Decidability Equivalence between the Star Problem and the Finite Power Problem in Trace Monoids

In the last decade, some researches on the star problem in trace monoids (is the iteration of a recognizable language also recognizable?) has pointed out the interest of the finite power property to achieve partial solutions of this problem. We prove that the star problem is decidable in some trace monoid if and only if in the same monoid, it is decidable whether a recognizable language has the finite power property. Intermediary results allow us to give a shorter proof for the decidability of the two previous problems in every trace monoid without C4-submonoid. We also deal with some earlier ideas, conjectures, and questions which have been raised in the research on the star problem and the finite power property, e.g. we show the decidability of these problems for recognizable languages which contain at most one non-connected trace

A Connection between the Star Problem and the Finite Power Property in Trace Monoids

This paper deals with a connection between two decision problems for recognizable trace languages: the star problem and the finite power property problem. Due to a theorem by Richomme from 1994 [26, 28], we know that both problems are decidable in trace monoids which do not contain a C4 submonoid. It is not known, whether the star problem or the finite power property are decidable in the C4 or in trace monoids containing a C4. In this paper, we show a new connection between these problems. Assume a trace monoid IM (Σ, I) which is isomorphic to the Cartesian Product of two disjoint trace monoids IM (Σ1, I1) and IM (Σ2, I2). Assume further a recognizable language L in IM (Σ, I) such that every trace in L contains at least one letter in Σ1 and at least in one letter in Σ2. Then, the main theorem of this paper asserts that L* is recognizable iff L has the finite power property

Some Undecidability Results related to the Star Problem in Trace Monoids

This paper deals with decision problems related to the star problem in trace monoids, which means to determine whether the iteration of a recognizable trace language is recognizable. Due to a theorem by Richomme from 1994[30,31], we know that the Star Problem is decidable in trace monoids which do not contain a C4-submonoid. The C4 is (isomorphic to) the Caresian Product of two free monoids over doubleton alphabets. It is not known, whether the Star Problem is decidable in C4 or in trace monoids containing a C4. In this paper, we show undecidability of some related problems: Assume a trace monoid which contains a C4. Then, it is undecidable whether for two given recognizable languages K and L, we have K ⊆ L*, although we can decide K* ⊆ L. Further, we can not decide recognizability of K ∩ L* as well as universality and recognizability of K U L*

26. Theorietag Automaten und Formale Sprachen 23. Jahrestagung Logik in der Informatik: Tagungsband

Der Theorietag ist die Jahrestagung der Fachgruppe Automaten und Formale Sprachen der Gesellschaft für Informatik und fand erstmals 1991 in Magdeburg statt. Seit dem Jahr 1996 wird der Theorietag von einem eintägigen Workshop mit eingeladenen Vorträgen begleitet. Die Jahrestagung der Fachgruppe Logik in der Informatik der Gesellschaft für Informatik fand erstmals 1993 in Leipzig statt. Im Laufe beider Jahrestagungen finden auch die jährliche Fachgruppensitzungen statt. In diesem Jahr wird der Theorietag der Fachgruppe Automaten und Formale Sprachen erstmalig zusammen mit der Jahrestagung der Fachgruppe Logik in der Informatik abgehalten. Organisiert wurde die gemeinsame Veranstaltung von der Arbeitsgruppe Zuverlässige Systeme des Instituts für Informatik an der Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel vom 4. bis 7. Oktober im Tagungshotel Tannenfelde bei Neumünster. Während des Tre↵ens wird ein Workshop für alle Interessierten statt finden. In Tannenfelde werden • Christoph Löding (Aachen) • Tomás Masopust (Dresden) • Henning Schnoor (Kiel) • Nicole Schweikardt (Berlin) • Georg Zetzsche (Paris) eingeladene Vorträge zu ihrer aktuellen Arbeit halten. Darüber hinaus werden 26 Vorträge von Teilnehmern und Teilnehmerinnen gehalten, 17 auf dem Theorietag Automaten und formale Sprachen und neun auf der Jahrestagung Logik in der Informatik. Der vorliegende Band enthält Kurzfassungen aller Beiträge. Wir danken der Gesellschaft für Informatik, der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel und dem Tagungshotel Tannenfelde für die Unterstützung dieses Theorietags. Ein besonderer Dank geht an das Organisationsteam: Maike Bradler, Philipp Sieweck, Joel Day. Kiel, Oktober 2016 Florin Manea, Dirk Nowotka und Thomas Wilk

Equivalence Testing of Weighted Automata over Partially Commutative Monoids

Motivated by equivalence testing of k-tape automata, we study the equivalence testing of weighted automata in the more general setting, over partially commutative monoids (in short, pc monoids), and show efficient algorithms in some special cases, exploiting the structure of the underlying non-commutation graph of the monoid. Specifically, if the edge clique cover number of the non-commutation graph of the pc monoid is a constant, we obtain a deterministic quasi-polynomial time algorithm for equivalence testing. As a corollary, we obtain the first deterministic quasi-polynomial time algorithms for equivalence testing of k-tape weighted automata and for equivalence testing of deterministic k-tape automata for constant k. Prior to this, the best complexity upper bound for these k-tape automata problems were randomized polynomial-time, shown by Worrell [James Worrell, 2013]. Finding a polynomial-time deterministic algorithm for equivalence testing of deterministic k-tape automata for constant k has been open for several years [Emily P. Friedman and Sheila A. Greibach, 1982] and our results make progress. We also consider pc monoids for which the non-commutation graphs have an edge cover consisting of at most k cliques and star graphs for any constant k. We obtain a randomized polynomial-time algorithm for equivalence testing of weighted automata over such monoids. Our results are obtained by designing efficient zero-testing algorithms for weighted automata over such pc monoids

Verification of Automata with Storage Mechanisms

An important question in computer science is to ask, whether a given system conforms to a specification. Often this question is equivalent to ask whether a finite automaton with certain memory like a stack or queue can reach some given state. In this thesis we focus this reachability problem of automata having one or more lossy or reliable stacks or queues as their memory. Unfortunately, the reachability problem is undecidable or of high complexity in most of these cases. We circumvent this by several approximation methods. So we extend the exploration algorithm by Boigelot and Godefroid under-approximating the reachability problem of queue automata. We also study some automata having multiple stacks with a restricted behavior. These “asynchronous pushdown systems” have an efficiently decidable reachability problem. To show our results we first have to gain knowledge of several algebraic properties of the so-called transformation monoid of the studied storage mechanisms.An important research topic in computer science is the verification, i.e., the analysis of systems towards their correctness. This analysis consists of two parts: first we have to formalize the system and the desired properties. Afterwards we have to find algorithms to check whether the properties hold in the system. In many cases we can model the system as a finite automaton with a suitable storage mechanism, e.g., functional programs with recursive calls can be modeled as automata with a stack (or pushdown). Here, we consider automata with two variations of stacks and queues: 1. Partially lossy queues and stacks, which are allowed to forget some specified parts of their contents at any time. We are able to model unreliable systems with such memories. 2. Distributed queues and stacks, i.e., multiple such memories with a special synchronization in between. Often we can check the properties of our models by solving the reachability and recurrent reachability problems in our automata models. It is well-known that the decidability of these problems highly depends on the concrete data type of our automata’s memory. Both problems can be solved in polynomial time for automata with one stack. In contrast, these problems are undecidable if we attach a queue or at least two stacks to our automata. In some special cases we are still able to verify such systems. So, we will consider only special automata with multiple stacks - so-called asynchronous pushdown automata. These are multiple (local) automata each having one stack. Whenever these automata try to write something into at least one stack, we require a read action on these stacks right before these actions. We will see that the (recurrent) reachability problem is decidable for such asynchronous pushdown automata in polynomial time. We can also semi-decide the reachability problem of our queue automata by exploration of the configration space. To this end, we can join multiple consecutive transitions to so-called meta-transformations and simulate them at once. Here, we study meta-transformations alternating between writing words from a given regular language into the queues and reading words from another regular language from the queues. We will see that such metatransformations can be applied in polynomial time. To show this result we first study some algebraic properties of our stacks and queues.Ein wichtiges Forschungsthema in der Informatik ist die Verifikation, d.h., die Analyse von Systemen bezüglich ihrer Korrektheit. Diese Analyse erfolgt in zwei Schritten: Zuerst müssen wir das System und die gewünschten Eigenschaften formalisieren. Anschließend benötigen wir Algorithmen zum Testen, ob das System die Eigenschaften erfüllt. Oftmals können wir das Systemals endlichen Automaten mit geeignetem Speichermechanismus modellieren, z.B. rekursive Programme sind im Wesentlichen Automaten mit einem Stack. Hier betrachten wir Automaten mit zwei Varianten von Stacks und Queues: 1. Partiell vergessliche Stacks und Queues, welche bestimmte Teile ihrer Inhalte jederzeit vergessen können. Diese können für unzuverlässige Systeme verwendet werden. 2. Verteilte Stacks und Queues, d.h., mehrere Stacks und Queues mit vordefinierter Synchronisierung. Häufig lassen sich die Eigenschaften unserer Modelle mithilfe des (wiederholten) Erreichbarkeitsproblems in unseren Automaten lösen. Dabei ist bekannt, dass die Entscheidbarkeit dieser Probleme oftmals stark vom konkreten Datentyp des Speichers abhängt. Beide Probleme können für Automaten mit einem Stack in Polynomialzeit gelöst werden. Sie sind jedoch unentscheidbar, wenn wir Automaten mit einer Queue oder zwei Stacks betrachten. In bestimmten Spezialfällen sind aber dennoch in der Lage diese Systeme zu verifizieren. So können wir beispielsweise bestimmte Automaten mit mehreren Stacks betrachten - so genannte Asynchrone Kellerautomaten. Diese bestehen aus mehreren (lokalen) Automaten mit jeweils einem Stack. Wann immer diese Automaten etwas in mind. einen Stack schreiben, müssen sie unmittelbar zuvor von diesen Stacks etwas lesen. Das (wiederholte) Erreichbarkeitsproblem ist in asynchronen Kellerautomaten in Polynomialzeit entscheidbar. Wir können zudem das Erreichbarkeitsproblem von Queueautomaten durch Exploration des Konfigurationsraums semi-entscheiden. Hierzu können wir mehrere aufeinanderfolgende Transitionen zu so genannten Meta-Transformationen zusammenfassen und diese in einem Schritt simulieren. Hier betrachten wir Meta-Transformationen, die zwischen dem Lesen und Schreiben von Wörtern aus zwei gegebenen regulären Sprachen alternieren. Diese Meta-Transformationen können in Polynomialzeit ausgeführt werden. Für dieses Ergebnis müssen wir jedoch zunächst verschiedene algebraische Eigenschaften der Queues betrachten

Logics with rigidly guarded data tests

The notion of orbit finite data monoid was recently introduced by Bojanczyk as an algebraic object for defining recognizable languages of data words. Following Buchi's approach, we introduce a variant of monadic second-order logic with data equality tests that captures precisely the data languages recognizable by orbit finite data monoids. We also establish, following this time the approach of Schutzenberger, McNaughton and Papert, that the first-order fragment of this logic defines exactly the data languages recognizable by aperiodic orbit finite data monoids. Finally, we consider another variant of the logic that can be interpreted over generic structures with data. The data languages defined in this variant are also recognized by unambiguous finite memory automata