982,907 research outputs found
A Paraconsistent Higher Order Logic
Classical logic predicts that everything (thus nothing useful at all) follows
from inconsistency. A paraconsistent logic is a logic where an inconsistency
does not lead to such an explosion, and since in practice consistency is
difficult to achieve there are many potential applications of paraconsistent
logics in knowledge-based systems, logical semantics of natural language, etc.
Higher order logics have the advantages of being expressive and with several
automated theorem provers available. Also the type system can be helpful. We
present a concise description of a paraconsistent higher order logic with
countable infinite indeterminacy, where each basic formula can get its own
indeterminate truth value (or as we prefer: truth code). The meaning of the
logical operators is new and rather different from traditional many-valued
logics as well as from logics based on bilattices. The adequacy of the logic is
examined by a case study in the domain of medicine. Thus we try to build a
bridge between the HOL and MVL communities. A sequent calculus is proposed
based on recent work by Muskens.Comment: Originally in the proceedings of PCL 2002, editors Hendrik Decker,
Joergen Villadsen, Toshiharu Waragai (http://floc02.diku.dk/PCL/). Correcte
Topos Semantics for Higher-Order Modal Logic
We define the notion of a model of higher-order modal logic in an arbitrary
elementary topos . In contrast to the well-known interpretation of
(non-modal) higher-order logic, the type of propositions is not interpreted by
the subobject classifier , but rather by a suitable
complete Heyting algebra . The canonical map relating and
both serves to interpret equality and provides a modal
operator on in the form of a comonad. Examples of such structures arise
from surjective geometric morphisms , where . The logic differs from non-modal higher-order
logic in that the principles of functional and propositional extensionality are
no longer valid but may be replaced by modalized versions. The usual Kripke,
neighborhood, and sheaf semantics for propositional and first-order modal logic
are subsumed by this notion
A Relational Logic for Higher-Order Programs
Relational program verification is a variant of program verification where
one can reason about two programs and as a special case about two executions of
a single program on different inputs. Relational program verification can be
used for reasoning about a broad range of properties, including equivalence and
refinement, and specialized notions such as continuity, information flow
security or relative cost. In a higher-order setting, relational program
verification can be achieved using relational refinement type systems, a form
of refinement types where assertions have a relational interpretation.
Relational refinement type systems excel at relating structurally equivalent
terms but provide limited support for relating terms with very different
structures.
We present a logic, called Relational Higher Order Logic (RHOL), for proving
relational properties of a simply typed -calculus with inductive types
and recursive definitions. RHOL retains the type-directed flavour of relational
refinement type systems but achieves greater expressivity through rules which
simultaneously reason about the two terms as well as rules which only
contemplate one of the two terms. We show that RHOL has strong foundations, by
proving an equivalence with higher-order logic (HOL), and leverage this
equivalence to derive key meta-theoretical properties: subject reduction,
admissibility of a transitivity rule and set-theoretical soundness. Moreover,
we define sound embeddings for several existing relational type systems such as
relational refinement types and type systems for dependency analysis and
relative cost, and we verify examples that were out of reach of prior work.Comment: Submitted to ICFP 201
Mass problems and intuitionistic higher-order logic
In this paper we study a model of intuitionistic higher-order logic which we
call \emph{the Muchnik topos}. The Muchnik topos may be defined briefly as the
category of sheaves of sets over the topological space consisting of the Turing
degrees, where the Turing cones form a base for the topology. We note that our
Muchnik topos interpretation of intuitionistic mathematics is an extension of
the well known Kolmogorov/Muchnik interpretation of intuitionistic
propositional calculus via Muchnik degrees, i.e., mass problems under weak
reducibility. We introduce a new sheaf representation of the intuitionistic
real numbers, \emph{the Muchnik reals}, which are different from the Cauchy
reals and the Dedekind reals. Within the Muchnik topos we obtain a \emph{choice
principle} and a \emph{bounding principle} where range over Muchnik
reals, ranges over functions from Muchnik reals to Muchnik reals, and
is a formula not containing or . For the convenience of the
reader, we explain all of the essential background material on intuitionism,
sheaf theory, intuitionistic higher-order logic, Turing degrees, mass problems,
Muchnik degrees, and Kolmogorov's calculus of problems. We also provide an
English translation of Muchnik's 1963 paper on Muchnik degrees.Comment: 44 page
Modal Linear Logic in Higher Order Logic, an experiment in Coq
The sequent calculus of classical modal linear logic KDT 4lin is coded in the higher order logic using the proof assistant COQ. The encoding has been done using two-level meta reasoning in Coq. KDT 4lin has been encoded as an object logic by inductively defining the set of modal linear logic formulas, the sequent relation on lists of these formulas, and some lemmas to work with lists.This modal linear logic has been argued to be a good candidate for epistemic applications. As examples some epistemic problems have been coded and proven in our encoding in Coq::the problem of logical omniscience and an epistemic puzzle: ’King, three wise men and five hats’
Formalization of Complex Vectors in Higher-Order Logic
Complex vector analysis is widely used to analyze continuous systems in many
disciplines, including physics and engineering. In this paper, we present a
higher-order-logic formalization of the complex vector space to facilitate
conducting this analysis within the sound core of a theorem prover: HOL Light.
Our definition of complex vector builds upon the definitions of complex numbers
and real vectors. This extension allows us to extensively benefit from the
already verified theorems based on complex analysis and real vector analysis.
To show the practical usefulness of our library we adopt it to formalize
electromagnetic fields and to prove the law of reflection for the planar waves.Comment: 15 pages, 1 figur
Indexed linear logic and higher-order model checking
In recent work, Kobayashi observed that the acceptance by an alternating tree
automaton A of an infinite tree T generated by a higher-order recursion scheme
G may be formulated as the typability of the recursion scheme G in an
appropriate intersection type system associated to the automaton A. The purpose
of this article is to establish a clean connection between this line of work
and Bucciarelli and Ehrhard's indexed linear logic. This is achieved in two
steps. First, we recast Kobayashi's result in an equivalent infinitary
intersection type system where intersection is not idempotent anymore. Then, we
show that the resulting type system is a fragment of an infinitary version of
Bucciarelli and Ehrhard's indexed linear logic. While this work is very
preliminary and does not integrate key ingredients of higher-order
model-checking like priorities, it reveals an interesting and promising
connection between higher-order model-checking and linear logic.Comment: In Proceedings ITRS 2014, arXiv:1503.0437
- …