161,150 research outputs found

    Intelligent Decision Support Systems- A Framework

    Get PDF
    Information technology applications that support decision-making processes and problem- solving activities have thrived and evolved over the past few decades. This evolution led to many different types of Decision Support System (DSS) including Intelligent Decision Support System (IDSS). IDSS include domain knowledge, modeling, and analysis systems to provide users the capability of intelligent assistance which significantly improves the quality of decision making. IDSS includes knowledge management component which stores and manages a new class of emerging AI tools such as machine learning and case-based reasoning and learning. These tools can extract knowledge from previous data and decisions which give DSS capability to support repetitive, complex real-time decision making.  This paper attempts to assess the role of IDSS in decision making. First, it explores the definitions and understanding of DSS and IDSS. Second, this paper illustrates a framework of IDSS along with various tools and technologies that support it. Keywords: Decision Support Systems, Data Warehouse, ETL, Data Mining, OLAP, Groupware, KDD, IDS

    Towards a Synthesized Decision Support Methodology that Integrates Human Cognition and Data Mining

    Get PDF
    Developments in information and computing technologies have given rise to Intelligent Decision Support Systems (IDSS). The design of IDSS is largely based on data mining techniques and fuzzy logic. While decision-making is an advanced cognitive process, very little has been done in developing decision support methodologies that help integrate high level cognitive human reasoning and thinking elements within IDSS. This paper proposes a new IDSS methodology that incorporates both data mining techniques and human cognition in the process of decision-making. This proposed methodology involves a phased decision-support process. The initial phase focuses on phrasing a decision based on important criteria or conditions. The second phase involves the machine to analyse the required information from one or more large datasets. The third phase involves human cognition in making intelligent decisions based on key cognitive elements. Furthermore, the proposed methodology is tested on a large data set in the context of elderly care units in Melbourne

    Intelligent Systems

    Get PDF
    This book is dedicated to intelligent systems of broad-spectrum application, such as personal and social biosafety or use of intelligent sensory micro-nanosystems such as "e-nose", "e-tongue" and "e-eye". In addition to that, effective acquiring information, knowledge management and improved knowledge transfer in any media, as well as modeling its information content using meta-and hyper heuristics and semantic reasoning all benefit from the systems covered in this book. Intelligent systems can also be applied in education and generating the intelligent distributed eLearning architecture, as well as in a large number of technical fields, such as industrial design, manufacturing and utilization, e.g., in precision agriculture, cartography, electric power distribution systems, intelligent building management systems, drilling operations etc. Furthermore, decision making using fuzzy logic models, computational recognition of comprehension uncertainty and the joint synthesis of goals and means of intelligent behavior biosystems, as well as diagnostic and human support in the healthcare environment have also been made easier

    CSM-H-R: An Automatic Context Reasoning Framework for Interoperable Intelligent Systems and Privacy Protection

    Full text link
    Automation of High-Level Context (HLC) reasoning for intelligent systems at scale is imperative due to the unceasing accumulation of contextual data in the IoT era, the trend of the fusion of data from multi-sources, and the intrinsic complexity and dynamism of the context-based decision-making process. To mitigate this issue, we propose an automatic context reasoning framework CSM-H-R, which programmatically combines ontologies and states at runtime and the model-storage phase for attaining the ability to recognize meaningful HLC, and the resulting data representation can be applied to different reasoning techniques. Case studies are developed based on an intelligent elevator system in a smart campus setting. An implementation of the framework - a CSM Engine, and the experiments of translating the HLC reasoning into vector and matrix computing especially take care of the dynamic aspects of context and present the potentiality of using advanced mathematical and probabilistic models to achieve the next level of automation in integrating intelligent systems; meanwhile, privacy protection support is achieved by anonymization through label embedding and reducing information correlation. The code of this study is available at: https://github.com/songhui01/CSM-H-R.Comment: 11 pages, 8 figures, Keywords: Context Reasoning, Automation, Intelligent Systems, Context Modeling, Context Dynamism, Privacy Protection, Context Sharing, Interoperability, System Integratio

    SigmaCLIPSE = presentation management + NASA CLI PS + SQL

    Get PDF
    SigmaCLIPSE provides an expert systems and 'intelligent' data base development program for diverse systems integration environments that require support for automated reasoning and expert systems technology, presentation management, and access to 'intelligent' SQL data bases. The SigmaCLIPSE technology and and its integrated ability to access 4th generation application development and decision support tools through a portable SQL interface, comprises a sophisticated software development environment for solving knowledge engineering and expert systems development problems in information intensive commercial environments -- financial services, health care, and distributed process control -- where the expert system must be extendable -- a major architectural advantage of NASA CLIPS. SigmaCLIPSE is a research effort intended to test the viability of merging SQL data bases with expert systems technology

    Model Management for Cybernetic Decision Support Systems

    Get PDF
    Managers being human have limited information processing capacity and are subject to judgmental biases, inferential shortcomings, and ignorance of the rules for optimal information processing and decision-making. Decision aids in the form of human computer information processing systems such as decision support systems, are sometimes employed to assist and support human managers in various tasks. These decision aids unfortunately do not fulfill the requirements and expectations of managers in arriving at the desired solution. This is due to the fact that the tools provided are not suitable for the managers, as they do not put sufficient emphasis on the human aspects of decision-making. Most recent models for decision support systems presented by researchers in model management are based on Operational Research or Artificial Intelligence, and are not adequate. They are based on a simplistic question-answer environment which does not reflect the real-life situation. They also do not put enough emphasis on the intelligent, deciding and reasoning side of the model. Furthermore, the models have little capacity to learn and adapt to new environments and needs. Thus, the proposal in this thesis is for a new system called Model Manager System (MOMS) that incorporates Artificial Intelligence and a Cybernetic Approach with the actual Decision-Making Environment. In order to design the proposed decision model system, various areas are explored - such as the decision-making process, managerial behaviour, human information system, and available decision aids - where various elements related to human decision making are considered. As Cybernetic tools are used in designing the model, human aspects are emphasised greatly, especially in the Information Processing techniques such as intelligence, control, coordination, monitoring, and implementation. The designed system tries to mimic Human Information Processing wherever possible

    Introduction to the ACM TIST Special Issue on Intelligent Healthcare Informatics

    Get PDF
    Healthcare Informatics is a research area dealing with the study and application of computer science and information and communication technology to face both theoretical/methodological and practical issues in healthcare, public health, and everyday wellness. Intelligent Healthcare Informatics may be defined as the specific area focusing on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) theories and techniques to offer important services (such as a component of complex systems) to allow integrated systems to perceive, reason, learn, and act intelligently in the healthcare arena. One of the many peculiarities of healthcare is that decision support systems need to be integrated with several heterogeneous systems supporting both collaborative work and process coordination and the management and analysis of a huge amount of clinical and health data, to compose intelligent, process-aware health information systems. After some pioneering work focusing explicitly on specific medical aspects and providing some efficient, even ad hoc, solutions, in recent years, AI in healthcare has been faced by researchers with different backgrounds and interests, taking into consideration the main results obtained in the more general and theoretical/methodological area of intelligent systems. Moreover, from a focus on reasoning strategies and deep knowledge representation, research in healthcare intelligent systems moved to data-intensive clinical tasks, where there is the need for supporting healthcare decision making in the presence of overwhelming amounts of clinical data. Significant solutions have been provided through a multidisciplinary combination of the results from the different research areas and their associated cultures, ranging from algorithms, to information systems and databases, to human-computer interaction, to medical informatics. To this regard, it is interesting to observe that, from one side, medical informaticians benefited by the general solutions coming from the generic computer science area, tailoring them to specific medical domains, while from the other side, computer scientists found several (still open) challenges in the medical and, more generally, health domains. This ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (ACM TIST) special issue contains articles discussing fundamental principles, algorithms, or applications for process-aware health information systems. Such articles are a sound answer to the research challenges for novel techniques, combinations of tools, and so forth to build effective ways to manage and deal in an integrated way with healthcare processes and data

    A MAS-based infrastructure for negotiation and its application to a water-right market

    Full text link
    The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10796-013-9443-8This paper presents a MAS-based infrastructure for the specification of a negotiation framework that handles multiple negotiation protocols in a coherent and flexible way. Although it may be used to implement one single type of agreement mechanism, it has been designed in such a way that multiple mechanisms may be available at any given time, to be activated and tailored on demand (on-line) by participating agents. The framework is also generic enough so that new protocols may be easily added. This infrastructure has been successfully used in a case study to implement a simulation tool as a component of a larger framework based on an electronic market of water rights.This paper was partially funded by the Consolider AT project CSD2007-0022 INGENIO 2010 of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation; the MICINN projects TIN2011-27652-C03-01 and TIN2009-13839-C03-01; and the Valencian Prometeo project 2008/051.Alfonso Espinosa, B.; Botti Navarro, VJ.; Garrido Tejero, A.; Giret Boggino, AS. (2014). A MAS-based infrastructure for negotiation and its application to a water-right market. Information Systems Frontiers. 16(2):183-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-013-9443-8S183199162Alberola, J.M., Such, J.M., Espinosa, A., Botti, V., García-Fornes, A. (2008). Magentix: a multiagent platform integrated in linux. In EUMAS (pp. 1–10).Alfonso, B., Vivancos, E., Botti, V., García-Fornes, A. (2011). Integrating jason in a multi-agent platform with support for interaction protocols. In Proceedings of the compilation of the co-located workshops on AGERE!’11, SPLASH ’11 workshop (pp. 221–226). New York: ACM.Andreu, J., Capilla, J., Sanchis, E. (1996). AQUATOOL, a generalized decision-support system for water-resources planning and operational management. Journal of Hydrology, 177(3–4), 269–291.Bellifemine, F., Caire, G., Greenwood, D. (2007). Developing multi-agent systems with JADE. Wiley.Bordini, R.H., Hübner, J.F., Wooldridge, M. (2007). Programming multi-agent systems in agent speak usign Jason. Wiley.Botti, V., Garrido, A., Gimeno, J.A., Giret, A., Noriega, P. (2011). The role of MAS as a decision support tool in a water-rights market. In AAMAS 2011 workshops, LNAI 7068 (pp. 35–49). Springer.Braubach, L., Pokahr, A., Lamersdorf, W. (2005). Software agent-based applications, platforms and development kits In C.M.K.R. Unland (Ed.), Jadex: a BDI agent system combining middleware and reasoning (Vol. 9, pp. 143–168): Birkhäuser-Verlag.DeSanctis, G.B., & Gallupe, B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Knowledge based systems, 33(5), 589–609.Eckersley, P. (2003). Virtual markets for virtual goods. Available at http://www.ipria.com/publications/wp/2003/IPRIAWP02.2003.pdf (Accessed April 2012).Fjermestad, J., & Hiltz, S. (2001). Group support systems: a descriptive evaluation of case and field studies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(3), 115–161.Fogués, R.L., Alberola, J.M., Such, J.M., Espinosa, A., García-Fornes, A. (2010). Towards dynamic agent interaction support in open multiagent systems. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference of the catalan association for artificial intelligence (Vol. 220, pp. 89–98). IOS Press.Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents. (2001). FIPA interaction protocol library specification XC00025E. FIPA Consortium.Garrido, A., Arangu, M., Onaindia, E. (2009). A constraint programming formulation for planning: from plan scheduling to plan generatio. Journal of Scheduling, 12(3), 227–256.Giret, A., Garrido, A., Gimeno, J.A., Botti, V., Noriega, P. (2011). A MAS decision support tool for water-right markets. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (Demonstrations@AAMAS) (pp. 1305–1306).Gomez-Limon, J., & Martinez, Y. (2006). Multi-criteria modelling of irrigation water market at basin level: a Spanish case study. European Journal of Operational Research, 173, 313–336.Janjua, N.K., Hussain, F.K., Hussain, O.K. (2013). Semantic information and knowledge integration through argumentative reasoning to support intelligent decision making. Information Systems Frontiers, 15(2), 167–192.jen Hsu, J.Y., Lin, K.-J., Chang, T.-H., ju Ho, C., Huang, H.-S., rong Jih, W. (2006). Parameter learning of personalized trust models in broker-based distributed trust management. Information Systems Frontiers, 8(4), 321–333.Kersten, G., & Lai, H. (2007). European Journal of Operational Research, 180(2), 922–937.Lee, N., Bae, J.K., Koo, C. (2012). A case-based reasoning based multi-agent cognitive map inference mechanism: an application to sales opportunity assessment. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(3), 653–668.Luck, M., & AgentLink. (2005). Agent technology: computing as interaction: a roadmap for agent-based computing. Compiled, written and edited by Michael Luck et al. AgentLink, Southampton.Ma, J., & Orgun, M.A. (2008). Formalizing theories of trust for authentication protocols. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(1), 19–32.Pokahr, A., Braubach, L., Walczak, A., Lamersdorf, W. (2007). Developing multi-agent systems with JADE. Jadex-Engineering Goal-Oriented Agents (pp. 254258). Wiley.Ramos, C., Cordeiro, M., Praça, I., Vale, Z. (2005). Intelligent agents for negotiation and game-based decision support in electricity market. Engineering Intelligent Systems for Electrical Engineering and Communications, 13(2), 147–154.Sierra, C., Botti, V., Ossowski, S. (2011). Agreement computing. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 25(1), 57–61.Thobani, M. (1997). Formal water markets: why, when and how to introduce tradable water rights. The World Bank Research Observer, 12(2), 161–179

    Risk management in intelligent agents

    Full text link
    University of Technology, Sydney. Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology.This thesis presents the development of a generalised risk analysis, modelling and management framework for intelligent agents based on the state-of-art techniques from knowledge representation and uncertainty management in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Assessment and management of risk are well established common practices in human society. However, formal recognition and treatment of risk are not usually considered in the design and implementation of (most existing) intelligent agents and information systems. This thesis aims to fill this gap and improve the overall performance of an intelligent agent. By providing a formal framework that can be easily implemented in practice, my work enables an agent to assess and manage relevant domain risks in a consistent, systematic and intelligent manner. In this thesis, I canvas a wide range of theories and techniques in AI research that deal with uncertainty representation and management. I formulated a generalised concept of risk for intelligent agents and developed formal qualitative and quantitative representations of risk based on the Possible Worlds paradigm. By adapting a selection of mature knowledge modelling and reasoning techniques, I develop a qualitative and a quantitative approach of modelling domains for risk assessment and management. Both approaches are developed under the same theoretical assumptions and use the same domain analysis procedure; both share a similar iterative process to maintain and improve domain knowledge base continuously over time. Most importantly, the knowledge modelling and reasoning techniques used in both approaches share the same underlying paradigm of Possible Worlds. The close connection between the two risk modelling and reasoning approaches leads us to combine them into a hybrid, multi-level, iterative risk modelling and management framework for intelligent agents, or HiRMA, that is generalised for risk modelling and management in many disparate problem domains and environments. Finally, I provide a top-level guide on how HiRMA can be implemented in a practical domain and a software architecture for such an implementation. My work lays a solid foundation for building better decision support tools (with respect to risk management) that can be integrated into existing or future intelligent agents
    corecore