Normalisierung und partielle Auswertung von funktional-logischen Programmen

This thesis deals with the development of a normalization scheme and a partial evaluator for the functional logic programming language Curry. The functional logic programming paradigm combines the two most important fields of declarative programming, namely functional and logic programming. While functional languages provide concepts such as algebraic data types, higher-order functions or demanddriven evaluation, logic languages usually support a non-deterministic evaluation and a built-in search for results. Functional logic languages finally combine these two paradigms in an integrated way, hence providing multiple syntactic constructs and concepts to facilitate the concise notation of high-level programs. However, both the variety of syntactic constructs and the high degree of abstraction complicate the translation into efficient target programs. To reduce the syntactic complexity of functional logic languages, a typical compilation scheme incorporates a normalization phase to subsequently replace complex constructs by simpler ones until a minimal language subset is reached. While the individual transformations are usually simple, they also have to be correctly combined to make the syntactic constructs interact in the intended way. The efficiency of normalized programs can then be improved by means of different optimization techniques. A very powerful optimization technique is the partial evaluation of programs. Partial evaluation basically anticipates the execution of certain program fragments at compile time and computes a semantically equivalent program, which is usually more efficient at run time. Since partial evaluation is a fully automatic optimization technique, it can also be incorporated into the normal compilation scheme of programs. Nevertheless, this also requires termination of the optimization process, which establishes one of the main challenges for partial evaluation besides semantic equivalence. In this work we consider the language Curry as a representative of the functional logic programming paradigm. We develop a formal representation of the normalization process of Curry programs into a kernel language, while respecting the interference of different language constructs. We then define the dynamic semantics of this kernel language, before we subsequently develop a partial evaluation scheme and show its correctness and termination. Due to the previously described normalization process, this scheme is then directly applicable to arbitrary Curry programs. Furthermore, the implementation of a practical partial evaluator is sketched based on the partial evaluation scheme, and its applicability and usefulness is documented by a variety of typical partial evaluation examples

An Analytical Approach to Programs as Data Objects

This essay accompanies a selection of 32 articles (referred to in bold face in the text and marginally marked in the bibliographic references) submitted to Aarhus University towards a Doctor Scientiarum degree in Computer Science.The author's previous academic degree, beyond a doctoral degree in June 1986, is an "Habilitation à diriger les recherches" from the Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris VI) in France; the corresponding material was submitted in September 1992 and the degree was obtained in January 1993.The present 32 articles have all been written since 1993 and while at DAIMI.Except for one other PhD student, all co-authors are or have been the author's students here in Aarhus

Denotational Aspects of Untyped Normalization by Evaluation

We show that the standard normalization-by-evaluation construction for the simply-typed lambda_{beta eta}-calculus has a natural counterpart for the untyped lambda_beta-calculus, with the central type-indexed logical relation replaced by a "recursively defined'' invariant relation, in the style of Pitts. In fact, the construction can be seen as generalizing a computational-adequacy argument for an untyped, call-by-name language to normalization instead of evaluation. In the untyped setting, not all terms have normal forms, so the normalization function is necessarily partial. We establish its correctness in the senses of soundness (the output term, if any, is in normal form and beta-equivalent to the input term); identification ( beta-equivalent terms are mapped to the same result); and completeness (the function is defined for all terms that do have normal forms). We also show how the semantic construction enables a simple yet formal correctness proof for the normalization algorithm, expressed as a functional program in an ML-like call-by-value language. Finally, we generalize the construction to produce an infinitary variant of normal forms, namely Böhm trees. We show that the three-part characterization of correctness, as well as the proofs, extend naturally to this generalization

Efficient local unfolding with ancestor stacks

The most successful unfolding rules used nowadays in the partial evaluation of logic programs are based on well quasi orders (wqo) applied over (covering) ancestors, i.e., a subsequence of the atoms selected during a derivation. Ancestor (sub)sequences are used to increase the specialization power of unfolding while still guaranteeing termination and also to reduce the number of atoms for which the wqo has to be checked. Unfortunately, maintaining the structure of the ancestor relation during unfolding introduces significant overhead. We propose an efficient, practical local unfolding rule based on the notion of covering ancestors which can be used in combination with a wqo and allows a stack-based implementation without losing any opportunities for specialization. Using our technique, certain non-leftmost unfoldings are allowed as long as local unfolding is performed, i.e., we cover depth-first strategies. To deal with practical programs, we propose assertion-based techniques which allow our approach to treat programs that include (Prolog) built-ins and external predicates in a very extensible manner, for the case of leftmost unfolding. Finally, we report on our mplementation of these techniques embedded in a practical partial evaluator, which shows that our techniques, in addition to dealing with practical programs, are also significantly more efficient in time and somewhat more efficient in memory than traditional tree-based implementations. To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP)

Collapsing towers of interpreters

Given a tower of interpreters, i.e., a sequence of multiple interpreters interpreting one another as input programs, we aim to collapse this tower into a compiler that removes all interpretive overhead and runs in a single pass. In the real world, a use case might be Python code executed by an x86 runtime, on a CPU emulated in a JavaScript VM, running on an ARM CPU. Collapsing such a tower can not only exponentially improve runtime performance, but also enable the use of base-language tools for interpreted programs, e.g., for analysis and verification. In this paper, we lay the foundations in an idealized but realistic setting. We present a multi-level lambda calculus that features staging constructs and stage polymorphism: based on runtime parameters, an evaluator either executes source code (thereby acting as an interpreter) or generates code (thereby acting as a compiler). We identify stage polymorphism, a programming model from the domain of high-performance program generators, as the key mechanism to make such interpreters compose in a collapsible way. We present Pink, a meta-circular Lisp-like evaluator on top of this calculus, and demonstrate that we can collapse arbitrarily many levels of self-interpretation, including levels with semantic modifications. We discuss several examples: compiling regular expressions through an interpreter to base code, building program transformers from modi ed interpreters, and others. We develop these ideas further to include reflection and reification, culminating in Purple, a reflective language inspired by Brown, Blond, and Black, which realizes a conceptually infinite tower, where every aspect of the semantics can change dynamically. Addressing an open challenge, we show how user programs can be compiled and recompiled under user-modified semantics.Parts of this research were supported by ERC grant 321217, NSF awards 1553471 and 1564207, and DOE award DE-SC0018050