467 research outputs found
Seasonal cultivated and fallow cropland mapping using MODIS-based automated cropland classification algorithm
Increasing drought occurrences and growing populations demand accurate, routine, and consistent cultivated and fallow cropland products to enable water and food security analysis. The overarching goal of this research was to develop and test automated cropland classification algorithm (ACCA) that provide accurate, consistent, and repeatable information on seasonal cultivated as well as seasonal fallow cropland extents and areas based on the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer remote sensing data. Seasonal ACCA development process involves writing series of iterative decision tree codes to separate cultivated and fallow croplands from noncroplands, aiming to accurately mirror reliable reference data sources. A pixel-by-pixel accuracy assessment when compared with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) cropland data showed, on average, a producer's accuracy of 93% and a user's accuracy of 85% across all months. Further, ACCA-derived cropland maps agreed well with the USDA Farm Service Agency crop acreage-reported data for both cultivated and fallow croplands with R-square values over 0.7 and field surveys with an accuracy of >= 95% for cultivated croplands and >= 76% for fallow croplands. Our results demonstrated the ability of ACCA to generate cropland products, such as cultivated and fallow cropland extents and areas, accurately, automatically, and repeatedly throughout the growing season
USING THE LANDSAT SATELLITE SYSTEM FOR WINTER WHEAT MONITORING IN THE WESTERN UKRAINE TERRITORY
Π‘Π΅Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΎΠ½Π°. Π‘ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΡ
β ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΏΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π΄ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ², Π»ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ°, Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΏΡΠΎΠ± ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²Ρ. Π Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΠΠ Landsat Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π° ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΠ°ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π£ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΈΠ½Ρ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΆΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎ-Π΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ Π°Π³ΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΉΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΈΠΌ. ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²Π° Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΊΠΎΠ² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Landsat Π·Π° 2010β2011 Π³Π³. (Π°Π²Π³ΡΡΡ, Π°ΠΏΡΠ΅Π»Ρ, ΠΈΡΠ»Ρ). ΠΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ², Π° ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ: ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° NDVI β ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° GVI (Green Vegetation Index). ΠΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΡΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ Π²Π΅Π³Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π·Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. ΠΠ° ΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° Π²ΠΎΡΡ
ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ° ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π² ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ² Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Landsat, ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°Π»Π³Π΅Π±ΡΡ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈ, Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΠΆΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ. Π£ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ, ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ° (Π½Π° Π±ΡΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅Π΅), Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΎΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π½ΡΠΆΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΡ Π² ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΌ Π°Π³ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Ρ Π΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠΈΠΌ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠΉ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ»Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ² Π°Π³ΡΠΎΡ
ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°, Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π° ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π²Π΅Π³Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΡ Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ»Π΅ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈ Π°Π³ΡΠΎΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡ, Π° ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ: ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ², Π²Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡ ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ, ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±Π°ΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ.Π‘Π΅Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΎΠ½Π°. Π‘ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΡ
β ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΏΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π΄ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ², Π»ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ°, Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΏΡΠΎΠ± ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²Ρ. Π Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΠΠ Landsat Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π° ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΠ°ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π£ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΈΠ½Ρ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΆΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎ-Π΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ Π°Π³ΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΉΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΈΠΌ. ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²Π° Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΊΠΎΠ² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Landsat Π·Π° 2010β2011 Π³Π³. (Π°Π²Π³ΡΡΡ, Π°ΠΏΡΠ΅Π»Ρ, ΠΈΡΠ»Ρ). ΠΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ², Π° ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ: ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° NDVI β ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° GVI (Green Vegetation Index). ΠΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΡΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ Π²Π΅Π³Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π·Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. ΠΠ° ΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° Π²ΠΎΡΡ
ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ° ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π² ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ² Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Landsat, ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°Π»Π³Π΅Π±ΡΡ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈ, Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΠΆΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ. Π£ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ, ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ° (Π½Π° Π±ΡΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅Π΅), Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΎΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π½ΡΠΆΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΡ Π² ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΌ Π°Π³ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Ρ Π΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠΈΠΌ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠΉ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ»Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ² Π°Π³ΡΠΎΡ
ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°, Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π° ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π²Π΅Π³Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΡ Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ»Π΅ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈ Π°Π³ΡΠΎΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡ, Π° ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ: ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ², Π²Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡ ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ, ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±Π°ΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ.Today, there are many ways to monitor crops throughout the season. Among them β the use of satellites and drones, sheet diagnostics, analysis of soil samples. This article discusses the technology of using Landsat remote sensing data for solving problems of monitoring the state of winter wheat in WesternUkraine. The issues of yield forecasting were also considered. The studies were conducted on one of the fields of the agro-farm. Volovikov using Landsat remote sensing imagery for 2010-2011. (August, April, July). The technology of creating geo-information models of the main indices is described, namely: the distribution models of the NDVI index β and the distribution models of the GVIindex (Green Vegetation Index). These models were indicators of the vegetation of green plants. On their basis, a quantitative assessment of the ascent and growth of winter wheat was carried out. Also in this study, the integration of digital elevation models and Landsat remote sensing materials was carried out, using the tools of cartographic algebra, problem areas were identified in which adecrease in the yield of winter wheat was observed. The reasons for this state were established, and decisions were made to correct the structure of the crop rotation (for the future), and the coordinates of sites that need special agronomic support with further integration of this geospatial information into the system of precision farming were determined. Studies show that aftergeoinformational analysis of cartographic materials of agrochemical indicators, topography, remote sensing data for different periods of plant vegetation, it is possible to obtain an upto-date informational picture of the state of the study area and effectively implement land management and agrotechnical measures, namely: correct the structure of crop rotation, fertilize, detect areas affected by pests and diseases, process well-defined problems areas, and to make informed management decisions
A cultivated planet in 2010 β Part 1: The global synergy cropland map
Information on global cropland distribution and agricultural production is critical for the world's agricultural monitoring and food security. We present datasets of cropland extent and agricultural production in a two-paper series of a cultivated planet in 2010. In the first part, we propose a new Self-adapting Statistics Allocation Model (SASAM) to develop the global map of cropland distribution. SASAM is based on the fusion of multiple existing cropland maps and multilevel statistics of the cropland area, which is independent of training samples. First, cropland area statistics are used to rank the input cropland maps, and then a scoring table is built to indicate the agreement among the input datasets. Secondly, statistics are allocated adaptively to the pixels with higher agreement scores until the cumulative cropland area is close to the statistics. The multilevel allocation results are then integrated to obtain the extent of cropland. We applied SASAM to produce a global cropland synergy map with a 500 m spatial resolution for circa 2010. The accuracy assessments show that the synergy map has higher accuracy than the input datasets and better consistency with the cropland statistics. The synergy cropland map is available via an open-data repository (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ZWSFAA; Lu et al., 2020). This new cropland map has been used as an essential input to the Spatial Production Allocation Model (SPAM) for producing the global dataset of agricultural production for circa 2010, which is described in the second part of the two-paper series
Towards a set of agrosystem-specific cropland mapping methods to address the global cropland diversity
Accurate cropland information is of paramount importance for crop monitoring. This study compares five existing cropland mapping methodologies over five contrasting Joint Experiment for Crop Assessment and Monitoring (JECAM) sites of medium to large average field size using the time series of 7-day 250 m Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) mean composites (red and near-infrared channels). Different strategies were devised to assess the accuracy of the classification methods: confusion matrices and derived accuracy indicators with and without equalizing class proportions, assessing the pairwise difference error rates and accounting for the spatial resolution bias. The robustness of the accuracy with respect to a reduction of the quantity of calibration data available was also assessed by a bootstrap approach in which the amount of training data was systematically reduced. Methods reached overall accuracies ranging from 85% to 95%, which demonstrates the ability of 250 m imagery to resolve fields down to 20 ha. Despite significantly different error rates, the site effect was found to persistently dominate the method effect. This was confirmed even after removing the share of the classification due to the spatial resolution of the satellite data (from 10% to 30%). This underlines the effect of other agrosystems characteristics such as cloudiness, crop diversity, and calendar on the ability to perform accurately. All methods have potential for large area cropland mapping as they provided accurate results with 20% of the calibration data, e.g. 2% of the study area in Ukraine. To better address the global cropland diversity, results advocate movement towards a set of cropland classification methods that could be applied regionally according to their respective performance in specific landscapes.Instituto de Clima y AguaFil: Waldner, FranΓ§ois. UniversitΓ© catholique de Louvain. Earth and Life Institute - Environment, Croix du Sud; BelgicaFil: De Abelleyra, Diego. Instituto Nacional de TecnologΓa Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; ArgentinaFil: Veron, Santiago RamΓ³n. Instituto Nacional de TecnologΓa Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de AgronomΓa. Departamento de MΓ©todos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de InformaciΓ³n; ArgentinaFil: Zhang, Miao. Chinese Academy of Science. Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth; ChinaFil: Wu, Bingfang. Chinese Academy of Science. Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth; ChinaFil: Plotnikov, Dmitry. Russian Academy of Sciences. Space Research Institute. Terrestrial Ecosystems Monitoring Laboratory; RusiaFil: Bartalev, Sergey. Russian Academy of Sciences. Space Research Institute. Terrestrial Ecosystems Monitoring Laboratory; RusiaFil: Lavreniuk, Mykola. Space Research Institute NAS and SSA. Department of Space Information Technologies; UcraniaFil: Skakun, Sergii. Space Research Institute NAS and SSA. Department of Space Information Technologies; Ucrania. University of Maryland. Department of Geographical Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Kussul, Nataliia. Space Research Institute NAS and SSA. Department of Space Information Technologies; UcraniaFil: Le Maire, Guerric. UMR Eco&Sols, CIRAD; Francia. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa AgropecuΓ‘ria. Meio Ambiante; BrasilFil: Dupuy, StΓ©phane. Centre de CoopΓ©ration Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le DΓ©veloppement. Territoires, Environnement, TΓ©lΓ©dΓ©tection et Information Spatiale; FranciaFil: Jarvis, Ian. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Science and Technology Branch. Agri-Climate, Geomatics and Earth Observation; CanadΓ‘Fil: Defourny, Pierre. UniversitΓ© Catholique de Louvain. Earth and Life Institute - Environment, Croix du Sud; Belgic
Cropland area estimates using Modis NDVI time series in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil.
The objective of this work was to evaluate a simple, semi?automated methodology for mapping cropland areas in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil. A Fourier transform was applied over a time series of vegetation index products from the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (Modis) sensor. This procedure allows for the evaluation of the amplitude of the periodic changes in vegetation response through time and the identification of areas with strong seasonal variation related to crop production. Annual cropland masks from 2006 to 2009 were generated and municipal cropland areas were estimated through remote sensing. We observed good agreement with official statistics on planted area, especially for municipalities with more than 10% of cropland cover (R2 = 0.89), but poor agreement in municipalities with less than 5% crop cover (R2 = 0.41). The assessed methodology can be used for annual cropland mapping over large production areas in Brazil
- β¦