Detecting Prolog programming techniques using abstract interpretation

There have been a number of attempts at developing intelligent tutoring systems (ITSs) for teaching students various programming languages. An important component of such an ITS is a debugger capable of recognizing errors in the code the student writes and possibly suggesting ways of correcting such errors. The debugging process involves a wealth of knowledge about the programming language, the student and the individual problem at hand, and an automated debugging component makes use of a number of tools which apply this knowledge. Successive ITSs have incorporated a wider range of knowledge and more powerful tools. The research described in this thesis should be seen as carrying on with this succes¬ sion. Specifically, we attempt to enhance an existing Prolog ITS (PITS) debugger called APR0P0S2 developed by Looi. The enhancements take the form of a richer language with which to describe Prolog code and more powerful tools with which constructs in this language may be detected in Prolog code. The richer language is based on the notion of programming techniques—common patterns in code which capture in some sense an expert's understanding of Prolog. The tools are based on Prolog abstract interpretation—a program analysis method for inferring dynamic properties of code. Our research makes contributions to both these areas. We develop a language for describing classes of Prolog programming techniques that manipulate data-structures. We define classes in this language for common Prolog techniques such as accumulator pairs and difference structures. We use abstract interpretation to infer the dynamic features with which techniques are described. We develop a general framework for abstract interpretation which is described in Prolog, so leading directly to an implementation. We develop two abstract domains—one which infers general data flow information about the code and one which infers particularly detailed type information—and describe the implementation of the former

Theorem proving support in programming language semantics

We describe several views of the semantics of a simple programming language as formal documents in the calculus of inductive constructions that can be verified by the Coq proof system. Covered aspects are natural semantics, denotational semantics, axiomatic semantics, and abstract interpretation. Descriptions as recursive functions are also provided whenever suitable, thus yielding a a verification condition generator and a static analyser that can be run inside the theorem prover for use in reflective proofs. Extraction of an interpreter from the denotational semantics is also described. All different aspects are formally proved sound with respect to the natural semantics specification.Comment: Propos\'e pour publication dans l'ouvrage \`a la m\'emoire de Gilles Kah

Gradual Program Analysis

Dataflow analysis and gradual typing are both well-studied methods to gain information about computer programs in a finite amount of time. The gradual program analysis project seeks to combine those two techniques in order to gain the benefits of both. This thesis explores the background information necessary to understand gradual program analysis, and then briefly discusses the research itself, with reference to publication of work done so far. The background topics include essential aspects of programming language theory, such as syntax, semantics, and static typing; dataflow analysis concepts, such as abstract interpretation, semilattices, and fixpoint computations; and gradual typing theory, such as the concept of an unknown type, liftings of predicates, and liftings of functions

A Graph Model for Imperative Computation

Scott's graph model is a lambda-algebra based on the observation that continuous endofunctions on the lattice of sets of natural numbers can be represented via their graphs. A graph is a relation mapping finite sets of input values to output values. We consider a similar model based on relations whose input values are finite sequences rather than sets. This alteration means that we are taking into account the order in which observations are made. This new notion of graph gives rise to a model of affine lambda-calculus that admits an interpretation of imperative constructs including variable assignment, dereferencing and allocation. Extending this untyped model, we construct a category that provides a model of typed higher-order imperative computation with an affine type system. An appropriate language of this kind is Reynolds's Syntactic Control of Interference. Our model turns out to be fully abstract for this language. At a concrete level, it is the same as Reddy's object spaces model, which was the first "state-free" model of a higher-order imperative programming language and an important precursor of games models. The graph model can therefore be seen as a universal domain for Reddy's model

Model Checking a Temporal Logic via Program Verification

openThe thesis explores the possibility of viewing Model Checking as an instance of program verification in order to allow for the reuse of the vast theory and toolset of Abstract Interpretation in the setting of Model Checking. Model Checking is a formal verification technique used to analyse the correctness of software systems, based on a representation of the system as a formal model, such as a finite-state machine or a transition system, and on a representation of the properties it must satisfy as temporal logic formulae. On the other hand, Abstract Interpretation is a program analysis method, based on the idea of extracting properties of programs by (over-)approximating their semantics over a so-called abstract domain, typically a complete lattice, whose elements represent program properties. The thesis focuses on ACTL, the universal fragment of the temporal logic CTL, which can describe properties of executions which are universally quantified. It shows how properties expressed in ACTL can be mapped into programs written in a suitable programming language, whose semantics consists of counterexamples to the validity of the formula. Then such a program is analysed by Abstract Interpretation over some abstract domain, exploiting the idea of local completeness as put forward in some recent work, combining lower- and under-approximations.The thesis explores the possibility of viewing Model Checking as an instance of program verification in order to allow for the reuse of the vast theory and toolset of Abstract Interpretation in the setting of Model Checking. Model Checking is a formal verification technique used to analyse the correctness of software systems, based on a representation of the system as a formal model, such as a finite-state machine or a transition system, and on a representation of the properties it must satisfy as temporal logic formulae. On the other hand, Abstract Interpretation is a program analysis method, based on the idea of extracting properties of programs by (over-)approximating their semantics over a so-called abstract domain, typically a complete lattice, whose elements represent program properties. The thesis focuses on ACTL, the universal fragment of the temporal logic CTL, which can describe properties of executions which are universally quantified. It shows how properties expressed in ACTL can be mapped into programs written in a suitable programming language, whose semantics consists of counterexamples to the validity of the formula. Then such a program is analysed by Abstract Interpretation over some abstract domain, exploiting the idea of local completeness as put forward in some recent work, combining lower- and under-approximations

A Database Interface for Complex Objects

We describe a formal design for a logical query language using psi-terms as data structures to interact effectively and efficiently with a relational database. The structure of psi-terms provides an adequate representation for so-called complex objects. They generalize conventional terms used in logic programming: they are typed attributed structures, ordered thanks to a subtype ordering. Unification of psi-terms is an effective means for integrating multiple inheritance and partial information into a deduction process. We define a compact database representation for psi-terms, representing part of the subtyping relation in the database as well. We describe a retrieval algorithm based on an abstract interpretation of the psi-term unification process and prove its formal correctness. This algorithm is efficient in that it incrementally retrieves only additional facts that are actually needed by a query, and never retrieves the same fact twice