15 research outputs found

    Performances Evaluation of a Low-Cost Platform for High-Resolution Plant Phenotyping

    Get PDF
    This study aims to test the performances of a low-cost and automatic phenotyping platform, consisting of a Red-Green-Blue (RGB) commercial camera scanning objects on rotating plates and the reconstruction of main plant phenotypic traits via the structure for motion approach (SfM). The precision of this platform was tested in relation to three-dimensional (3D) models generated from images of potted maize, tomato and olive tree, acquired at a different frequency (steps of 4ยฐ, 8ยฐ and 12ยฐ) and quality (4.88, 6.52 and 9.77 ยตm/pixel). Plant and organs heights, angles and areas were extracted from the 3D models generated for each combination of these factors. Coefficient of determination (R2), relative Root Mean Square Error (rRMSE) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) were used as goodness-of-fit indexes to compare the simulated to the observed data. The results indicated that while the best performances in reproducing plant traits were obtained using 90 images at 4.88 ยตm/pixel (R2 = 0.81, rRMSE = 9.49% and AIC = 35.78), this corresponded to an unviable processing time (from 2.46 h to 28.25 h for herbaceous plants and olive trees, respectively). Conversely, 30 images at 4.88 ยตm/pixel resulted in a good compromise between a reliable reconstruction of considered traits (R2 = 0.72, rRMSE = 11.92% and AIC = 42.59) and processing time (from 0.50 h to 2.05 h for herbaceous plants and olive trees, respectively). In any case, the results pointed out that this input combination may vary based on the trait under analysis, which can be more or less demanding in terms of input images and time according to the complexity of its shape (R2 = 0.83, rRSME = 10.15% and AIC = 38.78). These findings highlight the reliability of the developed low-cost platform for plant phenotyping, further indicating the best combination of factors to speed up the acquisition and elaboration process, at the same time minimizing the bias between observed and simulated data

    3์ฐจ์› ์Šค์บ” ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๊ด‘ํ•™ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ํŒŒํ”„๋ฆฌ์นด์˜ ์ƒ์œก ๋‹จ๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ์ฐจ๊ด‘ ์กฐ๊ฑด๋ณ„ ์ˆ˜๊ด‘๊ณผ ๊ด‘ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ์†๋„ ์˜ˆ์ธก

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๋†์—…์ƒ๋ช…๊ณผํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™ ์‹๋ฌผ์ƒ์‚ฐ๊ณผํ•™๋ถ€(์›์˜ˆ๊ณผํ•™์ „๊ณต), 2019. 2. ์†์ •์ต.In greenhouses, many crops are cultivated at high planting densities because this type of cultivation is highly productive and presents economic advantages. A high planting density causes strong mutual shading effects among adjacent crops, decreasing canopy light interception, photosynthesis, and consequently, crop yield and quality. The objective of this study was to analyze the light interception and photosynthetic rates of the paprika canopy using 3D-scanned plant models and optical simulation according to the growth stage and shading condition. Here, 3D plant models of paprika plants grown in greenhouses were constructed at 7, 35, 63, 91, and 112 days after transplanting by using a portable 3D scanner. To investigate the shading effects, the 3D-scanned plant models were arranged as isotropic forms of 1 ร— 1, 3 ร— 3, 5 ร— 5, 7 ร— 7, and 9 ร— 9 plants with a distance of 60 cm between plants, and the light interception of the center plant in the arrangement was obtained with the growth stage by simulation. The canopy photosynthetic rates were calculated using the Farquhar, von Caemmerer, and Berry (FvCB) model. The total canopy light interception and light interception per unit leaf area of the center plant decreased due to the self- and mutual shading effects caused by the growth of each plant and the increase in the number of surrounding plants. The canopy photosynthetic rates showed similar patterns to those of the total light interception, but their decreasing rate was less than that of the total light interception because the leaf photosynthetic rate was saturated at the top of the canopy. In this study, the spatial distributions of the canopy light interception and photosynthetic rates could be analyzed by using 3D-scanned models of paprika and optical simulation. This method can be an effective tool for designing crop cultivation systems as well as estimating canopy light interception and photosynthesis in greenhouses.์˜จ์‹ค์—์„œ๋Š” ๋†’์€ ๋‹จ์œ„ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋†’์€ ์žฌ์‹ ๋ฐ€๋„๋กœ ์ž‘๋ฌผ์„ ์žฌ๋ฐฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋†’์€ ์žฌ์‹ ๋ฐ€๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ๋Š” ์ธ์ ‘ํ•œ ๊ฐœ์ฒด์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ฐจ๊ด‘์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ์บ๋…ธํ”ผ ์ˆ˜๊ด‘๊ณผ ๊ด‘ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ , ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ž‘๋ฌผ ์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์˜ ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ตœ์  ์žฌ์‹ ๋ฐ€๋„๋ฅผ ์ฐพ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐ„์ ‘์ ์ธ ๋‹จ์œ„๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž‘๋ฌผ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„์ด ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ 3์ฐจ์› ์Šค์บ” ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๊ด‘ํ•™ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํŒŒํ”„๋ฆฌ์นด์˜ ์ƒ์œก ๋‹จ๊ณ„์™€ ์ฐจ๊ด‘ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ˆ˜๊ด‘๊ณผ ๊ด‘ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. 3์ฐจ์› ์Šค์บ๋‹์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ •์‹ ํ›„ 7, 35, 63, 91, 112์ผ์˜ ์ž‘๋ฌผ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ž‘๋ฌผ์˜ ์ฐจ๊ด‘ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ž‘๋ฌผ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ 60cm ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ 1 ร— 1, 3 ร— 3, 5 ร— 5, 7 ร— 7, 9 ร— 9๋กœ ์ •๋ฐฉํ˜• ๋ฐฐ์น˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ์œก ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋ณ„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ค‘์‹ฌ์— ์œ„์น˜ํ•œ ๊ฐœ์ฒด์˜ ์ˆ˜๊ด‘๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์บ๋…ธํ”ผ ๊ด‘ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ์†๋„๋Š” FvCB ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ƒ์œก ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ๊ฐœ์ฒด ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ• ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ž‘๋ฌผ ์ˆ˜๊ด‘๋Ÿ‰์€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ๋‹จ์œ„ ์—ฝ๋ฉด์ ๋‹น ์ˆ˜๊ด‘๋Ÿ‰์€ ์ž‘๋ฌผ์˜ ์ƒ์œก์ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ฐ ์ž‘๋ฌผ์˜ ์ƒ์œก์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ž๊ธฐ ๊ด‘ ์ฐจ๋‹จ๊ณผ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ์ž‘๋ฌผ์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ƒํ˜ธ ๊ด‘ ์ฐจ๋‹จ ํšจ๊ณผ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๊ฐ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด์‚ฐํ™”ํƒ„์†Œ ์†Œ๋ชจ๋Ÿ‰์€ ์ด ์ˆ˜๊ด‘๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ™” ์–‘์ƒ์„ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, ์ž‘๋ฌผ ์ƒ๋‹จ๋ถ€์—์„œ ๊ด‘ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ํฌํ™”๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ˆ˜๊ด‘๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๊ฐ์†Œ์œจ์€ ์ž‘์•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ๋Š” ํŒŒํ”„๋ฆฌ์นด์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ์Šค์บ” ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๊ด‘ํ•™ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ์œก ๋‹จ๊ณ„์™€ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ๊ฐœ์ฒด์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ž‘๋ฌผ์˜ ์ˆ˜๊ด‘๊ณผ ๊ด‘ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ถ”ํ›„ ์˜จ์‹ค ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์ž‘๋ฌผ ์žฌ๋ฐฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๋””์ž์ธํ•˜๊ณ , ์ˆ˜๊ด‘๊ณผ ๊ด‘ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ์— ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.ABSTRACT i CONTENTS iii LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF FIGURES v INTRODUCTION 1 LITERATURE REVIEW 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 6 DISCUSSION 12 CONCLUSION 24 LITERATURE CITED 29 APPENDICES 37 ABSTRACT IN KOREAN 40Maste

    ์˜จ์‹ค ๋‚ด ๊ตฐ๋ฝ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ LED๋ณด๊ด‘์— ์˜ํ•œ ํŒŒํ”„๋ฆฌ์นด์˜ ๊ด‘ ์ด์šฉ ํšจ์œจ ๋ฐ ๋ฌผ ์ด์šฉ ํšจ์œจ ํ‰๊ฐ€

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๋†์—…์ƒ๋ช…๊ณผํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™ ๋†๋ฆผ์ƒ๋ฌผ์ž์›ํ•™๋ถ€, 2021.8. ๊ถŒ์„ฑ๋ฏผ.In greenhouses, the higher plant density, the less sunlight inside the canopy due to mutual shadings by adjacent plants. As a countermeasure, inter-lighting has been introduced to compensate for the lack of light in the middle and bottom parts of the canopy. However, most research have focused on growth and yield, not light use efficiency (LUE) and water use efficiency (WUE). The objective of this study was to evaluate the LUE and WUE of sweet peppers subjected to inter-lighting in greenhouses. Two lighting treatments, natural light (control) and supplemental inter-lighting of red and blue LEDs, were applied. The inter-lighting started at 34 days after transplanting (DAT). The ratio of red and blue light in photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) was 8:2, and the total PPFD was adjusted to 71 ฮผmolยทm2ยทs1 at 20 cm distance. To quantify the transpiration from the plants, the amount of daily transpiration was measured by subtracting the drainage from the supplied nutrient solution, and hydroponic system weight change. The photosynthetic rate was obtained by measuring light response curves at light intensities of 0, 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 900, 1200, 1500, and 2000 ฮผmolยทm2ยทs1 in PPFD. The LUEs were calculated based on the light interception obtained by 3D-scanned plant models and ray-tracing simulation. The WUEs were calculated using dry weight per accumulated water consumption. The calculated results showed the increase in LUE at the canopy level, which is likely due to the improvement of canopy light distribution by inter-lighting. The WUE for biomass and fruit yield were higher in inter-lighting than those in the control. These results were due to the increases in plant dry weight and fruit yield, which is greater than the increase in water consumption by inter-lighting. In this study, the improvement of LUE and WUE by inter-lighting could be quantified by optical simulation and the water consumption during the whole growth period.์˜จ์‹ค์—์„œ๋Š” ์žฌ์‹๋ฐ€๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•„์งˆ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ธ์ ‘ํ•œ ์‹๋ฌผ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ฐ„์„ญ ํ˜„์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์บ๋…ธํ”ผ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์— ๋น›์ด ๋ถ€์กฑํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋Œ€์ฑ…์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฐ๋ฝ ์ค‘, ํ•˜๋‹จ๋ถ€์˜ ๋น› ๋ถ€์กฑ์„ ๋ณด์™„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ตฐ๋ฝ ๋‚ด ๋ณด๊ด‘์„ ๋„์ž…ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์žฌ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ด‘์ด์šฉ ํšจ์œจ(LUE), ๋ฌผ์ด์šฉ ํšจ์œจ(WUE)์ด ์•„๋‹Œ ์ƒ์žฅ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜ํ™•๋Ÿ‰์— ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ”์–ด ์™”๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์˜จ์‹ค์—์„œ ๊ตฐ๋ฝ ๋‚ด ์ธก๋ฉด ๋ณด๊ด‘(inter-lighting) ํ•˜์—์„œ ์ž๋ž€ ํŒŒํ”„๋ฆฌ์นด์˜ LUE์™€ WUE๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ž์—ฐ๊ด‘(๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฌ)๊ณผ ์ž์—ฐ๊ด‘์— ์ ์ƒ‰ ๋ฐ ์ฒญ์ƒ‰ LED์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋ณด๊ด‘ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณด๊ด‘ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์ •์‹ ํ›„ 34์ผ (DAT)์— ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ ์ƒ‰ ๋ฐ ์ฒญ์ƒ‰ LED ๋น„์œจ์ด 8:2์ธ ๊ด‘์›์€ 20cm ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ์—์„œ 71mol ยท m-2 ยท s-1๋กœ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹๋ฌผ์˜ ์ฆ์‚ฐ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™” ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ˆ˜๊ฒฝ์žฌ๋ฐฐ ๋ฌด๊ฒŒ์ธก์ • ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธ‰์•ก๋Ÿ‰์—์„œ ๋ฐฐ์•ก๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ œํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜๋ฃจ ์ฆ์‚ฐ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ธก์ •ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ด‘ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์†๋„๋Š” 0, 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 900, 1200, 1500, 2000 ฮผmol ยท m-2 ยท s-1์—์„œ ๊ด‘๋ฐ˜์‘ ๊ณก์„ ์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์–ป์—ˆ๋‹ค. LUE๋Š” 40, 60, 80, 100 ๋ฐ 120 DAT์—์„œ 3D ์‹๋ฌผ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ฐ ๊ด‘ํ•™ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์œผ๋กœ ์ธก์ •ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๊ด‘ ํƒœ์„ธ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. WUE๋Š” 40, 60, 80, 100 ๋ฐ 120 DAT์—์„œ ๋ˆ„์ ๋œ ๋ฌผ ์†Œ๋น„๋Ÿ‰ ๋Œ€๋น„ ๊ฑด์กฐ์ค‘์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์—์„œ ์บ๋…ธํ”ผ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ LUE๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋ณด๊ด‘ ์ด ์บ๋…ธํ”ผ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์˜ ์ˆ˜๊ด‘ ๊ฐœ์„ ์— ๊ธฐ์ธํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ๊ฑด๋ฌผ์ค‘ ๋ฐ ๊ณผ์ผ ์ƒ์‚ฐ๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ WUE๋Š” ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋ณด๊ด‘ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋” ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋ณด๊ด‘์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋ฌผ ์†Œ๋น„๋ณด๋‹ค ์‹๋ฌผ์˜ ๊ฑด์กฐ ์ค‘๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๊ณผ์ผ ์ˆ˜ํ™•๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํญ์ด ๋” ๋†’์•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ด‘ํ•™ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ์ „์ฒด ์ƒ์žฅ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ์˜ ๋ฌผ ์ด์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฐ๋ฝ ๋‚ด ์ธก๋ฉด ๋ณด๊ด‘์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ LUE ๋ฐ WUE ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™” ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.INTRODUCTION 1 LITERATURE REVIEW 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 5 RESULTS 15 DISCUSSION 25 CONCLUSION 28 LITERATURE CITED 29 ABSTRACT IN KOREAN 39์„

    Application of UAV based high-resolution remote sensing for crop monitoring

    Get PDF
    Advances in technologies could offer enormous potential for crop monitoring applications, allowing the real-time acquisition of various environmental data. Technology such as high spatio-temporal imagery of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVโ€™s) can be widely used in crop monitoring applications. These technologies are expected to revolutionize the global agriculture practices, by enabling decision-making during the crop cycle days. Such results allow the effective practice of agricultural inputs, aiding precision agriculture pillars, i.e., applying the right practice in the right place, with the right amount and time. However, the actual exploitation of UAVโ€™s has not been much strong in smart farming, mainly due to the challenges faced during selecting and deploying relevant technologies, including data acquisition and processing methods. The major problem is that there is still no consistent workflow for the use of UAVโ€™s in such areas, as this mechanization is relatively new. In this article, the latest applications of UAVโ€™s for crop monitoring are reviewed. It covers the most common applications, the types of UAVโ€™s used and then we focused on data acquisition methods and technologies, employing the benefit and drawbacks of each. It also indicates the most popular image processing methods and summarizes the potential application in agricultural operations.ย 

    Automatic leaf segmentation and overlapping leaf separation using stereo vision

    Get PDF
    Farm management and crop quality assessment is becoming increasingly automated to keep up with demand. The physical examination of the plant leaves, stems and fruit can provide valuable information about a plantโ€™s health. Automating the visual inspection through machine vision spawns challenges such as occlusions, irregular lightning and varying environmental conditions. In this paper, a plant leaf extraction algorithm utilising depth from a stereo vision sensor is presented. The algorithm tackles multiple leaf segmentation and overlapping leaf separation through synergising features such as colour, shape and depth. Depth is particularly used to measure discontinuities along its gradient in the disparity maps. The algorithm has a segmentation rate of 78% for individual plant leaves, over a range of complex backgrounds and changing plant canopies. The proposed algorithm was evaluated using 272 cotton and hibiscus plant images with results demonstrating that depth properties were effective in separating occluded and overlapping leaves, with a high separation rate of 84%. Leaf occlusion could be detected automatically without adding any artificial tags on the leaf boundaries. Furthermore, the results show a nearly identical performance for both types of plants (cotton and hibiscus) under various lighting and environmental conditions. The developed algorithm could be potentially applied to other types of plants that have similar structures to cotton and hibiscus

    ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์ด์˜จ ๋ฐ ์ž‘๋ฌผ ์ƒ์œก ์„ผ์‹ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ •๋ฐ€ ์ˆ˜๊ฒฝ์žฌ๋ฐฐ ์–‘์•ก ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๋†์—…์ƒ๋ช…๊ณผํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™ ๋ฐ”์ด์˜ค์‹œ์Šคํ…œยท์†Œ์žฌํ•™๋ถ€(๋ฐ”์ด์˜ค์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ณตํ•™), 2020. 8. ๊น€ํ•™์ง„.In current closed hydroponics, the nutrient solution monitoring and replenishment are conducted based on the electrical conductivity (EC) and pH, and the fertigation is carried out with the constant time without considering the plant status. However, the EC-based management is unable to detect the dynamic changes in the individual nutrient ion concentrations so the ion imbalance occurs during the iterative replenishment, thereby leading to the frequent discard of the nutrient solution. The constant time-based fertigation inevitably induces over- or under-supply of the nutrient solution for the growing plants. The approaches are two of the main causes of decreasing water and nutrient use efficiencies in closed hydroponics. Regarding the issues, the precision nutrient solution management that variably controls the fertigation volume and corrects the deficient nutrient ions individually would allow both improved efficiencies of fertilizer and water use and increased lifespan of the nutrient solution. The objectives of this study were to establish the precision nutrient solution management system that can automatically and variably control the fertigation volume based on the plant-growth information and supply the individual nutrient fertilizers in appropriate amounts to reach the optimal compositions as nutrient solutions for growing plants. To achieve the goal, the sensing technologies for the varying requirements of water and nutrients were investigated and validated. Firstly, an on-the-go monitoring system was constructed to monitor the lettuces grown under the closed hydroponics based on the nutrient film technique for the entire bed. The region of the lettuces was segmented by the excess green (ExG) and Otsu method to obtain the canopy cover (CC). The feasibility of the image processing for assessing the canopy (CC) was validated by comparing the computed CC values with the manually analyzed CC values. From the validation, it was confirmed the image monitoring and processing for the CC measurements were feasible for the lettuces before harvest. Then, a transpiration rate model using the modified Penman-Monteith equation was fitted based on the obtained CC, radiation, air temperature, and relative humidity to estimate the water need of the growing lettuces. Regarding the individual ion concentration measurements, two-point normalization, artificial neural network, and a hybrid signal processing consisting of the two-point normalization and artificial neural network were compared to select an effective method for the ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) application in continuous and autonomous monitoring of ions in hydroponic solutions. The hybrid signal processing showed the most accuracy in sample measurements, but the vulnerability to the sensor malfunction made the two-point normalization method with the most precision would be appropriate for the long-term monitoring of the nutrient solution. In order to determine the optimal injection amounts of the fertilizer salts and water for the given target individual ion concentrations, a decision tree-based dosing algorithm was designed. The feasibility of the dosing algorithm was validated with the stepwise and varying target focusing replenishments. From the results, the ion-specific replenishments formulated the compositions of the nutrient solution successfully according to the given target values. Finally, the proposed sensing and control techniques were integrated to implement the precision nutrient solution management, and the performance was verified by a closed lettuce cultivation test. From the application test, the fertigation volume was reduced by 57.4% and the growth of the lettuces was promoted in comparison with the constant timer-based fertigation strategy. Furthermore, the system successfully maintained the nutrient balance in the recycled solution during the cultivation with the coefficients of variance of 4.9%, 1.4%, 3.2%, 5.2%, and 14.9%, which were generally less than the EC-based replenishment with the CVs of 6.9%, 4.9%, 23.7%, 8.6%, and 8.3% for the NO3, K, Ca, Mg, and P concentrations, respectively. These results implied the developed precision nutrient solution management system could provide more efficient supply and management of water and nutrients than the conventional methods, thereby allowing more improved water and nutrient use efficiencies and crop productivity.ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ ์ˆœํ™˜์‹ ์ˆ˜๊ฒฝ์žฌ๋ฐฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ์–‘์•ก์˜ ๋ถ„์„๊ณผ ๋ณด์ถฉ์€ ์ „๊ธฐ์ „๋„๋„ (EC, electrical conductivity) ๋ฐ pH๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์–‘์•ก์˜ ๊ณต๊ธ‰์€ ์ž‘๋ฌผ์˜ ์ƒ์œก ์ƒํƒœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณ ๋ ค ์—†์ด ํ•ญ์ƒ ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ ํŽŒํ”„๊ฐ€ ๋™์ž‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋˜๋Š” ํ˜•ํƒœ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ EC ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์–‘์•ก ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์ด์˜จ ๋†๋„์˜ ๋™์ ์ธ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์ง€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์–ด ๋ฐ˜๋ณต๋˜๋Š” ๋ณด์ถฉ ์ค‘ ๋ถˆ๊ท ํ˜•์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜์–ด ์–‘์•ก์˜ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๊ณ ์ •๋œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ์˜ ์–‘์•ก ๊ณต๊ธ‰์€ ์ž‘๋ฌผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ณผ์ž‰ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถˆ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ๋ฌผ ๊ณต๊ธ‰์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ ธ ๋ฌผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ํšจ์œจ์˜ ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ์ผ์œผํ‚จ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด, ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์ด์˜จ ๋†๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋ถ€์กฑํ•œ ์„ฑ๋ถ„๋งŒ์„ ์„ ํƒ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ถฉํ•˜๊ณ , ์ž‘๋ฌผ์˜ ์ƒ์œก ์ •๋„์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ค€์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ์–‘์•ก์„ ๊ณต๊ธ‰ํ•˜๋Š” ์ •๋ฐ€ ๋†์—…์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ์–‘์•ก ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋ฌผ๊ณผ ๋น„๋ฃŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ํšจ์œจ์˜ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๊ณผ ์–‘์•ก์˜ ์žฌ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ์ฆ์ง„์„ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์ž๋™์œผ๋กœ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ฐ€๋ณ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ž‘๋ฌผ ์ƒ์œก ์ •๋ณด์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์–‘์•ก ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๊ณ , ์ž‘๋ฌผ ์ƒ์žฅ์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ์กฐ์„ฑ์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ํ˜„์žฌ ์–‘์•ก์˜ ์ด์˜จ ๋†๋„ ์„ผ์‹ฑ์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ค€๋งŒํผ์˜ ๋ฌผ๊ณผ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์–‘๋ถ„ ๋น„๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ถฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ •๋ฐ€ ์ˆ˜๊ฒฝ์žฌ๋ฐฐ ์–‘์•ก ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ํ•ด๋‹น ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ณ€์ดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌผ๊ณผ ์–‘๋ถ„ ์š”๊ตฌ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋“ค์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฐ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€์ฆ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ €, ์ž‘๋ฌผ์˜ ๋ฌผ ์š”๊ตฌ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์˜์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ธก์ • ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์˜์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ถ„์„ ํ™œ์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฐ•๋ง‰๊ฒฝ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ˆœํ™˜์‹ ์ˆ˜๊ฒฝ์žฌ๋ฐฐ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์ž๋ผ๋Š” ์ƒ์ถ”์˜ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋“ค์„ ์ „์ฒด ๋ฒ ๋“œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์˜์ƒ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•œ ์˜์ƒ ์ค‘ ์ƒ์ถ” ๋ถ€๋ถ„๋งŒ์„ excess green (ExG)๊ณผ Otsu ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ถ„๋ฆฌํ•˜์—ฌ ํˆฌ์˜์ž‘๋ฌผ๋ฉด์  (CC, canopy cover)์„ ํš๋“ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์˜์ƒ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์ ์šฉ์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ง์ ‘ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ํˆฌ์˜์ž‘๋ฌผ๋ฉด์  ๊ฐ’๊ณผ ์ด๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋น„๊ต ๊ฒ€์ฆ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์—์„œ ํˆฌ์˜์ž‘๋ฌผ๋ฉด์  ์ธก์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์˜์ƒ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„์ด ์ˆ˜ํ™• ์ „๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ์ƒ์ถ”์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ดํ›„ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•œ ํˆฌ์˜์ž‘๋ฌผ๋ฉด์ ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์˜จ, ์ƒ๋Œ€์Šต๋„, ์ผ์‚ฌ๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์œก ์ค‘์ธ ์ƒ์ถ”๋“ค์ด ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌผ์˜ ์–‘์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด Penman-Monteith ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ฆ์‚ฐ๋Ÿ‰ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์‹ค์ œ ์ฆ์‚ฐ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ ๋†’์€ ์ผ์น˜๋„๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์ด์˜จ ๋†๋„ ์ธก์ •๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ์„œ๋Š”, ์ด์˜จ์„ ํƒ์„ฑ์ „๊ทน (ISE, ion-selective electrode)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ˆ˜๊ฒฝ์žฌ๋ฐฐ ์–‘์•ก ๋‚ด ์ด์˜จ์˜ ์—ฐ์†์ ์ด๊ณ  ์ž์œจ์ ์ธ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์„ ์œ„ํ•ด 2์  ์ •๊ทœํ™”, ์ธ๊ณต์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ด ๋‘˜์„ ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•œ ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, ์„ผ์„œ ๊ณ ์žฅ์— ์ทจ์•ฝํ•œ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์žฅ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ์ •๋ฐ€๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ 2์  ์ •๊ทœํ™” ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์„ผ์„œ ์–ด๋ ˆ์ด์— ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ ํ•ฉํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์ด์˜จ ๋†๋„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๊ฐ’์— ๋งž๋Š” ๋น„๋ฃŒ ์—ผ ๋ฐ ๋ฌผ์˜ ์ตœ์  ์ฃผ์ž…๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์˜์‚ฌ๊ฒฐ์ •ํŠธ๋ฆฌ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ๋น„๋ฃŒ ํˆฌ์ž… ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ๋น„๋ฃŒ ํˆฌ์ž… ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ˆœ์ฐจ์ ์ธ ๋ชฉํ‘œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ณด์ถฉ ๋ฐ ํŠน์ • ์„ฑ๋ถ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ง‘์ค‘์ ์ธ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ถ€์—ฌํ•œ ๋ณด์ถฉ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๊ฐ’๋“ค์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์–‘์•ก์„ ์กฐ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ์ œ์‹œ๋˜์—ˆ๋˜ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ๋ฐ ์ œ์–ด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ NFT ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ˆœํ™˜์‹ ์ˆ˜๊ฒฝ์žฌ๋ฐฐ ๋ฐฐ๋“œ์— ์ƒ์ถ” ์žฌ๋ฐฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ค์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ฆ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ, ์ข…๋ž˜์˜ ๊ณ ์ • ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์–‘์•ก ๊ณต๊ธ‰ ๋Œ€๋น„ 57.4%์˜ ์–‘์•ก ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฐ์†Œ์™€ ์ƒ์ถ” ์ƒ์œก์˜ ์ด‰์ง„์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋™์‹œ์—, ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ NO3, K, Ca, Mg, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  P์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ฐ๊ฐ 4.9%, 1.4%, 3.2%, 5.2%, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  14.9% ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๋ณ€๋™๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ EC๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ณด์ถฉ ๋ฐฉ์‹์—์„œ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚œ ๋ณ€๋™๊ณ„์ˆ˜ 6.9%, 4.9%, 23.7%, 8.6%, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  8.3%๋ณด๋‹ค ๋Œ€์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์ด์˜จ ๊ท ํ˜• ์œ ์ง€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ์ •๋ฐ€ ๊ด€๋น„ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ด ๊ธฐ์กด๋ณด๋‹ค ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์–‘์•ก์˜ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์–‘์•ก ์ด์šฉ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ์˜ ์ฆ์ง„์— ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 BACKGROUND 1 Nutrient Imbalance 2 Fertigation Scheduling 3 OBJECTIVES 7 ORGANIZATION OF THE DISSERTATION 8 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 10 VARIABILITY OF NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS IN HYDROPONICS 10 LIMITATIONS OF CURRENT NUTRIENT SOLUTION MANAGEMENT IN CLOSED HYDROPONIC SYSTEM 11 ION-SPECIFIC NUTRIENT MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT IN CLOSED HYDROPONICS 13 REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES FOR PLANT MONITORING 17 FERTIGATION CONTROL METHODS BASED ON REMOTE SENSING 19 CHAPTER 3. ON-THE-GO CROP MONITORING SYSTEM FOR ESTIMATION OF THE CROP WATER NEED 21 ABSTRACT 21 INTRODUCTION 21 MATERIALS AND METHODS 23 Hydroponic Growth Chamber 23 Construction of an On-the-go Crop Monitoring System 25 Image Processing for Canopy Cover Estimation 29 Evaluation of the CC Calculation Performance 32 Estimation Model for Transpiration Rate 32 Determination of the Parameters of the Transpiration Rate Model 33 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 35 Performance of the CC Measurement by the Image Monitoring System 35 Plant Growth Monitoring in Closed Hydroponics 39 Evaluation of the Crop Water Need Estimation 42 CONCLUSIONS 46 CHAPTER 4. HYBRID SIGNAL-PROCESSING METHOD BASED ON NEURAL NETWORK FOR PREDICTION OF NO3, K, CA, AND MG IONS IN HYDROPONIC SOLUTIONS USING AN ARRAY OF ION-SELECTIVE ELECTRODES 48 ABSTRACT 48 INTRODUCTION 49 MATERIALS AND METHODS 52 Preparation of the Sensor Array 52 Construction and Evaluation of Data-Processing Methods 53 Preparation of Samples 57 Procedure of Sample Measurements 59 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 63 Determination of the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Structure 63 Evaluation of the Processing Methods in Training Samples 64 Application of the Processing Methods in Real Hydroponic Samples 67 CONCLUSIONS 72 CHAPTER 5. DECISION TREE-BASED ION-SPECIFIC NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ALGORITHM FOR CLOSED HYDROPONICS 74 ABSTRACT 74 INTRODUCTION 75 MATERIALS AND METHODS 77 Decision Tree-based Dosing Algorithm 77 Development of an Ion-Specific Nutrient Management System 82 Implementation of Ion-Specific Nutrient Management with Closed-Loop Control 87 System Validation Tests 89 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 91 Five-stepwise Replenishment Test 91 Replenishment Test Focused on The Ca 97 CONCLUSIONS 99 CHAPTER 6. ION-SPECIFIC AND CROP GROWTH SENSING BASED NUTRIENT SOLUTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR CLOSED HYDROPONICS 101 ABSTRACT 101 INTRODUCTION 102 MATERIALS AND METHODS 103 System Integration 103 Implementation of the Precision Nutrient Solution Management System 106 Application of the Precision Nutrient Solution Management System to Closed Lettuce Soilless Cultivation 112 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 113 Evaluation of the Plant Growth-based Fertigation in the Closed Lettuce Cultivation 113 Evaluation of the Ion-Specific Management in the Closed Lettuce Cultivation 118 CONCLUSIONS 128 CHAPTER 7. CONCLUSIONS 130 CONCLUSIONS OF THE STUDY 130 SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE STUDY 134 LIST OF REFERENCES 136 APPENDIX 146 A1. Python Code for Controlling the Image Monitoring and CC Calculation 146 A2. Ion Concentrations of the Solutions used in Chapter 4 (Unit: mgโˆ™Lโˆ’1) 149 A3. Block Diagrams of the LabVIEW Program used in Chapter 4 150 A4. Ion Concentrations of the Solutions used in Chapters 5 and 6 (Unit: mgโˆ™Lโˆ’1) 154 A5. Block Diagrams of the LabVIEW Program used in the Chapters 5 and 6 155 ABSTRACT IN KOREAN 160Docto

    Inferring plantโ€“plant interactions using remote sensing

    Get PDF
    Rapid technological advancements and increasing data availability have improved the capacity to monitor and evaluate Earth's ecology via remote sensing. However, remote sensing is notoriously โ€˜blindโ€™ to fine-scale ecological processes such as interactions among plants, which encompass a central topic in ecology. Here, we discuss how remote sensing technologies can help infer plantโ€“plant interactions and their roles in shaping plant-based systems at individual, community and landscape levels. At each of these levels, we outline the key attributes of ecosystems that emerge as a product of plantโ€“plant interactions and could possibly be detected by remote sensing data. We review the theoretical bases, approaches and prospects of how inference of plantโ€“plant interactions can be assessed remotely. At the individual level, we illustrate how close-range remote sensing tools can help to infer plantโ€“plant interactions, especially in experimental settings. At the community level, we use forests to illustrate how remotely sensed community structure can be used to infer dominant interactions as a fundamental force in shaping plant communities. At the landscape level, we highlight how remotely sensed attributes of vegetation states and spatial vegetation patterns can be used to assess the role of local plantโ€“plant interactions in shaping landscape ecological systems. Synthesis. Remote sensing extends the domain of plant ecology to broader and finer spatial scales, assisting to scale ecological patterns and search for generic rules. Robust remote sensing approaches are likely to extend our understanding of how plantโ€“plant interactions shape ecological processes across scalesโ€”from individuals to landscapes. Combining these approaches with theories, models, experiments, data-driven approaches and data analysis algorithms will firmly embed remote sensing techniques into ecological context and open new pathways to better understand biotic interactions

    Estimating rice yield related traits and quantitative trait loci analysis under different nitrogen treatments using a simple tower-based field phenotyping system with modified single-lens reflex cameras

    Get PDF
    CIAT- Outstanding Research Publication Award (ORPA) - 2017Application of field based high-throughput phenotyping (FB-HTP) methods for monitoring plant performance in real field conditions has a high potential to accelerate the breeding process. In this paper, we discuss the use of a simple tower based remote sensing platform using modified single-lens reflex cameras for phenotyping yield traits in rice under different nitrogen (N) treatments over three years. This tower based phenotyping platform has the advantages of simplicity, ease and stability in terms of introduction, maintenance and continual operation under field conditions. Out of six phenological stages of rice analyzed, the flowering stage was the most useful in the estimation of yield performance under field conditions. We found a high correlation between several vegetation indices (simple ratio (SR), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), transformed vegetation index (TVI), corrected transformed vegetation index (CTVI), soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) and modified soil-adjusted vegetation index (MSAVI)) and multiple yield traits (panicle number, grain weight and shoot biomass) across a three trials. Among all of the indices studied, SR exhibited the best performance in regards to the estimation of grain weight (R2 = 0.80). Under our tower-based field phenotyping system (TBFPS), we identified quantitative trait loci (QTL) for yield related traits using a mapping population of chromosome segment substitution lines (CSSLs) and a single nucleotide polymorphism data set. Our findings suggest the TBFPS can be useful for the estimation of yield performance during early crop development. This can be a major opportunity for rice breeders whom desire high throughput phenotypic selection for yield performance traits

    Sensorbasierte 3D-Modellierung zur morphologischen Phรคnotypisierung am Beispiel von Mais

    Get PDF
    Phรคnotypisierung ist eine Schlรผsseltechnologie fรผr das Feldversuchswesen in der Pflanzenzucht. Mit den gewonnenen Informationen รผber den Phรคnotyp der Pflanzen lassen sich neue Strategien fรผr die Zรผchtung ableiten, um so die Qualitรคt der Pflanzen und den Ertrag zu optimieren. Wichtige Bestandteile des Phรคnotyps sind hierbei die morphologischen Eigenschaften der Pflanze. Bislang werden die Analysen des morphologischen Phรคnotyps im Feldversuchswesen weitgehend mit manuellen Methoden durchgefรผhrt, in denen Experten die Pflanzen stichprobenartig bewerten. Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit wurden zwei Methoden zur automatischen, morphologischen Phรคnotypisierung von Maispflanzen entwickelt, die eine objektive Beurteilung von Einzelpflanzen ermรถglichen. Die Datenbasis fรผr diese Methoden lieferten Time-of-Flight-Kameras, die zunรคchst auf ihre Tauglichkeit fรผr die Phรคnotypisierung unter Feldbedingungen untersucht wurden. In der ersten Methode wurde ein Top-View-Ansatz verfolgt. Mit diesem wurde das Tiefenbild der Einzelpflanze mit Hilfe von Skelettierungsalgorithmen analysiert. Als Ergebnis konnten mit dieser Methode die Pflanzenhรถhe und die Blattanzahl der Pflanze bestimmt werden. Im zweiten Ansatz wurden mindestens vier Kameras im Abstand von 90ยฐ um die Pflanze positioniert und mit Hilfe eines Multi-View-Konzeptes die entstandenen Punktwolken der Pflanze in ein dreidimensionales Pflanzenmodell รผberfรผhrt. Hierfรผr wurden 3D-Rekonstruktionsalgorithmen angewandt und die entstandene 3D-Punktwolke vernetzt. Im Anschluss wurde das Pflanzenmodell mit den in dieser Arbeit entwickelten Algorithmen geometrisch analysiert. Neben Pflanzenhรถhe und Blattanzahl konnten mit dieser Methode auch Blattlรคnge und Blattflรคche ermittelt werden. Im Vergleich zu den manuellen Methoden zur Phรคnotypisierung von Pflanzen bieten die im Rahmen dieser Arbeit entwickelten Methoden die Mรถglichkeit einer dynamischen, morphologischen Untersuchung von Maispflanzen unter Labor- und Gewรคchshausbedingungen im BBCH Makrostadium 1 mit einer gemeinsamen Datenbasis
    corecore