First results of the SOAP project. Open access publishing in 2010

The SOAP (Study of Open Access Publishing) project has compiled data on the present offer for open access publishing in online peer-reviewed journals. Starting from the Directory of Open Access Journals, several sources of data are considered, including inspection of journal web site and direct inquiries within the publishing industry. Several results are derived and discussed, together with their correlations: the number of open access journals and articles; their subject area; the starting date of open access journals; the size and business models of open access publishers; the licensing models; the presence of an impact factor; the uptake of hybrid open access.Comment: Submitted to PLoS ON

Highlights from the SOAP project survey. What Scientists Think about Open Access Publishing

The SOAP (Study of Open Access Publishing) project has run a large-scale survey of the attitudes of researchers on, and the experiences with, open access publishing. Around forty thousands answers were collected across disciplines and around the world, showing an overwhelming support for the idea of open access, while highlighting funding and (perceived) quality as the main barriers to publishing in open access journals. This article serves as an introduction to the survey and presents this and other highlights from a preliminary analysis of the survey responses. To allow a maximal re-use of the information collected by this survey, the data are hereby released under a CC0 waiver, so to allow libraries, publishers, funding agencies and academics to further analyse risks and opportunities, drivers and barriers, in the transition to open access publishing.Comment: Data manual available at http://bit.ly/gI8nct Compressed CSV data file available at http://bit.ly/gSmm71 Alternative data formats: CSV http://bit.ly/ejuvKO XLS http://bit.ly/e6gE7o XLSX http://bit.ly/gTjyv

Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications. Executive summary

This article is a summary, by the authors, of a 140-page report prepared in 2012 by the UK Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings, chaired by British sociologist and academic administrator Janet Finch, DBE. The Working Group was charged with recommending how to develop a model that would be effective and sustainable over time, for expanding access to the published fi ndings of research. The whole report, which can be accessed at http://www.researchinfonet.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Finch-Group-report-FINAL-VERSION.pdf [http://tinyurl.com/d2lxqks], has been published under a Creative Commons License Attribution 3.0 Unported. This is the fi rst of a series of Perspectives articles devoted to the Open Access Initiative that will be published in INTERNATIONAL MICROBIOLOGY. Our journal already published an Editorial on the topic in 2004 (Guerrero R & Piqueras M, Int Microbiol 7:157-161), and strongly supports open access. [Int Microbiol 2013; 16(2):125-132

Open Access at Springer

This session took place on October 25, 2011 in the Lillooet Room of the Irving K. Barber Learning Centre at the University of British Columbia.Non UBCUnreviewedOthe

Long‐term effect of calcium supplementation on bone loss in perimenopausal women

We observed in a controlled 2 year longitudinal trial in 248 perimenopausal women that a daily calcium supplement of either 1000 or 2000 mg Ca2+ significantly reduced lumbar bone loss and bone turnover in the first year of calcium supplementation. In the second supplementation year the rate of lumbar bone loss in the treated subjects was not significantly different from that in the control group, although two of the three biochemical parameters of bone turnover remained decreased throughout the study. To quantify further the long‐term effect of calcium supplementation, we extended the study for another year in 214 women. In the women of the control group who were menstruating until the last year of the trial, the mean change in lumbar bone mineral density after 3 years was –3.2% of the initial value versus 1.6% in the calcium‐supplemented groups (p < 0.01). The decrease in lumbar bone loss in these supplemented premenopausal and early perimenopausal women remained statistically significant in the second and third years of supplementation. In the women who stopped menstruating before or during the study, the long‐term reduction in lumbar bone loss was not significant (mean difference between control and treatment groups <0.6% points after 3 years). The decrease in metacarpal cortical thickness (MCT) in the treated subjects during 3 years was on average –3.0% of the initial value in the control versus–2.0% in the supplemented subjects (P < 0.01). The effect of calcium supplementation on MCT was not significantly related to the menopausal status of the subjects. Serum alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, and urinary hydroxyproline excretion decreased after calcium supplementation in all menopausal groups. These parameters remained decreased throughout the trial, with exception of alkaline phosphatase in the 1000 mg calcium group. We conclude that calcium supplementation substantially reduces cortical and trabecular bone loss in the years immediately preceding menopause. Although it reduces postmenopausal cortical bone loss to some extent, it does not prevent the menopause‐related lumbar bone loss. Copyright © 1994 ASBM

Future of scholarly publishing and scholarly communication: Report of the Expert Group to the European Commission

The report proposes a vision for the future of scholarly communication; it examines the current system -with its strengths and weaknesses- and its main actors. It considers the roles of researchers, research institutions, funders and policymakers, publishers and other service providers, as well as citizens and puts forward recommendations addressed to each of them. The report places researchers and their needs at the centre of the scholarly communication of the future, and considers knowledge and understanding created by researchers as public goods. Current developments, enabled primarily by technology, have resulted into a broadening of types of actors involved in scholarly communication and in some cases the disaggregation of the traditional roles in the system. The report views research evaluation as a keystone for scholarly communication, affecting all actors. Researchers, communities and all organisations, in particular funders, have the possibility of improving the current scholarly communication and publishing system: they should start by bringing changes to the research evaluation system. Collaboration between actors is essential for positive change and to enable innovation in the scholarly communication and publishing system in the future