356 research outputs found
Upper bounds for alpha-domination parameters
In this paper, we provide a new upper bound for the alpha-domination number.
This result generalises the well-known Caro-Roditty bound for the domination
number of a graph. The same probabilistic construction is used to generalise
another well-known upper bound for the classical domination in graphs. We also
prove similar upper bounds for the alpha-rate domination number, which combines
the concepts of alpha-domination and k-tuple domination.Comment: 7 pages; Presented at the 4th East Coast Combinatorial Conference,
Antigonish (Nova Scotia, Canada), May 1-2, 200
Domination parameters with number 2: Interrelations and algorithmic consequences
In this paper, we study the most basic domination invariants in graphs, in which number 2 is intrinsic part of their definitions. We classify them upon three criteria, two of which give the following previously studied invariants: the weak 2-domination number, γw2(G), the 2-domination number, γ2(G), the {2}-domination number, γ{2}(G), the double domination number, γ×2(G), the total {2}-domination number, γt{2}(G), and the total double domination number, γt×2(G), where G is a graph in which the corresponding invariant is well defined. The third criterion yields rainbow versions of the mentioned six parameters, one of which has already been well studied, and three other give new interesting parameters. Together with a special, extensively studied Roman domination, γR(G), and two classical parameters, the domination number, γ(G), and the total domination number, γt(G), we consider 13 domination invariants in graphs. In the main result of the paper we present sharp upper and lower bounds of each of the invariants in terms of every other invariant, a large majority of which are new results proven in this paper. As a consequence of the main theorem we obtain new complexity results regarding the existence of approximation algorithms for the studied invariants, matched with tight or almost tight inapproximability bounds, which hold even in the class of split graphs.Fil: Bonomo, Flavia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Computación. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Computación; ArgentinaFil: Brešar, Boštjan. Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Mechanics; Eslovenia. University of Maribor; EsloveniaFil: Grippo, Luciano Norberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Instituto de Ciencias; ArgentinaFil: Milanič, Martin. University of Primorska; EsloveniaFil: Safe, Martin Dario. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Instituto de Ciencias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Computación. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Computación; Argentin
Domination parameters with number 2: interrelations and algorithmic consequences
In this paper, we study the most basic domination invariants in graphs, in
which number 2 is intrinsic part of their definitions. We classify them upon
three criteria, two of which give the following previously studied invariants:
the weak -domination number, , the -domination number,
, the -domination number, , the double
domination number, , the total -domination number,
, and the total double domination number, , where is a graph in which a corresponding invariant is well
defined. The third criterion yields rainbow versions of the mentioned six
parameters, one of which has already been well studied, and three other give
new interesting parameters. Together with a special, extensively studied Roman
domination, , and two classical parameters, the domination number,
, and the total domination number, , we consider 13
domination invariants in graphs . In the main result of the paper we present
sharp upper and lower bounds of each of the invariants in terms of every other
invariant, large majority of which are new results proven in this paper. As a
consequence of the main theorem we obtain some complexity results for the
studied invariants, in particular regarding the existence of approximation
algorithms and inapproximability bounds.Comment: 45 pages, 4 tables, 7 figure
On the approximability and exact algorithms for vector domination and related problems in graphs
We consider two graph optimization problems called vector domination and
total vector domination. In vector domination one seeks a small subset S of
vertices of a graph such that any vertex outside S has a prescribed number of
neighbors in S. In total vector domination, the requirement is extended to all
vertices of the graph. We prove that these problems (and several variants
thereof) cannot be approximated to within a factor of clnn, where c is a
suitable constant and n is the number of the vertices, unless P = NP. We also
show that two natural greedy strategies have approximation factors ln D+O(1),
where D is the maximum degree of the input graph. We also provide exact
polynomial time algorithms for several classes of graphs. Our results extend,
improve, and unify several results previously known in the literature.Comment: In the version published in DAM, weaker lower bounds for vector
domination and total vector domination were stated. Being these problems
generalization of domination and total domination, the lower bounds of 0.2267
ln n and (1-epsilon) ln n clearly hold for both problems, unless P = NP or NP
\subseteq DTIME(n^{O(log log n)}), respectively. The claims are corrected in
the present versio
- …