Decision Analysis Linguistic Framework

Everyday human beings are faced with situations they should choose among different alternatives by means of reasoning and mental processes when solving a problem. Many of these decision problems are under uncertain environments including vague, imprecise and subjective information that is usually modeled by linguistic information due to the use of natural language and its relation to mental reasoning processes of the experts when expressing their judgments. In a decision process multiple criteria can be evaluated which involving multiple experts with different degrees of knowledge. Such process can be modeled by using Multi-granular Linguistic Information (MGLI) and Computing with Words (CW) processes to solve the related decision problems. Different methodologies and approaches have been proposed to accomplish this process in an accurate and interpretable way. In this paper we propose a useful Decision Analysis Framework to manage this kind of problems by using the Extended Linguistic Hierarchy (ELH), 2-tuples linguistic representation model and its computational method. The developed Framework has many advantages when dealing with a complex problem in a simple way and its capability of having easy and useful reasonably results.Sociedad Argentina de Informática e Investigación Operativ

Multi-expert multi-criteria decision support model for traffic control

The common use of IP networking structures implies the increasing demand of resources by users and applications. For this reason, organizations must guarantee adequate conditions for critical traffic. To face this problem, network administrators constantly need to make decisions regarding this situation by means of using different strategies and tools of Quality of Service (QoS), such as Traffic Control (TC). Such decisions can be modeled by a decision support system that handles subjective information about decision maker’s perceptions. This information involves uncertainty and requires precise evaluation of traffic quality demanded. Subjectivity is modeled by using linguistic information (LI) in order to choose adequate solution to networking performance problems. This paper proposes a Multi-Expert (ME) Multi-Criteria (MC) Linguistic Decision Making (LDM) Model for TC in networking. Finally, an application example to show the model’s benefits is presented.Eje: Workshop Agentes y sistemas inteligentes (WASI)Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI

Decision Analysis Linguistic Framework

Everyday human beings are faced with situations they should choose among different alternatives by means of reasoning and mental processes when solving a problem. Many of these decision problems are under uncertain environments including vague, imprecise and subjective information that is usually modeled by linguistic information due to the use of natural language and its relation to mental reasoning processes of the experts when expressing their judgments. In a decision process multiple criteria can be evaluated which involving multiple experts with different degrees of knowledge. Such process can be modeled by using Multi-granular Linguistic Information (MGLI) and Computing with Words (CW) processes to solve the related decision problems. Different methodologies and approaches have been proposed to accomplish this process in an accurate and interpretable way. In this paper we propose a useful Decision Analysis Framework to manage this kind of problems by using the Extended Linguistic Hierarchy (ELH), 2-tuples linguistic representation model and its computational method. The developed Framework has many advantages when dealing with a complex problem in a simple way and its capability of having easy and useful reasonably results.Sociedad Argentina de Informática e Investigación Operativ

Multi-Criteria Decision Model based on AHP and Linguistic Information

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is a usual activity among organisations and decisions related to people’s activities. Due to the complexity of considering multiple criteria, to select an alternative is a non-trivial task. From operative levels to managerial ones, MCDA is implemented by using several (formal and informal) techniques. Two useful techniques that help to make a decision are the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and MCDA models based on Linguistic Information (LI). This work describes a MCDA framework that combines the mentioned techniques in order to provide more confidence in the decision making process. To test the proposed model, framework was used to select the adequate network configuration to improve quality of service (QoS). Finally, the framework’s outputs were compared to real experts’ opinions obtaining satisfactory results. Keywords: IPv6 deployment, IPv6 transition solutions, performance analysis, DNS64, TOTD, security, cache poisoning attack, random permutation.Facultad de Informátic

Ranking and selection of unsupervised learning marketing segmentation

This research paper has been partially conducted during a three-months visiting period by German Sanchez-Hernandez to the Centre for Computational Intelligence (CCI).NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in . Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Knowledge-Based Systems, 44, pp. 20–33 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.01.012This paper addresses the problem of choosing the most appropriate classification from a given set of classifications of a set of patterns. This is a relevant topic on unsupervised systems and clustering analysis because different classifications can in general be obtained from the same data set. The provided methodology is based on five fuzzy criteria which are aggregated using an Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) operator. To this end, a novel multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) system is defined, which assesses the degree up to which each criterion is met by all classifications. The corresponding single evaluations are then proposed to be aggregated into a collective one by means of an OWA operator guided by a fuzzy linguistic quantifier, which is used to implement the concept of fuzzy majority in the selection process. This new methodology is applied to a real marketing case based on a business to business (B2B) environment to help marketing experts during the segmentation process. As a result, a segmentation containing three segments consisting of 35, 98 and 127 points of sale respectively is selected to be the most suitable to endorse marketing strategies of the firm. Finally, an analysis of the managerial implications of the proposed methodology solution is provided.This work is supported by the SENSORIAL Research Project (TIN2010-20966- C02-01, 02), funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Information Technology

A contribution to the ranking and description of classifications

This thesis presents a novel and complete fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methodology. This methodology is specifically designed for selecting classifications in the framework of unsupervised learning systems. The main results obtained are twofold. On the one hand, the definition of fuzzy criteria to be used to assess the suitability of a set of given classifications and, on the other hand, the design and development of a natural language generation (NLG) system to qualitatively describe them. Unsupervised learning systems often produce a large number of possible classifications. In order to select the most suitable one, a set of criteria is usually defined and applied sequentially to assess and filter the obtained classifications. This is done, in general, by using a true-false decision in the application of each criterion. This approach could result in classifications being discarded and not taken into account when they marginally fail to meet one particular criterion even though they meet other criteria with a high score. An alternative solution to this sequential approach has been introduced in this thesis. It consists of evaluating the degree up to which each fuzzy criterion is met by each classification and, only after this, aggregating for each classification the individual assessments. This overall value reflects the degree up to which the set of criteria is globally satisfied by each classification. Five fuzzy criteria are defined and analysed to be used collectively to evaluate classifications. The corresponding single evaluations are then proposed to be aggregated into a collective one by means of an Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) operator guided by a fuzzy linguistic quantifier, which is used to implement the concept of fuzzy majority in the selection process. In addition, a NLG system to qualitatively describe the most important characteristics of the best classification is designed and developed in order to fully understand the chosen classification. Finally, this new methodology is applied to a real business problem in a marketing context. The main purpose of this application is to show how the proposed methodology can help marketing experts in the design of specific-oriented marketing strategies by means of an automatic and interpretable segmentation system