CMR data for gorilla immigration -pradel model

this file contains data for estimating immigration of adults individuals in Lokoué (sheet 1, population affected by ebola), and in Romani (sheet 2, undetermined epidemiological status). 0: not seen, 1: seen. data are analyzed with Pradel's model

Number of breeding groups (BG), non-breeding groups (NBG) and solitary individuals (S) identified during the study periods.

<p>LBE: Lokoué before Ebola, LAE1: Lokoué 2 years after Ebola, LAE2: Lokoué 6 years after Ebola (see details in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0037106#pone-0037106-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>).</p

Recovery Potential of a Western Lowland Gorilla Population following a Major Ebola Outbreak: Results from a Ten Year Study

<div><p>Investigating the recovery capacity of wildlife populations following demographic crashes is of great interest to ecologists and conservationists. Opportunities to study these aspects are rare due to the difficulty of monitoring populations both before and after a demographic crash. Ebola outbreaks in central Africa have killed up to 95% of the individuals in affected western lowland gorilla (<em>Gorilla gorilla gorilla</em>) populations. Assessing whether and how fast affected populations recover is essential for the conservation of this critically endangered taxon. The gorilla population visiting Lokoué forest clearing, Odzala-Kokoua National Park, Republic of the Congo, has been monitored before, two years after and six years after Ebola affected it in 2004. This allowed us to describe Ebola's short-term and long-term impacts on the structure of the population. The size of the population, which included around 380 gorillas before the Ebola outbreak, dropped to less than 40 individuals after the outbreak. It then remained stable for six years after the outbreak. However, the demographic structure of this small population has significantly changed. Although several solitary males have disappeared, the immigration of adult females, the formation of new breeding groups, and several birth events suggest that the population is showing potential to recover. During the outbreak, surviving adult and subadult females joined old solitary silverbacks. Those females were subsequently observed joining young silverbacks, forming new breeding groups where they later gave birth. Interestingly, some females were observed joining silverbacks that were unlikely to have sired their infant, but no infanticide was observed. The consequences of the Ebola outbreak on the population structure were different two years and six years after the outbreak. Therefore, our results could be used as demographic indicators to detect and date outbreaks that have happened in other, non-monitored gorilla populations.</p> </div

Number of adult males (M), adult females (F) and immatures (I) identified during the study periods.

<p>LBE: Lokoué before Ebola, LAE1: Lokoué 2 years after Ebola, LAE2: Lokoué 6 years after Ebola (see details in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0037106#pone-0037106-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>).</p

Composition of breeding and non-breeding groups in the Lokoué population before and after the Ebola outbreak.

<p>SB: Silverback, AF: Adult Female, BB: Blackback, Sub: Subadult, Juv: Juvenile, Inf: Infant, NI: Non Identified, LBE: Lokoué before Ebola, LAE1: Lokoué 2 years after Ebola, LAE2: Lokoué 6 years after Ebola (see details in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0037106#pone-0037106-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>).</p

Dynamics of the units during the study period (2001–2010).

<p>Only the units observed after the Ebola outbreak are included. The unit compositions are given at the first visit on the clearing, for every change in composition, and at the last visit. Only the months and years when any change in a unit composition occurred are mentioned. The names of units or individuals are in bold. BG: Breeding group; NBG: non-breeding group. m.: maturation of an individual during the period indicated by a line. m.o. (months old) or y.o. (years old): estimates of the age of infants at the date of observation. The grey bars distinguish between the study periods. LBE: Lokoué pre-Ebola period: April 2001 to November 2003, LE: Lokoué during Ebola period: December 2003 to December 2004, LAE1: Lokoué post-Ebola period 1: December 2004 to May 2006 and LAE2: Lokoué post-Ebola period 2: June 2008 to April 2010.</p

Boxplots of breeding group sizes during the study periods.

<p>LBE: Lokoué before Ebola, LAE1: Lokoué 2 years after Ebola, LAE2: Lokoué 6 years after Ebola (see details in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0037106#pone-0037106-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>). Bold horizontal lines are median values. The width of the boxes varies in proportion to the square roots of the number of observations in the groups. The ends of the vertical lines indicate the minimum and maximum values.</p

CMR data for gorilla social dynamics

the file contains the capture history for adult individuals in Lokoué (sheet 1, population affected by Ebola), and Romani (sheet 2, undetermined epidemiological status). Legends for status in capture history are in sheet

Observation time and presence of gorillas on the Lokoué clearing during each period of the study.

<p>LBE: Lokoué before Ebola, LE: Lokoué during Ebola, LAE1: Lokoué 2 years after Ebola, LAE2: Lokoué 6 years after Ebola.</p

Proportion of protected areas with conservation activities between 1990 and 1999 across different African regions.

<p>The number of protected areas with available information on presence and absence of any conservation activity (research, tourism and law enforcement guards) over the considered period were in total 105.</p