A Comparison of Lex Bounds for Multiset Variables in Constraint Programming

Set and multiset variables in constraint programming have typically been represented using subset bounds. However, this is a weak representation that neglects potentially useful information about a set such as its cardinality. For set variables, the length-lex (LL) representation successfully provides information about the length (cardinality) and position in the lexicographic ordering. For multiset variables, where elements can be repeated, we consider richer representations that take into account additional information. We study eight different representations in which we maintain bounds according to one of the eight different orderings: length-(co)lex (LL/LC), variety-(co)lex (VL/VC), length-variety-(co)lex (LVL/LVC), and variety-length-(co)lex (VLL/VLC) orderings. These representations integrate together information about the cardinality, variety (number of distinct elements in the multiset), and position in some total ordering. Theoretical and empirical comparisons of expressiveness and compactness of the eight representations suggest that length-variety-(co)lex (LVL/LVC) and variety-length-(co)lex (VLL/VLC) usually give tighter bounds after constraint propagation. We implement the eight representations and evaluate them against the subset bounds representation with cardinality and variety reasoning. Results demonstrate that they offer significantly better pruning and runtime.Comment: 7 pages, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-11

Solving Set Constraint Satisfaction Problems using ROBDDs

In this paper we present a new approach to modeling finite set domain constraint problems using Reduced Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams (ROBDDs). We show that it is possible to construct an efficient set domain propagator which compactly represents many set domains and set constraints using ROBDDs. We demonstrate that the ROBDD-based approach provides unprecedented flexibility in modeling constraint satisfaction problems, leading to performance improvements. We also show that the ROBDD-based modeling approach can be extended to the modeling of integer and multiset constraint problems in a straightforward manner. Since domain propagation is not always practical, we also show how to incorporate less strict consistency notions into the ROBDD framework, such as set bounds, cardinality bounds and lexicographic bounds consistency. Finally, we present experimental results that demonstrate the ROBDD-based solver performs better than various more conventional constraint solvers on several standard set constraint problems

Filtering Algorithms for the Multiset Ordering Constraint

Constraint programming (CP) has been used with great success to tackle a wide variety of constraint satisfaction problems which are computationally intractable in general. Global constraints are one of the important factors behind the success of CP. In this paper, we study a new global constraint, the multiset ordering constraint, which is shown to be useful in symmetry breaking and searching for leximin optimal solutions in CP. We propose efficient and effective filtering algorithms for propagating this global constraint. We show that the algorithms are sound and complete and we discuss possible extensions. We also consider alternative propagation methods based on existing constraints in CP toolkits. Our experimental results on a number of benchmark problems demonstrate that propagating the multiset ordering constraint via a dedicated algorithm can be very beneficial

Complexity Bounds for Ordinal-Based Termination

`What more than its truth do we know if we have a proof of a theorem in a given formal system?' We examine Kreisel's question in the particular context of program termination proofs, with an eye to deriving complexity bounds on program running times. Our main tool for this are length function theorems, which provide complexity bounds on the use of well quasi orders. We illustrate how to prove such theorems in the simple yet until now untreated case of ordinals. We show how to apply this new theorem to derive complexity bounds on programs when they are proven to terminate thanks to a ranking function into some ordinal.Comment: Invited talk at the 8th International Workshop on Reachability Problems (RP 2014, 22-24 September 2014, Oxford

On The Complexity and Completeness of Static Constraints for Breaking Row and Column Symmetry

We consider a common type of symmetry where we have a matrix of decision variables with interchangeable rows and columns. A simple and efficient method to deal with such row and column symmetry is to post symmetry breaking constraints like DOUBLELEX and SNAKELEX. We provide a number of positive and negative results on posting such symmetry breaking constraints. On the positive side, we prove that we can compute in polynomial time a unique representative of an equivalence class in a matrix model with row and column symmetry if the number of rows (or of columns) is bounded and in a number of other special cases. On the negative side, we show that whilst DOUBLELEX and SNAKELEX are often effective in practice, they can leave a large number of symmetric solutions in the worst case. In addition, we prove that propagating DOUBLELEX completely is NP-hard. Finally we consider how to break row, column and value symmetry, correcting a result in the literature about the safeness of combining different symmetry breaking constraints. We end with the first experimental study on how much symmetry is left by DOUBLELEX and SNAKELEX on some benchmark problems.Comment: To appear in the Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2010

Proof Theory at Work: Complexity Analysis of Term Rewrite Systems

This thesis is concerned with investigations into the "complexity of term rewriting systems". Moreover the majority of the presented work deals with the "automation" of such a complexity analysis. The aim of this introduction is to present the main ideas in an easily accessible fashion to make the result presented accessible to the general public. Necessarily some technical points are stated in an over-simplified way.Comment: Cumulative Habilitation Thesis, submitted to the University of Innsbruc

12th International Workshop on Termination (WST 2012) : WST 2012, February 19–23, 2012, Obergurgl, Austria / ed. by Georg Moser

This volume contains the proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Termination (WST 2012), to be held February 19–23, 2012 in Obergurgl, Austria. The goal of the Workshop on Termination is to be a venue for presentation and discussion of all topics in and around termination. In this way, the workshop tries to bridge the gaps between different communities interested and active in research in and around termination. The 12th International Workshop on Termination in Obergurgl continues the successful workshops held in St. Andrews (1993), La Bresse (1995), Ede (1997), Dagstuhl (1999), Utrecht (2001), Valencia (2003), Aachen (2004), Seattle (2006), Paris (2007), Leipzig (2009), and Edinburgh (2010). The 12th International Workshop on Termination did welcome contributions on all aspects of termination and complexity analysis. Contributions from the imperative, constraint, functional, and logic programming communities, and papers investigating applications of complexity or termination (for example in program transformation or theorem proving) were particularly welcome. We did receive 18 submissions which all were accepted. Each paper was assigned two reviewers. In addition to these 18 contributed talks, WST 2012, hosts three invited talks by Alexander Krauss, Martin Hofmann, and Fausto Spoto

Breaking symmetries to rescue Sum of Squares in the case of makespan scheduling

The Sum of Squares (\sos{}) hierarchy gives an automatized technique to create a family of increasingly tight convex relaxations for binary programs. There are several problems for which a constant number of rounds of this hierarchy give integrality gaps matching the best known approximation algorithms. For many other problems, however, ad-hoc techniques give better approximation ratios than \sos{} in the worst case, as shown by corresponding lower bound instances. Notably, in many cases these instances are invariant under the action of a large permutation group. This yields the question how symmetries in a formulation degrade the performance of the relaxation obtained by the \sos{} hierarchy. In this paper, we study this for the case of the minimum makespan problem on identical machines. Our first result is to show that $\Omega(n)$ rounds of \sos{} applied over the \emph{configuration linear program} yields an integrality gap of at least $1.0009$, where $n$ is the number of jobs. Our result is based on tools from representation theory of symmetric groups. Then, we consider the weaker \emph{assignment linear program} and add a well chosen set of symmetry breaking inequalities that removes a subset of the machine permutation symmetries. We show that applying $2^{\tilde{O}(1/\varepsilon^2)}$ rounds of the SA hierarchy to this stronger linear program reduces the integrality gap to $1+\varepsilon$, which yields a linear programming based polynomial time approximation scheme. Our results suggest that for this classical problem, symmetries were the main barrier preventing the \sos{}/ SA hierarchies to give relaxations of polynomial complexity with an integrality gap of~$1+\varepsilon$. We leave as an open question whether this phenomenon occurs for other symmetric problems

A study on set variable representations in constraint programming

Il lavoro presentato in questa tesi si colloca nel contesto della programmazione con vincoli, un paradigma per modellare e risolvere problemi di ricerca combinatoria che richiedono di trovare soluzioni in presenza di vincoli. Una vasta parte di questi problemi trova naturale formulazione attraverso il linguaggio delle variabili insiemistiche. Dal momento che il dominio di tali variabili può essere esponenziale nel numero di elementi, una rappresentazione esplicita è spesso non praticabile. Recenti studi si sono quindi focalizzati nel trovare modi efficienti per rappresentare tali variabili. Pertanto si è soliti rappresentare questi domini mediante l'uso di approssimazioni definite tramite intervalli (d'ora in poi rappresentazioni), specificati da un limite inferiore e un limite superiore secondo un'appropriata relazione d'ordine. La recente evoluzione della ricerca sulla programmazione con vincoli sugli insiemi ha chiaramente indicato che la combinazione di diverse rappresentazioni permette di raggiungere prestazioni di ordini di grandezza superiori rispetto alle tradizionali tecniche di codifica. Numerose proposte sono state fatte volgendosi in questa direzione. Questi lavori si differenziano su come è mantenuta la coerenza tra le diverse rappresentazioni e su come i vincoli vengono propagati al fine di ridurre lo spazio di ricerca. Sfortunatamente non esiste alcun strumento formale per paragonare queste combinazioni. Il principale obiettivo di questo lavoro è quello di fornire tale strumento, nel quale definiamo precisamente la nozione di combinazione di rappresentazioni facendo emergere gli aspetti comuni che hanno caratterizzato i lavori precedenti. In particolare identifichiamo due tipi possibili di combinazioni, una forte ed una debole, definendo le nozioni di coerenza agli estremi sui vincoli e sincronizzazione tra rappresentazioni. Il nostro studio propone alcune interessanti intuizioni sulle combinazioni esistenti, evidenziandone i limiti e svelando alcune sorprese. Inoltre forniamo un'analisi di complessità della sincronizzazione tra minlex, una rappresentazione in grado di propagare in maniera ottimale vincoli lessicografici, e le principali rappresentazioni esistenti