14 research outputs found
Disjunctive Answer Set Solvers via Templates
Answer set programming is a declarative programming paradigm oriented towards
difficult combinatorial search problems. A fundamental task in answer set
programming is to compute stable models, i.e., solutions of logic programs.
Answer set solvers are the programs that perform this task. The problem of
deciding whether a disjunctive program has a stable model is
-complete. The high complexity of reasoning within disjunctive
logic programming is responsible for few solvers capable of dealing with such
programs, namely DLV, GnT, Cmodels, CLASP and WASP. In this paper we show that
transition systems introduced by Nieuwenhuis, Oliveras, and Tinelli to model
and analyze satisfiability solvers can be adapted for disjunctive answer set
solvers. Transition systems give a unifying perspective and bring clarity in
the description and comparison of solvers. They can be effectively used for
analyzing, comparing and proving correctness of search algorithms as well as
inspiring new ideas in the design of disjunctive answer set solvers. In this
light, we introduce a general template, which accounts for major techniques
implemented in disjunctive solvers. We then illustrate how this general
template captures solvers DLV, GnT and Cmodels. We also show how this framework
provides a convenient tool for designing new solving algorithms by means of
combinations of techniques employed in different solvers.Comment: To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP
Evaluation Techniques and Systems for Answer Set Programming: a Survey
Answer set programming (ASP) is a prominent knowledge representation and reasoning paradigm that found both industrial and scientific applications. The success of ASP is due to the combination of two factors: a rich modeling language and the availability of efficient ASP implementations. In this paper we trace the history of ASP systems, describing the key evaluation techniques and their implementation in actual tools
Magic Sets for Disjunctive Datalog Programs
In this paper, a new technique for the optimization of (partially) bound
queries over disjunctive Datalog programs with stratified negation is
presented. The technique exploits the propagation of query bindings and extends
the Magic Set (MS) optimization technique.
An important feature of disjunctive Datalog is nonmonotonicity, which calls
for nondeterministic implementations, such as backtracking search. A
distinguishing characteristic of the new method is that the optimization can be
exploited also during the nondeterministic phase. In particular, after some
assumptions have been made during the computation, parts of the program may
become irrelevant to a query under these assumptions. This allows for dynamic
pruning of the search space. In contrast, the effect of the previously defined
MS methods for disjunctive Datalog is limited to the deterministic portion of
the process. In this way, the potential performance gain by using the proposed
method can be exponential, as could be observed empirically.
The correctness of MS is established thanks to a strong relationship between
MS and unfounded sets that has not been studied in the literature before. This
knowledge allows for extending the method also to programs with stratified
negation in a natural way.
The proposed method has been implemented in DLV and various experiments have
been conducted. Experimental results on synthetic data confirm the utility of
MS for disjunctive Datalog, and they highlight the computational gain that may
be obtained by the new method w.r.t. the previously proposed MS methods for
disjunctive Datalog programs. Further experiments on real-world data show the
benefits of MS within an application scenario that has received considerable
attention in recent years, the problem of answering user queries over possibly
inconsistent databases originating from integration of autonomous sources of
information.Comment: 67 pages, 19 figures, preprint submitted to Artificial Intelligenc
Lazy Model Expansion: Interleaving Grounding with Search
Finding satisfying assignments for the variables involved in a set of
constraints can be cast as a (bounded) model generation problem: search for
(bounded) models of a theory in some logic. The state-of-the-art approach for
bounded model generation for rich knowledge representation languages, like ASP,
FO(.) and Zinc, is ground-and-solve: reduce the theory to a ground or
propositional one and apply a search algorithm to the resulting theory.
An important bottleneck is the blowup of the size of the theory caused by the
reduction phase. Lazily grounding the theory during search is a way to overcome
this bottleneck. We present a theoretical framework and an implementation in
the context of the FO(.) knowledge representation language. Instead of
grounding all parts of a theory, justifications are derived for some parts of
it. Given a partial assignment for the grounded part of the theory and valid
justifications for the formulas of the non-grounded part, the justifications
provide a recipe to construct a complete assignment that satisfies the
non-grounded part. When a justification for a particular formula becomes
invalid during search, a new one is derived; if that fails, the formula is
split in a part to be grounded and a part that can be justified.
The theoretical framework captures existing approaches for tackling the
grounding bottleneck such as lazy clause generation and grounding-on-the-fly,
and presents a generalization of the 2-watched literal scheme. We present an
algorithm for lazy model expansion and integrate it in a model generator for
FO(ID), a language extending first-order logic with inductive definitions. The
algorithm is implemented as part of the state-of-the-art FO(ID) Knowledge-Base
System IDP. Experimental results illustrate the power and generality of the
approach