07151 Abstracts Collection -- Geometry in Sensor Networks

From 9.4.2007 to 13.4.07, the Dagstuhl Seminar 07151 ``Geometry in Sensor Networks\u27\u27 was held in the International Conference and Research Center (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl. During the seminar, several participants presented their current research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section describes the seminar topics and goals in general. Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available

Saving Energy and Improving Communications using Cooperative Group-based Wireless Sensor Networks

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) can be used in many real applications (environmental monitoring, habitat monitoring, health, etc.). The energy consumption of each sensor should be as lower as possible, and methods for grouping nodes can improve the network performance. In this work, we show how organizing sensors in cooperative groups can reduce the global energy consumption of the WSN. We will also show that a cooperative group-based network reduces the number of the messages transmitted inside the WSNs, which implieasa reduction of energy consumed by the whole network, and, consequently, an increase of the network lifetime. The simulations will show how the number of groups improves the network performance. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.García Pineda, M.; Sendra Compte, S.; Lloret, J.; Canovas Solbes, A. (2013). Saving Energy and Improving Communications using Cooperative Group-based Wireless Sensor Networks. Telecommunication Systems. 52(4):2489-2502. doi:10.1007/s11235-011-9568-3S24892502524Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Journal of Computer Networks, 38(4), 393–422.Garcia, M., Bri, D., Sendra, S., & Lloret, J. (2010). Practical deployments of wireless sensor networks: a survey. Journal on Advances in Networks and Services, 3(1&2), 1–16.Lloret, J., Garcia, M., Bri, D., & Sendra, S. (2009). A wireless sensor network deployment for rural and forest fire detection and verification. Sensors, 9(11), 8722–8747.Mainwaring, A., Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., & Culler, D. (2002). Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring. In ACM workshop on sensor networks and applications (WSNA’02), Atlanta, GA, USA, September.Garcia, M., Sendra, S., Lloret, G., & Lloret, J. (2010, in press). Monitoring and control sensor system for fish feeding in marine fish farms. IET Communications, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1049/iet-com.2010.0654 .Sinha, A., & Chandrakasan, A. (2001). Dynamic power management in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Design & Test of Computers, 18(2), 62–74.Garcia, M., Coll, H., Bri, D., & Lloret, J. (2008). Using MANET protocols in wireless sensor and actor networks. In The second international conference on sensor technologies and applications (SENSORCOMM 2008), Cap Esterel, Costa Azul, France, 25–31 August.Lloret, J., García, M., Boronat, F., & Tomás, J. (2008). MANET protocols performance in group-based networks. In Wireless and mobile networking: Vol. 284 (Chap. 13, pp. 161–172). Berlin, Heidelberg, Boston: Springer.Lloret, J., García, M., & Tomás, J. (2008). Improving mobile and ad-hoc networks performance using group-based topologies. In Wireless sensor and actor networks 2008 (WSAN 2008), Ottawa, Canada, 14–15 July. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.Lloret, J., Palau, C., Boronat, F., & Tomas, J. (2008). Improving networks using group-based topologies. Journal of Computer Communications, 31(14), 3438–3450.Lloret, J., Garcia, M., Tomás, J., & Boronat, F. (2008). GBP-WAHSN: a group-based protocol for large wireless ad hoc and sensor networks. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 23(3), 461–480.Lloret, J., García, M., Boronat, F., & Tomás, J. (2008). MANET protocols performance in group-based networks. In 10th IFIP international conference on mobile and wireless communications networks (MWCN 2008), Toulouse, France, 30 September–2 October.Garcia, M., Sendra, S., Lloret, J., & Lacuesta, R. (2010). Saving energy with cooperative group-based wireless sensor networks. In LNCS: Vol. 6240. Cooperative design, visualization, and engineering: CDVE 2010 (pp. 231–238), September. Berlin: Springer.Lloret, J., Sendra, S., Coll, H., & García, M. (2010). Saving energy in wireless local area sensor networks. Computer Journal, 53(10), 1658–1673.Meiyappan, S. S., Frederiks, G., & Hahn, S. (2006). Dynamic power save techniques for next generation WLAN systems. In Proceedings of the 38th southeastern symposium on system theory (SSST), Cookeville, Tennessee, USA, 5–7 March.Raghunathan, V., Schurgers, C., Park, S., & Srivastava, M. (2002). Energy aware wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 19(2), 40–50.Min, R., Bhardwaj, M., Cho, S.-H., Shih, E., Sinha, A., Wang, A., & Chandrakasan, A. (2001). Low power wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of international conference on VLSI design, India, Bangalore, 3–7 January.Salhieh, A., Weinmann, J., Kochha, M., & Schwiebert, L. (2001). Power efficient topologies for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on parallel processing (pp. 156–163), 3–7 September.Jayashree, S., Manoj, B. S., & Murthy, C. S. R. (2004). A battery aware medium access control (BAMAC) protocol for Ad-hoc wireless network. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications (PIMRC 2004), Barcelona, Spain, 5–8 September (Vol. 2, pp. 995–999).Ye, W., Heidemann, J., & Estrin, D. (2002). An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2002, the 21st annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies, New York, USA, 23–27 June.Ching, C., & Schindelhauer, C. (2010). Utilizing detours for energy conservation in mobile wireless networks. Journal of Telecommunication Systems. doi: 10.1007/s11235-009-9188-3 .Gao, Q., Blow, K., Holding, D., Marshall, I., & Peng, X. (2004). Radio range adjustment for energy efficient wireless sensor networks. Journal of Ad Hoc Networks, 4(1), 75–82.Li, D., Jia, X., & Liu, H. (2004). Energy efficient broadcast routing in static ad hoc wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 3(1), 1–8.Camilo, T., Carreto, C., Silva, J., & Boavida, F. (2006). An energy-efficient ant-based routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 4150. Ant colony optimization and swarm intelligence (pp. 49–59). Berlin: Springer.Younis, M., Youssef, M., & Arisha, K. (2002). Energy-aware routing in cluster-based sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE international symposium on modeling, analysis, and simulation of computer and telecommunications systems (MASCOTS ’02) (pp. 129–136). Washington: IEEE Computer Society.Cheng, Z., Perillo, M., & Heinzelman, W. B. (2008). General network lifetime and cost models for evaluating sensor network deployment strategies. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 7(4), 484–497.Heo, N., & Varshney, P. K. (2005). Energy-efficient deployment of intelligent mobile sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part A Systems and Humans, 35(1), 78–92.Vlajic, N., & Xia, D. (2006). Wireless sensor networks: to cluster or not to cluster? In International symposium on a world of wireless, mobile and multimedia networks, WoWMoM 2006.Garcia, M., & Lloret, J. (2009). A cooperative group-based sensor network for environmental monitoring. In LNCS: Vol. 5738. Cooperative design, visualization, and engineering: CDVE 2009. (pp. 276–279). Berlin: Springer.Garcia, M., Bri, D., Boronat, F., & Lloret, J. (2008). A new neighbour selection strategy for group-based wireless sensor networks. In 4th int. conf. on networking and services, ICNS 2008. 16–21 March (pp. 109–114).Kaplan, E. D. (1996). Understanding GPS: principles and applications. Boston: Artech House.Stojmenovic, I. (2002). Position based routing in ad hoc networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(7), 128–134.Heinzelman, W. B., Chandrakasan, A. P., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660–670.Bhardwaj, M., Garnett, T., & Chandrakasan, A. P. (2001). Upper bounds on the lifetime of sensor networks. In: International conference on communications (ICC’01). June 2001 (pp. 785–790).Gibbons, A. (1985). Algorithmic graph theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Fraigniaud, P., Pelc, A., Peleg, D., & Perennes, S. (2000). Assigning labels in unknown anonymous networks. In Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on principles of distributed computing, Portland, OR, USA (Vol. 1, pp. 101–111).OPNET Modeler® Wireless Suite network simulator (2011). Available at http://www.opnet.com/solutions/network_rd/modeler_wireless.html

Smart Sensor Technologies for IoT

The recent development in wireless networks and devices has led to novel services that will utilize wireless communication on a new level. Much effort and resources have been dedicated to establishing new communication networks that will support machine-to-machine communication and the Internet of Things (IoT). In these systems, various smart and sensory devices are deployed and connected, enabling large amounts of data to be streamed. Smart services represent new trends in mobile services, i.e., a completely new spectrum of context-aware, personalized, and intelligent services and applications. A variety of existing services utilize information about the position of the user or mobile device. The position of mobile devices is often achieved using the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) chips that are integrated into all modern mobile devices (smartphones). However, GNSS is not always a reliable source of position estimates due to multipath propagation and signal blockage. Moreover, integrating GNSS chips into all devices might have a negative impact on the battery life of future IoT applications. Therefore, alternative solutions to position estimation should be investigated and implemented in IoT applications. This Special Issue, “Smart Sensor Technologies for IoT” aims to report on some of the recent research efforts on this increasingly important topic. The twelve accepted papers in this issue cover various aspects of Smart Sensor Technologies for IoT

A group-based architecture and protocol for wireless sensor networks

There are many works related to wireless sensor networks (WSNs) where authors present new protocols with better or enhanced features, others just compare their performance or present an application, but this work tries to provide a different perspective. Why don¿t we see the network as a whole and split it into groups to give better network performance regardless of the routing protocol? For this reason, in this thesis we demonstrate through simulations that node¿s grouping feature in WSN improves the network¿s behavior. We propose the creation of a group-based architecture, where nodes have the same functionality within the network. Each group has a head node, which defines the area in which the nodes of such group are located. Each node has a unique node identifier (nodeID). First group¿s node makes a group identifier (groupID). New nodes will know their groupID and nodeID of their neighbors. End nodes are, physically, the nodes that define a group. When there is an event on a node, this event is sent to all nodes in its group in order to take an appropriate action. End nodes have connections to other end nodes of neighboring groups and they will be used to send data to other groups or to receive information from other groups and to distribute it within their group. Links between end nodes of different groups are established mainly depending on their position, but if there are multiple possibilities, neighbor nodes could be selected based on their ability ¿, being ¿ a choice parameter taking into account several network and nodes parameters. In order to set group¿s boundaries, we can consider two options, namely: i) limiting the group¿s diameter of a maximum number of hops, and ii) establishing boundaries of covered area. In order to improve the proposed group-based architecture, we add collaboration between groups. A collaborative group-based network gives better performance to the group and to the whole system, thereby avoiding unnecessary message forwarding and additional overheads while saving energy. Grouping nodes also diminishes the average network delay while allowing scaling the network considerably. In order to offer an optimized monitoring process, and in order to offer the best reply in particular environments, group-based collaborative systems are needed. They will simplify the monitoring needs while offering direct control. Finally, we propose a marine application where a variant of this groupbased architecture could be applied and deployed.García Pineda, M. (2013). A group-based architecture and protocol for wireless sensor networks [Tesis doctoral]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/27599TESISPremios Extraordinarios de tesis doctorale

Benefits of using mobile ad-hoc network protocols in federated satellite systems for polar satellite missions

© 2018 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes,creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.The Operational Network of Individual Observation Nodes (ONION) project evaluated the benefits of applying Distributed Satellite System (DSS) architectures to Earth Observation. One of its outcomes is the identification of Arctic services as top priority current user needs that require near-realtime observations. Using Inter-Satellite Communications (ISC) capabilities, a Federated Satellite System (FSS) can establish a win-win collaboration between two spacecrafts to provide these services. However, as a FSS is established during the contact between two satellites, the service duration is limited. Therefore, the Internet of Satellites (IoSat) paradigm promotes the use of multi-hop sporadic networks to deploy FSS. In this context, the routing protocol (which identifies routes between a source-destination pair) becomes crucial. One of the most extended networks is the Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET), in which nodes are constantly moving and changing the network topology. In principle, applying MANET technologies in the IoSat context would provide self-organization, self-configuration, and flexibility to satellite systems. The Optimized Link-State Routing (OLSR) protocol is the predominant solution in MANET, because it quickly reacts against topology changes. This article aims at studying the benefits of using satellite networks with MANET solutions (e.g. OLSR) for polar satellite missions. The results presented in this article demonstrate that the access time is significantly improved, and thus these new Arctic services can be achieved.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

Performance Evaluation of Energy-Autonomous Sensors Using Power-Harvesting Beacons for Environmental Monitoring in Internet of Things (IoT)

Environmental conditions and air quality monitoring have become crucial today due to the undeniable changes of the climate and accelerated urbanization. To efficiently monitor environmental parameters such as temperature, humidity, and the levels of pollutants, such as fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the air, and to collect data covering vast geographical areas, the development of cheap energy-autonomous sensors for large scale deployment and fine-grained data acquisition is required. Rapid advances in electronics and communication technologies along with the emergence of paradigms such as Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) and the Internet of Things (IoT) have led to the development of low-cost sensor devices that can operate unattended for long periods of time and communicate using wired or wireless connections through the Internet. We investigate the energy efficiency of an environmental monitoring system based on Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) beacons that operate in the IoT environment. The beacons developed measure the temperature, the relative humidity, the light intensity, and the CO2 and VOC levels in the air. Based on our analysis we have developed efficient sleep scheduling algorithms that allow the sensor nodes developed to operate autonomously without requiring the replacement of the power supply. The experimental results show that low-power sensors communicating using BLE technology can operate autonomously (from the energy perspective) in applications that monitor the environment or the air quality in indoor or outdoor settings

Communication platform for inter-satellite links in distributed satellite systems

EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo

Design, Implementation, and Analysis of Electrical System Architecture for CubeSat to Ground Communications

CubeSats facilitate a low barrier to entry in University and Industrial space research. With the rapid, low-cost development of CubeSats, the need for a reliable and ro- bust communications subsystem becomes evident to ensure mission accomplishment. With the advent of Software Defined Radio, Old Dominion University is compelled to upgrade the rigid Legacy Hardware systems in place with inexpensive and flexible Software Defined Radio Solutions. Currently, Old Dominion University is on the cusp of conducting its first space science mission as a member organization of the Virginia Space Grant Consortium Cubesat Constellation and is manifest for launch on April 17, 2019 NASA Wallops Flight Facility. To conduct this mission, the design and construction of a 1U Nano-Satellite and the upgrade to existing ground station architecture was necessary. To relay data in a point-to-point fashion as required by the Science Mission, Old Dominion University has developed custom ground station hardware and software to communicate with its own satellite and the satellites of others. This thesis presents the salient design aspects in implementing a complete electrical system architecture for a 1U spacecraft and the upgrades required in the Ground Station Architecture to support the required demodulation and decoding of a 9600 baud GMSK signal from a model of the deployed satellite necessary to conduct a true science research mission as part of a University Satellite Constellation. The demodulating signal processing steps are designed in GNU Radio Companion and deals with parts of the AX.25 data link layer protocol. Additionally, analysis shall be presented to highlight the design choices made for both the spacecraft and the ground station and will demonstrate various system parameters and characteristics of interest based on the Orbital Simulation results obtained from Systems Toolkit (STK). Finally, results of the architecture design shall be reported on the system by measuring Communications Link Performance benchmarks such as Bit-Error-Rates (BER) and Signal-To-Noise Ratios (SNR)

Multi-stakeholder Interactive Simulation for Federated Satellite Systems

Federated satellite systems (FSS) are a new class of space-based systems which emphasize a distributed architecture. New information exchanging functions among FSS members enable data transportation, storage, and processing as on-orbit services. As a system-of-systems, however there are significant technical and social barriers to designing a FSS. To mitigate these challenges, this paper develops a multi-stakeholder interactive simulation for use in future design activities. An FSS simulation interface is defined using the High Level Architecture to include orbital and surface assets and associated transmitters, receivers, and signals for communication. Sample simulators (federates) using World Wind and Orekit open source libraries are applied in a prototype simulation (federation). The application case studies a conceptual FSS using the International Space Station (ISS) as a service platform to serve Earth-observing customers in sun-synchronous orbits (SSO). Results identify emergent effects between FSS members including favorable ISS power conditions and potential service bottlenecks to serving SSO customers