151 research outputs found

    Spatial processing of conspecific signals in weakly electric fish: from sensory image to neural population coding

    Get PDF
    In this dissertation, I examine how an animal’s nervous system encodes spatially realistic conspecific signals in their environment and how the encoding mechanisms support behavioral sensitivity. I begin by modeling changes in the electrosensory signals exchanged by weakly electric fish in a social context. During this behavior, I estimate how the spatial structure of conspecific stimuli influences sensory responses at the electroreceptive periphery. I then quantify how space is represented in the hindbrain, specifically in the primary sensory area called the electrosensory lateral line lobe. I show that behavioral sensitivity is influenced by the heterogeneous properties of the pyramidal cell population. I further demonstrate that this heterogeneity serves to start segregating spatial and temporal information early in the sensory pathway. Lastly, I characterize the accuracy of spatial coding in this network and predict the role of network elements, such as correlated noise and feedback, in shaping the spatial information. My research provides a comprehensive understanding of spatial coding in the first stages of sensory processing in this system and allows us to better understand how network dynamics shape coding accuracy

    Peripheral and Central Mechanisms of Temporal Pattern Recognition

    Get PDF
    Encoding information into the timing patterns of action potentials, or spikes, is a strategy used broadly in neural circuits. This type of coding scheme requires downstream neurons to be sensitive to the temporal patterns of presynaptic inputs. Indeed, neurons with temporal filtering properties have been found in a wide range of sensory pathways. However, how such response properties arise was previously not well understood. The goal of my dissertation research has been to elucidate how temporal filtering by single neurons contributes to the behavioral ability to recognize timing patterns in communication signals. I have addressed this question using mormyrid weakly electric fish, which vary the time intervals between successive electric pulses to communicate. Fish detect these signals with sensory receptors in their skin. In the majority of species, these receptors fire a single spike in response to each electric pulse. Spiking receptors faithfully encode the interpulse intervals in communication signals into interspike intervals, which are then decoded by interval-selective midbrain neurons. Using in vivo intracellular recordings from awake fish during sensory stimulation, I found that short-term depression and temporal summation play important roles in establishing single-neuron interval selectivity. Moreover, the combination of short-term depression and temporal summation in the circuit resulted in greater diversity of interval tuning properties across the population of neurons, which would increase the population’s ability to detect temporally patterned communication signals. Indeed, I found that the responses of single interval-selective neurons were sensitive to subtle variation in the timing patterns of a specific communication display produced by different individuals. A subset of mormyrid species has sensory receptors that produce spontaneously oscillating potentials. How the electrosensory system of these species established sensitivity to temporally patterned communication signals was completely unknown. Using in vivo extracellular recordings, I demonstrated that these receptors encode sensory stimuli into phase resets, which is the first clear instance of information coding by oscillatory phase reset. Furthermore, the ongoing oscillations conferred enhanced sensitivity to fast temporal patterns that are only found in the communication signals of a large group of fish. Behavioral playback experiments provided further support for the hypothesis that oscillating receptors are specialized for detecting communication signals produced by a group of conspecifics, which is a novel role for a sensory receptor. These findings demonstrate that temporal pattern sensitivity, which was previously thought to be a central processing problem, can also arise from peripheral filtering through a novel oscillatory phase reset mechanism

    Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity Alters Sensory Network Connectivity

    Get PDF
    A fundamental question in neuroscience is: how does a sensory system optimize detection of behaviorally relevant stimuli, when those stimuli and the sensory environment are constantly changing? Spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP), in which synapse strength changes based on the relative timing of pre- and post-synaptic spiking, has been implicated in changes in neuronal connectivity thought to underlie learning and memory. Synaptic strength changes caused by STDP have been shown in optic tectum, visual cortex, hippocampus, and other brain regions in vitro across many organisms like fish, frogs, and mice. Although it is possible that STDP mechanisms underlie changes in sensory neuron connectivity, the relationship between sensory stimulation and central sensory neuronal response is complex and often involves populations of neurons that differ in the timing and frequency of spiking, resulting in complex spatiotemporal patterns of synaptic input to postsynaptic neurons. The organism I studied, weakly electric fish, produce and receive electric organ discharges (EODs) used to electrolocate and communicate. Taking advantage of the electrosensory system, weakly electric fishes are a system in which spiking patterns are themselves the behaviorally relevant stimulus. Previous work showed that STDP predictably altered synaptic xi responses and inter-pulse interval tuning in vitro (Ma and Carlson, unpublished). Using whole-cell intracellular recordings to repetitively pair sensory stimulation with intracellular spiking in vivo, I manipulated the relative timing of pre- and post-synaptic spiking in central sensory neurons in awake, behaving animals. I found that STDP alters sensory responses of central electrosensory neurons in vivo but there was more variability in the changes in sensory responses in vivo relative to the in vitro changes in synaptic responses (Chapter 2). Whether the in vivo data “fit” or “did not fit” the pattern predicted by the in vitro results was correlated with variations in synaptic potential landmarks. That variations in synaptic potential landmarks correlated with deviations from the pattern shown in vitro results suggest that whether the data “fit” or “did not fit” the in vitro hypothesis is influenced by polysynaptic activity, including inhibitory interneurons (Chapter 2). I now asked whether STDP could alter sensory tuning to behaviorally relevant stimuli in vivo. Using whole-cell intracellular recordings, I recorded postsynaptic potential responses to two different sensory stimuli before and after pairing postsynaptic spiking with only one of those sensory stimuli. I found that some in vivo responses followed the pattern predicted by STDP sensory tuning experiments done in vitro and some in vivo responses that did not. Whether the in vivo sensory tuning data “fit” or “did not fit” the pattern predicted by the in vitro sensory tuning changes was correlated with variations in synaptic potential landmarks. That variations in the synaptic potential landmarks correlated with differences in the in vitro and in vivo sensory tuning suggest that whether the in vivo tuning results did or did not “fit” the in vitro tuning prediction is influenced by polysynaptic activity, including inhibitory interneurons (Chapter 3). Next, I wanted to ask whether intrinsic network activity could alter sensory tuning based solely on the input of behaviorally relevant stimuli. Using extracellular evoked potential recordings and a freely behaving paradigm, I recorded postsynaptic potential responses and behavioral output to two xii different sensory stimuli before and after repeating only one of those sensory stimuli, with no pairing of postsynaptic spiking. I did not find any significant differences in the evoked potentials or behavior as a result of repetition of a sensory stimulus (Chapter 4). Thus, in this dissertation I showed that STDP can alter the sensory responses of central electrosensory neurons, but that STDP rules operating at identified synapses may not drive predictable changes in sensory responses and sensory tuning at the circuit or behavioral level. In conclusion, for altering sensory tuning in adult organisms in a changing sensory environment in vivo, the role of STDP is more complex than had been predicted from previous work in vitr

    Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity in the Intact Brain: Counteracting Spurious Spike Coincidences

    Get PDF
    A computationally rich algorithm of synaptic plasticity has been proposed based on the experimental observation that the sign and amplitude of the change in synaptic weight is dictated by the temporal order and temporal contiguity between pre- and postsynaptic activities. For more than a decade, this spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) has been studied mainly in brain slices of different brain structures and cultured neurons. Although not yet compelling, evidences for the STDP rule in the intact brain, including primary sensory cortices, have been provided lastly. From insects to mammals, the presentation of precisely timed sensory inputs drives synaptic and functional plasticity in the intact central nervous system, with similar timing requirements than the in vitro defined STDP rule. The convergent evolution of this plasticity rule in species belonging to so distant phylogenic groups points to the efficiency of STDP, as a mechanism for modifying synaptic weights, as the basis of activity-dependent development, learning and memory. In spite of the ubiquity of STDP phenomena, a number of significant variations of the rule are observed in different structures, neuronal types and even synapses on the same neuron, as well as between in vitro and in vivo conditions. In addition, the state of the neuronal network, its ongoing activity and the activation of ascending neuromodulatory systems in different behavioral conditions have dramatic consequences on the expression of spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity, and should be further explored

    Learning Contrast-Invariant Cancellation of Redundant Signals in Neural Systems

    Get PDF
    Cancellation of redundant information is a highly desirable feature of sensory systems, since it would potentially lead to a more efficient detection of novel information. However, biologically plausible mechanisms responsible for such selective cancellation, and especially those robust to realistic variations in the intensity of the redundant signals, are mostly unknown. In this work, we study, via in vivo experimental recordings and computational models, the behavior of a cerebellar-like circuit in the weakly electric fish which is known to perform cancellation of redundant stimuli. We experimentally observe contrast invariance in the cancellation of spatially and temporally redundant stimuli in such a system. Our model, which incorporates heterogeneously-delayed feedback, bursting dynamics and burst-induced STDP, is in agreement with our in vivo observations. In addition, the model gives insight on the activity of granule cells and parallel fibers involved in the feedback pathway, and provides a strong prediction on the parallel fiber potentiation time scale. Finally, our model predicts the existence of an optimal learning contrast around 15% contrast levels, which are commonly experienced by interacting fish

    Neuronal synchrony: peculiarity and generality

    Get PDF
    Synchronization in neuronal systems is a new and intriguing application of dynamical systems theory. Why are neuronal systems different as a subject for synchronization? (1) Neurons in themselves are multidimensional nonlinear systems that are able to exhibit a wide variety of different activity patterns. Their “dynamical repertoire” includes regular or chaotic spiking, regular or chaotic bursting, multistability, and complex transient regimes. (2) Usually, neuronal oscillations are the result of the cooperative activity of many synaptically connected neurons (a neuronal circuit). Thus, it is necessary to consider synchronization between different neuronal circuits as well. (3) The synapses that implement the coupling between neurons are also dynamical elements and their intrinsic dynamics influences the process of synchronization or entrainment significantly. In this review we will focus on four new problems: (i) the synchronization in minimal neuronal networks with plastic synapses (synchronization with activity dependent coupling), (ii) synchronization of bursts that are generated by a group of nonsymmetrically coupled inhibitory neurons (heteroclinic synchronization), (iii) the coordination of activities of two coupled neuronal networks (partial synchronization of small composite structures), and (iv) coarse grained synchronization in larger systems (synchronization on a mesoscopic scale
    • …
    corecore