857 research outputs found
Blind deconvolution of medical ultrasound images: parametric inverse filtering approach
©2007 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or distribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE. This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2007.910179The problem of reconstruction of ultrasound images by means of blind deconvolution has long been recognized as one of the central problems in medical ultrasound imaging. In this paper, this problem is addressed via proposing a blind deconvolution method which is innovative in several ways. In particular, the method is based on parametric inverse filtering, whose parameters are optimized using two-stage processing. At the first stage, some partial information on the point spread function is recovered. Subsequently, this information is used to explicitly constrain the spectral shape of the inverse filter. From this perspective, the proposed methodology can be viewed as a ldquohybridizationrdquo of two standard strategies in blind deconvolution, which are based on either concurrent or successive estimation of the point spread function and the image of interest. Moreover, evidence is provided that the ldquohybridrdquo approach can outperform the standard ones in a number of important practical cases. Additionally, the present study introduces a different approach to parameterizing the inverse filter. Specifically, we propose to model the inverse transfer function as a member of a principal shift-invariant subspace. It is shown that such a parameterization results in considerably more stable reconstructions as compared to standard parameterization methods. Finally, it is shown how the inverse filters designed in this way can be used to deconvolve the images in a nonblind manner so as to further improve their quality. The usefulness and practicability of all the introduced innovations are proven in a series of both in silico and in vivo experiments. Finally, it is shown that the proposed deconvolution algorithms are capable of improving the resolution of ultrasound images by factors of 2.24 or 6.52 (as judged by the autocorrelation criterion) depending on the type of regularization method used
Solving Inverse Problems with Piecewise Linear Estimators: From Gaussian Mixture Models to Structured Sparsity
A general framework for solving image inverse problems is introduced in this
paper. The approach is based on Gaussian mixture models, estimated via a
computationally efficient MAP-EM algorithm. A dual mathematical interpretation
of the proposed framework with structured sparse estimation is described, which
shows that the resulting piecewise linear estimate stabilizes the estimation
when compared to traditional sparse inverse problem techniques. This
interpretation also suggests an effective dictionary motivated initialization
for the MAP-EM algorithm. We demonstrate that in a number of image inverse
problems, including inpainting, zooming, and deblurring, the same algorithm
produces either equal, often significantly better, or very small margin worse
results than the best published ones, at a lower computational cost.Comment: 30 page
A mathematical and numerical framework for ultrasonically-induced Lorentz force electrical impedance tomography
We provide a mathematical analysis and a numerical framework for Lorentz
force electrical conductivity imaging. Ultrasonic vibration of a tissue in the
presence of a static magnetic field induces an electrical current by the
Lorentz force. This current can be detected by electrodes placed around the
tissue; it is proportional to the velocity of the ultrasonic pulse, but depends
nonlinearly on the conductivity distribution. The imaging problem is to
reconstruct the conductivity distribution from measurements of the induced
current. To solve this nonlinear inverse problem, we first make use of a
virtual potential to relate explicitly the current measurements to the
conductivity distribution and the velocity of the ultrasonic pulse. Then, by
applying a Wiener filter to the measured data, we reduce the problem to imaging
the conductivity from an internal electric current density. We first introduce
an optimal control method for solving such a problem. A new direct
reconstruction scheme involving a partial differential equation is then
proposed based on viscosity-type regularization to a transport equation
satisfied by the current density field. We prove that solving such an equation
yields the true conductivity distribution as the regularization parameter
approaches zero. We also test both schemes numerically in the presence of
measurement noise, quantify their stability and resolution, and compare their
performance
Data Unfolding with Wiener-SVD Method
Data unfolding is a common analysis technique used in HEP data analysis.
Inspired by the deconvolution technique in the digital signal processing, a new
unfolding technique based on the SVD technique and the well-known Wiener filter
is introduced. The Wiener-SVD unfolding approach achieves the unfolding by
maximizing the signal to noise ratios in the effective frequency domain given
expectations of signal and noise and is free from regularization parameter.
Through a couple examples, the pros and cons of the Wiener-SVD approach as well
as the nature of the unfolded results are discussed.Comment: 26 pages, 12 figures, match the accepted version by JINS
Recent Progress in Image Deblurring
This paper comprehensively reviews the recent development of image
deblurring, including non-blind/blind, spatially invariant/variant deblurring
techniques. Indeed, these techniques share the same objective of inferring a
latent sharp image from one or several corresponding blurry images, while the
blind deblurring techniques are also required to derive an accurate blur
kernel. Considering the critical role of image restoration in modern imaging
systems to provide high-quality images under complex environments such as
motion, undesirable lighting conditions, and imperfect system components, image
deblurring has attracted growing attention in recent years. From the viewpoint
of how to handle the ill-posedness which is a crucial issue in deblurring
tasks, existing methods can be grouped into five categories: Bayesian inference
framework, variational methods, sparse representation-based methods,
homography-based modeling, and region-based methods. In spite of achieving a
certain level of development, image deblurring, especially the blind case, is
limited in its success by complex application conditions which make the blur
kernel hard to obtain and be spatially variant. We provide a holistic
understanding and deep insight into image deblurring in this review. An
analysis of the empirical evidence for representative methods, practical
issues, as well as a discussion of promising future directions are also
presented.Comment: 53 pages, 17 figure
Image Restoration Techniques Using Fusion to Remove Motion Blur
Restoration techniques are oriented towards modelling the degradation and applying inverse process to recover the original image. The image gets blurred due to relative motion between object and detector (Motion Blur), and/or improperly focused image capturing device. This work presents a comparison of different image restoration process where, different filtering method are used with RL-Deconvolutionfor different applications. The proposed approach combines two different restoration method by using DWT
Weak Lensing Mass Reconstruction using Wavelets
This paper presents a new method for the reconstruction of weak lensing mass
maps. It uses the multiscale entropy concept, which is based on wavelets, and
the False Discovery Rate which allows us to derive robust detection levels in
wavelet space. We show that this new restoration approach outperforms several
standard techniques currently used for weak shear mass reconstruction. This
method can also be used to separate E and B modes in the shear field, and thus
test for the presence of residual systematic effects. We concentrate on large
blind cosmic shear surveys, and illustrate our results using simulated shear
maps derived from N-Body Lambda-CDM simulations with added noise corresponding
to both ground-based and space-based observations.Comment: Accepted manuscript with all figures can be downloaded at:
http://jstarck.free.fr/aa_wlens05.pdf and software can be downloaded at
http://jstarck.free.fr/mrlens.htm
Self-correcting multi-channel Bussgang blind deconvolution using expectation maximization (EM) algorithm and feedback
A Bussgang based blind deconvolution algorithm called self-correcting multi-channel Bussgang (SCMB) blind deconvolution algorithm was proposed. Unlike the original Bussgang blind deconvolution algorithm where the probability density function (pdf) of the signal being recovered is assumed to be completely known, the proposed SCMB blind deconvolution algorithm relaxes this restriction by parameterized the pdf with a Gaussian mixture model and expectation maximization (EM) algorithm, an iterative maximum likelihood approach, is employed to estimate the parameter side by side with the estimation of the equalization filters of the original Bussgang blind deconvolution algorithm. A feedback loop is also designed to compensate the effect of the parameter estimation error on the estimation of the equalization filters. Application of the SCMB blind deconvolution framework for binary image restoration, multi-pass synthetic aperture radar (SAR) autofocus and inverse synthetic aperture radar (ISAR) autofocus are exploited with great results.Ph.D.Committee Chair: Dr. Russell Mersereau; Committee Member: Dr. Doug Willams; Committee Member: Dr. Mark Richards; Committee Member: Dr. Xiaoming Huo; Committee Member: Dr. Ye (Geoffrey) L
- âŠ