Impact of Alu repeats on the evolution of human p53 binding sites

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The p53 tumor suppressor protein is involved in a complicated regulatory network, mediating expression of ~1000 human genes. Recent studies have shown that many p53 <it>in vivo </it>binding sites (BSs) reside in transposable repeats. The relationship between these BSs and functional p53 response elements (REs) remains unknown, however. We sought to understand whether the p53 REs also reside in transposable elements and particularly in the most-abundant Alu repeats.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We have analyzed ~160 functional p53 REs identified so far and found that 24 of them occur in repeats. More than half of these repeat-associated REs reside in Alu elements. In addition, using a position weight matrix approach, we found ~400,000 potential p53 BSs in Alu elements genome-wide. Importantly, these putative BSs are located in the same regions of Alu repeats as the functional p53 REs - namely, in the vicinity of Boxes A/A' and B of the internal RNA polymerase III promoter. Earlier nucleosome-mapping experiments showed that the Boxes A/A' and B have a different chromatin environment, which is critical for the binding of p53 to DNA. Here, we compare the Alu-residing p53 sites with the corresponding Alu consensus sequences and conclude that the p53 sites likely evolved through two different mechanisms - the sites overlapping with the Boxes A/A' were generated by CG → TG mutations; the other sites apparently pre-existed in the progenitors of several Alu subfamilies, such as AluJo and AluSq. The binding affinity of p53 to the Alu-residing sites generally correlates with the age of Alu subfamilies, so that the strongest sites are embedded in the 'relatively young' Alu repeats.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The primate-specific Alu repeats play an important role in shaping the p53 regulatory network in the context of chromatin. One of the selective factors responsible for the frequent occurrence of Alu repeats in introns may be related to the p53-mediated regulation of Alu transcription, which, in turn, influences expression of the host genes.</p> <p>Reviewers</p> <p>This paper was reviewed by Igor B. Rogozin (nominated by Pavel A. Pevzner), Sandor Pongor, and I. King Jordan.</p

A-tract clusters may facilitate DNA packaging in bacterial nucleoid

Molecular mechanisms of bacterial chromosome packaging are still unclear, as bacteria lack nucleosomes or other apparent basic elements of DNA compaction. Among the factors facilitating DNA condensation may be a propensity of the DNA molecule for folding due to its intrinsic curvature. As suggested previously, the sequence correlations in genome reflect such a propensity [Trifonov and Sussman (1980) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 77, 3816–3820]. To further elaborate this concept, we analyzed positioning of A-tracts (the sequence motifs introducing the most pronounced DNA curvature) in the Escherichia coli genome. First, we observed that the A-tracts are over-represented and distributed ‘quasi-regularly’ throughout the genome, including both the coding and intergenic sequences. Second, there is a 10–12 bp periodicity in the A-tract positioning indicating that the A-tracts are phased with respect to the DNA helical repeat. Third, the phased A-tracts are organized in ∼100 bp long clusters. The latter feature was revealed with the help of a novel approach based on the Fourier series expansion of the A-tract distance autocorrelation function. Since the A-tracts introduce local bends of the DNA duplex and these bends accumulate when properly phased, the observed clusters would facilitate DNA looping. Also, such clusters may serve as binding sites for the nucleoid-associated proteins that have affinities for curved DNA (such as HU, H-NS, Hfq and CbpA). Therefore, we suggest that the ∼100 bp long clusters of the phased A-tracts constitute the ‘structural code’ for DNA compaction by providing the long-range intrinsic curvature and increasing stability of the DNA complexes with architectural proteins

Recombination R-triplex: H-bonds contribution to stability as revealed with minor base substitutions for adenine

Several cellular processes involve alignment of three nucleic acids strands, in which the third strand (DNA or RNA) is identical and in a parallel orientation to one of the DNA duplex strands. Earlier, using 2-aminopurine as a fluorescent reporter base, we demonstrated that a self-folding oligonucleotide forms a recombination-like structure consistent with the R-triplex. Here, we extended this approach, placing the reporter 2-aminopurine either in the 5′- or 3′-strand. We obtained direct evidence that the 3′-strand forms a stable duplex with the complementary central strand, while the 5′-strand participates in non-Watson–Crick interactions. Substituting 2,6-diaminopurine or 7-deazaadenine for adenine, we tested and confirmed the proposed hydrogen bonding scheme of the A*(T·A) R-type triplet. The adenine substitutions expected to provide additional H-bonds led to triplex structures with increased stability, whereas the substitutions consistent with a decrease in the number of H-bonds destabilized the triplex. The triplex formation enthalpies and free energies exhibited linear dependences on the number of H-bonds predicted from the A*(T·A) triplet scheme. The enthalpy of the 10 nt long intramolecular triplex of −100 kJ·mol(−1) demonstrates that the R-triplex is relatively unstable and thus an ideal candidate for a transient intermediate in homologous recombination, t-loop formation at the mammalian telomere ends, and short RNA invasion into a duplex. On the other hand, the impact of a single H-bond, 18 kJ·mol(−1), is high compared with the overall triplex formation enthalpy. The observed energy advantage of a ‘correct’ base in the third strand opposite the Watson–Crick base pair may be a powerful mechanism for securing selectivity of recognition between the single strand and the duplex

Novel nucleosomal particles containing core histones and linker DNA but no histone H1

Eukaryotic chromosomal DNA is assembled into regularly spaced nucleosomes, which play a central role in gene regulation by determining accessibility of control regions. The nucleosome contains ∼147 bp of DNA wrapped ∼1.7 times around a central core histone octamer. The linker histone, H1, binds both to the nucleosome, sealing the DNA coils, and to the linker DNA between nucleosomes, directing chromatin folding. Micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digests the linker to yield the chromatosome, containing H1 and ∼160 bp, and then converts it to a core particle, containing ∼147 bp and no H1. Sequencing of nucleosomal DNA obtained after MNase digestion (MNase-seq) generates genome-wide nucleosome maps that are important for understanding gene regulation. We present an improved MNase-seq method involving simultaneous digestion with exonuclease III, which removes linker DNA. Remarkably, we discovered two novel intermediate particles containing 154 or 161 bp, corresponding to 7 bp protruding from one or both sides of the nucleosome core. These particles are detected in yeast lacking H1 and in H1-depleted mouse chromatin. They can be reconstituted in vitro using purified core histones and DNA. We propose that these \u27proto-chromatosomes\u27 are fundamental chromatin subunits, which include the H1 binding site and influence nucleosome spacing independently of H1

Distinctive sequence patterns in metazoan and yeast nucleosomes: Implications for linker histone binding to AT-rich and methylated DNA

Linker histones (LHs) bind to the DNA entry/exit points of nucleosomes and demonstrate preference for AT-rich DNA, although the recognized sequence patterns remain unknown. These patterns are expected to be more pronounced in metazoan nucleosomes with abundant LHs, compared to yeast nucleosomes with few LHs. To test this hypothesis, we compared the nucleosome core particle (NCP) sequences from chicken, Drosophila and yeast, extending them by the flanking sequences extracted from the genomes. We found that the known ∼10-bp periodic oscillation of AT-rich elements goes beyond the ends of yeast nucleosomes, but is distorted in metazoan sequences where the ‘out-of-phase’ AT-peaks appear at the NCP ends. The observed difference is likely to be associated with sequence-specific LH binding. We therefore propose a new structural model for LH binding to metazoan nucleosomes, postulating that the highly conserved nonpolar ‘wing’ region of the LH globular domain (tetrapeptide GVGA) recognizes AT-rich fragments through hydrophobic interactions with the thymine methyl groups. These interactions lead to DNA bending at the NCP ends and formation of a ‘stem-like’ structure. The same mechanism accounts for the high affinity of LH to methylated DNA—a feature critical for stabilization of the higher-order structure of chromatin and for repression of transcription

Nucleosome reorganisation in breast cancer tissues.

Background Nucleosome repositioning in cancer is believed to cause many changes in genome organisation and gene expression. Understanding these changes is important to elucidate fundamental aspects of cancer. It is also important for medical diagnostics based on cell-free DNA (cfDNA), which originates from genomic DNA regions protected from digestion by nucleosomes. Results We have generated high-resolution nucleosome maps in paired tumour and normal tissues from the same breast cancer patients using MNase-assisted histone H3 ChIP-seq and compared them with the corresponding cfDNA from blood plasma. This analysis has detected single-nucleosome repositioning at key regulatory regions in a patient-specific manner and common cancer-specific patterns across patients. The nucleosomes gained in tumour versus normal tissue were particularly informative of cancer pathways, with ~ 20-fold enrichment at CpG islands, a large fraction of which marked promoters of genes encoding DNA-binding proteins. The tumour tissues were characterised by a 5-10 bp decrease in the average distance between nucleosomes (nucleosome repeat length, NRL), which is qualitatively similar to the differences between pluripotent and differentiated cells. This effect was correlated with gene activity, differential DNA methylation and changes in local occupancy of linker histone variants H1.4 and H1X. Conclusions Our study offers a novel resource of high-resolution nucleosome maps in breast cancer patients and reports for the first time the effect of systematic decrease of NRL in paired tumour versus normal breast tissues from the same patient. Our findings provide a new mechanistic understanding of nucleosome repositioning in tumour tissues that can be valuable for patient diagnostics, stratification and monitoring

CTCF-dependent chromatin boundaries formed by asymmetric nucleosome arrays with decreased linker length

The CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) organises the genome in 3D through DNA loops and in 1D by setting boundaries isolating different chromatin states, but these processes are not well understood. Here we focus on the relationship between CTCF binding and the decrease of the Nucleosome Repeat Length (NRL) for ∼20 adjacent nucleosomes, affecting up to 10% of the mouse genome. We found that the chromatin boundary near CTCF is created by the nucleosome-depleted region (NDR) asymmetrically located &gt;40 nucleotides 5’-upstream from the centre of CTCF motif. The strength of CTCF binding to DNA is correlated with the decrease of NRL near CTCF and anti-correlated with the level of asymmetry of the nucleosome array. Individual chromatin remodellers have different contributions, with Snf2h having the strongest effect on the NRL decrease near CTCF and Chd4 playing a major role in the symmetry breaking. Upon differentiation of embryonic stem cells to neural progenitor cells and embryonic fibroblasts, a subset of common CTCF sites preserved in all three cell types maintains a relatively small local NRL despite genome-wide NRL increase. The sites which lost CTCF upon differentiation are characterised by nucleosome rearrangement 3’-downstream, but the boundary defined by the NDR 5’-upstream of CTCF motif remains

Specific alignment of nucleosomes on DNA correlates with periodic distribution of purine—pyrimidine and pyrimidine—purine dimers

AbstractComparison of the X-ray data and results of conformational analysis reveals the sequence-dependent helical anisotropy of DNA: purine—pyrimidine (RY) and pyrmidine—purine (YR) dimers prefer bending in the opposite directions. On this basis it is suggested that in the optimal nucleosomal DNA sequence the RY and YR dinucleotides alternate at intervals of 5–6 basepairs. Examination of the cases with the known disposition of nucleosomes confirms this concept