Optimization of cool roof and night ventilation in office buildings: A case study in Xiamen, China

Increasing roof albedo (using a “cool” roof) and night ventilation are passive cooling technologies that can reduce the cooling loads in buildings, but existing studies have not comprehensively explored the potential benefits of integrating these two technologies. This study combines an experiment in the summer and transition seasons with an annual simulation so as to evaluate the thermal performance, energy savings and thermal comfort improvement that could be obtained by coupling a cool roof with night ventilation. A holistic approach integrating sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization is developed to explore key design parameters (roof albedo, night ventilation air change rate, roof insulation level and internal thermal mass level) and optimal design options for the combined application of the cool roof and night ventilation. The proposed approach is validated and demonstrated through studies on a six-storey office building in Xiamen, a cooling-dominated city in southeast China. Simulations show that combining a cool roof with night ventilation can significantly decrease the annual cooling energy consumption by 27% compared to using a black roof without night ventilation and by 13% compared to using a cool roof without night ventilation. Roof albedo is the most influential parameter for both building energy performance and indoor thermal comfort. Optimal use of the cool roof and night ventilation can reduce the annual cooling energy use by 28% during occupied hours when air-conditioners are on and reduce the uncomfortable time slightly during occupied hours when air-conditioners are off

Experimental energy performance assessment of a bifacial photovoltaic system and effect of cool roof coating

In the quest for high albedo materials that boost the energy production of bifacial photovoltaic systems, a range of material already exists for reducing building roof surface temperatures, called cool roof materials. However, there is a noticeable absence of scientific literature addressing the combination of cool roofs and bifacial photovoltaic systems. This study investigates the photovoltaic performance of a bifacial photovoltaic system with cool roof coating on the underside and its impact on floor temperature. For this purpose, four ∼1kWp prototypes were installed on the terrace of the GAIA building of the UPC near Barcelona, Spain: (1) bifacial panels above a cool roof, (2) bifacial panels above normal floor, (3) bifacial panels above a normal floor with n-type solar cells encapsulated in TPO, and (4) monofacial panels. The results reveal 8.6 % higher PV yield for bifacial with cool roof compared to monofacial, and 4–4.5 % higher for bifacial (normal floor) compared to monofacial. Additionally, the cool roof coating contributes to reducing the floor temperatures, particularly in the unshaded (exposed) areas during summer (−3.8 °C). The presence of photovoltaic panels has also demonstrated a positive impact on floor temperatures during both winter and summer. Thus, the cool roof coating offers two benefits: increased photovoltaic yield and reduced building cooling requirements, both of which are associated with economic advantages. The cool roof coating can be integrated into existing or new bifacial roof systems.This work was supported by the SUDOKET SOE2/P1/E0677 project funded by FEDER of the EU under the Interreg-Sudoe program

Energy analysis of cool, medium, and dark roofs on residential buildings in the U.S.

This study reports an energy analysis of cool, medium, and dark roofs on residential buildings in the U.S. Three analyses were undertaken in this study: energy consumption, economic analysis, and an environmental analysis. The energy consumption reports the electricity and natural gas consumption of the simulations. The economic analysis uses tools such as simple payback period (SPP) and net present value (NPV) to determine the profitability of the cool roof and the medium roof. The variable change for each simulation model was the roof color. The default color was a dark roof and the results were focused on the changes produced by the cool roof and the medium roof. The environmental analysis uses CO2 emissions to assess the environmental impact of the cool roof and the medium roof. The analysis uses the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) EnergyPlus software to produce simulations of a typical, two-story residential home in the U.S. The building details of the typical, two-story U.S. residential home and the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) building code standards used are discussed in this study. This study indicates that, when material and labor costs are assessed, the cool roof and the medium roof do not yield a SPP less than 10 years. Furthermore, the NPV results assess that neither the cool roof nor the medium roof are a profitable investment in any climate zone in the U.S. The environmental analysis demonstrates that both the cool roof and the medium roof have a positive impact in warmer climates by reducing the CO2 emissions as much as 264 kg and 129 kg, respectively

Cool roof technology in London: An experimental and modelling study

This is the post-print version of the final paper published in Journal of Energy and Buildings. The published article is available from the link below. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. Copyright @ 2011 Elsevier B.V.One of the primary reasons for the application of cool materials is their energy and associated environmental impact on the built environment. Cool materials are usually applied on the roof of buildings to reduce cooling energy demand. The relative benefits of this reduction depend on the construction of the building, external weather conditions and use of the building. This paper examines the impact from the application of a reflective paint on a flat roof in a naturally ventilated office building in the area of London, UK where the climate is moderate with high heating demand by buildings. The environmental conditions (internal/external air and surface temperatures) of the building were monitored before and after the application of the cool roof during the summer. It was found that internal temperatures were reduced after the application of the cool roof. The building was modelled using TRNSYS and the model was calibrated successfully using the measurements. A parametric analysis was carried out by varying the reflectivity and insulation of the roof and ventilation rate; the heating and cooling demand for a year was calculated using the Summer Design Year for London as the weather file. It was found that cooling demand is significantly reduced, heating demand is increased and the total energy savings vary between 1 and 8.5% relative to an albedo of 0.1 for the same conditions. In free floating (naturally ventilated) buildings summer comfort is improved but there is a penalty of increased heating energy during the winter. Thermal comfort can be improved by an average of 2.5 °C (operative temperature difference for a change of 0.5 in albedo) but heating demand could be increased by 10% for a ventilation rate of 2 air changes per hour. The results indicate that in the case of temperate climates the type, operation and thermal characteristics of the building should be considered carefully to determine potential benefits of the application of cool roof technology. For the examined case-study, it was found that a roof reflectivity of 0.6–0.7 is the optimum value to achieve energy savings in a cooled office, improve summer internal thermal conditions in a non-cooled office (albeit with some heating energy penalty). It indicates that it is a suitable strategy for refurbishment of existing offices to improve energy efficiency or internal environmental conditions in the summer and should be considered in the design of new offices together with other passive energy efficient strategies.Intelligent Energy Europe (IEE

Effects of natural soiling and weathering on cool roof energy savings for dormitory buildings in Chinese cities with hot summers

Roofs with high-reflectance (solar reflectance) coating, commonly known as cool roofs, can stay cool in the sun, thereby reducing building energy consumption and mitigating the urban heat island. However, chemical-physical degradation and biological growth can decrease their solar reflectance and the ability to save energy. In this study, the solar spectral reflectance of 12 different roofing products with an initial albedo of 0.56–0.90 was measured before exposure and once every three months over 32 months. Specimens were exposed on the roofs of dormitory buildings in Xiamen and Chengdu, each major urban areas with hot summers. The albedos of high and medium-lightness coatings stabilized in the ranges 0.45–0.62 and 0.36–0.59 in both cities, respectively. This study yielded albedo loss exceeded those reported in the latest Chinese standard by 0.08–0.15. Finally, DesignBuilder (EnergyPlus) simulations estimate that a new cool roof with albedo 0.78 on a six-story dormitory building will yield annual site energy savings (heating and cooling) for the top floor, which are 8.01 kWh/m2 (24.2%) and 9.12 kWh/m2 (26.3%) per unit floor area in Xiamen and Chengdu, respectively; while an aged cool roof with albedo 0.45 and 0.56 will yield the annual savings by 5.12 kWh/m2 (15.4%) and 2.47 kWh/m2 (10.5%) in these two cities

Cool Roof Impact on Building Energy Need: The Role of Thermal Insulation with Varying Climate Conditions

Cool roof effectiveness in improving building thermal-energy performance is affected by different variables. In particular, roof insulation level and climate conditions are key parameters influencing cool roofs benefits and whole building energy performance. This work aims at assessing the role of cool roof in the optimum roof configuration, i.e., combination of solar reflectance capability and thermal insulation level, in terms of building energy performance in different climate conditions worldwide. To this aim, coupled dynamic thermal-energy simulation and optimization analysis is carried out. In detail, multi-dimensional optimization of combined building roof thermal insulation and solar reflectance is developed to minimize building annual energy consumption for heating-cooling. Results highlight how a high reflectance roof minimizes annual energy need for a small standard office building in the majority of considered climates. Moreover, building energy performance is more sensitive to roof solar reflectance than thermal insulation level, except for the coldest conditions. Therefore, for the selected building, the optimum roof typology presents high solar reflectance capability (0.8) and no/low insulation level (0.00-0.03 m), except for extremely hot or cold climate zones. Accordingly, this research shows how the classic approach of super-insulated buildings should be reframed for the office case toward truly environmentally friendly buildings.The work was partially funded by the Spanish government (RTI2018-093849-B-C31). This work was partially supported by ICREA under the ICREA Academia programme. Dr. Alvaro de Gracia has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 712949 (TECNIOspring PLUS) and from the Agency for Business Competitiveness of the Government of Catalonia. This publication has emanated from research supported (in part) by Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) under the SFI Strategic Partnership Programme Grant Number SFI/15/SPP/E3125

Economic Impact of the Reflectivity of Roofs

For years, dark roofs have been used on residential and commercial buildings in all areas of the United States, but these roofs absorb large amounts of solar radiation, which can result in high cooling costs for the building. In some parts of the country, using a cool roof on a building is more beneficial because it will lower the energy consumption (and therefore will reduce energy costs) of heating and cooling the building. This paper summarizes the results from using the program eQUEST to analyze three different types of buildings – an office, a high school, and a hospital – in each ASHRAE climate zone to determine the economic impact of using a cool roof as opposed to a dark roof on these buildings. Three different reflectivities of roofs are chosen: a light roof (reflectivity of 0.6), a medium roof (reflectivity of 0.4), and a dark roof (reflectivity of 0.1), and several types of simulation results (utility charges, roof conduction, max HVAC heating and cooling load, and max hourly heating and cooling load) are collected from the simulations. According to the eQUEST simulations and assumed gas and electric rates, using a cool roof on a hospital anywhere in the United States increases the total energy consumption, and therefore is not advisable. In offices and schools in zones 4, 5, 6, and 7, and schools in zones 2 and 3, utilizing a cool roof may not be the most profitable investment; however, in many situations, it is economically viable. For schools in zone 1 and offices in zones 1, 2, and 3, utilizing cool roofs may be a good investment, depending on the company or school’s minimum attractive rate of return (MARR). When constructing a roof where the cost of a cool roof and non-cool roof are the same, utilizing a cool roof is the better option in offices in all zones and schools in all zones except zones 5, 6, and