Refactoring for Multi-Dimensional Reusability

Source code should be simpler, easy to read and easy to understand. This slogan is not only relates to change the existing code for current service, but also has an association with reusability. Refactoring is a best idea for above issues i.e. keeping the code simple and support the emergent design practice. Many refactoring techniques have been produced related to code simplicity and understandability for maintainability & extensibility. Here author enforced to make the method with the division of three sections and each section should have an argument as a signal. Such technique will be the pillar of reusability from many directions

Barriers to Refactoring: Issues and Solutions

Refactoring mechanism is commonly used in software development. Though Object oriented programming promotes ease in designing reusable software but the long coded methods makes it unreadable and enhances the complexity of the methods. The common code defects are associated with large classes and methods. To ease up the code comprehension Extract method, Extract class serves as a comfortable option to reduce the disorganization and duplication of the code to produce more fine grained methods and classes. Though refactoring serves as an important mechanism to improve the software quality whether performed manually or in an automated way with the help of tools or IDEs but there are umpteen cases where refactoring could lead to deterrent effect. This paper intends to explore the various problems and barriers associated with refactoring and specifically while extracting the code (extract method, extract class, extract interface) and their solutions

Detailed Overview of Software Smells

This document provides an overview of literature concerning software smells covering various dimensions of smells along with their corresponding references

A large-scale empirical exploration on refactoring activities in open source software projects

Refactoring is a well-established practice that aims at improving the internal structure of a software system without changing its external behavior. Existing literature provides evidence of how and why developers perform refactoring in practice. In this paper, we continue on this line of research by performing a large-scale empirical analysis of refactoring practices in 200 open source systems. Specifically, we analyze the change history of these systems at commit level to investigate: (i) whether developers perform refactoring operations and, if so, which are more diffused and (ii) when refactoring operations are applied, and (iii) which are the main developer-oriented factors leading to refactoring. Based on our results, future research can focus on enabling automatic support for less frequent refactorings and on recommending refactorings based on the developer's workload, project's maturity and developer's commitment to the project

PROGRAM INSPECTION AND TESTING TECHNIQUES FOR CODE CLONES AND REFACTORINGS IN EVOLVING SOFTWARE

Developers often perform copy-and-paste activities. This practice causes the similar code fragment (aka code clones) to be scattered throughout a code base. Refactoring for clone removal is beneficial, preventing clones from having negative effects on software quality, such as hidden bug propagation and unintentional inconsistent changes. However, recent research has provided evidence that factoring out clones does not always reduce the risk of introducing defects, and it is often difficult or impossible to remove clones using standard refactoring techniques. To investigate which or how clones can be refactored, developers typically spend a significant amount of their time managing individual clone instances or clone groups scattered across a large code base. To address the problem, this research proposes two techniques to inspect and validate refactoring changes. First, we propose a technique for managing clone refactorings, Pattern-based clone Refactoring Inspection (PRI), using refactoring pattern templates. By matching the refactoring pattern templates against a code base, it summarizes refactoring changes of clones, and detects the clone instances not consistently factored out as potential anomalies. Second, we propose Refactoring Investigation and Testing technique, called RIT. RIT improves the testing efficiency for validating refactoring changes. RIT uses PRI to identify refactorings by analyzing original and edited versions of a program. It then uses the semantic impact of a set of identified refactoring changes to detect tests whose behavior may have been affected and modified by refactoring edits. Given each failed asserts, RIT helps developers focus their attention on logically related program statements by applying program slicing for minimizing each test. For debugging purposes, RIT determines specific failure-inducing refactoring edits, separating from other changes that only affect other asserts or tests

MORE: A multi‐objective refactoring recommendation approach to introducing design patterns and fixing code smells

Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/137556/1/smr1843.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/137556/2/smr1843_am.pd