Improvements for Gate-Hiding Garbled Circuits

Garbled circuits have been highly optimized for practice over the last several years. Today\u27s most efficient constructions treat different types of gates (e.g., AND vs XOR) differently; as such, they leak the type of each gate. In many applications of garbled circuits, the circuit itself is public, so such leakage is tolerable. In other settings, however, it is desirable to hide the type of each gate. In this paper we consider optimizing garbled circuits for the gate-hiding case. We observe that the best state-of-the-art constructions support only a limited class of gate functions, which turns out to undermine their improvements in several settings. These state-of-the-art constructions also require a non-minimal hardness assumption. We introduce two new gate-hiding constructions of garbled circuits. Both constructions achieve the same communication complexity as the best state-of-the-art schemes, but support a more useful class of boolean gates and use only the minimal assumption of a secure PRF

An Efficient 2-Party Private Function Evaluation Protocol Based on Half Gates

The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.Private function evaluation (PFE) is a special case of secure multi-party computation (MPC), where the function to be computed is known by only one party. PFE is useful in several real-life applications where an algorithm or a function itself needs to remain secret for reasons such as protecting intellectual property or security classification level. In this paper, we focus on improving 2-party PFE based on symmetric cryptographic primitives. In this respect, we look back at the seminal PFE framework presented by Mohassel and Sadeghian at Eurocrypt’13. We show how to adapt and utilize the well-known half gates garbling technique (Zahur et al., Eurocrypt’15) to their constant-round 2-party PFE scheme. Compared to their scheme, our resulting optimization significantly improves the efficiency of both the underlying Oblivious Evaluation of Extended Permutation (OEP) and secure 2-party computation (2PC) protocols, and yields a more than 40% reduction in overall communication cost (the computation time is also slightly decreased and the number of rounds remains unchanged)

Highly Efficient and Re-executable Private Function Evaluation with Linear Complexity

The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.Private function evaluation aims to securely compute a function f(x1, ... ; xn) without leaking any information other than what is revealed by the output, where f is a private input of one of the parties (say Party1) and xi is a private input of the i-th party Partyi. In this work, we propose a novel and secure two-party private function evaluation (2PFE) scheme based on the DDH assumption. Our scheme introduces a reusability feature that signi cantly improves the state-of-the-art. Accordingly, our scheme has two variants, one is utilized in the initial execution of the function f, and the other is utilized in its subsequent evaluations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first and most efficient 2PFE scheme that enjoys a reusablity feature. Our protocols achieve linear communication and computation complexities and a constant number of rounds which is at most three

Secure and fair two-party computation

Consider several parties that do not trust each other, yet they wish to correctly compute some common function of their local inputs while keeping these inputs private. This problem is known as "Secure Multi-Party Computation", and was introduced by Andrew Yao in 1982. Secure multi-party computations have some real world examples like electronic auctions, electronic voting or fingerprinting. In this thesis we consider the case where there are only two parties involved. This is known as "Secure Two-Party Computation". If there is a trusted third party called Carol, then the problem is pretty straightforward. The participating parties could hand their inputs in Carol who can compute the common function correctly and could return the outputs to the corresponding parties. The goal is to achieve (almost) the same result when there is no trusted third party. Cryptographic protocols are designed in order to solve these kinds of problems. These protocols are analyzed within an appropriate model in which the behavior of parties is structured. The basic level is called the Semi-Honest Model where parties are assumed to follow the protocol specification, but later can derive additional information based on the messages which have been received so far. A more realistic model is the so-called Malicious Model. The common approach is to first analyze a protocol in the semi-honest model and then later extend it into the malicious model. Any cryptographic protocol for secure two-party computation must satisfy the following security requirements: correctness, privacy and fairness. It must guarantee the correctness of the result while preserving the privacy of the parties’ inputs, even if one of the parties is malicious and behaves arbitrarily throughout the protocol. It must also guarantee fairness. This roughly means that whenever a party aborts the protocol prematurely, he or she should not have any advantage over the other party in discovering the output. The main question for researchers is to construct new protocols that achieve the above mentioned goals for secure multi-party computation. Of course, such protocols must be secure in a given model, as well as be as efficient as possible. In 1986, Yao presented the first general protocol for secure two-party computation which was applicable only to the semi-honest model. He uses a tool called "Garbled Circuit". Yao’s protocol uses the underlying primitives ("Pseudorandom Generator" and "Oblivious Transfer") as blackboxes which lead to efficient results. After Yao’s work many variants and improvements have been proposed for the malicious model. In this thesis, we design several new protocols for secure two-party computation based on Yao’s garbled circuit. Before we present the details of our new designs, we first show several weaknesses, security flaws or problems with the existing protocols in the literature. We first work in the semi-honest model and then extend it into the malicious model by presenting new protocols. Finally we add fairness to our protocol. Oblivious transfer (OT) is a fundamental primitive in modern cryptography which is useful for implementing protocols for secure multi-party computation. We study several variants of oblivious transfer in this thesis. We present a new protocol for the so-called "Committed OT". This protocol is very efficient in the sense that it is quite good in comparison to the most efficient committed OT protocols in the literature. The abovementioned flaw with the use of OT can be fixed with our committed oblivious transfer protocol. Furthermore, it is more general than all previous protocols, and, therefore, it is of independent interest. We also deal with fairness in this thesis. For protocols based on garbled circuit, so far only Benny Pinkas has presented a protocol in the literature for achieving fairness. We show a subtle problem with this protocol where the privacy of the inputs of one party can be compromised. We also describe this problem in detail which is in fact related to the fairness, and finally propose a more efficient scheme that does achieve fairness

Oblivious Pseudo-Random Functions via Garbled Circuits

An Oblivious Pseudo-Random Function (OPRF) is a protocol that allows two parties – a server and a user – to jointly compute the output of a Pseudo-Random Function (PRF). The server holds the key for the PRF and the user holds an input on which the function shall be evaluated. The user learns the correct output while the inputs of both parties remain private. If the server can additionally prove to the user that several executions of the protocol were performed with the same key, we call the OPRF verifiable. One way to construct an OPRF protocol is by using generic tools from multi-party computation, like Yao’s seminal garbled circuits protocol. Garbled circuits allow two parties to evaluate any boolean circuit, while the input that each party provides to the circuit remains hidden from the respective other party. An approach to realizing OPRFs based on garbled circuits was e.g. mentioned by Pinkas et al. (ASIACRYPT ’09). But OPRFs are used as a building block in various cryptographic protocols. This frequent usage in conjunction with other building blocks calls for a security analysis that takes composition, i.e., the usage in a bigger context into account. In this work, we give the first construction of a garbled-circuit-based OPRF that is secure in the universal composability model by Canetti (FOCS ’01). This means the security of our protocol holds even if the protocol is used in arbitrary execution environments, even under parallel composition. We achieve a passively secure protocol that relies on authenticated channels, the random oracle model, and the security of oblivious transfer. We use a technique from Albrecht et al. (PKC ’21) to extend the protocol to a verifiable OPRF by employing a commitment scheme. The two parties compute a circuit that only outputs a PRF value if a commitment opens to the right server-key. Further, we implemented our construction and compared the concrete efficiency with two other OPRFs. We found that our construction is over a hundred times faster than a recent lattice-based construction by Albrecht et al. (PKC ’21), but not as efficient as the state-of-the-art protocol from Jarecki et al. (EUROCRYPT ’18), based on the hardness of the discrete logarithm problem in certain groups. Our efficiency-benchmark results imply that – under certain circumstances – generic techniques as garbled circuits can achieve substantially better performance in practice than some protocols specifically designed for the problem. Büscher et al. (ACNS ’20) showed that garbled circuits are secure in the presence of adversaries using quantum computers. This fact combined with our results indicates that garbled-circuit-based OPRFs are a promising way towards efficient OPRFs that are secure against those quantum adversaries

Garbling Schemes and Applications

The topic of this thesis is garbling schemes and their applications. A garbling scheme is a set of algorithms for realizing secure two-party computation. A party called a client possesses a private algorithm as well as a private input and would like to compute the algorithm with this input. However, the client might not have enough computational resources to evaluate the function with the input on his own. The client outsources the computation to another party, called an evaluator. Since the client wants to protect the algorithm and the input, he cannot just send the algorithm and the input to the evaluator. With a garbling scheme, the client can protect the privacy of the algorithm, the input and possibly also the privacy of the output. The increase in network-based applications has arisen concerns about the privacy of user data. Therefore, privacy-preserving or privacy-enhancing techniques have gained interest in recent research. Garbling schemes seem to be an ideal solution for privacy-preserving applications. First of all, secure garbling schemes hide the algorithm and its input. Secondly, garbling schemes are known to have efficient implementations. In this thesis, we propose two applications utilizing garbling schemes. The first application provides privacy-preserving electronic surveillance. The second application extends electronic surveillance to more versatile monitoring, including also health telemetry. This kind of application would be ideal for assisted living services. In this work, we also present theoretical results related to garbling schemes. We present several new security definitions for garbling schemes which are of practical use. Traditionally, the same garbled algorithm can be evaluated once with garbled input. In applications, the same function is often evaluated several times with different inputs. Recently, a solution based on fully homomorphic encryption provides arbitrarily reusable garbling schemes. The disadvantage in this approach is that the arbitrary reuse cannot be efficiently implemented due to the inefficiency of fully homomorphic encryption. We propose an alternative approach. Instead of arbitrary reusability, the same garbled algorithm could be used a limited number of times. This gives us a set of new security classes for garbling schemes. We prove several relations between new and established security definitions. As a result, we obtain a complex hierarchy which can be represented as a product of three directed graphs. The three graphs in turn represent the different flavors of security: the security notion, the security model and the level of reusability. In addition to defining new security classes, we improve the definition of side-information function, which has a central role in defining the security of a garbling scheme. The information allowed to be leaked by the garbled algorithm and the garbled input depend on the representation of the algorithm. The established definition of side-information models the side-information of circuits perfectly but does not model side-information of Turing machines as well. The established model requires that the length of the argument, the length of the final result and the length of the function can be efficiently computable from the side-information function. Moreover, the side-information depends only on the function. In other words, the length of the argument, the length of the final result and the length of the function should only depend on the function. For circuits this is a natural requirement since the number of input wires tells the size of the argument, the number of output wires tells the size of the final result and the number of gates and wires tell the size of the function. On the other hand, the description of a Turing machine does not set any limitation to the size of the argument. Therefore, side-information that depends only on the function cannot provide information about the length of the argument. To tackle this problem, we extend the model of side-information so that side-information depends on both the function and the argument. The new model of side information allows us to define new security classes. We show that the old security classes are compatible with the new model of side-information. We also prove relations between the new security classes.Tämä väitöskirja käsittelee garblausskeemoja ja niiden sovelluksia. Garblausskeema on työkalu, jota käytetään turvallisen kahden osapuolen laskennan toteuttamiseen. Asiakas pitää hallussaan yksityistä algoritmia ja sen yksityistä syötettä, joilla hän haluaisi suorittaa tietyn laskennan. Asiakkaalla ei välttämättä ole riittävästi laskentatehoa, minkä vuoksi hän ei pysty suorittamaan laskentaa itse, vaan joutuu ulkoistamaan laskennan toiselle osapuolelle, palvelimelle. Koska asiakas tahtoo suojella algoritmiaan ja syötettään, hän ei voi vain lähettää niitä palvelimen laskettavaksi. Asiakas pystyy suojelemaan syötteensä ja algoritminsa yksityisyyttä käyttämällä garblausskeemaa. Verkkopohjaisten sovellusten kasvu on herättänyt huolta käyttäjien datan yksityisyyden turvasta. Siksi yksityisyyden säilyttävien tai yksityisyyden suojaa lisäävien tekniikoiden tutkimus on saanut huomiota. Garblaustekniikan avulla voidaan suojata sekä syöte että algoritmi. Lisäksi garblaukselle tiedetään olevan useita tehokkaita toteutuksia. Näiden syiden vuoksi garblausskeemat ovat houkutteleva tekniikka käytettäväksi yksityisyyden säilyttävien sovellusten toteutuksessa. Tässä työssä esittelemme kaksi sovellusta, jotka hyödyntävät garblaustekniikkaa. Näistä ensimmäinen on yksityisyyden säilyttävä sähköinen seuranta. Toinen sovellus laajentaa seurantaa monipuolisempaan monitorointiin, kuten terveyden kaukoseurantaan. Tästä voi olla hyötyä etenkin kotihoidon palveluille. Tässä työssä esitämme myös teoreettisia tuloksia garblausskeemoihin liittyen. Esitämme garblausskeemoille uusia turvallisuusmääritelmiä, joiden tarve kumpuaa käytännön sovelluksista. Perinteisen määritelmän mukaan samaa garblattua algoritmia voi käyttää vain yhdellä garblatulla syötteellä laskemiseen. Käytännössä kuitenkin samaa algoritmia käytetään usean eri syötteen evaluoimiseen. Hiljattain on esitetty tähän ongelmaan ratkaisu, joka perustuu täysin homomorfiseen salaukseen. Tämän ratkaisun ansiosta samaa garblattua algoritmia voi turvallisesti käyttää mielivaltaisen monta kertaa. Ratkaisun haittapuoli kuitenkin on, ettei sille ole tiedossa tehokasta toteutusta, sillä täysin homomorfiseen salaukseen ei ole vielä onnistuttu löytämään sellaista. Esitämme vaihtoehtoisen näkökulman: sen sijaan, että samaa garblattua algoritmia voisi käyttää mielivaltaisen monta kertaa, sitä voikin käyttää vain tietyn, ennalta rajatun määrän kertoja. Tämä näkökulman avulla voidaan määritellä lukuisia uusia turvallisuusluokkia. Todistamme useita relaatioita uusien ja vanhojen turvallisuusmääritelmien välillä. Relaatioiden avulla garblausskeemojen turvallisuusluokille saadaan muodostettua hierarkia, joka koostuu kolmesta komponentista. Tieto, joka paljastuu garblatusta algoritmista tai garblatusta syötteestä riippuu siitä, millaisessa muodossa algoritmi on esitetty, kutsutaan sivutiedoksi. Vakiintunut määritelmä mallintaa loogisen piiriin liittyvää sivutietoa täydellisesti, mutta ei yhtä hyvin Turingin koneeseen liittyvää sivutietoa. Tämä johtuu siitä, että jokainen yksittäinen looginen piiri asettaa syötteensä pituudelle rajan, mutta yksittäisellä Turingin koneella vastaavanlaista rajoitusta ei ole. Parannamme sivutiedon määritelmää, jolloin tämä ongelma poistuu. Uudenlaisen sivutiedon avulla voidaan määritellä uusia turvallisuusluokkia. Osoitamme, että vanhat turvallisuusluokat voidaan esittää uudenkin sivutiedon avulla. Todistamme myös relaatioita uusien luokkien välillä.Siirretty Doriast

Predicate Encryption for Circuits from LWE

In predicate encryption, a ciphertext is associated with descriptive attribute values x in addition to a plaintext μ, and a secret key is associated with a predicate f. Decryption returns plaintext μ if and only if f(x)=1. Moreover, security of predicate encryption guarantees that an adversary learns nothing about the attribute x or the plaintext μ from a ciphertext, given arbitrary many secret keys that are not authorized to decrypt the ciphertext individually. We construct a leveled predicate encryption scheme for all circuits, assuming the hardness of the subexponential learning with errors (LWE) problem. That is, for any polynomial function d=d(λ), we construct a predicate encryption scheme for the class of all circuits with depth bounded by d(λ), where λ is the security parameter.Microsoft Corporation (PhD Fellowship)Northrop Grumman Cybersecurity Research ConsortiumUnited States. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Grant FA8750-11-2-0225)National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Awards CNS-1350619)National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Awards CNS-1413920)Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (Fellowship)Microsoft (Faculty Fellowship

Efficient and secure schemes for private function evaluation

Development of computing devices with the proliferation of the Internet has prompted enormous opportunities for cooperative computation. These computations could occur between trusted or partially trusted partners, or even between competitors. Secure multi-party computation (MPC) protocols allow two or more parties to collaborate and compute a public functionality using their private inputs without the need for a trusted third-party. However, the generic solutions for MPC are not adequate for some particular cases where the function itself is also sensitive and required to be kept private. Private function evaluation (PFE) is a special case of MPC, where the function to be computed is known by only one party. PFE is useful in several real-life applications where an algorithm or a function itself needs to remain secret for reasons such as protecting intellectual property or security classification level. Recently, designing efficient PFE protocols have been a challenging and attractive task for cryptography researchers. iv In this dissertation, we mainly focus on improving two-party private function evaluation (2PFE) schemes. Our primary goal is enhancing the state-of-the-art by designing secure and cost-efficient 2PFE protocols for both symmetric and asymmetric cryptography based solutions. In this respect, we first aim to improve 2PFE protocols based on (mostly) symmetric cryptographic primitives. We look back at the seminal PFE framework presented by Mohassel and Sadeghian at Eurocrypt'13. We show how to adapt and utilize the well-known half gates garbling technique (Zahur et al., Eurocrypt'15) to their constant round 2PFE scheme. Compared to their scheme, our resulting optimization significantly improves both underlying oblivious extended permutation (OEP) and secure 2-party computation (2PC) protocols, and yields a more than 40% reduction in overall communication cost. We next propose a novel and highly efficient 2PFE scheme based on the decisional Di e-Hellman (DDH) assumption. Our scheme consists of two protocols, one is utilized in the initial execution, and the other is in the subsequent runs. One of the novelties of our scheme over the state-of-the-art is that it results in a significant cost reduction when the same private function is evaluated more than once between the same or varying parties. To the best of our knowledge, this is the most efficient and the first 2PFE scheme that enjoys reusability feature. Our protocols achieve linear communication and computation complexities, and a constant number of rounds which is at most three (depending on the size of the inputs of the party that holds the function)

IST Austria Thesis

Many security definitions come in two flavors: a stronger “adaptive” flavor, where the adversary can arbitrarily make various choices during the course of the attack, and a weaker “selective” flavor where the adversary must commit to some or all of their choices a-priori. For example, in the context of identity-based encryption, selective security requires the adversary to decide on the identity of the attacked party at the very beginning of the game whereas adaptive security allows the attacker to first see the master public key and some secret keys before making this choice. Often, it appears to be much easier to achieve selective security than it is to achieve adaptive security. A series of several recent works shows how to cleverly achieve adaptive security in several such scenarios including generalized selective decryption [Pan07][FJP15], constrained PRFs [FKPR14], and Yao’s garbled circuits [JW16]. Although the above works expressed vague intuition that they share a common technique, the connection was never made precise. In this work we present a new framework (published at Crypto ’17 [JKK+17a]) that connects all of these works and allows us to present them in a unified and simplified fashion. Having the framework in place, we show how to achieve adaptive security for proxy re-encryption schemes (published at PKC ’19 [FKKP19]) and provide the first adaptive security proofs for continuous group key agreement protocols (published at S&P ’21 [KPW+21]). Questioning optimality of our framework, we then show that currently used proof techniques cannot lead to significantly better security guarantees for "graph-building" games (published at TCC ’21 [KKPW21a]). These games cover generalized selective decryption, as well as the security of prominent constructions for constrained PRFs, continuous group key agreement, and proxy re-encryption. Finally, we revisit the adaptive security of Yao’s garbled circuits and extend the analysis of Jafargholi and Wichs in two directions: While they prove adaptive security only for a modified construction with increased online complexity, we provide the first positive results for the original construction by Yao (published at TCC ’21 [KKP21a]). On the negative side, we prove that the results of Jafargholi and Wichs are essentially optimal by showing that no black-box reduction can provide a significantly better security bound (published at Crypto ’21 [KKPW21c])