1,973 research outputs found
Understanding Space in Proof Complexity: Separations and Trade-offs via Substitutions
For current state-of-the-art DPLL SAT-solvers the two main bottlenecks are
the amounts of time and memory used. In proof complexity, these resources
correspond to the length and space of resolution proofs. There has been a long
line of research investigating these proof complexity measures, but while
strong results have been established for length, our understanding of space and
how it relates to length has remained quite poor. In particular, the question
whether resolution proofs can be optimized for length and space simultaneously,
or whether there are trade-offs between these two measures, has remained
essentially open.
In this paper, we remedy this situation by proving a host of length-space
trade-off results for resolution. Our collection of trade-offs cover almost the
whole range of values for the space complexity of formulas, and most of the
trade-offs are superpolynomial or even exponential and essentially tight. Using
similar techniques, we show that these trade-offs in fact extend to the
exponentially stronger k-DNF resolution proof systems, which operate with
formulas in disjunctive normal form with terms of bounded arity k. We also
answer the open question whether the k-DNF resolution systems form a strict
hierarchy with respect to space in the affirmative.
Our key technical contribution is the following, somewhat surprising,
theorem: Any CNF formula F can be transformed by simple variable substitution
into a new formula F' such that if F has the right properties, F' can be proven
in essentially the same length as F, whereas on the other hand the minimal
number of lines one needs to keep in memory simultaneously in any proof of F'
is lower-bounded by the minimal number of variables needed simultaneously in
any proof of F. Applying this theorem to so-called pebbling formulas defined in
terms of pebble games on directed acyclic graphs, we obtain our results.Comment: This paper is a merged and updated version of the two ECCC technical
reports TR09-034 and TR09-047, and it hence subsumes these two report
From Small Space to Small Width in Resolution
In 2003, Atserias and Dalmau resolved a major open question about the
resolution proof system by establishing that the space complexity of CNF
formulas is always an upper bound on the width needed to refute them. Their
proof is beautiful but somewhat mysterious in that it relies heavily on tools
from finite model theory. We give an alternative, completely elementary proof
that works by simple syntactic manipulations of resolution refutations. As a
by-product, we develop a "black-box" technique for proving space lower bounds
via a "static" complexity measure that works against any resolution
refutation---previous techniques have been inherently adaptive. We conclude by
showing that the related question for polynomial calculus (i.e., whether space
is an upper bound on degree) seems unlikely to be resolvable by similar
methods
Resolution over Linear Equations and Multilinear Proofs
We develop and study the complexity of propositional proof systems of varying
strength extending resolution by allowing it to operate with disjunctions of
linear equations instead of clauses. We demonstrate polynomial-size refutations
for hard tautologies like the pigeonhole principle, Tseitin graph tautologies
and the clique-coloring tautologies in these proof systems. Using the
(monotone) interpolation by a communication game technique we establish an
exponential-size lower bound on refutations in a certain, considerably strong,
fragment of resolution over linear equations, as well as a general polynomial
upper bound on (non-monotone) interpolants in this fragment.
We then apply these results to extend and improve previous results on
multilinear proofs (over fields of characteristic 0), as studied in
[RazTzameret06]. Specifically, we show the following:
1. Proofs operating with depth-3 multilinear formulas polynomially simulate a
certain, considerably strong, fragment of resolution over linear equations.
2. Proofs operating with depth-3 multilinear formulas admit polynomial-size
refutations of the pigeonhole principle and Tseitin graph tautologies. The
former improve over a previous result that established small multilinear proofs
only for the \emph{functional} pigeonhole principle. The latter are different
than previous proofs, and apply to multilinear proofs of Tseitin mod p graph
tautologies over any field of characteristic 0.
We conclude by connecting resolution over linear equations with extensions of
the cutting planes proof system.Comment: 44 page
Tight Size-Degree Bounds for Sums-of-Squares Proofs
We exhibit families of -CNF formulas over variables that have
sums-of-squares (SOS) proofs of unsatisfiability of degree (a.k.a. rank)
but require SOS proofs of size for values of from
constant all the way up to for some universal constant.
This shows that the running time obtained by using the Lasserre
semidefinite programming relaxations to find degree- SOS proofs is optimal
up to constant factors in the exponent. We establish this result by combining
-reductions expressible as low-degree SOS derivations with the
idea of relativizing CNF formulas in [Kraj\'i\v{c}ek '04] and [Dantchev and
Riis'03], and then applying a restriction argument as in [Atserias, M\"uller,
and Oliva '13] and [Atserias, Lauria, and Nordstr\"om '14]. This yields a
generic method of amplifying SOS degree lower bounds to size lower bounds, and
also generalizes the approach in [ALN14] to obtain size lower bounds for the
proof systems resolution, polynomial calculus, and Sherali-Adams from lower
bounds on width, degree, and rank, respectively
Automating Resolution is NP-Hard
We show that the problem of finding a Resolution refutation that is at most
polynomially longer than a shortest one is NP-hard. In the parlance of proof
complexity, Resolution is not automatizable unless P = NP. Indeed, we show it
is NP-hard to distinguish between formulas that have Resolution refutations of
polynomial length and those that do not have subexponential length refutations.
This also implies that Resolution is not automatizable in subexponential time
or quasi-polynomial time unless NP is included in SUBEXP or QP, respectively
An Improved Separation of Regular Resolution from Pool Resolution and Clause Learning
We prove that the graph tautology principles of Alekhnovich, Johannsen,
Pitassi and Urquhart have polynomial size pool resolution refutations that use
only input lemmas as learned clauses and without degenerate resolution
inferences. We also prove that these graph tautology principles can be refuted
by polynomial size DPLL proofs with clause learning, even when restricted to
greedy, unit-propagating DPLL search
Narrow Proofs May Be Maximally Long
We prove that there are 3-CNF formulas over n variables that can be refuted
in resolution in width w but require resolution proofs of size n^Omega(w). This
shows that the simple counting argument that any formula refutable in width w
must have a proof in size n^O(w) is essentially tight. Moreover, our lower
bound generalizes to polynomial calculus resolution (PCR) and Sherali-Adams,
implying that the corresponding size upper bounds in terms of degree and rank
are tight as well. Our results do not extend all the way to Lasserre, however,
where the formulas we study have proofs of constant rank and size polynomial in
both n and w
Complexity of Propositional Proofs under a Promise
We study -- within the framework of propositional proof complexity -- the
problem of certifying unsatisfiability of CNF formulas under the promise that
any satisfiable formula has many satisfying assignments, where ``many'' stands
for an explicitly specified function \Lam in the number of variables . To
this end, we develop propositional proof systems under different measures of
promises (that is, different \Lam) as extensions of resolution. This is done
by augmenting resolution with axioms that, roughly, can eliminate sets of truth
assignments defined by Boolean circuits. We then investigate the complexity of
such systems, obtaining an exponential separation in the average-case between
resolution under different size promises:
1. Resolution has polynomial-size refutations for all unsatisfiable 3CNF
formulas when the promise is \eps\cd2^n, for any constant 0<\eps<1.
2. There are no sub-exponential size resolution refutations for random 3CNF
formulas, when the promise is (and the number of clauses is
), for any constant .Comment: 32 pages; a preliminary version appeared in the Proceedings of
ICALP'0
Resolution Lower Bounds for Refutation Statements
For any unsatisfiable CNF formula we give an exponential lower bound on the
size of resolution refutations of a propositional statement that the formula
has a resolution refutation. We describe three applications. (1) An open
question in (Atserias, M\"uller 2019) asks whether a certain natural
propositional encoding of the above statement is hard for Resolution. We answer
by giving an exponential size lower bound. (2) We show exponential resolution
size lower bounds for reflection principles, thereby improving a result in
(Atserias, Bonet 2004). (3) We provide new examples of CNFs that exponentially
separate Res(2) from Resolution (an exponential separation of these two proof
systems was originally proved in (Segerlind, Buss, Impagliazzo 2004))
Narrow proofs may be maximally long
We prove that there are 3-CNF formulas over n variables that can be refuted in resolution in width w but require resolution proofs of size n(Omega(w)). This shows that the simple counting argument that any formula refutable in width w must have a proof in size n(O(w)) is essentially tight. Moreover, our lower bound generalizes to polynomial calculus resolution and Sherali-Adams, implying that the corresponding size upper bounds in terms of degree and rank are tight as well. The lower bound does not extend all the way to Lasserre, however, since we show that there the formulas we study have proofs of constant rank and size polynomial in both n and w.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft
- …