9 research outputs found
An Enhanced Features Extractor for a Portfolio of Constraint Solvers
Recent research has shown that a single arbitrarily efficient solver can be
significantly outperformed by a portfolio of possibly slower on-average
solvers. The solver selection is usually done by means of (un)supervised
learning techniques which exploit features extracted from the problem
specification. In this paper we present an useful and flexible framework that
is able to extract an extensive set of features from a Constraint
(Satisfaction/Optimization) Problem defined in possibly different modeling
languages: MiniZinc, FlatZinc or XCSP. We also report some empirical results
showing that the performances that can be obtained using these features are
effective and competitive with state of the art CSP portfolio techniques
SUNNY-CP and the MiniZinc Challenge
In Constraint Programming (CP) a portfolio solver combines a variety of
different constraint solvers for solving a given problem. This fairly recent
approach enables to significantly boost the performance of single solvers,
especially when multicore architectures are exploited. In this work we give a
brief overview of the portfolio solver sunny-cp, and we discuss its performance
in the MiniZinc Challenge---the annual international competition for CP
solvers---where it won two gold medals in 2015 and 2016. Under consideration in
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP)Comment: Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
(TPLP
An Extensive Evaluation of Portfolio Approaches for Constraint Satisfaction Problems
In the context of Constraint Programming, a portfolio
approach exploits the complementary strengths of a portfolio of
different constraint solvers. The goal is to predict and run the best
solver(s) of the portfolio for solving a new, unseen problem. In
this work we reproduce, simulate, and evaluate the performance
of different portfolio approaches on extensive benchmarks of
Constraint Satisfaction Problems. Empirical results clearly show
the benefits of portfolio solvers in terms of both solved instances
and solving time
SUNNY-CP: a Portfolio Solver for Constraint Programming
In Constraint Programming (CP) a portfolio solver combines a variety of different constraint solvers for solving a given problem. This fairly recent approach enables to significantly boost the performance of single solvers, especially when multicore architectures are exploited. In this work we give a brief overview of the portfolio solver sunny-cp, and we discuss its performance in the last MiniZinc Challenge —the annual international competition for CP solvers— where it won a gold medal
SUNNY: a Lazy Portfolio Approach for Constraint Solving
*** To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP) ***
Within the context of constraint solving, a portfolio approach allows one to
exploit the synergy between different solvers in order to create a globally
better solver. In this paper we present SUNNY: a simple and flexible algorithm
that takes advantage of a portfolio of constraint solvers in order to compute
--- without learning an explicit model --- a schedule of them for solving a
given Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP). Motivated by the performance
reached by SUNNY vs. different simulations of other state of the art
approaches, we developed sunny-csp, an effective portfolio solver that exploits
the underlying SUNNY algorithm in order to solve a given CSP. Empirical tests
conducted on exhaustive benchmarks of MiniZinc models show that the actual
performance of SUNNY conforms to the predictions. This is encouraging both for
improving the power of CSP portfolio solvers and for trying to export them to
fields such as Answer Set Programming and Constraint Logic Programming
An Extensive Evaluation of Portfolio Approaches for Constraint Satisfaction Problems
International audienceIn the context of Constraint Programming, a portfolio approach exploits the complementary strengths of a portfolio of different constraint solvers. The goal is to predict and run the best solver(s) of the portfolio for solving a new, unseen problem. In this work we reproduce, simulate, and evaluate the performance of different portfolio approaches on extensive benchmarks of Constraint Satisfaction Problems. Empirical results clearly show the benefits of portfolio solvers in terms of both solved instances and solving time
ASlib: A Benchmark Library for Algorithm Selection
The task of algorithm selection involves choosing an algorithm from a set of
algorithms on a per-instance basis in order to exploit the varying performance
of algorithms over a set of instances. The algorithm selection problem is
attracting increasing attention from researchers and practitioners in AI. Years
of fruitful applications in a number of domains have resulted in a large amount
of data, but the community lacks a standard format or repository for this data.
This situation makes it difficult to share and compare different approaches
effectively, as is done in other, more established fields. It also
unnecessarily hinders new researchers who want to work in this area. To address
this problem, we introduce a standardized format for representing algorithm
selection scenarios and a repository that contains a growing number of data
sets from the literature. Our format has been designed to be able to express a
wide variety of different scenarios. Demonstrating the breadth and power of our
platform, we describe a set of example experiments that build and evaluate
algorithm selection models through a common interface. The results display the
potential of algorithm selection to achieve significant performance
improvements across a broad range of problems and algorithms.Comment: Accepted to be published in Artificial Intelligence Journa
SUNNY-CP : a Sequential CP Portfolio Solver
International audienceThe Constraint Programming (CP) paradigm allows to model and solve Constraint Satisfaction / Optimization Problems (CSPs / COPs). A CP Portfolio Solver is a particular constraint solver that takes advantage of a portfolio of different CP solvers in order to solve a given problem by properly exploiting Algorithm Selection techniques. In this work we present sunny-cp: a CP portfolio for solving both CSPs and COPs that turned out to be competitive also in the MiniZinc Challenge, the reference competition for CP solvers
Automated streamliner portfolios for constraint satisfaction problems
Funding: This work is supported by the EPSRC grants EP/P015638/1 and EP/P026842/1, and Nguyen Dang is a Leverhulme Early Career Fellow. We used the Cirrus UK National Tier-2 HPC Service at EPCC (http://www.cirrus.ac.uk) funded by the University of Edinburgh and EPSRC (EP/P020267/1).Constraint Programming (CP) is a powerful technique for solving large-scale combinatorial problems. Solving a problem proceeds in two distinct phases: modelling and solving. Effective modelling has a huge impact on the performance of the solving process. Even with the advance of modern automated modelling tools, search spaces involved can be so vast that problems can still be difficult to solve. To further constrain the model, a more aggressive step that can be taken is the addition of streamliner constraints, which are not guaranteed to be sound but are designed to focus effort on a highly restricted but promising portion of the search space. Previously, producing effective streamlined models was a manual, difficult and time-consuming task. This paper presents a completely automated process to the generation, search and selection of streamliner portfolios to produce a substantial reduction in search effort across a diverse range of problems. The results demonstrate a marked improvement in performance for both Chuffed, a CP solver with clause learning, and lingeling, a modern SAT solver.Publisher PDFPeer reviewe