1,566 research outputs found

    Early Identification of Alzheimerโ€™s Disease Using Medical Imaging: A Review From a Machine Learning Approach Perspective

    Get PDF
    Alzheimerโ€™s disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia in aged adults, affecting up to 70% of the dementia patients, and posing a serious public health hazard in the twenty-first century. AD is a progressive, irreversible and neuro-degenerative disease with a long pre-clinical period, affecting brain cells leading to memory loss, misperception, learning problems, and improper decisions. Given its significance, presently no treatment options are available, although disease advancement can be retarded through medication. Unfortunately, AD is diagnosed at a very later stage, after irreversible damages to the brain cells have occurred, when there is no scope to prevent further cognitive decline. The use of non-invasive neuroimaging procedures capable of detecting AD at preliminary stages is crucial for providing treatment retarding disease progression, and has stood as a promising area of research. We conducted a comprehensive assessment of papers employing machine learning to predict AD using neuroimaging data. Most of the studies employed brain images from Alzheimerโ€™s disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI) dataset, consisting of magnetic resonance image (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) images. The most widely used method, the support vector machine (SVM), has a mean accuracy of 75.4 percent, whereas convolutional neural networks(CNN) have a mean accuracy of 78.5 percent. Better classification accuracy has been achieved by combining MRI and PET, rather using single neuroimaging technique. Overall, more complicated models, like deep learning, paired with multimodal and multidimensional data (neuroimaging, cognitive, clinical, behavioral and genetic) produced superlative results. However, promising results have been achieved, still there is a room for performance improvement of the proposed methods, providing assistance to healthcare professionals and clinician

    Alzheimers Disease Diagnosis by Deep Learning Using MRI-Based Approaches

    Full text link
    The most frequent kind of dementia of the nervous system, Alzheimer's disease, weakens several brain processes (such as memory) and eventually results in death. The clinical study uses magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose AD. Deep learning algorithms are capable of pattern recognition and feature extraction from the inputted raw data. As early diagnosis and stage detection are the most crucial elements in enhancing patient care and treatment outcomes, deep learning algorithms for MRI images have recently allowed for diagnosing a medical condition at the beginning stage and identifying particular symptoms of Alzheimer's disease. As a result, we aimed to analyze five specific studies focused on AD diagnosis using MRI-based deep learning algorithms between 2021 and 2023 in this study. To completely illustrate the differences between these techniques and comprehend how deep learning algorithms function, we attempted to explore selected approaches in depth

    ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ตฐ์ง‘ํ™” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ FDG PET์—์„œ ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ๋‡Œ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ํŒจํ„ด์˜ ํŠน์ง•์  ์•„ํ˜• ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์œตํ•ฉ๊ณผํ•™๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ๋ถ„์ž์˜ํ•™ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ”์ด์˜ค์ œ์•ฝํ•™๊ณผ, 2022.2. ์ด๋™์ˆ˜.์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์€ ์•„๋ฐ€๋กœ์ด๋“œ์™€ ํƒ€์šฐ ์นจ์ฐฉ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ณ‘๋ฆฌํ•™์  ํŠน์ง•์„ ๊ณต์œ ํ•จ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์ž„์ƒ๋ณ‘๋ฆฌํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ตฐ์ง‘ํ™” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ FDG PET ์˜์ƒ์—์„œ ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘ ํŠน์ง•์  ์•„ํ˜•์„ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ ํ‡ดํ–‰์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ๋‡Œ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ๋‡Œ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ํŒจํ„ด์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ •์˜๋œ ์•„ํ˜•์˜ ์ž„์ƒ๋ณ‘๋ฆฌํ•™์  ํŠน์ง•์„ ๋ฐํžˆ๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Alzheimerโ€™s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative(ADNI) ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ฒซ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธ ๋ฐ ์ถ”์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘, ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์• , ์ธ์ง€ ์ •์ƒ๊ตฐ์˜ ์ด 3620๊ฐœ์˜ FDG ๋‡Œ ์–‘์ „์ž๋‹จ์ธต์ดฌ์˜(PET) ์˜์ƒ์„ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์—์„œ ์งˆ๋ณ‘์˜ ์ง„ํ–‰ ์™ธ์˜ ๋‡Œ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ํ‘œํ˜„(representation)์„ ์ฐพ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์กฐ๊ฑด๋ถ€ ๋ณ€์ดํ˜• ์˜คํ† ์ธ์ฝ”๋”(conditional variational autoencoder)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉ๋œ ํ‘œํ˜„์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ตฐ์ง‘ํ™”(clustering)๋ฅผ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์˜ ๋‡Œ FDG PET (n=838)๊ณผ CDR-SB(Clinical Demetria Rating Scale Sum of Boxes) ์ ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ cVAE ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ž…๋ ฅ๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ตฐ์ง‘ํ™”์—๋Š” k-means ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ›ˆ๋ จ๋œ ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์• ๊ตฐ (n=1761)์˜ ๋‡Œ FDG PET์— ์ „์ด(transfer)๋˜์–ด ๊ฐ ์•„ํ˜•์˜ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ถค์ (trajectory)๊ณผ ์˜ˆํ›„๋ฅผ ๋ฐํžˆ๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์ง€๋„์ž‘์„ฑ๋ฒ•(Statistical Parametric Mapping, SPM)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ ๊ตฐ์ง‘์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ํŒจํ„ด์„ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™” ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฐ ๊ตฐ์ง‘์˜ ์ž„์ƒ์  ๋ฐ ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ํŠน์ง•์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์•„ํ˜• ๋ณ„ ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์• ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์œผ๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜๋˜๋Š” ๋น„์œจ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ตฐ์ง‘ํ™” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ 4๊ฐœ์˜ ํŠน์ง•์  ์•„ํ˜•์ด ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. (i) S1 (angular): ๋ชจ์ด๋ž‘(angular gyrus)์—์„œ ํ˜„์ €ํ•œ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ๋œ ํ”ผ์งˆ์˜ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ์ €ํ•˜ ํŒจํ„ด, ๋‚จ์„ฑ์—์„œ ๋นˆ๋„ ๋†’์Œ, ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์•„๋ฐ€๋กœ์ด๋“œ ์นจ์ฐฉ, ๋” ์ ์€ ํƒ€์šฐ ์นจ์ฐฉ, ๋” ์‹ฌํ•œ ํ•ด๋งˆ ์œ„์ถ•, ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์˜ ์ธ์ง€ ์ €ํ•˜์˜ ํŠน์ง•์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. (ii) S2 (occipital): ํ›„๋‘์—ฝ(occipital) ํ”ผ์งˆ์—์„œ ํ˜„์ €ํ•œ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ ํ›„๋ถ€ ์šฐ์„ธํ•œ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ์ €ํ•˜ ํŒจํ„ด, ๋” ์ ์€ ์—ฐ๋ น, ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ํƒ€์šฐ, ๋” ์ ์€ ํ•ด๋งˆ ์œ„์ถ•, ๋” ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ง‘ํ–‰ ๋ฐ ์‹œ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ ์ˆ˜, ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์• ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์œผ๋กœ์˜ ๋น ๋ฅธ ์ „ํ™˜์˜ ํŠน์ง•์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. (iii) S3(orbitofrontal): ์•ˆ์™€์ „๋‘(orbitofrontal) ํ”ผ์งˆ์—์„œ ํ˜„์ €ํ•œ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ ์ „๋ฐฉ ์šฐ์„ธํ•œ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ์ €ํ•˜ ํŒจํ„ด, ๋” ๋†’์€ ์—ฐ๋ น, ๋” ์ ์€ ์•„๋ฐ€๋กœ์ด๋“œ ์นจ์ฐฉ, ๋” ์‹ฌํ•œ ํ•ด๋งˆ ์œ„์ถ•, ๋” ๋†’์€ ์ง‘ํ–‰ ๋ฐ ์‹œ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ ์ˆ˜์˜ ํŠน์ง•์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. (iv) S4(minimal): ์ตœ์†Œ์˜ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ž„, ์—ฌ์„ฑ์—์„œ ๋นˆ๋„ ๋†’์Œ, ๋” ์ ์€ ์•„๋ฐ€๋กœ์ด๋“œ ์นจ์ฐฉ, ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ํƒ€์šฐ ์นจ์ฐฉ, ๋” ์ ์€ ํ•ด๋งˆ ์œ„์ถ•, ๋” ๋†’์€ ์ธ์ง€๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ์ ์ˆ˜์˜ ํŠน์ง•์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋‡Œ ๋ณ‘๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ์ž„์ƒ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์˜ ํŠน์ง•์  ์•„ํ˜•์„ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์• ๊ตฐ์— ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ „์ด๋˜์–ด ์•„ํ˜• ๋ณ„ ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์• ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์œผ๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜๋˜๋Š” ์˜ˆํ›„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” FDG PET์—์„œ ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์˜ ํŠน์ง•์  ์•„ํ˜•์€ ๊ฐœ์ธ์˜ ์ž„์ƒ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ , ๋ณ‘ํƒœ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์˜ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์ŠคํŽ™ํŠธ๋Ÿผ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋‹จ์„œ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค.Alzheimerโ€™s disease (AD) presents a broad spectrum of clinicopathologic profiles, despite common pathologic features including amyloid and tau deposition. Here, we aimed to identify AD subtypes using deep learning-based clustering on FDG PET images to understand distinct spatial patterns of neurodegeneration. We also aimed to investigate clinicopathologic features of subtypes defined by spatial brain metabolism patterns. A total of 3620 FDG brain PET images with AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and cognitively normal controls (CN) at baseline and follow-up visits were obtained from Alzheimerโ€™s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. In order to identify representations of brain metabolism patterns different from disease progression in AD, a conditional variational autoencoder (cVAE) was used, followed by clustering using the encoded representations. FDG brain PET images with AD (n=838) and Clinical Demetria Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) scores were used as inputs of cVAE model and the k-means algorithm was applied for the clustering. The trained deep learning model was also transferred to FDG brain PET image with MCI (n=1761) to identify differential trajectories and prognosis of subtypes. Statistical parametric maps were generated to visualize spatial patterns of clusters, and clinical and biological characteristics were compared among the clusters. The conversion rate from MCI to AD was also compared among the subtypes. Four distinct subtypes were identified by deep learning-based FDG PET clusters: (i) S1 (angular), showing prominent hypometabolism in the angular gyrus with a diffuse cortical hypometabolism pattern; frequent in males; more amyloid; less tau; more hippocampal atrophy; cognitive decline in the earlier stage. (ii) S2 (occipital), showing prominent hypometabolism in the occipital cortex with a posterior-predominant hypometabolism pattern; younger age; more tau; less hippocampal atrophy; lower executive and visuospatial scores; faster conversion from MCI to AD. (iii) S3 (orbitofrontal), showing prominent hypometabolism in the orbitofrontal cortex with an anterior-predominant hypometabolism pattern; older age; less amyloid; more hippocampal atrophy; higher executive and visuospatial scores. (iv) S4 (minimal), showing minimal hypometabolism; frequent in females; less amyloid; more tau; less hippocampal atrophy; higher cognitive scores. In conclusion, we could identify distinct subtypes in AD with different brain pathologies and clinical profiles. Also, our deep learning model was successfully transferred to MCI to predict the prognosis of subtypes for conversion from MCI to AD. Our results suggest that distinct AD subtypes on FDG PET may have implications for the individual clinical outcomes and provide a clue to understanding a broad spectrum of AD in terms of pathophysiology.1. Introduction 1 1.1 Heterogeneity of Alzheimer's disease 1 1.2 FDG PET as a biomarker of Alzheimer's disease 1 1.3 Biologic subtypes of Alzheimer's disease 2 1.4 Dimensionality reduction methods 5 1.5 Variational autoencoder for clustering 8 1.6 Final goal of the study 10 2. Methods 11 2.1 Subjects 11 2.2 FDG PET data acquisition and preprocessing 12 2.3 Deep learning-based model for representations of FDG PET in AD 12 2.4 Clustering method for AD subtypes on FDG PET 17 2.5 Transfer of deep learning-based FDG PET cluster model for MCI subtypes 17 2.6 Visualization of subtype-specific spatial brain metabolism pattern 21 2.7 Clinical and biological characterization 21 2.8 Prognosis prediction of MCI subtypes 22 2.9 Generation of subtype-specific FDG PET images 22 2.10 Statistical analysis 23 3. Results 24 3.1 Deep learning-based FDG PET clusters 24 3.2 Spatial brain metabolism pattern in AD subtypes 27 3.3 Clinical and biological characterization in AD subtypes 32 3.4 Subtype-specific spatial metabolism patterns resemble in MCI 43 3.5 Clinical and biological characterization in MCI subtypes 50 3.6 Prognosis prediction of subtypes for conversion from MCI to AD 56 3.7 Generating FDG PET images of AD subtypes 61 4. Discussion 66 4.1 Limitations of previous subtyping approach 68 4.2 Interpretation of results 68 4.3 Strength of our deep learning-based clustering approach 73 4.4 Strength of our deep learning-based AD subtypes 77 4.5 Limitations and future directions 82 5. Conclusion 83 References 84 Supplementary Figures 99 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ ์ดˆ๋ก 101๋ฐ•

    Alzheimer's Disease: A Survey

    Get PDF
    Alzheimer's Diseases (AD) is one of the type of dementia. This is one of the harmful disease which can lead to death and yet there is no treatment. There is no current technique which is 100% accurate for the treatment of this disease. In recent years, Neuroimaging combined with machine learning techniques have been used for detection of Alzheimer's disease. Based on our survey we came across many methods like Convolution Neural Network (CNN) where in each brain area is been split into small three dimensional patches which acts as input samples for CNN. The other method used was Deep Neural Networks (DNN) where the brain MRI images are segmented to extract the brain chambers and then features are extracted from the segmented area. There are many such methods which can be used for detection of Alzheimerโ€™s Disease

    A study on the specificity of the association between hippocampal volume and delayed primacy performance in cognitively intact elderly individuals.

    Get PDF
    Delayed recall at the primacy position (first few items on a list) has been shown to predict cognitive decline in cognitively intact elderly participants, with poorer delayed primacy performance associated with more pronounced generalized cognitive decline during follow-up. We have previously suggested that this association is due to delayed primacy performance indexing memory consolidation, which in turn is thought to depend upon hippocampal function. Here, we test the hypothesis that hippocampal size is associated with delayed primacy performance in cognitively intact elderly individuals. Data were analyzed from a group (N=81) of cognitively intact participants, aged 60 or above. Serial position performance was measured with the Buschke selective reminding test (BSRT). Hippocampal size was automatically measured via MRI, and unbiased voxel-based analyses were also conducted to explore further regional specificity of memory performance. We conducted regression analyses of hippocampus volumes on serial position performance; other predictors included age, family history of Alzheimer's disease (AD), APOE ฮต4 status, education, and total intracranial volume. Our results collectively suggest that there is a preferential association between hippocampal volume and delayed primacy performance. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that delayed primacy consolidation is associated with hippocampal size, and shed light on the relationship between delayed primacy performance and generalized cognitive decline in cognitively intact individuals, suggesting that delayed primacy consolidation may serve as a sensitive marker of hippocampal health in these individuals
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore