D6.1: Technologies and Tools for Lexical Acquisition

This report describes the technologies and tools to be used for Lexical Acquisition in PANACEA. It includes descriptions of existing technologies and tools which can be built on and improved within PANACEA, as well as of new technologies and tools to be developed and integrated in PANACEA platform. The report also specifies the Lexical Resources to be produced. Four main areas of lexical acquisition are included: Subcategorization frames (SCFs), Selectional Preferences (SPs), Lexical-semantic Classes (LCs), for both nouns and verbs, and Multi-Word Expressions (MWEs)

Selectional Preferences Based on Distributional Semantic Model

In this paper, we propose a approach based on distributional semantic model to the selectional preference in the verb & dobj (direct object) relationship. The distributional representations of words are employed as the semantic feature by using the Word2Vec algorithm. The machine learning method is used to build the discrimination model. Experimental results show that the proposed approach is effective to discriminate the compatibility of the object words and the performance could be improved by increasing the number of training data. By comparing the previous method, the proposed method obtain the promising results with obvious improvement. Moreover, the results demonstrate that the semantics is an universal, effective and stable feature in this task, which is consistent with our awareness of using words

D7.1. Criteria for evaluation of resources, technology and integration.

This deliverable defines how evaluation is carried out at each integration cycle in the PANACEA project. As PANACEA aims at producing large scale resources, evaluation becomes a critical and challenging issue. Critical because it is important to assess the quality of the results that should be delivered to users. Challenging because we prospect rather new areas, and through a technical platform: some new methodologies will have to be explored or old ones to be adapted

Parser lexicalisation through self-learning

We describe a new self-learning framework for parser lexicalisation that requires only a plain-text corpus of in-domain text. The method first creates augmented versions of dependency graphs by applying a series of modifications designed to directly capture higherorder lexical path dependencies. Scores are assigned to each edge in the graph using statistics from an automatically parsed background corpus. As bilexical dependencies are sparse, a novel directed distributional word similarity measure is used to smooth edge score estimates. Edge scores are then combined into graph scores and used for reranking the topn analyses found by the unlexicalised parser. The approach achieves significant improvements on WSJ and biomedical text over the unlexicalised baseline parser, which is originally trained on a subset of the Brown corpus

Distributional lexical semantics: toward uniform representation paradigms for advanced acquisition and processing tasks

The distributional hypothesis states that words with similar distributional properties have similar semantic properties (Harris 1968). This perspective on word semantics, was early discussed in linguistics (Firth 1957; Harris 1968), and then successfully applied to Information Retrieval (Salton, Wong and Yang 1975). In Information Retrieval, distributional notions (e.g. document frequency and word co-occurrence counts) have proved a key factor of success, as opposed to early logic-based approaches to relevance modeling (van Rijsbergen 1986; Chiaramella and Chevallet 1992; van Rijsbergen and Lalmas 1996).</jats:p

Semi-supervised Dependency Parsing using Lexical Affinities

International audienceTreebanks are not large enough to reliably model precise lexical phenomena. This deficiency provokes attachment errors in the parsers trained on such data. We propose in this paper to compute lexical affinities, on large corpora, for specific lexico-syntactic configurations that are hard to disambiguate and introduce the new information in a parser. Experiments on the French Treebank showed a relative decrease of the error rate of 7.1% Labeled Accuracy Score yielding the best pars- ing results on this treebank

Research in the Language, Information and Computation Laboratory of the University of Pennsylvania

This report takes its name from the Computational Linguistics Feedback Forum (CLiFF), an informal discussion group for students and faculty. However the scope of the research covered in this report is broader than the title might suggest; this is the yearly report of the LINC Lab, the Language, Information and Computation Laboratory of the University of Pennsylvania. It may at first be hard to see the threads that bind together the work presented here, work by faculty, graduate students and postdocs in the Computer Science and Linguistics Departments, and the Institute for Research in Cognitive Science. It includes prototypical Natural Language fields such as: Combinatorial Categorial Grammars, Tree Adjoining Grammars, syntactic parsing and the syntax-semantics interface; but it extends to statistical methods, plan inference, instruction understanding, intonation, causal reasoning, free word order languages, geometric reasoning, medical informatics, connectionism, and language acquisition. Naturally, this introduction cannot spell out all the connections between these abstracts; we invite you to explore them on your own. In fact, with this issue it’s easier than ever to do so: this document is accessible on the “information superhighway”. Just call up http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~cliff-group/94/cliffnotes.html In addition, you can find many of the papers referenced in the CLiFF Notes on the net. Most can be obtained by following links from the authors’ abstracts in the web version of this report. The abstracts describe the researchers’ many areas of investigation, explain their shared concerns, and present some interesting work in Cognitive Science. We hope its new online format makes the CLiFF Notes a more useful and interesting guide to Computational Linguistics activity at Penn