2,491 research outputs found

    Comment on ``Understanding the scalar meson quark-antiquark nonet''

    Full text link
    It is shown that the incomplete scalar meson nonets found by Toernqvist (T) and Toernqvist and Roos (TR), employing a new version of the Helsinki unitarised quark model, should in fact be complete, including an as yet unconfirmed light K*0 below 1 GeV (old kappa) and the established f0(1500). A detailed comparison is presented with the predictions of the Nijmegen unitarised meson model, in which two complete scalar nonets show up below 1.5 GeV. The reason for the flavour-nonet breaking found in T and TR we argue to originate in the use of coupling constants for the three-meson vertex which are not independent of flavour. Also some statements made by Toernqvist are critically reviewed.Comment: 10 pages, plain LaTeX, extension (more detailed on pole doubling and f0(1500) interpretation) and cosmetic

    Decoupling in singular systems: a polynomial equation approach

    Get PDF

    H infinity control design for generalized second order systems based on acceleration sensitivity function

    Get PDF
    This article presents an Hinfinty control design method based on the Acceleration Sensitivity (AS) function. This approach can be applied to any fully actuated generalized second order system. In this framework, classical modal specifications(pulsations / damping ratios) are expressed in terms of Hinfinty templates allowing other frequency domain specifications to betaken into account. Finally, a comparison between AS with a more classical Hinfinty approach and with the Cross Standard Form(CSF) is presented. A 2 degrees of freedom spring-damper-mass academic example is used to illustrate the properties of the AS,though this method was developed and is used for atmospheric reentry control design

    A direct approach to the design of linear multivariable systems

    Get PDF
    Design of multivariable systems is considered and design procedures are formulated in the light of the most recent work on model matching. The word model matching is used exclusively to mean matching the input-output behavior of two systems. The term is used in the frequency domain to indicate the comparison of two transfer matrices containing transfer functions as elements. Design methods where non-interaction is not used as a criteria were studied. Two design methods are considered. The first method of design is based solely upon the specification of generalized error coefficients for each individual transfer function of the overall system transfer matrix. The second design method is called the pole fixing method because all the system poles are fixed at preassigned positions. The zeros of terms either above or below the diagonal are partially fixed via steady state error coefficients. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed and an example is worked to demonstrate their uses. The special cases of triangular decoupling and minimum constraints are discussed
    corecore