14,746 research outputs found
Full abstraction for fair testing in CCS
In previous work with Pous, we defined a semantics for CCS which may both be
viewed as an innocent presheaf semantics and as a concurrent game semantics. It
is here proved that a behavioural equivalence induced by this semantics on CCS
processes is fully abstract for fair testing equivalence. The proof relies on a
new algebraic notion called playground, which represents the 'rule of the
game'. From any playground, two languages, equipped with labelled transition
systems, are derived, as well as a strong, functional bisimulation between
them.Comment: 15 pages, to appear in CALCO '13. To appear Lecture notes in computer
science (2013
A graph semantics for a variant of the ambient calculus more adequate for modeling SOC
In this paper we present a graph semantics of a variant of the well known ambient calculus. The main change of our variant is to extract the mobility commands of the original calculus from the ambient topology. Similar to a previous work of ours, we prove that our encoding have good properties. We strongly believe that this variant would allow us to integrate our graph semantics of our mobile calculus with previous work of us in service oriented computing (SOC). Basically, our work on SOC develops a new graph transformation system which we call temporal symbolic graphs. This new graph formalism is used to give semantics to a design language for SOC developed in an european
project, but it could also be used in connection with other approaches for modeling or specifying service systems.Postprint (published version
Towards Practical Graph-Based Verification for an Object-Oriented Concurrency Model
To harness the power of multi-core and distributed platforms, and to make the
development of concurrent software more accessible to software engineers,
different object-oriented concurrency models such as SCOOP have been proposed.
Despite the practical importance of analysing SCOOP programs, there are
currently no general verification approaches that operate directly on program
code without additional annotations. One reason for this is the multitude of
partially conflicting semantic formalisations for SCOOP (either in theory or
by-implementation). Here, we propose a simple graph transformation system (GTS)
based run-time semantics for SCOOP that grasps the most common features of all
known semantics of the language. This run-time model is implemented in the
state-of-the-art GTS tool GROOVE, which allows us to simulate, analyse, and
verify a subset of SCOOP programs with respect to deadlocks and other
behavioural properties. Besides proposing the first approach to verify SCOOP
programs by automatic translation to GTS, we also highlight our experiences of
applying GTS (and especially GROOVE) for specifying semantics in the form of a
run-time model, which should be transferable to GTS models for other concurrent
languages and libraries.Comment: In Proceedings GaM 2015, arXiv:1504.0244
The Geometry of Concurrent Interaction: Handling Multiple Ports by Way of Multiple Tokens (Long Version)
We introduce a geometry of interaction model for Mazza's multiport
interaction combinators, a graph-theoretic formalism which is able to
faithfully capture concurrent computation as embodied by process algebras like
the -calculus. The introduced model is based on token machines in which
not one but multiple tokens are allowed to traverse the underlying net at the
same time. We prove soundness and adequacy of the introduced model. The former
is proved as a simulation result between the token machines one obtains along
any reduction sequence. The latter is obtained by a fine analysis of
convergence, both in nets and in token machines
COSMICAH 2005: workshop on verification of COncurrent Systems with dynaMIC Allocated Heaps (a Satellite event of ICALP 2005) - Informal Proceedings
Lisboa Portugal, 10 July 200
Trace Spaces: an Efficient New Technique for State-Space Reduction
State-space reduction techniques, used primarily in model-checkers, all rely
on the idea that some actions are independent, hence could be taken in any
(respective) order while put in parallel, without changing the semantics. It is
thus not necessary to consider all execution paths in the interleaving
semantics of a concurrent program, but rather some equivalence classes. The
purpose of this paper is to describe a new algorithm to compute such
equivalence classes, and a representative per class, which is based on ideas
originating in algebraic topology. We introduce a geometric semantics of
concurrent languages, where programs are interpreted as directed topological
spaces, and study its properties in order to devise an algorithm for computing
dihomotopy classes of execution paths. In particular, our algorithm is able to
compute a control-flow graph for concurrent programs, possibly containing
loops, which is "as reduced as possible" in the sense that it generates traces
modulo equivalence. A preliminary implementation was achieved, showing
promising results towards efficient methods to analyze concurrent programs,
with very promising results compared to partial-order reduction techniques
Recommended from our members
Graph models for reachability analysis of concurrent programs
Reachability analysis is an attractive technique for analysis of concurrent programs because it is simple and relatively straightforward to automate, and can be used in conjunction with model-checking procedures to check for application-specific as well as general properties. Several techniques have been proposed differing mainly on the model used; some of these propose the use of flowgraph based models, some others of Petri nets.This paper addresses the question: What essential difference does it make, if any, what sort of finite-state model we extract from program texts for purposes of reachability analysis? How do they differ in expressive power, decision power, or accuracy? Since each is intended to model synchronization structure while abstracting away other features, one would expect them to be roughly equivalent.We confirm that there is no essential semantic difference between the most well known models proposed in the literature by providing algorithms for translation among these models. This implies that the choice of model rests on other factors, including convenience and efficiency.Since combinatorial explosion is the primary impediment to application of reachability analysis, a particular concern in choosing a model is facilitating divide-and-conquer analysis of large programs. Recently, much interest in finite-state verification systems has centered on algebraic theories of concurrency. Yeh and Young have exploited algebraic structure to decompose reachability analysis based on a flowgraph model. The semantic equivalence of graph and Petri net based models suggests that one ought to be able to apply a similar strategy for decomposing Petri nets. We show this is indeed possible through application of category theory
- …