Testing of Asynchronous NULL Conventional Logic (NCL) Circuits

Due to the absence of a global clock and presence of more state holding elements that synchronize the control and data paths, conventional automatic test pattern generation (ATPG) algorithms would fail when applied to asynchronous circuits, leading to poor fault coverage. This paper focuses on design for test (DFT) techniques aimed at making asynchronous NCL designs testable using existing DFT CAD tools with reasonable gate overhead, by enhancing controllability of feedback nets and observability for fault sites that are flagged unobservable. The proposed approach performs scan and test points insertion on NCL designs using custom ATPG library. The approach has been automated, which is essential for large systems; and are fully compatible with industry standard tools

Study of Single Event Transient Error Mitigation

Single Event Transient (SET) errors in ground-level electronic devices are a growing concern in the radiation hardening field. However, effective SET mitigation technologies which satisfy ground-level demands such as generic, flexible, efficient, and fast, are limited. The classic Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR) method is the most well-known and popular technique in space and nuclear environment. But it leads to more than 200% area and power overheads, which is too costly to implement in ground-level applications. Meanwhile, the coding technique is extensively utilized to inhibit upset errors in storage cells, but the irregularity of combinatorial logics limits its use in SET mitigation. Therefore, SET mitigation techniques suitable for ground-level applications need to be addressed. Aware of the demands for SET mitigation techniques in ground-level applications, this thesis proposes two novel approaches based on the redundant wire and approximate logic techniques. The Redundant Wire is a SET mitigation technique. By selectively adding redundant wire connections, the technique can prohibit targeted transient faults from propagating on the fly. This thesis proposes a set of signature-based evaluation equations to efficiently estimate the protecting effect provided by each redundant wire candidates. Based on the estimated results, a greedy algorithm is used to insert the best candidate repeatedly. Simulation results substantiate that the evaluation equations can achieve up to 98% accuracy on average. Regarding protecting effects, the technique can mask 18.4% of the faults with a 4.3% area, 4.4% power, and 5.4% delay overhead on average. Overall, the quality of protecting results obtained are 2.8 times better than the previous work. Additionally, the impact of synthesis constraints and signature length are discussed. Approximate Logic is a partial TMR technique offering a trade-off between fault coverage and area overheads. The approximate logic consists of an under-approximate logic and an over-approximate logic. The under-approximate logic is a subset of the original min-terms and the over-approximate logic is a subset of the original max-terms. This thesis proposes a new algorithm for generating the two approximate logics. Through the generating process, the algorithm considers the intrinsic failure probabilities of each gate and utilizes a confidence interval estimate equation to minimize required computations. The technique is applied to two fault models, Stuck-at and SET, and the separate results are compared and discussed. The results show that the technique can reduce the error 75% with an area penalty of 46% on some circuits. The delay overheads of this technique are always two additional layers of logic. The two proposed SET mitigation techniques are both applicable to generic combinatorial logics and with high flexibility. The simulation shows promising SET mitigation ability. The proposed mitigation techniques provide designers more choices in developing reliable combinatorial logic in ground-level applications

Black Box Model based Self Healing Solution for Stuck at Faults in Digital Circuits

The paper proposes a design strategy to retain the true nature of the output in the event of occurrence of stuck at faults at the interconnect levels of digital circuits. The procedure endeavours to design a combinational architecture which includes attributes to identify stuck at faults present in the intermediate lines and involves a healing mechanism to redress the same. The simulated fault injection procedure introduces both single as well as multiple stuck-at faults at the interconnect levels of a two level combinational circuit in accordance with the directives of a control signal. The inherent heal facility attached to the formulation enables to reach out the fault free output even in the presence of faults. The Modelsim based simulation results obtained for the Circuit Under Test [CUT] implemented using a Read Only Memory [ROM], proclaim the ability of the system to survive itself from the influence of faults. The comparison made with the traditional Triple Modular Redundancy [TMR] exhibits the superiority of the scheme in terms of fault coverage and area overhead. 

A Hardware Security Solution against Scan-Based Attacks

Scan based Design for Test (DfT) schemes have been widely used to achieve high fault coverage for integrated circuits. The scan technique provides full access to the internal nodes of the device-under-test to control them or observe their response to input test vectors. While such comprehensive access is highly desirable for testing, it is not acceptable for secure chips as it is subject to exploitation by various attacks. In this work, new methods are presented to protect the security of critical information against scan-based attacks. In the proposed methods, access to the circuit containing secret information via the scan chain has been severely limited in order to reduce the risk of a security breach. To ensure the testability of the circuit, a built-in self-test which utilizes an LFSR as the test pattern generator (TPG) is proposed. The proposed schemes can be used as a countermeasure against side channel attacks with a low area overhead as compared to the existing solutions in literature

Analysis of Hardware Descriptions

The design process for integrated circuits requires a lot of analysis of circuit descriptions. An important class of analyses determines how easy it will be to determine if a physical component suffers from any manufacturing errors. As circuit complexities grow rapidly, the problem of testing circuits also becomes increasingly difficult. This thesis explores the potential for analysing a recent high level hardware description language called Ruby. In particular, we are interested in performing testability analyses of Ruby circuit descriptions. Ruby is ammenable to algebraic manipulation, so we have sought transformations that improve testability while preserving behaviour. The analysis of Ruby descriptions is performed by adapting a technique called abstract interpretation. This has been used successfully to analyse functional programs. This technique is most applicable where the analysis to be captured operates over structures isomorphic to the structure of the circuit. Many digital systems analysis tools require the circuit description to be given in some special form. This can lead to inconsistency between representations, and involves additional work converting between representations. We propose using the original description medium, in this case Ruby, for performing analyses. A related technique, called non-standard interpretation, is shown to be very useful for capturing many circuit analyses. An implementation of a system that performs non-standard interpretation forms the central part of the work. This allows Ruby descriptions to be analysed using alternative interpretations such test pattern generation and circuit layout interpretations. This system follows a similar approach to Boute's system semantics work and O'Donnell's work on Hydra. However, we have allowed a larger class of interpretations to be captured and offer a richer description language. The implementation presented here is constructed to allow a large degree of code sharing between different analyses. Several analyses have been implemented including simulation, test pattern generation and circuit layout. Non-standard interpretation provides a good framework for implementing these analyses. A general model for making non-standard interpretations is presented. Combining forms that combine two interpretations to produce a new interpretation are also introduced. This allows complex circuit analyses to be decomposed in a modular manner into smaller circuit analyses which can be built independently

Transient error mitigation by means of approximate logic circuits

Mención Internacional en el título de doctorThe technological advances in the manufacturing of electronic circuits have allowed to greatly improve their performance, but they have also increased the sensitivity of electronic devices to radiation-induced errors. Among them, the most common effects are the SEEs, i.e., electrical perturbations provoked by the strike of high-energy particles, which may modify the internal state of a memory element (SEU) or generate erroneous transient pulses (SET), among other effects. These events pose a threat for the reliability of electronic circuits, and therefore fault-tolerance techniques must be applied to deal with them. The most common fault-tolerance techniques are based in full replication (DWC or TMR). These techniques are able to cover a wide range of failure mechanisms present in electronic circuits. However, they suffer from high overheads in terms of area and power consumption. For this reason, lighter alternatives are often sought at the expense of slightly reducing reliability for the least critical circuit sections. In this context a new paradigm of electronic design is emerging, known as approximate computing, which is based on improving the circuit performance in change of slight modifications of the intended functionality. This is an interesting approach for the design of lightweight fault-tolerant solutions, which has not been yet studied in depth. The main goal of this thesis consists in developing new lightweight fault-tolerant techniques with partial replication, by means of approximate logic circuits. These circuits can be designed with great flexibility. This way, the level of protection as well as the overheads can be adjusted at will depending on the necessities of each application. However, finding optimal approximate circuits for a given application is still a challenge. In this thesis a method for approximate circuit generation is proposed, denoted as fault approximation, which consists in assigning constant logic values to specific circuit lines. On the other hand, several criteria are developed to generate the most suitable approximate circuits for each application, by using this fault approximation mechanism. These criteria are based on the idea of approximating the least testable sections of circuits, which allows reducing overheads while minimising the loss of reliability. Therefore, in this thesis the selection of approximations is linked to testability measures. The first criterion for fault selection developed in this thesis uses static testability measures. The approximations are generated from the results of a fault simulation of the target circuit, and from a user-specified testability threshold. The amount of approximated faults depends on the chosen threshold, which allows to generate approximate circuits with different performances. Although this approach was initially intended for combinational circuits, an extension to sequential circuits has been performed as well, by considering the flip-flops as both inputs and outputs of the combinational part of the circuit. The experimental results show that this technique achieves a wide scalability, and an acceptable trade-off between reliability versus overheads. In addition, its computational complexity is very low. However, the selection criterion based in static testability measures has some drawbacks. Adjusting the performance of the generated approximate circuits by means of the approximation threshold is not intuitive, and the static testability measures do not take into account the changes as long as faults are approximated. Therefore, an alternative criterion is proposed, which is based on dynamic testability measures. With this criterion, the testability of each fault is computed by means of an implication-based probability analysis. The probabilities are updated with each new approximated fault, in such a way that on each iteration the most beneficial approximation is chosen, that is, the fault with the lowest probability. In addition, the computed probabilities allow to estimate the level of protection against faults that the generated approximate circuits provide. Therefore, it is possible to generate circuits which stick to a target error rate. By modifying this target, circuits with different performances can be obtained. The experimental results show that this new approach is able to stick to the target error rate with reasonably good precision. In addition, the approximate circuits generated with this technique show better performance than with the approach based in static testability measures. In addition, the fault implications have been reused too in order to implement a new type of logic transformation, which consists in substituting functionally similar nodes. Once the fault selection criteria have been developed, they are applied to different scenarios. First, an extension of the proposed techniques to FPGAs is performed, taking into account the particularities of this kind of circuits. This approach has been validated by means of radiation experiments, which show that a partial replication with approximate circuits can be even more robust than a full replication approach, because a smaller area reduces the probability of SEE occurrence. Besides, the proposed techniques have been applied to a real application circuit as well, in particular to the microprocessor ARM Cortex M0. A set of software benchmarks is used to generate the required testability measures. Finally, a comparative study of the proposed approaches with approximate circuit generation by means of evolutive techniques have been performed. These approaches make use of a high computational capacity to generate multiple circuits by trial-and-error, thus reducing the possibility of falling into local minima. The experimental results demonstrate that the circuits generated with evolutive approaches are slightly better in performance than the circuits generated with the techniques here proposed, although with a much higher computational effort. In summary, several original fault mitigation techniques with approximate logic circuits are proposed. These approaches are demonstrated in various scenarios, showing that the scalability and adaptability to the requirements of each application are their main virtuesLos avances tecnológicos en la fabricación de circuitos electrónicos han permitido mejorar en gran medida sus prestaciones, pero también han incrementado la sensibilidad de los mismos a los errores provocados por la radiación. Entre ellos, los más comunes son los SEEs, perturbaciones eléctricas causadas por el impacto de partículas de alta energía, que entre otros efectos pueden modificar el estado de los elementos de memoria (SEU) o generar pulsos transitorios de valor erróneo (SET). Estos eventos suponen un riesgo para la fiabilidad de los circuitos electrónicos, por lo que deben ser tratados mediante técnicas de tolerancia a fallos. Las técnicas de tolerancia a fallos más comunes se basan en la replicación completa del circuito (DWC o TMR). Estas técnicas son capaces de cubrir una amplia variedad de modos de fallo presentes en los circuitos electrónicos. Sin embargo, presentan un elevado sobrecoste en área y consumo. Por ello, a menudo se buscan alternativas más ligeras, aunque no tan efectivas, basadas en una replicación parcial. En este contexto surge una nueva filosofía de diseño electrónico, conocida como computación aproximada, basada en mejorar las prestaciones de un diseño a cambio de ligeras modificaciones de la funcionalidad prevista. Es un enfoque atractivo y poco explorado para el diseño de soluciones ligeras de tolerancia a fallos. El objetivo de esta tesis consiste en desarrollar nuevas técnicas ligeras de tolerancia a fallos por replicación parcial, mediante el uso de circuitos lógicos aproximados. Estos circuitos se pueden diseñar con una gran flexibilidad. De este forma, tanto el nivel de protección como el sobrecoste se pueden regular libremente en función de los requisitos de cada aplicación. Sin embargo, encontrar los circuitos aproximados óptimos para cada aplicación es actualmente un reto. En la presente tesis se propone un método para generar circuitos aproximados, denominado aproximación de fallos, consistente en asignar constantes lógicas a ciertas líneas del circuito. Por otro lado, se desarrollan varios criterios de selección para, mediante este mecanismo, generar los circuitos aproximados más adecuados para cada aplicación. Estos criterios se basan en la idea de aproximar las secciones menos testables del circuito, lo que permite reducir los sobrecostes minimizando la perdida de fiabilidad. Por tanto, en esta tesis la selección de aproximaciones se realiza a partir de medidas de testabilidad. El primer criterio de selección de fallos desarrollado en la presente tesis hace uso de medidas de testabilidad estáticas. Las aproximaciones se generan a partir de los resultados de una simulación de fallos del circuito objetivo, y de un umbral de testabilidad especificado por el usuario. La cantidad de fallos aproximados depende del umbral escogido, lo que permite generar circuitos aproximados con diferentes prestaciones. Aunque inicialmente este método ha sido concebido para circuitos combinacionales, también se ha realizado una extensión a circuitos secuenciales, considerando los biestables como entradas y salidas de la parte combinacional del circuito. Los resultados experimentales demuestran que esta técnica consigue una buena escalabilidad, y unas prestaciones de coste frente a fiabilidad aceptables. Además, tiene un coste computacional muy bajo. Sin embargo, el criterio de selección basado en medidas estáticas presenta algunos inconvenientes. No resulta intuitivo ajustar las prestaciones de los circuitos aproximados a partir de un umbral de testabilidad, y las medidas estáticas no tienen en cuenta los cambios producidos a medida que se van aproximando fallos. Por ello, se propone un criterio alternativo de selección de fallos, basado en medidas de testabilidad dinámicas. Con este criterio, la testabilidad de cada fallo se calcula mediante un análisis de probabilidades basado en implicaciones. Las probabilidades se actualizan con cada nuevo fallo aproximado, de forma que en cada iteración se elige la aproximación más favorable, es decir, el fallo con menor probabilidad. Además, las probabilidades calculadas permiten estimar la protección frente a fallos que ofrecen los circuitos aproximados generados, por lo que es posible generar circuitos que se ajusten a una tasa de fallos objetivo. Modificando esta tasa se obtienen circuitos aproximados con diferentes prestaciones. Los resultados experimentales muestran que este método es capaz de ajustarse razonablemente bien a la tasa de fallos objetivo. Además, los circuitos generados con esta técnica muestran mejores prestaciones que con el método basado en medidas estáticas. También se han aprovechado las implicaciones de fallos para implementar un nuevo tipo de transformación lógica, consistente en sustituir nodos funcionalmente similares. Una vez desarrollados los criterios de selección de fallos, se aplican a distintos campos. En primer lugar, se hace una extensión de las técnicas propuestas para FPGAs, teniendo en cuenta las particularidades de este tipo de circuitos. Esta técnica se ha validado mediante experimentos de radiación, los cuales demuestran que una replicación parcial con circuitos aproximados puede ser incluso más robusta que una replicación completa, ya que un área más pequeña reduce la probabilidad de SEEs. Por otro lado, también se han aplicado las técnicas propuestas en esta tesis a un circuito de aplicación real, el microprocesador ARM Cortex M0, utilizando un conjunto de benchmarks software para generar las medidas de testabilidad necesarias. Por ´último, se realiza un estudio comparativo de las técnicas desarrolladas con la generación de circuitos aproximados mediante técnicas evolutivas. Estas técnicas hacen uso de una gran capacidad de cálculo para generar múltiples circuitos mediante ensayo y error, reduciendo la posibilidad de caer en algún mínimo local. Los resultados confirman que, en efecto, los circuitos generados mediante técnicas evolutivas son ligeramente mejores en prestaciones que con las técnicas aquí propuestas, pero con un coste computacional mucho mayor. En definitiva, se proponen varias técnicas originales de mitigación de fallos mediante circuitos aproximados. Se demuestra que estas técnicas tienen diversas aplicaciones, haciendo de la flexibilidad y adaptabilidad a los requisitos de cada aplicación sus principales virtudes.Programa Oficial de Doctorado en Ingeniería Eléctrica, Electrónica y AutomáticaPresidente: Raoul Velazco.- Secretario: Almudena Lindoso Muñoz.- Vocal: Jaume Segura Fuste

Error Mitigation Using Approximate Logic Circuits: A Comparison of Probabilistic and Evolutionary Approaches

Technology scaling poses an increasing challenge to the reliability of digital circuits. Hardware redundancy solutions, such as triple modular redundancy (TMR), produce very high area overhead, so partial redundancy is often used to reduce the overheads. Approximate logic circuits provide a general framework for optimized mitigation of errors arising from a broad class of failure mechanisms, including transient, intermittent, and permanent failures. However, generating an optimal redundant logic circuit that is able to mask the faults with the highest probability while minimizing the area overheads is a challenging problem. In this study, we propose and compare two new approaches to generate approximate logic circuits to be used in a TMR schema. The probabilistic approach approximates a circuit in a greedy manner based on a probabilistic estimation of the error. The evolutionary approach can provide radically different solutions that are hard to reach by other methods. By combining these two approaches, the solution space can be explored in depth. Experimental results demonstrate that the evolutionary approach can produce better solutions, but the probabilistic approach is close. On the other hand, these approaches provide much better scalability than other existing partial redundancy techniques.This work was supported by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain under project ESP2015-68245-C4-1-P, and by the Czech science foundation project GA16-17538S and the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic from the National Programme of Sustainability (NPU II); project IT4Innovations excellence in science - LQ1602

Injecting Intermittent Faults for the Dependability Assessment of a Fault-Tolerant Microcomputer System

© 2016 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.As scaling is more and more aggressive, intermittent faults are increasing their importance in current deep submicron complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technologies. This work shows the dependability assessment of a fault-tol- erant computer system against intermittent faults. The applied methodology lies in VHDL-based fault injection, which allows the assessment in early design phases, together with a high level of observability and controllability. The evaluated system is a duplex microcontroller system with cold stand-by sparing. A wide set of intermittent fault models have been injected, and from the simulation traces, coverages and latencies have been measured. Markov models for this system have been generated and some dependability functions, such as reliability and safety, have been calculated. From these results, some enhancements of detection and recovery mechanisms have been suggested. The methodology presented is general to any fault-tolerant computer system.This work was supported in part by the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia under the Research Project SP20120806, and in part by the Spanish Government under the Research Project TIN2012-38308-C02-01. Associate Editor: J. Shortle.Gil Tomás, DA.; Gracia Morán, J.; Baraza Calvo, JC.; Saiz Adalid, LJ.; Gil Vicente, PJ. (2016). Injecting Intermittent Faults for the Dependability Assessment of a Fault-Tolerant Microcomputer System. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. 65(2):648-661. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2015.2484058S64866165