133 research outputs found
USING THE LANDSAT SATELLITE SYSTEM FOR WINTER WHEAT MONITORING IN THE WESTERN UKRAINE TERRITORY
Π‘Π΅Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΎΠ½Π°. Π‘ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΡ
β ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΏΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π΄ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ², Π»ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ°, Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΏΡΠΎΠ± ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²Ρ. Π Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΠΠ Landsat Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π° ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΠ°ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π£ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΈΠ½Ρ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΆΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎ-Π΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ Π°Π³ΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΉΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΈΠΌ. ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²Π° Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΊΠΎΠ² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Landsat Π·Π° 2010β2011 Π³Π³. (Π°Π²Π³ΡΡΡ, Π°ΠΏΡΠ΅Π»Ρ, ΠΈΡΠ»Ρ). ΠΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ², Π° ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ: ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° NDVI β ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° GVI (Green Vegetation Index). ΠΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΡΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ Π²Π΅Π³Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π·Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. ΠΠ° ΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° Π²ΠΎΡΡ
ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ° ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π² ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ² Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Landsat, ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°Π»Π³Π΅Π±ΡΡ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈ, Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΠΆΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ. Π£ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ, ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ° (Π½Π° Π±ΡΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅Π΅), Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΎΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π½ΡΠΆΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΡ Π² ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΌ Π°Π³ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Ρ Π΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠΈΠΌ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠΉ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ»Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ² Π°Π³ΡΠΎΡ
ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°, Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π° ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π²Π΅Π³Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΡ Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ»Π΅ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈ Π°Π³ΡΠΎΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡ, Π° ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ: ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ², Π²Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡ ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ, ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±Π°ΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ.Π‘Π΅Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΎΠ½Π°. Π‘ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΡ
β ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΏΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π΄ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ², Π»ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ°, Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΏΡΠΎΠ± ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²Ρ. Π Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΠΠ Landsat Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π° ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΠ°ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π£ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΈΠ½Ρ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΆΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎ-Π΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ Π°Π³ΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΉΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΈΠΌ. ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²Π° Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΊΠΎΠ² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Landsat Π·Π° 2010β2011 Π³Π³. (Π°Π²Π³ΡΡΡ, Π°ΠΏΡΠ΅Π»Ρ, ΠΈΡΠ»Ρ). ΠΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ², Π° ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ: ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° NDVI β ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° GVI (Green Vegetation Index). ΠΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΡΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ Π²Π΅Π³Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π·Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. ΠΠ° ΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° Π²ΠΎΡΡ
ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ° ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π² ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ² Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Landsat, ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°Π»Π³Π΅Π±ΡΡ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈ, Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΠΆΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ. Π£ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ, ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ° (Π½Π° Π±ΡΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅Π΅), Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΎΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π½ΡΠΆΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΡ Π² ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΌ Π°Π³ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Ρ Π΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠΈΠΌ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠΉ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ»Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ² Π°Π³ΡΠΎΡ
ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°, Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π° ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π²Π΅Π³Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΡ Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ»Π΅ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈ Π°Π³ΡΠΎΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡ, Π° ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ: ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ², Π²Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡ ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ, ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±Π°ΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ.Today, there are many ways to monitor crops throughout the season. Among them β the use of satellites and drones, sheet diagnostics, analysis of soil samples. This article discusses the technology of using Landsat remote sensing data for solving problems of monitoring the state of winter wheat in WesternUkraine. The issues of yield forecasting were also considered. The studies were conducted on one of the fields of the agro-farm. Volovikov using Landsat remote sensing imagery for 2010-2011. (August, April, July). The technology of creating geo-information models of the main indices is described, namely: the distribution models of the NDVI index β and the distribution models of the GVIindex (Green Vegetation Index). These models were indicators of the vegetation of green plants. On their basis, a quantitative assessment of the ascent and growth of winter wheat was carried out. Also in this study, the integration of digital elevation models and Landsat remote sensing materials was carried out, using the tools of cartographic algebra, problem areas were identified in which adecrease in the yield of winter wheat was observed. The reasons for this state were established, and decisions were made to correct the structure of the crop rotation (for the future), and the coordinates of sites that need special agronomic support with further integration of this geospatial information into the system of precision farming were determined. Studies show that aftergeoinformational analysis of cartographic materials of agrochemical indicators, topography, remote sensing data for different periods of plant vegetation, it is possible to obtain an upto-date informational picture of the state of the study area and effectively implement land management and agrotechnical measures, namely: correct the structure of crop rotation, fertilize, detect areas affected by pests and diseases, process well-defined problems areas, and to make informed management decisions
Towards a set of agrosystem-specific cropland mapping methods to address the global cropland diversity
Accurate cropland information is of paramount importance for crop monitoring. This study compares five existing cropland mapping methodologies over five contrasting Joint Experiment for Crop Assessment and Monitoring (JECAM) sites of medium to large average field size using the time series of 7-day 250 m Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) mean composites (red and near-infrared channels). Different strategies were devised to assess the accuracy of the classification methods: confusion matrices and derived accuracy indicators with and without equalizing class proportions, assessing the pairwise difference error rates and accounting for the spatial resolution bias. The robustness of the accuracy with respect to a reduction of the quantity of calibration data available was also assessed by a bootstrap approach in which the amount of training data was systematically reduced. Methods reached overall accuracies ranging from 85% to 95%, which demonstrates the ability of 250 m imagery to resolve fields down to 20 ha. Despite significantly different error rates, the site effect was found to persistently dominate the method effect. This was confirmed even after removing the share of the classification due to the spatial resolution of the satellite data (from 10% to 30%). This underlines the effect of other agrosystems characteristics such as cloudiness, crop diversity, and calendar on the ability to perform accurately. All methods have potential for large area cropland mapping as they provided accurate results with 20% of the calibration data, e.g. 2% of the study area in Ukraine. To better address the global cropland diversity, results advocate movement towards a set of cropland classification methods that could be applied regionally according to their respective performance in specific landscapes.Instituto de Clima y AguaFil: Waldner, FranΓ§ois. UniversitΓ© catholique de Louvain. Earth and Life Institute - Environment, Croix du Sud; BelgicaFil: De Abelleyra, Diego. Instituto Nacional de TecnologΓa Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; ArgentinaFil: Veron, Santiago RamΓ³n. Instituto Nacional de TecnologΓa Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de AgronomΓa. Departamento de MΓ©todos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de InformaciΓ³n; ArgentinaFil: Zhang, Miao. Chinese Academy of Science. Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth; ChinaFil: Wu, Bingfang. Chinese Academy of Science. Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth; ChinaFil: Plotnikov, Dmitry. Russian Academy of Sciences. Space Research Institute. Terrestrial Ecosystems Monitoring Laboratory; RusiaFil: Bartalev, Sergey. Russian Academy of Sciences. Space Research Institute. Terrestrial Ecosystems Monitoring Laboratory; RusiaFil: Lavreniuk, Mykola. Space Research Institute NAS and SSA. Department of Space Information Technologies; UcraniaFil: Skakun, Sergii. Space Research Institute NAS and SSA. Department of Space Information Technologies; Ucrania. University of Maryland. Department of Geographical Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Kussul, Nataliia. Space Research Institute NAS and SSA. Department of Space Information Technologies; UcraniaFil: Le Maire, Guerric. UMR Eco&Sols, CIRAD; Francia. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa AgropecuΓ‘ria. Meio Ambiante; BrasilFil: Dupuy, StΓ©phane. Centre de CoopΓ©ration Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le DΓ©veloppement. Territoires, Environnement, TΓ©lΓ©dΓ©tection et Information Spatiale; FranciaFil: Jarvis, Ian. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Science and Technology Branch. Agri-Climate, Geomatics and Earth Observation; CanadΓ‘Fil: Defourny, Pierre. UniversitΓ© Catholique de Louvain. Earth and Life Institute - Environment, Croix du Sud; Belgic
Crop type identification and spatial mapping using Sentinel-2 satellite data with focus on field-level information
Accurate monitoring of croplands helps in making decisions (for
insurance claims, crop management and contingency plans) at
the macro-level, especially in drylands where variability in cropping
is very high owing to erratic weather conditions. Dryland
cereals and grain legumes are key to ensuring the food and nutritional
security of a large number of vulnerable populations living
in the drylands. Reliable information on area cultivated to such
crops forms part of the national accounting of food production
and supply in many Asian countries, many of which are employing
remote sensing tools to improve the accuracy of assessments
of cultivated areas. This paper assesses the capabilities and limitations
of mapping cultivated areas in the Rabi (winter) season and
corresponding cropping patterns in three districts characterized
by small-plot agriculture. The study used Sentinel-2 Normalized
Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) 15-day time-series at 10m
resolution by employing a Spectral Matching Technique (SMT)
approach. The use of SMT is based on the well-studied relationship
between temporal NDVI signatures and crop phenology. The
rabi season in India, dominated by non-rainy days, is best suited
for the application of this method, as persistent cloud cover will
hamper the availability of images necessary to generate clearly
differentiating temporal signatures. Our study showed that the
temporal signatures of wheat, chickpea and mustard are easily
distinguishable, enabling an overall accuracy of 84%, with wheat
and mustard achieving 86% and 94% accuracies, respectively. The
most significant misclassifications were in irrigated areas for mustard
and wheat, in small-plot mustard fields covered by trees and
in fragmented chickpea areas. A comparison of district-wise
national crop statistics and those obtained from this study
revealed a correlation of 96%
Comparative geospatial approach for agricultural crops identification in interfluvial plain - A case study of Sahiwal district, Pakistan
Agricultural crop cover identification is a major issue and time-consuming effort to verify the crop type through surveys of the individual field or using prehistoric methods. To establish the scenario of crop identification, the stage of crop provides diverse spatial information about the variety of crops due to its spectral changes. The main aim of this study was to the identify the crop types and their behavior using remote sensing and geographical information system-based approach. Moreover, two main methods were applied to the Sentinel-2 satellite data in which one is random forest based supervised classification and another was Normalize Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) density estimation method through the google earth engine to procure the data in time-efficient way. This study also established the comparison between classified and vegetation index based seasonal compositional datasets for wheat, cotton, maize, and fodder crops. Study discussed the best fit technique for crops identification in the light of observed methods. Furthermore, the vegetation index ranges by the zonal statistics of the field samples were established according to crop precision. Results showed that -22.94, -43.72, 20.61, and 32.49 % dissimilarities existed in wheat, fodder, cotton, and maize results respectively, after comparison of both techniques. Although, the accuracy assessment was performed on the classified dataset for validation of results by confusion matrix accuracy assessment process using field sample data. Moreover, the vegetation index was used to evaluate crop land surface temperature to estimate the crop growth stage valuation that revealed noticeably enthralling outcomes. The results determined that the classified accuracies of wheat, cotton, maize and fodder were 84, 80, 81 and 71 % respectively. This study also revealed that the random forest classifier has used more features and information potentially during the classifier trainings but vegetation index just implies the limited number of features such as crop growing status
Using Machine Learning to generate an open-access cropland map from satellite images time series in the Indian Himalayan Region
Crop maps are crucial for agricultural monitoring and food management and can
additionally support domain-specific applications, such as setting cold supply
chain infrastructure in developing countries. Machine learning (ML) models,
combined with freely-available satellite imagery, can be used to produce
cost-effective and high spatial-resolution crop maps. However, accessing ground
truth data for supervised learning is especially challenging in developing
countries due to factors such as smallholding and fragmented geography, which
often results in a lack of crop type maps or even reliable cropland maps. Our
area of interest for this study lies in Himachal Pradesh, India, where we aim
at producing an open-access binary cropland map at 10-meter resolution for the
Kullu, Shimla, and Mandi districts. To this end, we developed an ML pipeline
that relies on Sentinel-2 satellite images time series. We investigated two
pixel-based supervised classifiers, support vector machines (SVM) and random
forest (RF), which are used to classify per-pixel time series for binary
cropland mapping. The ground truth data used for training, validation and
testing was manually annotated from a combination of field survey reference
points and visual interpretation of very high resolution (VHR) imagery. We
trained and validated the models via spatial cross-validation to account for
local spatial autocorrelation and selected the RF model due to overall
robustness and lower computational cost. We tested the generalization
capability of the chosen model at the pixel level by computing the accuracy,
recall, precision, and F1-score on hold-out test sets of each district,
achieving an average accuracy for the RF (our best model) of 87%. We used this
model to generate a cropland map for three districts of Himachal Pradesh,
spanning 14,600 km2, which improves the resolution and quality of existing
public maps
A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps
Global and regional scale agricultural monitoring systems aim to provide up-to-date information regarding food production to different actors and decision makers in support of global and national food security. To help reduce price volatility of the kind experienced between 2007 and 2011, a global system of agricultural monitoring systems is needed to ensure the coordinated flow of information in a timely manner for early warning purposes. A number of systems now exist that fill this role. This paper provides an overview of the eight main global and regional scale agricultural monitoring systems currently in operation and compares them based on the input data and models used, the outputs produced and other characteristics such as the role of the analyst, their interaction with other systems and the geographical scale at which they operate. Despite improvements in access to high resolution satellite imagery over the last decade and the use of numerous remote-sensing based products by the different systems, there are still fundamental gaps. Based on a questionnaire, discussions with the system experts and the literature, we present the main gaps in the data and in the methods. Finally, we propose some recommendations for addressing these gaps through ongoing improvements in remote sensing, harnessing new and innovative data streams and the continued sharing of more and more data
Improvement in Land Cover and Crop Classification based on Temporal Features Learning from Sentinel-2 Data Using Recurrent-Convolutional Neural Network (R-CNN)
Understanding the use of current land cover, along with monitoring change over time, is vital for agronomists and agricultural agencies responsible for land management. The increasing spatial and temporal resolution of globally available satellite images, such as provided by Sentinel-2, creates new possibilities for researchers to use freely available multi-spectral optical images, with decametric spatial resolution and more frequent revisits for remote sensing applications such as land cover and crop classification (LC&CC), agricultural monitoring and management, environment monitoring. Existing solutions dedicated to cropland mapping can be categorized based on per-pixel based and object-based. However, it is still challenging when more classes of agricultural crops are considered at a massive scale. In this paper, a novel and optimal deep learning model for pixel-based LC&CC is developed and implemented based on Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) in combination with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) using multi-temporal sentinel-2 imagery of central north part of Italy, which has diverse agricultural system dominated by economic crop types. The proposed methodology is capable of automated feature extraction by learning time correlation of multiple images, which reduces manual feature engineering and modeling crop phenological stages. Fifteen classes, including major agricultural crops, were considered in this study. We also tested other widely used traditional machine learning algorithms for comparison such as support vector machine SVM, random forest (RF), Kernal SVM, and gradient boosting machine, also called XGBoost. The overall accuracy achieved by our proposed Pixel R-CNN was 96.5%, which showed considerable improvements in comparison with existing mainstream methods. This study showed that Pixel R-CNN based model offers a highly accurate way to assess and employ time-series data for multi-temporal classification tasks
Remote Sensing for Precision Agriculture: Sentinel-2 Improved Features and Applications
The use of satellites to monitor crops and support their management is gathering increasing attention. The improved temporal, spatial, and spectral resolution of the European Space Agency (ESA) launched Sentinel-2 A + B twin platform is paving the way to their popularization in precision agriculture. Besides the Sentinel-2 A + B constellation technical features the open-access nature of the information they generate, and the available support software are a significant improvement for agricultural monitoring. This paper was motivated by the challenges faced by researchers and agrarian institutions entering this field; it aims to frame remote sensing principles and Sentinel-2 applications in agriculture. Thus, we reviewed the features and uses of Sentinel-2 in precision agriculture, including abiotic and biotic stress detection, and agricultural management. We also compared the panoply of satellites currently in use for land remote sensing that are relevant for agriculture to the Sentinel-2 A + B constellation features. Contrasted with previous satellite image systems, the Sentinel-2 A + B twin platform has dramatically increased the capabilities for agricultural monitoring and crop management worldwide. Regarding crop stress monitoring, Sentinel-2 capacities for abiotic and biotic stresses detection represent a great step forward in many ways though not without its limitations; therefore, combinations of field data and different remote sensing techniques may still be needed. We conclude that Sentinel-2 has a wide range of useful applications in agriculture, yet still with room for further improvements. Current and future ways that Sentinel-2 can be utilized are also discussed.This research was funded by the Spanish projects AGL2016-76527-R and IRUEC PCIN-2017-063 from the Ministerio de EconomΓa y Competividad (MINECO, Spain) and by the support of Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA, Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain), through the ICREA Academia Program
- β¦