18,599 research outputs found

    Economic Impacts of Aquatic Vegetation to Angling in Two South Carolina Reservoirs

    Get PDF
    Angler creel surveys and economic impact models were used to evaluate potential expansion of aquatic vegetation in Lakes Murray and Moultrie, South Carolina. (PDF contains 4 pages.

    The role of aquatic vegetation in Iowa lakes

    Get PDF
    Chapter 2 Abstract - ABIOTIC FACTORS INFLUENCE OF AQUATIC VEGETATION ABUNDANCE IN IOWA LAKES In spite of the importance of aquatic vegetation to lakes, there are ongoing conflicts between the need to manage vegetation for multiple users of a lake and the need for aquatic vegetation for the aquatic biota. In 2007, a study was undertaken to assess the relationships between water quality and aquatic vegetation communities in 13 Iowa lakes. These lakes varied in location and fishery management protocols. The total number of emergent/floating aquatic vegetation species per lake varied from six to 14 species, while the total number of submerged aquatic vegetation species per lake varied from three to 11 species. Mean emergent/floating aquatic vegetation abundance and submerged aquatic vegetation were compared against physical-chemical parameters. There were four significant relationships between physical-chemical parameters (alkalinity, hardness, chlorophyll a, and temperature) and emergent/floating vegetation abundance and significant relationships between submerged aquatic vegetation and chlorophyll a, Secchi-depth, total suspended solids, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen. The lakes with the best values of physical-chemical indicators typically had higher submerged aquatic vegetation abundance, but not necessarily diversity. The nMDS plot shows relationships the lakes have with emergent/ floating vegetation and submerged aquatic vegetation species as well as abundance. The emergent/floating aquatic vegetation ordination indicates that lakes Meadow, Greenfield, Anita, and Mormon Trail share similar plant species. The submerged aquatic vegetation nMDS plot reiterates the strong negative relationship between Secchi-depth and chlorophyll a levels, and lakes that share these characteristics. Overall, each lake seemingly similar at first, has many unique characteristics, making it difficult to set up a comprehensive guideline for all Iowa lakes vegetation management practices. By using simple linear regression, Shannon diversity index, and nMDS plots, managers can start to understand similarities and differences among lakes with reference to aquatic vegetation and physical-chemical parameters. Chapter 3 Abstract- LITTORAL INFLUENCES ON ZOOPLANKTON POPULATIONS AND JUVENILE BLUEGILLS IN IOWA LAKES Aquatic vegetation helps maintain the overall integrity of aquatic ecosystems. Lakes with vegetation are characteristic of reduced chlorophyll concentrations, lower phytoplankton densities, and large-bodied cladocerans. Littoral zones with dense vegetation beds accommodate invertebrate communities that are richer in abundance and diversity compared to barren littoral zones. Two objectives of this research were to determine whether vegetated and non-vegetated littoral zones have similar zooplankton populations, and the role of the littoral zone upon juvenile bluegills food habits. Vegetation-loving cladocerans, e.g., Chydorus spp., were typically found in higher abundance in vegetated areas compared to open littoral and limentic zones, while limnetic zooplankton, Daphnia spp. was often found in higher concentrations in pelagic zone. Regardless of fish size (≤50mm and \u3e50mm), prey selectivity was similar. However, different sampling periods (spring/summer vs. fall) showed different prey choices

    Evaluation of spatial, radiometric and spectral Thematic Mapper performance for coastal studies

    Get PDF
    On 31 March 1983, the University of Delaware's Center for Remote Sensing initiated a study to evaluate the spatial, radiometric and spectral performance of the LANDSAT Thematic Mapper for coastal and estuarine studies. The investigation was supported by Contract NAS5-27580 from the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. The research was divided into three major subprojects: (1) a comparison of LANDSAT TM to MSS imagery for detecting submerged aquatic vegetation in Chesapeake Bay; (2) remote sensing of submerged aquatic vegetation - a radiative transfer approach; and (3) remote sensing of coastal wetland biomass using Thematic Mapper wavebands

    Effects of aquatic vegetation type on denitrification

    Get PDF
    In a microcosm 15N enrichment experiment we tested the effect of floating vegetation (Lemna sp.) and submerged vegetation (Elodea nuttallii) on denitrification rates, and compared it to systems without macrophytes. Oxygen concentration, and thus photosynthesis, plays an important role in regulating denitrification rates and therefore the experiments were performed under dark as well as under light conditions. Denitrification rates differed widely between treatments, ranging from 2.8 to 20.9 µmol N m-2 h-1, and were strongly affected by the type of macrophytes present. These differences may be explained by the effects of macrophytes on oxygen conditions. Highest denitrification rates were observed under a closed mat of floating macrophytes where oxygen concentrations were low. In the light, denitrification was inhibited by oxygen from photosynthesis by submerged macrophytes, and by benthic algae in the systems without macrophytes. However, in microcosms with floating vegetation there was no effect of light, as the closed mat of floating plants caused permanently dark conditions in the water column. Nitrate removal was dominated by plant uptake rather than denitrification, and did not differ between systems with submerged or floating plant

    Review of best management practices for aquatic vegetation control in stormwater ponds, wetlands, and lakes

    Get PDF
    Auckland Council (AC) is responsible for the development and operation of a stormwater network across the region to avert risks to citizens and the environment. Within this stormwater network, aquatic vegetation (including plants, unicellular and filamentous algae) can have both a positive and negative role in stormwater management and water quality treatment. The situations where management is needed to control aquatic vegetation are not always clear, and an inability to identify effective, feasible and economical control options may constrain management initiatives. AC (Infrastructure and Technical Services, Stormwater) commissioned this technical report to provide information for decision- making on aquatic vegetation management with in stormwater systems that are likely to experience vegetation-related issues. Information was collated from a comprehensive literature review, augmented by knowledge held by the authors. This review identified a wide range of management practices that could be potentially employed. It also demonstrated complexities and uncertainties relating to these options that makes the identification of a best management practice difficult. Hence, the focus of this report was to enable users to screen for potential options, and use reference material provided on each option to confirm the best practice to employ for each situation. The report identifies factors to define whether there is an aquatic vegetation problem (Section 3.0), and emphasises the need for agreed management goals for control (e.g. reduction, mitigation, containment, eradication). Resources to screen which management option(s) to employ are provided (Section 4.0), relating to the target aquatic vegetation, likely applicability of options to the system being managed, indicative cost, and ease of implementation. Initial screening allows users to shortlist potential control options for further reference (Section 5.0). Thirty-five control options are described (Section 5.0) in sufficient detail to consider applicability to individual sites and species. These options are grouped under categories of biological, chemical or physical control. Biological control options involve the use of organisms to predate, infect or control vegetation growth (e.g. classical biological control) or manipulate conditions to control algal growth (e.g. pest fish removal, microbial products). Chemical control options involve the use of pesticides and chemicals (e.g. glyphosate, diquat), or the use of flocculants and nutrient inactivation products that are used to reduce nutrient loading, thereby decreasing algal growth. Physical control options involve removing vegetation or algal biomass (e.g. mechanical or manual harvesting), or setting up barriers to their growth (e.g. shading, bottom lining, sediment capping). Preventative management options are usually the most cost effective, and these are also briefly described (Section 6.0). For example, the use of hygiene or quarantine protocols can reduce weed introductions or spread. Catchment- based practices to reduce sediment and nutrient sources to stormwater are likely to assist in the avoidance of algal and possibly aquatic plant problems. Nutrient removal may be a co-benefit where harvesting of submerged weed biomass is undertaken in stormwater systems. It should also be considered that removal of substantial amounts of submerged vegetation may result in a sudden and difficult-to-reverse s witch to a turbid, phytoplankton dominated state. Another possible solution is the conversion of systems that experience aquatic vegetation issues, to systems that are less likely to experience issues. The focus of this report is on systems that receive significant stormwater inputs, i.e. constructed bodies, including ponds, amenity lakes, wetlands, and highly-modified receiving bodies. However, some information will have application to other natural water bodies

    Population Characteristics of Largemouth Bass Associated with Changes in Abundance of Submersed Aquatic Vegetation in Lake Seminole, Georgia

    Get PDF
    Population characteristics of largemouth bass ( Micropterus salmoides L.) including growth, body condition (relative weight), survival, and egg production were examined in relation to abundance of submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV) coverage (primarily hydrilla [ Hydrilla verticillata L.f. Royle]) in three embayments of Lake Seminole, GA, and compared to a previous study conducted in 1998. (PDF has 8 pages.

    Evaluation of macrophyte control in 38 Florida lakes using triploid grass carp

    Get PDF
    Florida’s large number of shallow lakes, warm climate and long growing season have contributed to the development of excessive growths of aquatic macrophytes that have seriously interfered with many water use activities. The introduction of exotic aquatic macrophyte species such as hydrilla ( Hydrilla verticillata ) have added significantly to aquatic plant problems in Florida lakes. The use of grass carp ( Ctenopharyngodon idella ) can be an effective and economical control for aquatic vegetation such as hydrilla. Early stocking rates (24 to 74 grass carp per hectare of lake area) resulted in grass carp consumption rates that vastly exceeded the growth rates of the aquatic plants and often resulted in the total loss of all submersed vegetation. This study looked at 38 Florida lakes that had been stocked with grass carp for 3 to 10 years with stocking rates ranging from < 1 to 59 grass carp per hectare of lake and 1 to 207 grass carp per hectare of vegetation to determine the long term effects of grass carp on aquatic macrophyte communities. The median PAC (percent area coverage) value of aquatic macrophytes for the study lakes after they were stocked with grass carp was 14% and the median PVI (percent volume infested) value of aquatic macrophytes was 2%. Only lakes stocked with less than 25 to 30 fish per hectare of vegetation tended to have higher than median PAC and PVI values. When grass carp are stocked at levels of > 25 to 30 fish per hectare of vegetation the complete control of aquatic vegetation can be achieved, with the exception of a few species of plants that grass carp have extreme difficulty consuming. If the management goal for a lake is to control some of the problem aquatic plants while maintaining a small population of predominately unpalatable aquatic plants, grass carp can be stocked at approximately 25 to 30 fish per hectare of vegetation
    corecore