342 research outputs found

    Every group is the maximal subgroup of a naturally occurring free idempotent generated semigroup

    Full text link
    Gray and Ruskuc have shown that any group G occurs as the maximal subgroup of some free idempotent generated semigroup IG(E) on a biordered set of idempotents E, thus resolving a long standing open question. Given the group G, they make a careful choice for E and use a certain amount of well developed machinery. Our aim here is to present a short and direct proof of the same result, moreover by using a naturally occuring biordered set. More specifically, for any free G-act F_n(G) of finite rank at least 3, we have that G is a maximal subgroup of IG(E) where E is the biordered set of idempotents of End F_n(G). Note that if G is finite then so is End F_n(G)

    Subgroups of free idempotent generated semigroups: full linear monoid

    Full text link
    We develop some new topological tools to study maximal subgroups of free idempotent generated semigroups. As an application, we show that the rank 1 component of the free idempotent generated semigroup of the biordered set of a full matrix monoid of n x n matrices, n>2$ over a division ring Q has maximal subgroup isomorphic to the multiplicative subgroup of Q.Comment: We hope to use similar methods to study the higher rank component

    On Maximal Subgroups of Free Idempotent Generated Semigroups

    Get PDF
    We prove the following results: (1) Every group is a maximal subgroup of some free idempotent generated semigroup. (2) Every finitely presented group is a maximal subgroup of some free idempotent generated semigroup arising from a finite semigroup. (3) Every group is a maximal subgroup of some free regular idempotent generated semigroup. (4) Every finite group is a maximal subgroup of some free regular idempotent generated semigroup arising from a finite regular semigroup.Comment: 27 page

    Maximal subgroups of free idempotent generated semigroups over the full linear monoid

    Get PDF
    We show that the rank r component of the free idempotent generated semigroup of the biordered set of the full linear monoid of n x n matrices over a division ring Q has maximal subgroup isomorphic to the general linear group GL_r(Q), where n and r are positive integers with r < n/3.Comment: 37 pages; Transactions of the American Mathematical Society (to appear). arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1009.5683 by other author

    On Semigroups with Lower Semimodular Lattice of Subsemigroups

    Get PDF
    The question of which semigroups have lower semimodular lattice of subsemigroups has been open since the early 1960s, when the corresponding question was answered for modularity and for upper semimodularity. We provide a characterization of such semigroups in the language of principal factors. Since it is easily seen (and has long been known) that semigroups for which Green\u27s relation J is trivial have this property, a description in such terms is natural. In the case of periodic semigroupsā€”a case that turns out to include all eventually regular semigroupsā€”the characterization becomes quite explicit and yields interesting consequences. In the general case, it remains an open question whether there exists a simple, but not completely simple, semigroup with this property. Any such semigroup must at least be idempotent-free and D-trivial

    Free idempotent generated semigroups and endomorphism monoids of free GG-acts

    Full text link
    The study of the free idempotent generated semigroup IG(E)\mathrm{IG}(E) over a biordered set EE began with the seminal work of Nambooripad in the 1970s and has seen a recent revival with a number of new approaches, both geometric and combinatorial. Here we study IG(E)\mathrm{IG}(E) in the case EE is the biordered set of a wreath product Gā‰€TnG\wr \mathcal{T}_n, where GG is a group and Tn\mathcal{T}_n is the full transformation monoid on nn elements. This wreath product is isomorphic to the endomorphism monoid of the free GG-act Fn(G)F_n(G) on nn generators, and this provides us with a convenient approach. We say that the rank of an element of Fn(G)F_n(G) is the minimal number of (free) generators in its image. Let Īµ=Īµ2āˆˆFn(G).\varepsilon=\varepsilon^2\in F_n(G). For rather straightforward reasons it is known that if rankā€‰Īµ=nāˆ’1\mathrm{rank}\,\varepsilon =n-1 (respectively, nn), then the maximal subgroup of IG(E)\mathrm{IG}(E) containing Īµ\varepsilon is free (respectively, trivial). We show that if rankā€‰Īµ=r\mathrm{rank}\,\varepsilon =r where 1ā‰¤rā‰¤nāˆ’21\leq r\leq n-2, then the maximal subgroup of IG(E)\mathrm{IG}(E) containing Īµ\varepsilon is isomorphic to that in Fn(G)F_n(G) and hence to Gā‰€SrG\wr \mathcal{S}_r, where Sr\mathcal{S}_r is the symmetric group on rr elements. We have previously shown this result in the case r=1 r=1; however, for higher rank, a more sophisticated approach is needed. Our current proof subsumes the case r=1r=1 and thus provides another approach to showing that any group occurs as the maximal subgroup of some IG(E)\mathrm{IG}(E). On the other hand, varying rr again and taking GG to be trivial, we obtain an alternative proof of the recent result of Gray and Ru\v{s}kuc for the biordered set of idempotents of Tn.\mathcal{T}_n.Comment: 35 page

    Quivers of monoids with basic algebras

    Full text link
    We compute the quiver of any monoid that has a basic algebra over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. More generally, we reduce the computation of the quiver over a splitting field of a class of monoids that we term rectangular monoids (in the semigroup theory literature the class is known as DO\mathbf{DO}) to representation theoretic computations for group algebras of maximal subgroups. Hence in good characteristic for the maximal subgroups, this gives an essentially complete computation. Since groups are examples of rectangular monoids, we cannot hope to do better than this. For the subclass of R\mathscr R-trivial monoids, we also provide a semigroup theoretic description of the projective indecomposables and compute the Cartan matrix.Comment: Minor corrections and improvements to exposition were made. Some theorem statements were simplified. Also we made a language change. Several of our results are more naturally expressed using the language of Karoubi envelopes and irreducible morphisms. There are no substantial changes in actual result
    • ā€¦
    corecore