LPWAN Technologies: Emerging Application Characteristics, Requirements, and Design Considerations

Low power wide area network (LPWAN) is a promising solution for long range and low power Internet of Things (IoT) and machine to machine (M2M) communication applications. This paper focuses on defining a systematic and powerful approach of identifying the key characteristics of such applications, translating them into explicit requirements, and then deriving the associated design considerations. LPWANs are resource-constrained networks and are primarily characterized by long battery life operation, extended coverage, high capacity, and low device and deployment costs. These characteristics translate into a key set of requirements including M2M traffic management, massive capacity, energy efficiency, low power operations, extended coverage, security, and interworking. The set of corresponding design considerations is identified in terms of two categories, desired or expected ones and enhanced ones, which reflect the wide range of characteristics associated with LPWAN-based applications. Prominent design constructs include admission and user traffic management, interference management, energy saving modes of operation, lightweight media access control (MAC) protocols, accurate location identification, security coverage techniques, and flexible software re-configurability. Topological and architectural options for interconnecting LPWAN entities are discussed. The major proprietary and standards-based LPWAN technology solutions available in the marketplace are presented. These include Sigfox, LoRaWAN, Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT), and long term evolution (LTE)-M, among others. The relevance of upcoming cellular 5G technology and its complementary relationship with LPWAN technology are also discussed

Internet of Things-aided Smart Grid: Technologies, Architectures, Applications, Prototypes, and Future Research Directions

Traditional power grids are being transformed into Smart Grids (SGs) to address the issues in existing power system due to uni-directional information flow, energy wastage, growing energy demand, reliability and security. SGs offer bi-directional energy flow between service providers and consumers, involving power generation, transmission, distribution and utilization systems. SGs employ various devices for the monitoring, analysis and control of the grid, deployed at power plants, distribution centers and in consumers' premises in a very large number. Hence, an SG requires connectivity, automation and the tracking of such devices. This is achieved with the help of Internet of Things (IoT). IoT helps SG systems to support various network functions throughout the generation, transmission, distribution and consumption of energy by incorporating IoT devices (such as sensors, actuators and smart meters), as well as by providing the connectivity, automation and tracking for such devices. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive survey on IoT-aided SG systems, which includes the existing architectures, applications and prototypes of IoT-aided SG systems. This survey also highlights the open issues, challenges and future research directions for IoT-aided SG systems

ACUTA Journal of Telecommunications in Higher Education

In This Issue New Bandwidth Boosts Opportunities at the University of ldaho Colleges Meld Data Functionality to Afford Larger, Better Facilities Focusing on Video Demands Wireless Optical Mesh Networking Wireless LANs for Voice Delivering Broadband over Power Lines The Real lmpact of Napster ACUTA Awards Presentations Interview President\u27s Message From the Executive Director Here\u27s My Advic

Design and evaluation of a self-configuring wireless mesh network architecture

Wireless network connectivity plays an increasingly important role in supporting our everyday private and professional lives. For over three decades, self-organizing wireless multi-hop ad-hoc networks have been investigated as a decentralized replacement for the traditional forms of wireless networks that rely on a wired infrastructure. However, despite the tremendous efforts of the international wireless research community and widespread availability of devices that are able to support these networks, wireless ad-hoc networks are hardly ever used. In this work, the reasons behind this discrepancy are investigated. It is found that several basic theoretical assumptions on ad-hoc networks prove to be wrong when solutions are deployed in reality, and that several basic functionalities are still missing. It is argued that a hierarchical wireless mesh network architecture, in which specialized, multi-interfaced mesh nodes form a reliable multi-hop wireless backbone for the less capable end-user clients is an essential step in bringing the ad-hoc networking concept one step closer to reality. Therefore, in a second part of this work, algorithms increasing the reliability and supporting the deployment and management of these wireless mesh networks are developed, implemented and evaluated, while keeping the observed limitations and practical considerations in mind. Furthermore, the feasibility of the algorithms is verified by experiment. The performance analysis of these protocols and the ability to deploy the developed algorithms on current generation off-the-shelf hardware indicates the successfulness of the followed research approach, which combines theoretical considerations with practical implementations and observations. However, it was found that there are also many pitfalls to using real-life implementation as a research technique. Therefore, in the last part of this work, a methodology for wireless network research using real-life implementation is developed, allowing researchers to generate more reliable protocols and performance analysis results with less effort

Application acceleration for wireless and mobile data networks

This work studies application acceleration for wireless and mobile data networks. The problem of accelerating application can be addressed along multiple dimensions. The first dimension is advanced network protocol design, i.e., optimizing underlying network protocols, particulary transport layer protocol and link layer protocol. Despite advanced network protocol design, in this work we observe that certain application behaviors can fundamentally limit the performance achievable when operating over wireless and mobile data networks. The performance difference is caused by the complex application behaviors of these non-FTP applications. Explicitly dealing with application behaviors can improve application performance for new environments. Along this overcoming application behavior dimension, we accelerate applications by studying specific types of applications including Client-server, Peer-to-peer and Location-based applications. In exploring along this dimension, we identify a set of application behaviors that significantly affect application performance. To accommodate these application behaviors, we firstly extract general design principles that can apply to any applications whenever possible. These design principles can also be integrated into new application designs. We also consider specific applications by applying these design principles and build prototypes to demonstrate the effectiveness of the solutions. In the context of application acceleration, even though all the challenges belong to the two aforementioned dimensions of advanced network protocol design and overcoming application behavior are addressed, application performance can still be limited by the underlying network capability, particularly physical bandwidth. In this work, we study the possibility of speeding up data delivery by eliminating traffic redundancy present in application traffics. Specifically, we first study the traffic redundancy along multiple dimensions using traces obtained from multiple real wireless network deployments. Based on the insights obtained from the analysis, we propose Wireless Memory (WM), a two-ended AP-client solution to effectively exploit traffic redundancy in wireless and mobile environments. Application acceleration can be achieved along two other dimensions: network provision ing and quality of service (QoS). Network provisioning allocates network resources such as physical bandwidth or wireless spectrum, while QoS provides different priority to different applications, users, or data flows. These two dimensions have their respective limitations in the context of application acceleration. In this work, we focus on the two dimensions of overcoming application behavior and Eliminating traffic redundancy to improve application performance. The contribution of this work is as follows. First, we study the problem of application acceleration for wireless and mobile data networks, and we characterize the dimensions along which to address the problem. Second, we identify that application behaviors can significantly affect application performance, and we propose a set of design principles to deal with the behaviors. We also build prototypes to conduct system research. Third, we consider traffic redundancy elimination and propose a wireless memory approach.Ph.D.Committee Chair: Sivakumar, Raghupathy; Committee Member: Ammar, Mostafa; Committee Member: Fekri, Faramarz; Committee Member: Ji, Chuanyi; Committee Member: Ramachandran, Umakishor

A group-based architecture and protocol for wireless sensor networks

There are many works related to wireless sensor networks (WSNs) where authors present new protocols with better or enhanced features, others just compare their performance or present an application, but this work tries to provide a different perspective. Why don¿t we see the network as a whole and split it into groups to give better network performance regardless of the routing protocol? For this reason, in this thesis we demonstrate through simulations that node¿s grouping feature in WSN improves the network¿s behavior. We propose the creation of a group-based architecture, where nodes have the same functionality within the network. Each group has a head node, which defines the area in which the nodes of such group are located. Each node has a unique node identifier (nodeID). First group¿s node makes a group identifier (groupID). New nodes will know their groupID and nodeID of their neighbors. End nodes are, physically, the nodes that define a group. When there is an event on a node, this event is sent to all nodes in its group in order to take an appropriate action. End nodes have connections to other end nodes of neighboring groups and they will be used to send data to other groups or to receive information from other groups and to distribute it within their group. Links between end nodes of different groups are established mainly depending on their position, but if there are multiple possibilities, neighbor nodes could be selected based on their ability ¿, being ¿ a choice parameter taking into account several network and nodes parameters. In order to set group¿s boundaries, we can consider two options, namely: i) limiting the group¿s diameter of a maximum number of hops, and ii) establishing boundaries of covered area. In order to improve the proposed group-based architecture, we add collaboration between groups. A collaborative group-based network gives better performance to the group and to the whole system, thereby avoiding unnecessary message forwarding and additional overheads while saving energy. Grouping nodes also diminishes the average network delay while allowing scaling the network considerably. In order to offer an optimized monitoring process, and in order to offer the best reply in particular environments, group-based collaborative systems are needed. They will simplify the monitoring needs while offering direct control. Finally, we propose a marine application where a variant of this groupbased architecture could be applied and deployed.García Pineda, M. (2013). A group-based architecture and protocol for wireless sensor networks [Tesis doctoral]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/27599TESISPremios Extraordinarios de tesis doctorale

Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, 2014, nr 3

kwartalni

Saving Energy and Improving Communications using Cooperative Group-based Wireless Sensor Networks

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) can be used in many real applications (environmental monitoring, habitat monitoring, health, etc.). The energy consumption of each sensor should be as lower as possible, and methods for grouping nodes can improve the network performance. In this work, we show how organizing sensors in cooperative groups can reduce the global energy consumption of the WSN. We will also show that a cooperative group-based network reduces the number of the messages transmitted inside the WSNs, which implieasa reduction of energy consumed by the whole network, and, consequently, an increase of the network lifetime. The simulations will show how the number of groups improves the network performance. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.García Pineda, M.; Sendra Compte, S.; Lloret, J.; Canovas Solbes, A. (2013). Saving Energy and Improving Communications using Cooperative Group-based Wireless Sensor Networks. Telecommunication Systems. 52(4):2489-2502. doi:10.1007/s11235-011-9568-3S24892502524Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Journal of Computer Networks, 38(4), 393–422.Garcia, M., Bri, D., Sendra, S., & Lloret, J. (2010). Practical deployments of wireless sensor networks: a survey. Journal on Advances in Networks and Services, 3(1&2), 1–16.Lloret, J., Garcia, M., Bri, D., & Sendra, S. (2009). A wireless sensor network deployment for rural and forest fire detection and verification. Sensors, 9(11), 8722–8747.Mainwaring, A., Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., & Culler, D. (2002). Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring. In ACM workshop on sensor networks and applications (WSNA’02), Atlanta, GA, USA, September.Garcia, M., Sendra, S., Lloret, G., & Lloret, J. (2010, in press). Monitoring and control sensor system for fish feeding in marine fish farms. IET Communications, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1049/iet-com.2010.0654 .Sinha, A., & Chandrakasan, A. (2001). Dynamic power management in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Design & Test of Computers, 18(2), 62–74.Garcia, M., Coll, H., Bri, D., & Lloret, J. (2008). Using MANET protocols in wireless sensor and actor networks. In The second international conference on sensor technologies and applications (SENSORCOMM 2008), Cap Esterel, Costa Azul, France, 25–31 August.Lloret, J., García, M., Boronat, F., & Tomás, J. (2008). MANET protocols performance in group-based networks. In Wireless and mobile networking: Vol. 284 (Chap. 13, pp. 161–172). Berlin, Heidelberg, Boston: Springer.Lloret, J., García, M., & Tomás, J. (2008). Improving mobile and ad-hoc networks performance using group-based topologies. In Wireless sensor and actor networks 2008 (WSAN 2008), Ottawa, Canada, 14–15 July. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.Lloret, J., Palau, C., Boronat, F., & Tomas, J. (2008). Improving networks using group-based topologies. Journal of Computer Communications, 31(14), 3438–3450.Lloret, J., Garcia, M., Tomás, J., & Boronat, F. (2008). GBP-WAHSN: a group-based protocol for large wireless ad hoc and sensor networks. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 23(3), 461–480.Lloret, J., García, M., Boronat, F., & Tomás, J. (2008). MANET protocols performance in group-based networks. In 10th IFIP international conference on mobile and wireless communications networks (MWCN 2008), Toulouse, France, 30 September–2 October.Garcia, M., Sendra, S., Lloret, J., & Lacuesta, R. (2010). Saving energy with cooperative group-based wireless sensor networks. In LNCS: Vol. 6240. Cooperative design, visualization, and engineering: CDVE 2010 (pp. 231–238), September. Berlin: Springer.Lloret, J., Sendra, S., Coll, H., & García, M. (2010). Saving energy in wireless local area sensor networks. Computer Journal, 53(10), 1658–1673.Meiyappan, S. S., Frederiks, G., & Hahn, S. (2006). Dynamic power save techniques for next generation WLAN systems. In Proceedings of the 38th southeastern symposium on system theory (SSST), Cookeville, Tennessee, USA, 5–7 March.Raghunathan, V., Schurgers, C., Park, S., & Srivastava, M. (2002). Energy aware wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 19(2), 40–50.Min, R., Bhardwaj, M., Cho, S.-H., Shih, E., Sinha, A., Wang, A., & Chandrakasan, A. (2001). Low power wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of international conference on VLSI design, India, Bangalore, 3–7 January.Salhieh, A., Weinmann, J., Kochha, M., & Schwiebert, L. (2001). Power efficient topologies for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on parallel processing (pp. 156–163), 3–7 September.Jayashree, S., Manoj, B. S., & Murthy, C. S. R. (2004). A battery aware medium access control (BAMAC) protocol for Ad-hoc wireless network. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications (PIMRC 2004), Barcelona, Spain, 5–8 September (Vol. 2, pp. 995–999).Ye, W., Heidemann, J., & Estrin, D. (2002). An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2002, the 21st annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies, New York, USA, 23–27 June.Ching, C., & Schindelhauer, C. (2010). Utilizing detours for energy conservation in mobile wireless networks. Journal of Telecommunication Systems. doi: 10.1007/s11235-009-9188-3 .Gao, Q., Blow, K., Holding, D., Marshall, I., & Peng, X. (2004). Radio range adjustment for energy efficient wireless sensor networks. Journal of Ad Hoc Networks, 4(1), 75–82.Li, D., Jia, X., & Liu, H. (2004). Energy efficient broadcast routing in static ad hoc wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 3(1), 1–8.Camilo, T., Carreto, C., Silva, J., & Boavida, F. (2006). An energy-efficient ant-based routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 4150. Ant colony optimization and swarm intelligence (pp. 49–59). Berlin: Springer.Younis, M., Youssef, M., & Arisha, K. (2002). Energy-aware routing in cluster-based sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE international symposium on modeling, analysis, and simulation of computer and telecommunications systems (MASCOTS ’02) (pp. 129–136). Washington: IEEE Computer Society.Cheng, Z., Perillo, M., & Heinzelman, W. B. (2008). General network lifetime and cost models for evaluating sensor network deployment strategies. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 7(4), 484–497.Heo, N., & Varshney, P. K. (2005). Energy-efficient deployment of intelligent mobile sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part A Systems and Humans, 35(1), 78–92.Vlajic, N., & Xia, D. (2006). Wireless sensor networks: to cluster or not to cluster? In International symposium on a world of wireless, mobile and multimedia networks, WoWMoM 2006.Garcia, M., & Lloret, J. (2009). A cooperative group-based sensor network for environmental monitoring. In LNCS: Vol. 5738. Cooperative design, visualization, and engineering: CDVE 2009. (pp. 276–279). Berlin: Springer.Garcia, M., Bri, D., Boronat, F., & Lloret, J. (2008). A new neighbour selection strategy for group-based wireless sensor networks. In 4th int. conf. on networking and services, ICNS 2008. 16–21 March (pp. 109–114).Kaplan, E. D. (1996). Understanding GPS: principles and applications. Boston: Artech House.Stojmenovic, I. (2002). Position based routing in ad hoc networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(7), 128–134.Heinzelman, W. B., Chandrakasan, A. P., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660–670.Bhardwaj, M., Garnett, T., & Chandrakasan, A. P. (2001). Upper bounds on the lifetime of sensor networks. In: International conference on communications (ICC’01). June 2001 (pp. 785–790).Gibbons, A. (1985). Algorithmic graph theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Fraigniaud, P., Pelc, A., Peleg, D., & Perennes, S. (2000). Assigning labels in unknown anonymous networks. In Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on principles of distributed computing, Portland, OR, USA (Vol. 1, pp. 101–111).OPNET Modeler® Wireless Suite network simulator (2011). Available at http://www.opnet.com/solutions/network_rd/modeler_wireless.html