ODALISKA J.A.INGRES 1780-1867 [Material gráfico]

Copia digital. Madrid : Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, 201

Documenter pour l’avenir : la campagne de restauration des dessins d’Ingres du musée de Montauban (1946-1952)

En 1946, une inspection menée sur les dessins de Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres (1780-1867) conservés au musée Ingres de Montauban constate leur état de conservation préoccupant. Les œuvres sont envoyées à Paris pour examen et étude en vue de leur restauration et de leur remontage, parallèlement au réaménagement complet du musée. Depuis lors, les nombreux documents conservés permettent de mieux connaître les interventions entreprises, les réflexions qui les ont précédées et les méthodes utilisées. Cette documentation constitue aujourd’hui un apport important à la connaissance de la collection et à l’histoire de la restauration des dessins.In 1946, the drawings of Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres (1780-1867) in the Musée Ingres, Montauban, were inspected and found to be in a worrying condition. The works were sent to Paris for further examination and study with a view to being restored and remounted, in tandem with the overall renovation of the museum. Since then, several documents kept in the archives have provided insight into the restoration processes undertaken, the logic behind them, and the methods used. Today these documents contribute to a better understanding of the collection and to the restoration of the drawings over the years

Le musée de l’Arles et de la Provence antiques met Ingres à l’honneur

Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres (1780-1867), lorsqu’il dirige l’Académie de France à Rome, prône auprès de ses élèves un rapport à l’art antique qui s’écarte du dogmatisme du néo-classicisme : « il est nécessaire d’étudier les antiques et les maîtres, non pour les imiter, mais […] pour apprendre à voir ». Le peintre ne considère plus les œuvres du passé comme des modèles inaccessibles et indépassables, mais bien comme des outils de la connaissance, dont l’artiste moderne doit se saisir afin d’é..

Історія мистецтв

Робоча програма «Історія мистецтв» для студентів спеціальності 024 «Хореографія», освітнього рівня першого (бакалаврського), 1 кур

Історія мистецтв

Робоча програма «Історія мистецтв» для студентів спеціальності 024 «Хореографія», освітнього рівня першого (бакалаврського), освітньої програми 024.00.01 «Хореографія (за видами)

Seeing With Two Eyes: Colonial Policy, the Huron Tract Treaty and Changes in the Land in Lambton County, 1780-1867

ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the histories of Walpole Island (Bkejwanong), Sarnia (Aamjiwnaang), and Kettle and Stoney Point (Wiiwkwedong and Aazhoodena) between 1790 and 1867 in what became Lambton County, Ontario. Anishinabe peoples faced tremendous challenges during this crucial period in their histories stemming from the loss of the Ohio Valley, non-native settlement, and intense pressure to surrender the land and settle permanently on reserves. With few exceptions, literature on the subject of Upper Canadian history and Indian policy largely accepts the decline of Anishinabe communities as an inevitable consequence of demilitarization after the War of 1812. The fact that Anishinabe peoples continue to live in these same communities as they have for hundreds of years, complicates such analyses. Through the lens of ‘two-eyed seeing’ I interrogate this contradiction and explore the many ways that the Anishinabeg sought to combine Indigenous knowledge and worldviews with the tools to survive in Eurocanadian economies between 1790 and 1867. While this story is not one of swift decline, I argue that Indigenous leaders sought a future for themselves that differed fundamentally from the one that unfolded in the years before Confederation. This study¬ uses petitions, Indian Affairs and municipal documents to explore the confluence of local processes that undermined Anishinabe attempts to co-exist with Eurocanadians. While it is true that Great Britain no longer needed its ‘Indian allies’ after the War of 1812, this does not sufficiently explain why fellow Loyalists and settlers did not accept Anishinabe peoples as partners in a province that both communities helped establish. While policy is an important part of this process, it is only a part of this story. My focus is on the relationships established between two peoples, and the construction, devolution, and disintegration of these relationships. Plans made by Anishinabe Chiefs to create a self-sufficient and independent future in Upper Canada were gradually undone by a combination of politics, policy, land and economics. These coalesced over the first half of the nineteenth century to radically transform their vision to one that by Confederation, increasingly sought to confine and define ‘Indians’ as legal wards