Sensor Node Easy Moving Monitoring Region Location Algorithm in Internet of Things

Because of the influence from geographical location, weather and other kinds of circumstances in monitored areas, the shift of the node location and non-uniform distribution, this paper proposed an improved DV-Hop location algorithm. First of all, the package structure by changing the anchor nodes to reduce the number of hops data acquisition phase node data storage; introducing weights to the average hop distance calculation phase the original average hop distance calculation method was improved, and between the node and anchor node distance calculated on the basis of reference anchor nodes are different; then, iterative refinement of node localization stage through the use of multilateral measurement method and Taylor series. Finally, simulation experiment of this method, and compared with the existing methods, the results prove that the method in this paper can greatly reduce positioning errors without adding hardware equipment and network traffic, improve the positioning accuracy, a better solution to the problem of node localization networking monitoring area

Security and Privacy for Modern Wireless Communication Systems

The aim of this reprint focuses on the latest protocol research, software/hardware development and implementation, and system architecture design in addressing emerging security and privacy issues for modern wireless communication networks. Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, the following: deep-learning-based security and privacy design; covert communications; information-theoretical foundations for advanced security and privacy techniques; lightweight cryptography for power constrained networks; physical layer key generation; prototypes and testbeds for security and privacy solutions; encryption and decryption algorithm for low-latency constrained networks; security protocols for modern wireless communication networks; network intrusion detection; physical layer design with security consideration; anonymity in data transmission; vulnerabilities in security and privacy in modern wireless communication networks; challenges of security and privacy in node–edge–cloud computation; security and privacy design for low-power wide-area IoT networks; security and privacy design for vehicle networks; security and privacy design for underwater communications networks

Social Network Analysis Based Localization Technique with Clustered Closeness Centrality for 3D Wireless Sensor Networks

[EN] In this paper, we proposed a new wireless localization technique based on the ideology of social network analysis (SNA), to study the different properties of networks as a graph. Centrality is a main concept in SNA, so we propose using closeness centrality (CC) as a measurement to denote the importance of the node inside the network due to its geo-location to others. The node with highest degree of CC is chosen as a cluster heads, then each cluster head can form its trilateration process to collect data from its cluster. The selection of closest cluster based on CC values, and the unknown node's location can be estimated through the trilateration process. To form a perfect trilateration, the cluster head chooses three anchor nodes. The proposed algorithm provides high accuracy even in different network topologies like concave shape, O shape, and C shape as compared to existing received signal strength indicator (RSSI) techniques. Matlab simulation results based on practical radio propagation data sets showed a localization error of 0.32 m with standard deviation of 0.26 m.This work was fully supported by the Vice Chancellor Doctoral Scholarship at Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand.Ahmad, T.; Li, XJ.; Seet, B.; Cano, J. (2020). Social Network Analysis Based Localization Technique with Clustered Closeness Centrality for 3D Wireless Sensor Networks. Electronics. 9(5):1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9050738S11995Zhou, B., Yao, X., Yang, L., Yang, S., Wu, S., Kim, Y., & Ai, L. (2019). Accurate Rigid Body Localization Using DoA Measurements from a Single Base Station. Electronics, 8(6), 622. doi:10.3390/electronics8060622Ahmad, T., Li, X., & Seet, B.-C. (2017). Parametric Loop Division for 3D Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors, 17(7), 1697. doi:10.3390/s17071697Kaur, A., Kumar, P., & Gupta, G. P. (2019). A weighted centroid localization algorithm for randomly deployed wireless sensor networks. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 31(1), 82-91. doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2017.01.007Khelifi, F., Bradai, A., Benslimane, A., Rawat, P., & Atri, M. (2018). A Survey of Localization Systems in Internet of Things. Mobile Networks and Applications, 24(3), 761-785. doi:10.1007/s11036-018-1090-3Sanchez-Iborra, R., G. Liaño, I., Simoes, C., Couñago, E., & Skarmeta, A. (2018). Tracking and Monitoring System Based on LoRa Technology for Lightweight Boats. Electronics, 8(1), 15. doi:10.3390/electronics8010015Sayed, A. H., Tarighat, A., & Khajehnouri, N. (2005). Network-based wireless location: challenges faced in developing techniques for accurate wireless location information. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 22(4), 24-40. doi:10.1109/msp.2005.1458275Maşazade, E., Ruixin Niu, Varshney, P. K., & Keskinoz, M. (2010). Energy Aware Iterative Source Localization for Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 58(9), 4824-4835. doi:10.1109/tsp.2010.2051433Yang, X., Kong, Q., & Xie, X. (2009). One-Dimensional Localization Algorithm Based on Signal Strength Ratio. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 5(1), 79-79. doi:10.1080/15501320802571822Xie, S., Wang, T., Hao, X., Yang, M., Zhu, Y., & Li, Y. (2019). Localization and Frequency Identification of Large-Range Wide-Band Electromagnetic Interference Sources in Electromagnetic Imaging System. Electronics, 8(5), 499. doi:10.3390/electronics8050499Zhu, X., Wu, X., & Chen, G. (2013). Relative localization for wireless sensor networks with linear topology. Computer Communications, 36(15-16), 1581-1591. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2013.07.007Meng, W., Xiao, W., & Xie, L. (2011). An Efficient EM Algorithm for Energy-Based Multisource Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 60(3), 1017-1027. doi:10.1109/tim.2010.2047035Lim, H., & Hou, J. C. (2009). Distributed localization for anisotropic sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 5(2), 1-26. doi:10.1145/1498915.1498917Xiaohong Sheng, & Yu-Hen Hu. (2005). Maximum likelihood multiple-source localization using acoustic energy measurements with wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 53(1), 44-53. doi:10.1109/tsp.2004.838930Yun Wang, Xiaodong Wang, Demin Wang, & Agrawal, D. P. (2009). Range-Free Localization Using Expected Hop Progress in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 20(10), 1540-1552. doi:10.1109/tpds.2008.239Huang, H., & Zheng, Y. R. (2018). Node localization with AoA assistance in multi-hop underwater sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 78, 32-41. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.05.005Zàruba, G. V., Huber, M., Kamangar, F. A., & Chlamtac, I. (2006). Indoor location tracking using RSSI readings from a single Wi-Fi access point. Wireless Networks, 13(2), 221-235. doi:10.1007/s11276-006-5064-1Singh, M., & Khilar, P. M. (2015). An analytical geometric range free localization scheme based on mobile beacon points in wireless sensor network. Wireless Networks, 22(8), 2537-2550. doi:10.1007/s11276-015-1116-8Yiqiang Chen, Qiang Yang, Jie Yin, & Xiaoyong Chai. (2006). Power-efficient access-point selection for indoor location estimation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 18(7), 877-888. doi:10.1109/tkde.2006.112Alzoubi, K., Li, X.-Y., Wang, Y., Wan, P.-J., & Frieder, O. (2003). Geometric spanners for wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 14(4), 408-421. doi:10.1109/tpds.2003.1195412Safa, H. (2014). A novel localization algorithm for large scale wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 45, 32-46. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2014.03.020Kaemarungsi, K., & Krishnamurthy, P. (2012). Analysis of WLAN’s received signal strength indication for indoor location fingerprinting. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 8(2), 292-316. doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2011.09.003Patwari, N., Hero, A. O., Perkins, M., Correal, N. S., & O’Dea, R. J. (2003). Relative location estimation in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 51(8), 2137-2148. doi:10.1109/tsp.2003.814469Niculescu, D. (2003). Telecommunication Systems, 22(1/4), 267-280. doi:10.1023/a:1023403323460Mahyar, H., Hasheminezhad, R., Ghalebi K., E., Nazemian, A., Grosu, R., Movaghar, A., & Rabiee, H. R. (2018). Compressive sensing of high betweenness centrality nodes in networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 497, 166-184. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2017.12.145Plets, D., Bastiaens, S., Martens, L., & Joseph, W. (2019). An Analysis of the Impact of LED Tilt on Visible Light Positioning Accuracy. Electronics, 8(4), 389. doi:10.3390/electronics8040389RSSI Datasethttps://github.com/pspachos/RSSI-DatasetAhmad, T., Li, X. J., & Seet, B.-C. (2019). Noise Reduction Scheme for Parametric Loop Division 3D Wireless Localization Algorithm Based on Extended Kalman Filtering. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 8(2), 24. doi:10.3390/jsan8020024Benson, S. J., Ye, Y., & Zhang, X. (2000). Solving Large-Scale Sparse Semidefinite Programs for Combinatorial Optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 10(2), 443-461. doi:10.1137/s105262349732800

Improved Recursive DV-Hop Localization Algorithm with RSSI Measurement for Wireless Sensor Networks

Abstract: Please refer tp full text to view abstrac

Design, analysis and optimization of visible light communications based indoor access systems for mobile and internet of things applications

Demands for indoor broadband wireless access services are expected to outstrip the spectrum capacity in the near-term spectrum crunch . Deploying additional femtocells to address spectrum crunch is cost-inefficient due to the backhaul challenge and the exorbitant system maintenance. According to an Alcatel-Lucent report, most mobile Internet access traffic happens indoors. To alleviate the spectrum crunch and the backhaul challenge problems, visible light communication (VLC) emerges as an attractive candidate for indoor wireless access in the 5G architecture. In particular, VLC utilizes LED or fluorescent lamps to send out imperceptible flickering light that can be captured by a smart phone camera or photodetector. Leveraging power line communication and the available indoor infrastructure, VLC can be utilized with a small one-time cost. VLC also facilitates the great advantage of being able to jointly perform illumination and communications. Integration of VLC into the existing indoor wireless access networks embraces many challenges, such as lack of uplink infrastructure, excessive delay caused by blockage in heterogeneous networks, and overhead of power consumption. In addition, applying VLC to Internet-of-Things (IoT) applications, such as communication and localization, faces the challenges including ultra-low power requirement, limited modulation bandwidth, and heavy computation and sensing at the device end. In this dissertation, to overcome the challenges of VLC, a VLC enhanced WiFi system is designed by incorporating VLC downlink and WiFi uplink to connect mobile devices to the Internet. To further enhance robustness and throughput, WiFi and VLC are aggregated in parallel by leveraging the bonding technique in Linux operating system. Based on dynamic resource allocation, the delay performance of heterogeneous RF-VLC network is analyzed and evaluated for two different configurations - aggregation and non-aggregation. To mitigate the power consumption overhead of VLC, a problem of minimizing the total power consumption of a general multi-user VLC indoor network while satisfying users traffic demands and maintaining an acceptable level of illumination is formulated. The optimization problem is solved by the efficient column generation algorithm. With ultra-low power consumption, VLC backscatter harvests energy from indoor light sources and transmits optical signals by modulating the reflected light from a reflector. A novel pixelated VLC backscatter is proposed and prototyped to address the limited modulation bandwidth by enabling more advanced modulation scheme than the state-of-the-art on-off keying (OOK) scheme and allowing for the first time orthogonal multiple access. VLC-based indoor access system is also suitable for indoor localization due to its unique properties, such as utilization of existing ubiquitous lighting infrastructure, high location and orientation accuracy, and no interruption to RF-based devices. A novel retroreflector-based visible light localization system is proposed and prototyped to establish an almost zero-delay backward channel using a retroreflector to reflect light back to its source. This system can localize passive IoT devices without requiring computation and heavy sensing (e.g., camera) at the device end

Efficient Range-Free Monte-Carlo-Localization for Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Das Hauptproblem von Lokalisierungsalgorithmen für WSNs basierend auf Ankerknoten ist die Abhängigkeit von diesen. Mobilität im Netzwerk kann zu Topologien führen, in denen einzelne Knoten oder ganze Teile des Netzwerks temporär von allen Ankerknoten isoliert werden. In diesen Fällen ist keine weitere Lokalisierung möglich. Dies wirkt sich primär auf den Lokalisierungsfehler aus, der in diesen Fällen stark ansteigt. Des weiteren haben Betreiber von Sensornetzwerken Interesse daran, die Anzahl der kosten- und wartungsintensiveren Ankerknoten auf ein Minimum zu reduzieren. Dies verstärkt zusätzlich das Problem von nicht verfügbaren Ankerknoten während des Netzwerkbetriebs. In dieser Arbeit werden zunächst die Vor- und Nachteile der beiden großen Hauptkategorien von Lokalisierungsalgorithmen (range-based und range-free Verfahren) diskutiert und eine Studie eines oft für range-based Lokalisierung genutzten Distanzbestimmungsverfahren mit Hilfe des RSSI vorgestellt. Danach werden zwei neue Varianten für ein bekanntes range-free Lokalisierungsverfahren mit Namen MCL eingeführt. Beide haben zum Ziel das Problem der temporär nicht verfügbaren Ankerknoten zu lösen, bedienen sich dabei aber unterschiedlicher Mittel. SA-MCL nutzt ein dead reckoning Verfahren, um die Positionsschätzung vom letzten bekannten Standort weiter zu führen. Dies geschieht mit Hilfe von zusätzlichen Sensorinformationen, die von einem elektronischen Kompass und einem Beschleunigungsmesser zur Verfügung gestellt werden. PO-MCL hingegen nutzt das Mobilitätsverhalten von einigen Anwendungen in Sensornetzwerken aus, bei denen sich alle Knoten primär auf einer festen Anzahl von Pfaden bewegen, um den Lokalisierungsprozess zu verbessern. Beide Methoden werden durch detaillierte Netzwerksimulationen evaluiert. Im Fall von SA-MCL wird außerdem eine Implementierung auf echter Hardware vorgestellt und eine Feldstudie in einem mobilen Sensornetzwerk durchgeführt. Aus den Ergebnissen ist zu sehen, dass der Lokalisierungsfehler in Situationen mit niedriger Ankerknotendichte im Fall von SA-MCL um bis zu 60% reduziert werden kann, beziehungsweise um bis zu 50% im Fall von PO-MCL.

Localization Context-Aware Models for Wireless Sensor Network

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are emerging as the key technology to support the Internet of Things (IoT) and smart objects. Small devices with low energy consumption and limited computing resources have wide use in many applications and different fields. Nodes are deployed randomly without a priori knowledge of their location. However, location context is a fundamental feature necessary to provide a context-aware framework to information gathered from sensors in many services such as intrusion detection, surveillance, geographic routing/forwarding, and coverage area management. Nevertheless, only a little number of nodes called anchors are equipped with localization components, such as Global Positioning System (GPS) chips. Worse still, when sensors are deployed in an indoor environment, GPS serves no purpose. This chapter surveys a variety of state-of-the-art existing localization techniques and compares their characteristics by detailing their applications, strengths, and challenges. The specificities and enhancements of the most popular and effective techniques are as well reported. Besides, current research directions in localization are discussed