24 research outputs found

    Using Semantic Technologies in Digital Libraries- A Roadmap to Quality Evaluation

    Get PDF
    Abstract. In digital libraries semantic techniques are often deployed to reduce the expensive manual overhead for indexing documents, maintaining metadata, or caching for future search. However, using such techniques may cause a decrease in a collection’s quality due to their statistical nature. Since data quality is a major concern in digital libraries, it is important to be able to measure the (loss of) quality of metadata automatically generated by semantic techniques. In this paper we present a user study based on a typical semantic technique use

    The Method of Normalizing OWL 2 DL Ontologies

    Get PDF
    The paper proposes a method of normalizing OWL 2 DL ontologies. The method introduces rules aimed at refactoring OWL 2 constructs. The proposed transformations only use a subset of OWL 2 constructs and enable to present an input OWL 2 ontology in a new but semantically equivalent form. The normalization is motivated by the fact that normalized OWL 2 DL ontologies have a unified structure of axioms so that they can be compared in an algorithmic way

    Ontology Repositories

    Get PDF
    The growing use and application of ontologies in the last years has led to an increased interest of researchers and practitioners in the development of ontologies, either from scratch o by reusing existing ones. ..

    Metrics and methods for comparative ontology evaluation

    Get PDF
    While progress has been made toward describing the need for ontology evaluation and offering proposals concerning what properties to measure and how, work remains to develop ontology evaluation as a rigorous discipline. Ontologies as information artifacts have a variety of aspects that can inform their evaluation, both in terms of what is evaluated and the metrics used. Ontology evaluation as a discipline requires (1) having a systematic account of the different aspects of ontologies and the properties relevant to those aspects, (2) critically developing methods for examining those properties, (3) developing comparative metrics that allow ontology engineers to compare the effects of various modeling choices and allow users to compare the merits of existing ontologies, and (4) charting possible pitfalls of evaluation. This paper considers various properties of ontologies that have been proposed and organizes these properties according to different aspects of ontologies. To begin bringing previous work together and to illustrate where pitfalls and potential solutions might enter into a rigorous evaluation, I offer a more in depth (though still partial) analysis of evaluating the correctness of ontologies. I conclude with a discussion of next steps in systematizing ontology evaluation

    Ontology similarity in the alignment space

    Get PDF
    david2010bInternational audienceMeasuring similarity between ontologies can be very useful for different purposes, e.g., finding an ontology to replace another, or finding an ontology in which queries can be translated. Classical measures compute similarities or distances in an ontology space by directly comparing the content of ontologies. We introduce a new family of ontology measures computed in an alignment space: they evaluate the similarity between two ontologies with regard to the available alignments between them. We define two sets of such measures relying on the existence of a path between ontologies or on the ontology entities that are preserved by the alignments. The former accounts for known relations between ontologies, while the latter reflects the possibility to perform actions such as instance import or query translation. All these measures have been implemented in the OntoSim library, that has been used in experiments which showed that entity preserving measures are comparable to the best ontology space measures. Moreover, they showed a robust behaviour with respect to the alteration of the alignment space

    Building Synchrotron ontology: the analysis of synchrotron control system in collaborative environment

    Get PDF
    This paper presents research on building a synchrotron ontology using analysis of a synchrotron control system and the aspects of collaborative ontology engineering. It includes a general description of the studied domain and the method used to develop a synchrotron domain ontology. The ontology is being created on the basis of a Solaris synchrotron control system in cooperation with the synchrotron facilities belonging to the Tango community. The first Polish synchrotron radiation facility Solaris is located at Jagiellonian University’s Third Campus in Krakow, Poland. Synchrotron is an unique source of electromagnetic radiation known as synchrotron radiation. This paper discusses the impact of the Solaris control system on the building of a synchrotron ontology. It also includes the main assumptions relating to the collaborative knowledge acquired for this domain. The synchrotron ontology will support the optimization of existing control systems and the development of a new synchrotron control system based on Tango controls or other technologies in a consistent manner. Using the same general assumptions and terms, this could be later used for integration and data sharing purposes. The synchrotron ontology can facilitate interoperation by the integration of information from different sources from one or many synchrotron control systems and integrate different parts of the controls systems that provide analogical or similar services. It can also be used to support the translation between different representations, especially regarding particular devices. Knowledge sharing and reuse is a big challenge in complex, distributed systems where the knowledge required is very specialized for different sets of functionalities or subsystems. Regarding synchrotron systems, many specialists must provide their support so the IT specialists are able to develop and maintain a control system. In this case, the synchrotron ontology can be a guideline for knowledge sharing and reuse
    corecore