Extracting Biomolecular Interactions Using Semantic Parsing of Biomedical Text

We advance the state of the art in biomolecular interaction extraction with three contributions: (i) We show that deep, Abstract Meaning Representations (AMR) significantly improve the accuracy of a biomolecular interaction extraction system when compared to a baseline that relies solely on surface- and syntax-based features; (ii) In contrast with previous approaches that infer relations on a sentence-by-sentence basis, we expand our framework to enable consistent predictions over sets of sentences (documents); (iii) We further modify and expand a graph kernel learning framework to enable concurrent exploitation of automatically induced AMR (semantic) and dependency structure (syntactic) representations. Our experiments show that our approach yields interaction extraction systems that are more robust in environments where there is a significant mismatch between training and test conditions.Comment: Appearing in Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-16

The Internal Consistency of the Moral Injury Event Scale: A Reliability Generalisation Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

© Hogrefe. All rights reserved. This is the accepted manuscript version of an article which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000824The Moral Injury Event Scale (MIES) is a tool for measuring exposure to potentially morally injurious event(s) and distress. Although it reported acceptable psychometric properties in its initial development studies, it has since been used in multiple contexts and populations without assessment of its changing properties. A reliability generalization of the MIES and its Sub-Scales was therefore undertaken. A systematic search of electronic databases (PsychINFO; PTSD Pubs; MEDLINE; Scopus; Web of Science) identified 42 studies reporting internal consistencies (Cronbach’s α) up to April 2022. Unfortunately, few studies reported any other form of reliability or validity metric (e.g., test-retest, inter-rater reliability). A random effects model with a Bayesian analytic framework and the DerSimonian-Laird (1986) estimate was used. The review found the MIES to be an internally consistent tool based on α estimates at both Full-scale (α = .88; 95% CI [.87–.89]) and Sub-scales (α = .82–.92; 95% CI [.79–.93]). The review uncovered high heterogeneity and inconsistencies in its administration and modification although figures generally remained above acceptable levels (α .70). Based on the review, the MIES represents an internally reliably tool for measuring potentially morally injurious events and distress at both Full and Sub-Scales according to pooled Cronbach’s α estimates.Peer reviewe

Adaptive Governance: An Introduction and Implications for Public Policy

Adaptive governance is a concept from institutional theory that deals with the evolution of institutions for the management of shared assets, particularly common pool resources and other forms of natural capital. This paper is the first of a set of four papers on adaptive governance, providing a brief overview of the history of the concept, the distinguishing features of the literature, and key insights provided for economists and policy advisors. We argue that adaptive governance provides an interesting lens for examining the political economy of policy responses akin to the concept of market failure within economics, but applied to wider processes of social learning and collective choice, including collective choices about the scope and structure of institutions that govern lower level choices by individuals and organizations.adaptive governance, public policy, common pool resources, natural resource management, wicked problems, Institutional and Behavioral Economics,

Instrument development, data collection, and characteristics of practices, staff, and measures in the Improving Quality of Care in Diabetes (iQuaD) Study

Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Implications for Sin and Psychology: An Investigative Study of the Sin Awareness Scale

Though scientific psychology once attempted to distance itself from religious constructs, times have changed. It now seems clear that the clinical practice of psychology involves metaphysics as well as science (O\u27donohue, 1989, Jones, 1994). Recent research also shows significant relationships between religion, spirituality and health (Hill and Pargament, 2003, Richards and Bergin, 2005). Yet the body of psycho logy and scholarship largely overlooks the study of sin. As a result, there is a shocking absence of measurement tools for research on perceptions of sin. What are the psychological implications of a Christian view of sin? Before studying the religious notion of sin, a suitable measurement tool needs to be developed. The purpose of this study is to assist in the examination of the psychometric properties and the continuation of the scale development for the final version of the Sin Awareness Scale (SAS). The final version of the SAS is analyzed with two samples: One involving Christian participants (N = 104) and another involving a large, religiously and ethnically diverse group (N = 1806). The results evidence sustained suppo11 for the structure of a 24-item tool with 6 subscales that demonstrated moderate to strong reliabilities, though one of the subscales demonstrates poorer reliability and construct validity than the other five subscales. Discriminant validity analyses revealed the SAS to measure a construct other than religious strain, shame and guilt. Finally, convergent validity analyses suggests that the SAS Grace from God subscale highly corresponds with religious comfort. Implications and limitations are discussed

The relationship between organisation identity and organisational performance

D. Phil.Whetten (1985), Dutton and Dukerich (1991) and Van Tonder (1987; 1999; 2004a). Organisation identity is often simply described as the distinctive character of the organisation and more formally defined as the core, unique, enduring and unifying features of the organisation. Labich (1994) argued that it is a central factor in corporate failure, while De Geus (1997) concluded that organisation identity is a critical factor in long-living organisations, but empirical research on organisation identity is exceptionally rare. In particular, the organisation identity–performance relationship, which raises and illuminates the relevance of the organisation identity construct, especially at an applied level and from the perspective of organisational management, has not received formal research attention. The present study was expressly concerned with the relevance of the organisation identity construct and specifically investigated the relationship between organisation identity and organisational performance. It elaborates on an earlier empirical study by Van Tonder (1999), which indicated that organisation identity relates to several critical organisational variables, including organisational culture, institutional focus, lifecycle stage, and organisational performance, and which suggested the relevance of the construct. The present study aimed to isolate and illuminate the key variables of organisation identity and organisational performance in order to study and clarify the relationship between these constructs. Consistent with a growing trend towards non-participation, only three of the organisations that were approached eventually participated in the research. Predominantly quantitative in approach, the study used an adapted organisation identity questionnaire (cf. Van Tonder, 1999) together with an organisational performance questionnaire (the PI or Performance Index) (Spannenberg & Theron, 2002). Results from the 274 respondents revealed that organisation identity – both the ‘fact-of-identity’ and the organisational ‘sense-of-identity’ – are directly and indirectly related to the organisation’s performance. It was concluded that these findings are significant from the perspectives of the construct’s relevance to science, theory confirmation and building and at an applied (organisational managerial) level. The findings and their implications for continued research are discussed

Measuring Employee Perceptions of Organizational Tolerance for Failure

The empirical concept of Organizational Tolerance for Organizational Failure was examined. First, a clear definition of the concept was established and, second, the concept\u27s dimensionality was explored. Based on data collected from 140 participants, four main scale components were identified: Organizational Values and Beliefs, Organizational and Supervisor Support and Motivation, Compensation and Reward Systems, and Recognition. Even though the final scale developed represented a good research base, further development is needed to improve some of the subscale\u27s internal consistencies