A Bandura

A Walker

B Verplanken

D Blackman

D Bonetti

D Collins

DP Goldberg

Elaine Stamp

FF Sniehotta

GC Homans

Gillian Hawthorne

HTO Davies

I Ajzen

Jeremy M Grimshaw

Jill J Francis

JJ Francis

Justin Presseau

Karasek

M Elovainio

M Fishbein

M Kivimaki

M Roland

M Schuster

Margaret Hunter

Marie Johnston

Marko Elovainio

Martin P Eccles

ME Seddon

MP Eccles

National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions

Nick Steen

P Blau

R Karasek

RH Moorman

S Hrisos

S Michie

SM Campbell

Susan Hrisos

The Healthcare Commission

The Information Centre

English

PubMed

Eccles, Martin P

Hrisos, Susan

Francis, Jill J

Stamp, Elaine

Johnston, Marie

Hawthorne, Gillian

Steen, Nick

Grimshaw, Jeremy M

Elovainio, Marko

Presseau, Justin

Hunter, Margaret

Aberdeen University Research

A: ’Psychological Theory’ Group. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Quality & Safety in Health Care

A: Explaining the effects of an intervention designed to promote evidence-based diabetes care: a theory-based process evaluation of a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. Implementation Science

Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: theory and assessment.

Applying multiple models to predict clinicians’ behavioural intention and objective behaviour when managing children’s teeth. Psychol Health

Applying psychological theories to evidence-based clinical practice: Identifying factors predictive of managing upper respiratory tract infections without antibiotics. Implementation Science

Attitude and the prediction of behavior.

Bridging the intention-behaviour gap: planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise.

Can’t do it, won’t do it! Developing a theoretically framed intervention to encourage better decontamination practice in Scottish dental practices. Implementation Science

content questionnaire and user’s guide. Volume Revision

Developing the content of two behavioural interventions: Using theory-based interventions to promote GP management of upper respiratory tract infection without prescribing antibiotics #1. BMC Health Services Research

EF: Translating clinicians’ beliefs into implementation interventions (TRACII): a protocol for an intervention modelling experiment to change clinicians’ intentions to implement evidence-based practice. Implementation Science

Effects of pay-for-performance on the quality of primary care in England.

Elovainio M: A short version of the team climate inventory: development and psychometric properties.

EM: Using theories of behaviour to understand transfusion prescribing in three clinical contexts in two countries: development work for an implementation trial. Implementation Science

et al: Applying psychological theories to evidence-based clinical practice: identifying factors predictive of placing preventive fissure sealants. Implementation Science

et al: Applying psychological theory to evidence-based clinical practice: identifying factors predictive of taking intra-oral radiographs. Soc Sci Med

Exchange and power in social life

for Chronic Conditions: Type 2 diabetes: national clinical guideline for management in primary and secondary care (update). London: Royal College of Physicians;

Guiding the design and selection of interventions to influence the implementation of evidence-based practice: an experimental simulation of a complex intervention trial. Soc Sci Med

Healthcare professionals’ intentions and behaviours: A systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories. Implementation Science

Improving the delivery of care for patients with diabetes through understanding optimised team work and organisation in primary care. Implementation Science

IN: Factors predicting team climate, and its relationship with quality of care in general practice.

IN: Using psychological theory to understand the clinical management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: a comparison across two European countries.

JC: Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science

JM: A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implementation Science

Linking physicians’ pay to the quality of care.

MP: Determinants of the intention of elementary school nurses to adopt a redefined role in health promotion at school. Implementation Science

MP: PRocess modelling in ImpleMEntation research:selecting a theoretical basis for interventions to change clinical practice.

MP: Response rates in postal surveys of healthcare professionals between

MP: Team climate and quality of care in primary health care: a review of studies using the Team Climate Inventory in the United Kingdom.

MP: Using the theory of planned behaviour as a process evaluation tool in randomised trials of knowledge translation strategies: a case study from UK primary care. Implementation Science

Operant conditioning: an experimental analysis of behaviour London:

Orbell S: Reflections on past behavior: a self-report index of habit strength.

Organisational culture and quality of health care. QHC

Organisational justice: evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health.

Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res

Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: do fairness perception influence employee citizenship?

RH: How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q

Self-efficacy: the exercise of control

Self-efficacy: towards a unifying theory of behaviour change. Psychological Review

Social behaviour as exchange.

Stanworth SJ: Evidence-based selection of theories for designing behaviour change interventions: using methods based on theoretical construct domains to understand clinicians’ blood transfusion behaviour.

Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. QHC

The Healthcare Commission: The views of people with diabetes: key findings from the 2006 survey

The Healthcare Commission: The views of people with diabetes: key findings from the 2006 survey 2007. Eccles et al.

The Information Centre: General and personal medical services: England, 1997-2007. Leeds: The Information Centre;

The job content questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics.

The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes

VF: A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med

Instrument development, data collection, and characteristics of practices, staff, and measures in the Improving Quality of Care in Diabetes (iQuaD) Study

Crossref

Implementation Science

Eccles, Martin P.

Francis, Jill J.

Grimshaw, Jeremy M.

Julkari

Abstract
              
                Background
                Type 2 diabetes is an increasingly prevalent chronic illness and an important cause of avoidable mortality. Patients are managed by the integrated activities of clinical and non-clinical members of primary care teams. This study aimed to: investigate theoretically-based organisational, team, and individual factors determining the multiple behaviours needed to manage diabetes; and identify multilevel determinants of different diabetes management behaviours and potential interventions to improve them. This paper describes the instrument development, study recruitment, characteristics of the study participating practices and their constituent healthcare professionals and administrative staff and reports descriptive analyses of the data collected.
              
              
                Methods
                The study was a predictive study over a 12-month period. Practices (N = 99) were recruited from within the UK Medical Research Council General Practice Research Framework. We identified six behaviours chosen to cover a range of clinical activities (prescribing, non-prescribing), reflect decisions that were not necessarily straightforward (controlling blood pressure that was above target despite other drug treatment), and reflect recommended best practice as described by national guidelines. Practice attributes and a wide range of individually reported measures were assessed at baseline; measures of clinical outcome were collected over the ensuing 12 months, and a number of proxy measures of behaviour were collected at baseline and at 12 months. Data were collected by telephone interview, postal questionnaire (organisational and clinical) to practice staff, postal questionnaire to patients, and by computer data extraction query.
              
              
                Results
                All 99 practices completed a telephone interview and responded to baseline questionnaires. The organisational questionnaire was completed by 931/1236 (75.3%) administrative staff, 423/529 (80.0%) primary care doctors, and 255/314 (81.2%) nurses. Clinical questionnaires were completed by 326/361 (90.3%) primary care doctors and 163/186 (87.6%) nurses. At a practice level, we achieved response rates of 100% from clinicians in 40 practices and > 80% from clinicians in 67 practices. All measures had satisfactory internal consistency (alpha coefficient range from 0.61 to 0.97; Pearson correlation coefficient (two item measures) 0.32 to 0.81); scores were generally consistent with good practice. Measures of behaviour showed relatively high rates of performance of the six behaviours, but with considerable variability within and across the behaviours and measures.
              
              
                Discussion
                We have assembled an unparalleled data set from clinicians reporting on their cognitions in relation to the performance of six clinical behaviours involved in the management of people with one chronic disease (diabetes mellitus), using a range of organisational and individual level measures as well as information on the structure of the practice teams and across a large number of UK primary care practices. We would welcome approaches from other researchers to collaborate on the analysis of this data

uO Research (Univ. of Ottawa)

Springer - Publisher Connector

Recherche uO Research

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is an increasingly prevalent chronic illness and an important cause of avoidable mortality. Patients are managed by the integrated activities of clinical and non-clinical members of primary care teams. This study aimed to: investigate theoretically-based organisational, team, and individual factors determining the multiple behaviours needed to manage diabetes; and identify multilevel determinants of different diabetes management behaviours and potential interventions to improve them. This paper describes the instrument development, study recruitment, characteristics of the study participating practices and their constituent healthcare professionals and administrative staff and reports descriptive analyses of the data collected. METHODS: The study was a predictive study over a 12-month period. Practices (N = 99) were recruited from within the UK Medical Research Council General Practice Research Framework. We identified six behaviours chosen to cover a range of clinical activities (prescribing, non-prescribing), reflect decisions that were not necessarily straightforward (controlling blood pressure that was above target despite other drug treatment), and reflect recommended best practice as described by national guidelines. Practice attributes and a wide range of individually reported measures were assessed at baseline; measures of clinical outcome were collected over the ensuing 12 months, and a number of proxy measures of behaviour were collected at baseline and at 12 months. Data were collected by telephone interview, postal questionnaire (organisational and clinical) to practice staff, postal questionnaire to patients, and by computer data extraction query. RESULTS: All 99 practices completed a telephone interview and responded to baseline questionnaires. The organisational questionnaire was completed by 931/1236 (75.3%) administrative staff, 423/529 (80.0%) primary care doctors, and 255/314 (81.2%) nurses. Clinical questionnaires were completed by 326/361 (90.3%) primary care doctors and 163/186 (87.6%) nurses. At a practice level, we achieved response rates of 100% from clinicians in 40 practices and > 80% from clinicians in 67 practices. All measures had satisfactory internal consistency (alpha coefficient range from 0.61 to 0.97; Pearson correlation coefficient (two item measures) 0.32 to 0.81); scores were generally consistent with good practice. Measures of behaviour showed relatively high rates of performance of the six behaviours, but with considerable variability within and across the behaviours and measures. DISCUSSION: We have assembled an unparalleled data set from clinicians reporting on their cognitions in relation to the performance of six clinical behaviours involved in the management of people with one chronic disease (diabetes mellitus), using a range of organisational and individual level measures as well as information on the structure of the practice teams and across a large number of UK primary care practices. We would welcome approaches from other researchers to collaborate on the analysis of this data

Instrument development, data collection, and characteristics of practices, staff, and measures in the Improving Quality of Care in Diabetes (iQuaD) Study

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Aberdeen University Research

Crossref

Julkari

uO Research (Univ. of Ottawa)

Springer - Publisher Connector

Recherche uO Research

uO Research (Univ. of Ottawa)

University of Melbourne Institutional Repository