm. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 57(11-12), 1756-1766. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2008.10.036Nan, G.-F., Li, M.-Q., & Li, J. (2007). Estimation of Node Localization with a Real-Coded Genetic Algorithm in WSNs. 2007 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics. doi:10.1109/icmlc.2007.4370265Saleem, K., Fisal, N., Abdullah, M. S., Zulkarmwan, A. B., Hafizah, S., & Kamilah, S. (2009). Proposed Nature Inspired Self-Organized Secure Autonomous Mechanism for WSNs. 2009 First Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems. doi:10.1109/aciids.2009.75Jabbari, A., & Lang, W. (2010). Advanced Bio-inspired Plausibility Checking in a Wireless Sensor Network Using Neuro-immune Systems: Autonomous Fault Diagnosis in an Intelligent Transportation System. 2010 Fourth International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications. doi:10.1109/sensorcomm.2010.24Ponnusamy, V., & Abdullah, A. (2010). Biologically Inspired (Botany) Mobile Agent Based Self-Healing Wireless Sensor Network. 2010 Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Environments. doi:10.1109/ie.2010.46Li, J., Cui, Z., & Shi, Z. (2012). An Improved Artificial Plant Optimization Algorithm for Coverage Problem in WSN. Sensor Letters, 10(8), 1874-1878. doi:10.1166/sl.2012.2627Sendra, S., Llario, F., Parra, L., & Lloret, J. (2014). Smart Wireless Sensor Network to Detect and Protect Sheep and Goats to Wolf Attacks. Recent Advances in Communications and Networking Technology, 2(2), 91-101. doi:10.2174/22117407112016660012Sendra, S., Granell, E., Lloret, J., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2013). Smart Collaborative Mobile System for Taking Care of Disabled and Elderly People. Mobile Networks and Applications, 19(3), 287-302. doi:10.1007/s11036-013-0445-zGarcia, M., Sendra, S., Lloret, G., & Lloret, J. (2011). Monitoring and control sensor system for fish feeding in marine fish farms. IET Communications, 5(12), 1682-1690. doi:10.1049/iet-com.2010.0654Sendra, S., Lloret, J., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., & Aguiar, J. M. (2013). Underwater Wireless Communications in Freshwater at 2.4 GHz. IEEE Communications Letters, 17(9), 1794-1797. doi:10.1109/lcomm.2013.072313.131214Lloret, J., Sendra, S., Ardid, M., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2012). Underwater Wireless Sensor Communications in the 2.4 GHz ISM Frequency Band. Sensors, 12(4), 4237-4264. doi:10.3390/s12040423

Towards Cyber Security for Low-Carbon Transportation: Overview, Challenges and Future Directions

In recent years, low-carbon transportation has become an indispensable part as sustainable development strategies of various countries, and plays a very important responsibility in promoting low-carbon cities. However, the security of low-carbon transportation has been threatened from various ways. For example, denial of service attacks pose a great threat to the electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid networks. To minimize these threats, several methods have been proposed to defense against them. Yet, these methods are only for certain types of scenarios or attacks. Therefore, this review addresses security aspect from holistic view, provides the overview, challenges and future directions of cyber security technologies in low-carbon transportation. Firstly, based on the concept and importance of low-carbon transportation, this review positions the low-carbon transportation services. Then, with the perspective of network architecture and communication mode, this review classifies its typical attack risks. The corresponding defense technologies and relevant security suggestions are further reviewed from perspective of data security, network management security and network application security. Finally, in view of the long term development of low-carbon transportation, future research directions have been concerned.Comment: 34 pages, 6 figures, accepted by journal Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review

IoT Crawler with Behavior Analyzer at Fog layer for Detecting Malicious Nodes

The limitations in terms of power and processing in IoT (Internet of Things) nodes make nodes an easy prey for malicious attacks, thus threatening business and industry. Detecting malicious nodes before they trigger an attack is highly recommended. The paper introduces a special purpose IoT crawler that works as an inspector to catch malicious nodes. This crawler is deployed in the Fog layer to inherit its capabilities, and to be an intermediate connection between the things and the cloud computing nodes. The crawler collects data streams from IoT nodes, upon a priority criterion. A behavior analyzer, with a machine learning core, detects malicious nodes according to the extracted node behavior from the crawler collected data streams. The performance of the behavior analyzer was investigated using three machine learning algorithms: Adaboost, Random forest and Extra tree. The behavior analyzer produces better testing accuracy, for the tested data, when using Extra tree compared to Adaboost and Random forest; it achieved 98.3% testing accuracy with Extra tree

Lotus effect optimization algorithm (LEA): a lotus nature-inspired algorithm for engineering design optimization

Here we introduce a new evolutionary algorithm called the Lotus Effect Algorithm, which combines efficient operators from the dragonfly algorithm, such as the movement of dragonflies in flower pollination for exploration, with the self-cleaning feature of water on flower leaves known as the lotus effect, for extraction and local search operations. The authors compared this method to other improved versions of the dragonfly algorithm using standard benchmark functions, and it outperformed all other methods according to Fredman\u27s test on 29 benchmark functions. The article also highlights the practical application of LEA in reducing energy consumption in IoT nodes through clustering, resulting in increased packet delivery ratio and network lifetime. Additionally, the performance of the proposed method was tested on real-world problems with multiple constraints, such as the welded beam design optimization problem and the speed-reducer problem applied in a gearbox, and the results showed that LEA performs better than other methods in terms of accuracy