Design of water distribution networks using a pseudo-genetic algorithm and sensitivity of genetic operators

[EN] Genetic algorithms (GA) are optimization techniques that are widely used in the design of water distribution networks. One of the main disadvantages of GA is positional bias, which degrades the quality of the solution. In this study, a modified pseudo-genetic algorithm (PGA) is presented. In a PGA, the coding of chromosomes is performed using integer coding; in a traditional GA, binary coding is utilized. Each decision variable is represented by only one gene. This variation entails a series of special characteristics in the definition of mutation and crossover operations. Some benchmark networks have been used to test the suitability of a PGA for designing water distribution networks. More than 50,000 simulations were conducted with different sets of parameters. A statistical analysis of the obtained solutions was also performed. Through this analysis, more suitable values of mutation and crossover probabilities were discovered for each case. The results demonstrate the validity of the method. Optimum solutions are not guaranteed in any heuristic method. Hence, the concept of a good solution is introduced. A good solution is a design solution that does not substantially exceed the optimal solution that is obtained from the simulations. This concept may be useful when the computational cost is critical. The main conclusion derived from this study is that a proper combination of population and crossover and mutation probabilities leads to a high probability that good solutions will be obtained[This work was supported by the project DPI2009-13674 (OPERAGUA) of the Direccion General de Investigacion y Gestion del Plan Nacional de I + D + I del Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spain.Mora Meliá, D.; Iglesias Rey, PL.; Martínez-Solano, FJ.; Fuertes Miquel, VS. (2013). Design of water distribution networks using a pseudo-genetic algorithm and sensitivity of genetic operators. Water Resources Management. 27(12):4149-4162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0400-6S414941622712Alperovits E, Shamir U (1977) Design of optimal water distribution systems. Water Resour Res 13(6):885–900Balla M, Lingireddy S (2000) Distributed genetic algorithm model on network of personal computers. J Comput Civ Eng 14(3):199–205. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2000)14:3(199)Baños R, Gil C, Agulleiro JI, Reca J (2007) A memetic algorithm for water distribution network design. Advances in Soft Computing 39:279–289. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-70706-6_26Cisty M (2010) Hybrid genetic algorithm and linear programming method for least-cost design of water distribution systems. Water Resour Manage 24(1):1–24. doi: 10.1007/s1269-009-9434-1Chung G, Lansey K (2008) Application of the shuffled frog leaping algorithm for the optimization of a general large-scale in a watersupply system. Water Resour Manage 23:797–823. doi: 10.1007/s11269-008-9300-6Cunha MC, Sousa J (1999) Water distribution network design optimization: simulated annealing approach. J Water Resour Plann Manage 125(4):215–221. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1999)125:4(215)Eusuff M, Lansey K (2003) Optimization of water distribution network design using the shuffled frog leaping algorithm. J Water Resour Plann Manage 129(3):210–225. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:3(210)Fujiwara O, Khang DB (1990) A two phase decomposition method for optimal design of looped water distribution network. Water Resour Res 26(4):539–549. doi: 10.1029/WR026i004p00539Geem ZW (2006) Optimal cost design of water distribution networks using harmony search. Eng Optimiz 38(3):259–277. doi: 10.1080/03052150500467430Goldberg DE, Kuo CH (1987) Genetic algorithms in pipeline optimization. J Comput Civil Eng 1(2):128–141. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1987)1:2(128)Goulter IC, Morgan DR (1985) An integrated approach to the layout and design of water distribution systems. Civil Eng Syst 2(2):104–113. doi: 10.1080/02630258508970389Halhal D, Walters GA, Ouazar D, Savic DA (1997) Water network rehabilitation with structured messy genetic algorithms. J Water Resour Plann Manage 123(3):137–147. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1997)123:3(137)Iglesias-Rey PL, Martínez-Solano FJ, Mora-Meliá D, Ribelles-Aguilar JV (2012) The battle water networks II: Combination of meta-heuristic techniques with the concept of setpoint function in water network optimization algorithms. In: Proc. 14th Water Distribution Systems Analysis symposium (WDSA), Engineers Australia, Adelaide, AustraliaJin YX, Cheng HZ, Yan J, Zhang L (2007) New discrete method for particle swarm optimization and its application in transmission network expansion planning. Electr Pow Syst Res 77(3–4):227–233. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2006.02.016Lansey KE, Mays LW (1989). Optimization model for design of water distribution systems. Reliability analysis of water distribution systems. In: L. R. Mays (ed) ASCE: Reston, VaLouati M, Benabdallah S, Lebdi F, Milutin D (2011) Application of a genetic algorithm for the optimization of a complex reservoir system in Tunisia. Water Resour Manage 25(10):2387–2404. doi: 10.1007/s11269-011-9814-1Matías A (2003) “Diseño de redes de distribución de agua contemplando la fiabilidad mediante Algoritmos Genéticos”. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, ValenciaNazif S, Karamouz M, Tabesh M, Moridi A (2010) Pressure management model for urban water distribution networks. Water Resour Manage 24(3):437–458. doi: 10.1007/s11269-009-9454-xPrasad DT, Park NS (2004) Multiobjective genetic algorithms for design of water distribution networks. J Water Resour Plann Manage 130(1):73–82. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:1(73)Reca J, Martinez J (2006) Genetic algorithms for the design of looped irrigation water distribution networks. Water Resour Res 42(5):W05416. doi: 10.1029/2005WR004383Reca J, Martinez J, Gil C, Baños R (2008) Application of several meta-heuristic techniques to the optimization of real looped water distribution networks. Water Resour Manage 22(10):1367–1379. doi: 10.1007/s11269-007-9230-8Rossman LA (2000) EPANET 2.0 User’s manual. EPA/600/R-00/057, 2000Savic DA, Walters GA (1997) Genetic algorithms for least-cost design of water distribution systems. J Water Resour Plann Manage 123(2):67–77. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1997)123:2(67)Su YL, Mays LW, Duan N, Lansey KE (1987) Reliability based optimization model for water distribution systems. J Hydraul Eng 113(12):1539–1556. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1987)113:12(1539)Tsai FTC, Katiyar V, Toy D, Goff RA (2008) Conjunctive management of large-scale pressurized water distribution and groundwater systems in semi-arid area with parallel genetic algorithm. Water Resour Manage 23(8):1497–1517. doi: 10.1007/s11269-008-9338-5Vairavamoorthy K, Ali M (2000) Optimal design of water distribution systems using genetic algorithms. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruc Eng 15(5):374–382. doi: 10.1111/0885-9507.00201Wang QJ (1991) The genetic algorithm and its application to calibrating conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour Res 27(9):2467–2471. doi: 10.1029/91WR0130

A hybrid, auto-adaptive, and rule-based multi-agent approach using evolutionary algorithms for improved searching

Selecting the most appropriate heuristic for solving a specific problem is not easy, for many reasons. This article focuses on one of these reasons: traditionally, the solution search process has operated in a given manner regardless of the specific problem being solved, and the process has been the same regardless of the size, complexity and domain of the problem. To cope with this situation, search processes should mould the search into areas of the search space that are meaningful for the problem. This article builds on previous work in the development of a multi-agent paradigm using techniques derived from knowledge discovery (data-mining techniques) on databases of so-far visited solutions. The aim is to improve the search mechanisms, increase computational efficiency and use rules to enrich the formulation of optimization problems, while reducing the search space and catering to realistic problems.Izquierdo Sebastián, J.; Montalvo Arango, I.; Campbell, E.; Pérez García, R. (2015). A hybrid, auto-adaptive, and rule-based multi-agent approach using evolutionary algorithms for improved searching. Engineering Optimization. 1-13. doi:10.1080/0305215X.2015.1107434S113Becker, U., & Fahrmeir, L. (2001). Bump Hunting for Risk: a New Data Mining Tool and its Applications. Computational Statistics, 16(3), 373-386. doi:10.1007/s001800100073Bouguessa, M., & Shengrui Wang. (2009). Mining Projected Clusters in High-Dimensional Spaces. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(4), 507-522. doi:10.1109/tkde.2008.162Chong, I.-G., & Jun, C.-H. (2005). Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 78(1-2), 103-112. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.12.011CHONG, I., & JUN, C. (2008). Flexible patient rule induction method for optimizing process variables in discrete type. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(4), 3014-3020. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.047Cole, S. W., Galic, Z., & Zack, J. A. (2003). Controlling false-negative errors in microarray differential expression analysis: a PRIM approach. Bioinformatics, 19(14), 1808-1816. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg242FRIEDMAN, J. H., & FISHER, N. I. (1999). Statistics and Computing, 9(2), 123-143. doi:10.1023/a:1008894516817Geem, Z. W. (2006). Optimal cost design of water distribution networks using harmony search. Engineering Optimization, 38(3), 259-277. doi:10.1080/03052150500467430Goncalves, L. B., Vellasco, M. M. B. R., Pacheco, M. A. C., & Flavio Joaquim de Souza. (2006). Inverted hierarchical neuro-fuzzy BSP system: a novel neuro-fuzzy model for pattern classification and rule extraction in databases. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 36(2), 236-248. doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2004.843220Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001). The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer Series in Statistics. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5Chih-Ming Hsu, & Ming-Syan Chen. (2009). On the Design and Applicability of Distance Functions in High-Dimensional Data Space. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(4), 523-536. doi:10.1109/tkde.2008.178Hwang, S.-F., & He, R.-S. (2006). A hybrid real-parameter genetic algorithm for function optimization. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 20(1), 7-21. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2005.09.001Izquierdo, J., Montalvo, I., Pérez, R., & Fuertes, V. S. (2008). Design optimization of wastewater collection networks by PSO. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 56(3), 777-784. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2008.02.007Javadi, A. A., Farmani, R., & Tan, T. P. (2005). A hybrid intelligent genetic algorithm. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 19(4), 255-262. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2005.07.003Jin, X., Zhang, J., Gao, J., & Wu, W. (2008). Multi-objective optimization of water supply network rehabilitation with non-dominated sorting Genetic Algorithm-II. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 9(3), 391-400. doi:10.1631/jzus.a071448Johns, M. B., Keedwell, E., & Savic, D. (2014). Adaptive locally constrained genetic algorithm for least-cost water distribution network design. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 16(2), 288-301. doi:10.2166/hydro.2013.218Jourdan, L., Corne, D., Savic, D., & Walters, G. (2005). Preliminary Investigation of the ‘Learnable Evolution Model’ for Faster/Better Multiobjective Water Systems Design. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, 841-855. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-31880-4_58Kamwa, I., Samantaray, S. R., & Joos, G. (2009). Development of Rule-Based Classifiers for Rapid Stability Assessment of Wide-Area Post-Disturbance Records. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 24(1), 258-270. doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2008.2009430Kang, D., & Lansey, K. (2012). Revisiting Optimal Water-Distribution System Design: Issues and a Heuristic Hierarchical Approach. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 138(3), 208-217. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000165Keedwell, E., & Khu, S.-T. (2005). A hybrid genetic algorithm for the design of water distribution networks. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 18(4), 461-472. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2004.10.001Kehl, V., & Ulm, K. (2006). Responder identification in clinical trials with censored data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 50(5), 1338-1355. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.11.015Liu, X., Minin, V., Huang, Y., Seligson, D. B., & Horvath, S. (2004). Statistical Methods for Analyzing Tissue Microarray Data. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 14(3), 671-685. doi:10.1081/bip-200025657Marchi, A., Dandy, G., Wilkins, A., & Rohrlach, H. (2014). Methodology for Comparing Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimization of Water Distribution Systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 140(1), 22-31. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000321Martínez-Rodríguez, J. B., Montalvo, I., Izquierdo, J., & Pérez-García, R. (2011). Reliability and Tolerance Comparison in Water Supply Networks. Water Resources Management, 25(5), 1437-1448. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9753-2McClymont, K., Keedwell, E., Savić, D., & Randall-Smith, M. (2013). A general multi-objective hyper-heuristic for water distribution network design with discolouration risk. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 15(3), 700-716. doi:10.2166/hydro.2012.022McClymont, K., Keedwell, E. C., Savić, D., & Randall-Smith, M. (2014). Automated construction of evolutionary algorithm operators for the bi-objective water distribution network design problem using a genetic programming based hyper-heuristic approach. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 16(2), 302-318. doi:10.2166/hydro.2013.226Michalski, R. S. (2000). Machine Learning, 38(1/2), 9-40. doi:10.1023/a:1007677805582Montalvo, I., Izquierdo, J., Pérez-García, R., & Herrera, M. (2014). Water Distribution System Computer-Aided Design by Agent Swarm Optimization. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 29(6), 433-448. doi:10.1111/mice.12062Montalvo, I., Izquierdo, J., Schwarze, S., & Pérez-García, R. (2010). Multi-objective particle swarm optimization applied to water distribution systems design: An approach with human interaction. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 52(7-8), 1219-1227. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2010.02.017Nguyen, V. V., Hartmann, D., & König, M. (2012). A distributed agent-based approach for simulation-based optimization. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(4), 814-832. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2012.06.001Nicklow, J., Reed, P., Savic, D., Dessalegne, T., Harrell, L., … Chan-Hilton, A. (2010). State of the Art for Genetic Algorithms and Beyond in Water Resources Planning and Management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 136(4), 412-432. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000053Onwubolu, G. C., & Babu, B. V. (2004). New Optimization Techniques in Engineering. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39930-8Pelikan, M., Goldberg, D. E., & Lobo, F. G. (2002). Computational Optimization and Applications, 21(1), 5-20. doi:10.1023/a:1013500812258Reed, P. M., Hadka, D., Herman, J. D., Kasprzyk, J. R., & Kollat, J. B. (2013). Evolutionary multiobjective optimization in water resources: The past, present, and future. Advances in Water Resources, 51, 438-456. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.01.005Shang, W., Zhao, S., & Shen, Y. (2009). A flexible tolerance genetic algorithm for optimal problems with nonlinear equality constraints. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 23(3), 253-264. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2008.09.001Vrugt, J. A., & Robinson, B. A. (2007). Improved evolutionary optimization from genetically adaptive multimethod search. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(3), 708-711. doi:10.1073/pnas.0610471104Vrugt, J. A., Robinson, B. A., & Hyman, J. M. (2009). Self-Adaptive Multimethod Search for Global Optimization in Real-Parameter Spaces. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 13(2), 243-259. doi:10.1109/tevc.2008.924428Xie, X.-F., & Liu, J. (2008). Graph coloring by multiagent fusion search. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 18(2), 99-123. doi:10.1007/s10878-008-9140-6Xiao-Feng Xie, & Jiming Liu. (2009). Multiagent Optimization System for Solving the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP). IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 39(2), 489-502. doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2008.2006910Zheng, F., Simpson, A. R., & Zecchin, A. C. (2013). A decomposition and multistage optimization approach applied to the optimization of water distribution systems with multiple supply sources. Water Resources Research, 49(1), 380-399. doi:10.1029/2012wr013160Zheng, F., Simpson, A. R., & Zecchin, A. C. (2014). Coupled Binary Linear Programming–Differential Evolution Algorithm Approach for Water Distribution System Optimization. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 140(5), 585-597. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.000036

AI and OR in management of operations: history and trends

The last decade has seen a considerable growth in the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for operations management with the aim of finding solutions to problems that are increasing in complexity and scale. This paper begins by setting the context for the survey through a historical perspective of OR and AI. An extensive survey of applications of AI techniques for operations management, covering a total of over 1200 papers published from 1995 to 2004 is then presented. The survey utilizes Elsevier's ScienceDirect database as a source. Hence, the survey may not cover all the relevant journals but includes a sufficiently wide range of publications to make it representative of the research in the field. The papers are categorized into four areas of operations management: (a) design, (b) scheduling, (c) process planning and control and (d) quality, maintenance and fault diagnosis. Each of the four areas is categorized in terms of the AI techniques used: genetic algorithms, case-based reasoning, knowledge-based systems, fuzzy logic and hybrid techniques. The trends over the last decade are identified, discussed with respect to expected trends and directions for future work suggested

Optimal design of water distribution systems based on entropy and topology

A new multi-objective evolutionary optimization approach for joint topology and pipe size design of water distribution systems is presented. The algorithm proposed considers simultaneously the adequacy of flow and pressure at the demand nodes; the initial construction cost; the network topology; and a measure of hydraulic capacity reliability. The optimization procedure is based on a general measure of hydraulic performance that combines statistical entropy, network connectivity and hydraulic feasibility. The topological properties of the solutions are accounted for and arbitrary assumptions regarding the quality of infeasible solutions are not applied. In other words, both feasible and infeasible solutions participate in the evolutionary processes; solutions survive and reproduce or perish strictly according to their Pareto-optimality. Removing artificial barriers in this way frees the algorithm to evolve optimal solutions quickly. Furthermore, any redundant binary codes that result from crossover or mutation are eliminated gradually in a seamless and generic way that avoids the arbitrary loss of potentially useful genetic material and preserves the quality of the information that is transmitted from one generation to the next. The approach proposed is entirely generic: we have not introduced any additional parameters that require calibration on a case-by-case basis. Detailed and extensive results for two test problems are included that suggest the approach is highly effective. In general, the frontier-optimal solutions achieved include topologies that are fully branched, partially- and fully-looped and, for networks with multiple sources, completely separate sub-networks

Multiobjective optimization of water distribution systems accounting for economic cost, hydraulic reliability, and greenhouse gas emissions

In this paper, three objectives are considered for the optimization of water distribution systems (WDSs): the traditional objectives of minimizing economic cost and maximizing hydraulic reliability and the recently proposed objective of minimizing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It is particularly important to include the GHG minimization objective for WDSs involving pumping into storages or water transmission systems (WTSs), as these systems are the main contributors of GHG emissions in the water industry. In order to better understand the nature of tradeoffs among these three objectives, the shape of the solution space and the location of the Pareto-optimal front in the solution space are investigated for WTSs and WDSs that include pumping into storages, and the implications of the interaction between the three objectives are explored from a practical design perspective. Through three case studies, it is found that the solution space is a U-shaped curve rather than a surface, as the tradeoffs among the three objectives are dominated by the hydraulic reliability objective. The Pareto-optimal front of real-world systems is often located at the "elbow" section and lower "arm" of the solution space (i.e., the U-shaped curve), indicating that it is more economic to increase the hydraulic reliability of these systems by increasing pipe capacity (i.e., pipe diameter) compared to increasing pumping power. Solutions having the same GHG emission level but different cost-reliability tradeoffs often exist. Therefore, the final decision needs to be made in conjunction with expert knowledge and the specific budget and reliability requirements of the system. © 2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.Wenyan Wu, Holger R. Maier, and Angus R. Simpso

Application of a new multi-agent Hybrid Co-evolution based Particle Swarm Optimisation methodology in ship design

In this paper, a multiple objective 'Hybrid Co-evolution based Particle Swarm Optimisation' methodology (HCPSO) is proposed. This methodology is able to handle multiple objective optimisation problems in the area of ship design, where the simultaneous optimisation of several conflicting objectives is considered. The proposed method is a hybrid technique that merges the features of co-evolution and Nash equilibrium with a ε-disturbance technique to eliminate the stagnation. The method also offers a way to identify an efficient set of Pareto (conflicting) designs and to select a preferred solution amongst these designs. The combination of co-evolution approach and Nash-optima contributes to HCPSO by utilising faster search and evolution characteristics. The design search is performed within a multi-agent design framework to facilitate distributed synchronous cooperation. The most widely used test functions from the formal literature of multiple objectives optimisation are utilised to test the HCPSO. In addition, a real case study, the internal subdivision problem of a ROPAX vessel, is provided to exemplify the applicability of the developed method

Water Distribution System Computer-Aided Design by Agent Swarm Optimization

Optimal design of water distribution systems (WDS), including the sizing of components, quality control, reliability, renewal and rehabilitation strategies, etc., is a complex problem in water engineering that requires robust methods of optimization. Classical methods of optimization are not well suited for analyzing highly-dimensional, multimodal, non-linear problems, especially given inaccurate, noisy, discrete and complex data. Agent Swarm Optimization (ASO) is a novel paradigm that exploits swarm intelligence and borrows some ideas from multiagent based systems. It is aimed at supporting decisionmaking processes by solving multi-objective optimization problems. ASO offers robustness through a framework where various population-based algorithms co-exist. The ASO framework is described and used to solve the optimal design of WDS. The approach allows engineers to work in parallel with the computational algorithms to force the recruitment of new searching elements, thus contributing to the solution process with expert-based proposals.This work has been developed with the support of the project IDAWAS, DPI2009-11591, of the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science, and ACOMP/2010/146 of the education department of the Generalitat Valenciana. The use of English was revised by John Rawlins.Montalvo Arango, I.; Izquierdo Sebastián, J.; Pérez García, R.; Herrera Fernández, AM. (2014). Water Distribution System Computer-Aided Design by Agent Swarm Optimization. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 29(6):433-448. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12062S433448296Adeli, H., & Kumar, S. (1995). Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Structural Optimization. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 8(3), 156-163. doi:10.1061/(asce)0893-1321(1995)8:3(156)Afshar, M. H., Akbari, M., & Mariño, M. A. (2005). Simultaneous Layout and Size Optimization of Water Distribution Networks: Engineering Approach. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 11(4), 221-230. doi:10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2005)11:4(221)Amini, F., Hazaveh, N. K., & Rad, A. A. (2013). Wavelet PSO-Based LQR Algorithm for Optimal Structural Control Using Active Tuned Mass Dampers. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 28(7), 542-557. doi:10.1111/mice.12017Arumugam, M. S., & Rao, M. V. C. (2008). On the improved performances of the particle swarm optimization algorithms with adaptive parameters, cross-over operators and root mean square (RMS) variants for computing optimal control of a class of hybrid systems. Applied Soft Computing, 8(1), 324-336. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2007.01.010Badawy, R., Yassine, A., Heßler, A., Hirsch, B., & Albayrak, S. (2013). A novel multi-agent system utilizing quantum-inspired evolution for demand side management in the future smart grid. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 20(2), 127-141. doi:10.3233/ica-130423Černý, V. (1985). Thermodynamical approach to the traveling salesman problem: An efficient simulation algorithm. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 45(1), 41-51. doi:10.1007/bf00940812Dandy, G. C., & Engelhardt, M. O. (2006). Multi-Objective Trade-Offs between Cost and Reliability in the Replacement of Water Mains. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 132(2), 79-88. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2006)132:2(79)Díaz , J. L. Herrera , M. Izquierdo , J. Montalvo , I. Pérez-García , R. 2008 A particle swarm optimization derivative applied to cluster analysisDorigo, M., Maniezzo, V., & Colorni, A. (1996). Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 26(1), 29-41. doi:10.1109/3477.484436Dridi, L., Parizeau, M., Mailhot, A., & Villeneuve, J.-P. (2008). Using Evolutionary Optimization Techniques for Scheduling Water Pipe Renewal Considering a Short Planning Horizon. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 23(8), 625-635. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2008.00564.xDuan, Q. Y., Gupta, V. K., & Sorooshian, S. (1993). Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 76(3), 501-521. doi:10.1007/bf00939380Duchesne, S., Beardsell, G., Villeneuve, J.-P., Toumbou, B., & Bouchard, K. (2012). A Survival Analysis Model for Sewer Pipe Structural Deterioration. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 28(2), 146-160. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00773.xDupont, G., Adam, S., Lecourtier, Y., & Grilheres, B. (2008). Multi objective particle swarm optimization using enhanced dominance and guide selection. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research, 4(2). doi:10.5019/j.ijcir.2008.134Fougères, A.-J., & Ostrosi, E. (2013). Fuzzy agent-based approach for consensual design synthesis in product configuration. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 20(3), 259-274. doi:10.3233/ica-130434Fuggini, C., Chatzi, E., & Zangani, D. (2012). Combining Genetic Algorithms with a Meso-Scale Approach for System Identification of a Smart Polymeric Textile. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 28(3), 227-245. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00789.xZong Woo Geem, Joong Hoon Kim, & Loganathan, G. V. (2001). A New Heuristic Optimization Algorithm: Harmony Search. SIMULATION, 76(2), 60-68. doi:10.1177/003754970107600201Giustolisi, O., Savic, D., & Kapelan, Z. (2008). Pressure-Driven Demand and Leakage Simulation for Water Distribution Networks. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134(5), 626-635. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2008)134:5(626)Goulter, I. C., & Bouchart, F. (1990). Reliability‐Constrained Pipe Network Model. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 116(2), 211-229. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1990)116:2(211)Goulter, I. C., & Coals, A. V. (1986). Quantitative Approaches to Reliability Assessment in Pipe Networks. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 112(3), 287-301. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(1986)112:3(287)Gupta, R., & Bhave, P. R. (1994). Reliability Analysis of Water‐Distribution Systems. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 120(2), 447-461. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(1994)120:2(447)Gutierrez-Garcia, J. O., & Sim, K. M. (2012). Agent-based cloud workflow execution. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 19(1), 39-56. doi:10.3233/ica-2012-0387Herrera, M., Izquierdo, J., Montalvo, I., García-Armengol, J., & Roig, J. V. (2009). Identification of surgical practice patterns using evolutionary cluster analysis. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 50(5-6), 705-712. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2008.12.026Hsiao, F.-Y., Wang, S.-H., Wang, W.-C., Wen, C.-P., & Yu, W.-D. (2012). Neuro-Fuzzy Cost Estimation Model Enhanced by Fast Messy Genetic Algorithms for Semiconductor Hookup Construction. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 27(10), 764-781. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00786.xIzquierdo , J. Minciardi , R. Montalvo , I. Robba , M. Tavera , M. 2008a Particle swarm optimization for the biomass supply chain strategic planning 1272 80Izquierdo , J. Montalvo , I. Herrera , M. Pérez-García , R. 2012 A general purpose non-linear optimization framework based on particle swarm optimizationIzquierdo, J., Montalvo, I., Pérez, R., & Fuertes, V. S. (2008). Design optimization of wastewater collection networks by PSO. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 56(3), 777-784. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2008.02.007Izquierdo, J., Montalvo, I., Pérez, R., & Fuertes, V. S. (2009). Forecasting pedestrian evacuation times by using swarm intelligence. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 388(7), 1213-1220. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2008.12.008Izquierdo , J. Montalvo , I. Pérez , R. Tavera , M. 2008b Optimization in water systems: a PSO approach 239 46Jafarkhani, R., & Masri, S. F. (2010). Finite Element Model Updating Using Evolutionary Strategy for Damage Detection. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 26(3), 207-224. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00687.xJanson, S., Merkle, D., & Middendorf, M. (2008). Molecular docking with multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 8(1), 666-675. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2007.05.005Kalungi, P., & Tanyimboh, T. T. (2003). Redundancy model for water distribution systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 82(3), 275-286. doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(03)00168-6Keedwell, E., & Khu, S.-T. (2006). Novel Cellular Automata Approach to Optimal Water Distribution Network Design. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 20(1), 49-56. doi:10.1061/(asce)0887-3801(2006)20:1(49)Kennedy , J. Eberhart , R. C. 1995 Particle swarm optimization 1942 48Khomsi, D., Walters, G. A., Thorley, A. R. D., & Ouazar, D. (1996). Reliability Tester for Water-Distribution Networks. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 10(1), 10-19. doi:10.1061/(asce)0887-3801(1996)10:1(10)KIM, H., & ADELI, H. (2001). DISCRETE COST OPTIMIZATION OF COMPOSITE FLOORS USING A FLOATING-POINT GENETIC ALGORITHM. Engineering Optimization, 33(4), 485-501. doi:10.1080/03052150108940930Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimization by Simulated Annealing. Science, 220(4598), 671-680. doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671Kleiner, Y., Adams, B. J., & Rogers, J. S. (2001). Water Distribution Network Renewal Planning. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 15(1), 15-26. doi:10.1061/(asce)0887-3801(2001)15:1(15)Martínez-Rodríguez, J. B., Montalvo, I., Izquierdo, J., & Pérez-García, R. (2011). Reliability and Tolerance Comparison in Water Supply Networks. Water Resources Management, 25(5), 1437-1448. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9753-2Montalvo Arango, I. (s. f.). Diseño óptimo de sistemas de distribución de agua mediante Agent Swarm Optimization. doi:10.4995/thesis/10251/14858Montalvo, I., Izquierdo, J., Pérez-García, R., & Herrera, M. (2010). Improved performance of PSO with self-adaptive parameters for computing the optimal design of Water Supply Systems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 23(5), 727-735. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2010.01.015Montalvo, I., Izquierdo, J., Pérez, R., & Iglesias, P. L. (2008). A diversity-enriched variant of discrete PSO applied to the design of water distribution networks. Engineering Optimization, 40(7), 655-668. doi:10.1080/03052150802010607Montalvo, I., Izquierdo, J., Pérez, R., & Tung, M. M. (2008). Particle Swarm Optimization applied to the design of water supply systems. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 56(3), 769-776. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2008.02.006Montalvo, I., Izquierdo, J., Schwarze, S., & Pérez-García, R. (2010). Multi-objective particle swarm optimization applied to water distribution systems design: An approach with human interaction. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 52(7-8), 1219-1227. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2010.02.017Moscato , P. 1989 On Evolution, Search, Optimization, Genetic Algorithms and Martial Arts: Towards Memetic AlgorithmsNejat, A., & Damnjanovic, I. (2012). Agent-Based Modeling of Behavioral Housing Recovery Following Disasters. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 27(10), 748-763. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00787.xPark, H., & Liebman, J. C. (1993). Redundancy‐Constrained Minimum‐Cost Design of Water‐Distribution Nets. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 119(1), 83-98. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(1993)119:1(83)Paya, I., Yepes, V., González-Vidosa, F., & Hospitaler, A. (2008). Multiobjective Optimization of Concrete Frames by Simulated Annealing. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 23(8), 596-610. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2008.00561.xPinto, T., Praça, I., Vale, Z., Morais, H., & Sousa, T. M. (2013). Strategic bidding in electricity markets: An agent-based simulator with game theory for scenario analysis. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 20(4), 335-346. doi:10.3233/ica-130438Putha, R., Quadrifoglio, L., & Zechman, E. (2011). Comparing Ant Colony Optimization and Genetic Algorithm Approaches for Solving Traffic Signal Coordination under Oversaturation Conditions. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 27(1), 14-28. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00715.xRaich, A. M., & Liszkai, T. R. (2011). Multi-objective Optimization of Sensor and Excitation Layouts for Frequency Response Function-Based Structural Damage Identification. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 27(2), 95-117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2011.00726.xRodríguez-Seda, E. J., Stipanović, D. M., & Spong, M. W. (2012). Teleoperation of multi-agent systems with nonuniform control input delays. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 19(2), 125-136. doi:10.3233/ica-2012-0396Saldarriaga , J. G. Bernal , A. Ochoa , S. 2008 Optimized design of water distribution network enlargements using resilience and dissipated power concepts 298 312Sarma, K. C., & Adeli, H. (2000). Fuzzy Genetic Algorithm for Optimization of Steel Structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 126(5), 596-604. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2000)126:5(596)Sgambi, L., Gkoumas, K., & Bontempi, F. (2012). Genetic Algorithms for the Dependability Assurance in the Design of a Long-Span Suspension Bridge. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 27(9), 655-675. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00780.xShafahi, Y., & Bagherian, M. (2012). A Customized Particle Swarm Method to Solve Highway Alignment Optimization Problem. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 28(1), 52-67. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00769.xTanyimboh, T. T., Tabesh, M., & Burrows, R. (2001). Appraisal of Source Head Methods for Calculating Reliability of Water Distribution Networks. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127(4), 206-213. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2001)127:4(206)Tao, H., Zain, J. M., Ahmed, M. M., Abdalla, A. N., & Jing, W. (2012). A wavelet-based particle swarm optimization algorithm for digital image watermarking. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 19(1), 81-91. doi:10.3233/ica-2012-0392Todini, E. (2000). Looped water distribution networks design using a resilience index based heuristic approach. Urban Water, 2(2), 115-122. doi:10.1016/s1462-0758(00)00049-2Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia, L. S., Walters, G. A., & Savic, D. A. (2005). Fuzzy Multiobjective Optimization of Water Distribution Networks. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 131(6), 467-476. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2005)131:6(467)Vitins, B. J., & Axhausen, K. W. (2009). Optimization of Large Transport Networks Using the Ant Colony Heuristic. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 24(1), 1-14. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2008.00569.xVrugt, J. A., Gupta, H. V., Bastidas, L. A., Bouten, W., & Sorooshian, S. (2003). Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models. Water Resources Research, 39(8). doi:10.1029/2002wr001746Vrugt, J. A., Ó Nualláin, B., Robinson, B. A., Bouten, W., Dekker, S. C., & Sloot, P. M. A. (2006). Application of parallel computing to stochastic parameter estimation in environmental models. Computers & Geosciences, 32(8), 1139-1155. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2005.10.015Vrugt , J. A. Robinson , B. A. 2007 Improved evolutionary search from genetically adaptive multi-search method 104 3 708 11Wu , Z. Y. Wang , R. H. Walski , T. M. Yang , S. Y. Bowdler , D. Baggett , C. C. 2006 Efficient pressure dependent demand model for large water distribution system analysisXie, C., & Waller, S. T. (2011). Optimal Routing with Multiple Objectives: Efficient Algorithm and Application to the Hazardous Materials Transportation Problem. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 27(2), 77-94. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2011.00720.xXu, C., & Goulter, I. C. (1999). Reliability-Based Optimal Design of Water Distribution Networks. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 125(6), 352-362. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(1999)125:6(352)Zeferino, J. A., Antunes, A. P., & Cunha, M. C. (2009). An Efficient Simulated Annealing Algorithm for Regional Wastewater System Planning. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 24(5), 359-370. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00594.