54 research outputs found

    RĂŽle actuel de la capsule endoscopique dans la dĂ©tection des tumeurs nĂ©oplasiques de l’intestin grĂȘle

    Get PDF
    Although small-bowel tumors are a small proportion of gastrointestinal neoplasms recent studies suggest that the incidence of these diseases is increasing. In fact, using new diagnostic modalities, their frequency has been shown to be slightly superior than previously thought. Until recently, diagnosis and management of these tumors were delayed by the difficult of access to the small bowel and the poor diagnostic capabilities of the available diagnostic techniques. An array of new methods has recently been developed, increasing the possibility of detecting these tumors at an earlier stage. In this particular subset of patients capsule endoscopy, despite its possible limitations, may provide crucial information changing the subsequent patient management and possibly influencing the long-term clinical outcome.Bien que les tumeurs de l’intestin grĂȘle ne reprĂ©sentent qu’une faible proportion des lĂ©sions nĂ©oplasiques du tractus digestif, de rĂ©centes Ă©tudes ont mis en Ă©vidence une lĂ©gĂšre augmentation de leur incidence. En fait, grĂące aux nouvelles modalitĂ©s diagnostiques, leur frĂ©quence s’est avĂ©rĂ©e lĂ©gĂšrement supĂ©rieure Ă  ce qui Ă©tait prĂ©cĂ©demment rapportĂ©. Jusqu’à trĂšs rĂ©cemment, le diagnostic et la prise en charge de ces tumeurs Ă©taient retardĂ©s en raison d’un accĂšs difficile Ă  l’intestin grĂȘle et aux faibles capacitĂ©s diagnostiques des moyens techniques disponibles. Tout un Ă©ventail de nouvelles mĂ©thodes ont rĂ©cemment Ă©tĂ© mises au point, amĂ©liorant la possibilitĂ© de dĂ©tecter ces lĂ©sions Ă  un stade plus prĂ©coce. Pour cette catĂ©gorie spĂ©cifique de patients avec lĂ©sions de l’intestin grĂȘle, la capsule endoscopique, en dĂ©pit de ses limites, peut fournir une information cruciale influant par consĂ©quent sur la prise en charge du patient et sur les rĂ©sultats cliniques au long cours

    Recent developments in small bowel endoscopy: the “black box” is now open!

    Get PDF
    Over the last few years, capsule endoscopy has been established as a fundamental device in the practicing gastroenterologist’s toolbox. Its utilization in diagnostic algorithms for suspected small bowel bleeding, Crohn’s disease, and small bowel tumors has been approved by several guidelines. The advent of double-balloon enteroscopy has significantly increased the therapeutic possibilities and release of multiple devices (single-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy) aimed at improving the performance of small bowel enteroscopy. Recently, some important innovations have appeared in the small bowel endoscopy scene, providing further improvement to its evolution. Artificial intelligence in capsule endoscopy should increase diagnostic accuracy and reading efficiency, and the introduction of motorized spiral enteroscopy into clinical practice could also improve the therapeutic yield. This review focuses on the most recent studies on artificial-intelligence-assisted capsule endoscopy and motorized spiral enteroscopy

    Improving Diagnostic Yield of Capsule Endoscopy in Coeliac Disease: Can Flexible Spectral Imaging Colour Enhancement Play a Role?

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Flexible spectral imaging colour enhancement (FICE) is a form of virtual chromoendoscopy that is incorporated in the capsule reading software and that can be used by reviewers to enhance the delineation of lesions in the small bowel. This has been shown to be useful in the detection of pigmented (ulcers, angioectasias) lesions. However, its application to coeliac disease (CD) images from small bowel capsule endoscopies (SBCEs) has rarely been studied. Methods: This was a European, multicentre study that included 5 expert capsule reviewers who were asked to evaluate a number of normal and abnormal de-identified images from SBCEs of patients with CD to determine whether the use of FICE and blue light can improve the detection of CD-related changes. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of conventional white light in the delineation of CD-related changes were 100%. The next best image modification was FICE 1 with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 100%. There was no difference between conventional white light, FICE and blue light for the identification of CD-related changes. There was a low agreement (Fleiss kappa 0.107; p = 0.147) between expert reviewers in selecting the best image modification that detected CD-related changes. Conclusions: FICE and blue light were not found to be superior to conventional white light in the delineation of macroscopic changes related to CD on SBCEs

    Small-bowel capsule endoscopy with panoramic view: results of the first multicenter, observational study (with videos).

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The first small-bowel video-capsule endoscopy (VCE) with 360° panoramic view has been recently developed. This new capsule has a wire-free technology, 4 high frame-rate cameras, and a long-lasting battery life. The present study was aimed at assessing performances and the safety profile of the 360° panoramic-view capsule in a large series of patients from a multicenter clinical practice setting. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing a 360° panoramic-view capsule procedure in 7 European Institutions between January 2011 and November 2015 were included. Both technical (ie, technical failures, completion rate) and clinical (ie, indication, findings, retention rate) data were collected by means of a structured questionnaire. VCE findings were classified according to the likelihood to explain reason for referral: P0-low, P1-intermediate and P2-high. RESULTS: Among 172 patients (94 men; median age: 68 years, IQR: 53-75), 142 underwent VCE for obscure (32 overt, 110 occult) GI bleeding (OGIB) and 28 for suspected (17) or established (2) Crohn's disease (CD). Overall, 560 findings were detected; 252 of them were P2. The overall diagnostic yield was 40.1%; 42.2% and 30.0% in patients with OGIB and CD, respectively. The rate of complete enteroscopy was 90.2%. All of the patients but one, who experienced capsule retention (1/172: 0.6%), excreted and retrieved the capsule. VCE failure occurred in 4 of 172 (2.3%) cases for technical problems. CONCLUSION: The present multicenter study, conducted in clinical practice setting and based on a large consecutive series of patients, showed that DY and safety profile of 360° panoramic-view capsule are similar to those of forward-view VCEs

    Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met?

    Get PDF
    Background and study aims The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recently issued a quality performance measures document for small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). The aim of this nationwide survey was to explore SBCE practice with ESGE quality measures as a benchmark. Patients and methods A dedicated per-center semiquantitative questionnaire based on ESGE performance measures for SBCE was created by a group of SBCE experts. One-hundred-eighty-one centers were invited to participate and were asked to calculate performance measures for SBCE performed in 2018. Data were compared with 10 ESGE quality standards for both key and minor performance measures. Results Ninety-one centers (50.3 %) participated in the data collection. Overall in the last 5 years (2014–2018), 26,615 SBCEs were performed, 5917 of which were done in 2018. Eighty percent or more of the participating centers reached the minimum standard established by the ESGE Small Bowel Working Group (ESBWG) for four performance measures (indications for SBCE, complete small bowel evaluation, diagnostic yield and retention rate). Conversely, compliance with six minimum standards established by ESBWG concerning adequate bowel preparation, patient selection, timing of SBCE in overt bleeding, appropriate reporting, reading protocols and referral to device-assisted enteroscopy was met by only 15.5%, 10.9%, 31.1%, 67.7%, 53.4%, and 32.2% of centers, respectively. Conclusions The present survey shows significant variability across SBCE centers; only four (4/10: 40 %) SBCE procedural minimum standards were met by a relevant proportion of the centers ( ≄ 80 %). Our data should help in identifying target areas for quality improvement programs in SBCE

    KID Project:an internet-based digital video atlas of capsule endoscopy for research purposes

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Capsule endoscopy (CE) has revolutionized small-bowel (SB) investigation. Computational methods can enhance diagnostic yield (DY); however, incorporating machine learning algorithms (MLAs) into CE reading is difficult as large amounts of image annotations are required for training. Current databases lack graphic annotations of pathologies and cannot be used. A novel database, KID, aims to provide a reference for research and development of medical decision support systems (MDSS) for CE. METHODS: Open-source software was used for the KID database. Clinicians contribute anonymized, annotated CE images and videos. Graphic annotations are supported by an open-access annotation tool (Ratsnake). We detail an experiment based on the KID database, examining differences in SB lesion measurement between human readers and a MLA. The Jaccard Index (JI) was used to evaluate similarity between annotations by the MLA and human readers. RESULTS: The MLA performed best in measuring lymphangiectasias with a JI of 81\u200a\ub1\u200a6\u200a%. The other lesion types were: angioectasias (JI 64\u200a\ub1\u200a11\u200a%), aphthae (JI 64\u200a\ub1\u200a8\u200a%), chylous cysts (JI 70\u200a\ub1\u200a14\u200a%), polypoid lesions (JI 75\u200a\ub1\u200a21\u200a%), and ulcers (JI 56\u200a\ub1\u200a9\u200a%). CONCLUSION: MLA can perform as well as human readers in the measurement of SB angioectasias in white light (WL). Automated lesion measurement is therefore feasible. KID is currently the only open-source CE database developed specifically to aid development of MDSS. Our experiment demonstrates this potential

    Small bowel capsule endoscopy in 2007: Indications, risks and limitations

    No full text

    Capsule endoscopy in neoplastic diseases

    No full text
    Until recently, diagnosis and management of small-bowel tumors were delayed by the difficulty of access to the small bowel and the poor diagnostic capabilities of the available diagnostic techniques. An array of new methods has recently been developed, increasing the possibility of detecting these tumors at an earlier stage. Capsule endoscopy (CE) appears to be an ideal tool to recognize the presence of neoplastic lesions along this organ, since it is non-invasive and enables the entire small bowel to be visualized. High-quality images of the small-bowel mucosa may be captured and small and flat lesions recognized, without exposure to radiation. Recent studies on a large population of patients undergoing CE have reported small-bowel tumor frequency only slightly above that reported in previous surgical series (range, 1.6%-2.4%) and have also confirmed that the main clinical indication to CE in patients with small-bowel tumors is obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. The majority of tumors identified by CE are malignant; many were unsuspected and not found by other methods. However, it remains difficult to identify pathology and tumor type based on the lesion’s endoscopic appearance. Despite its limitations, CE provides crucial information leading in most cases to changes in subsequent patient management. Whether the use of CE in combination with other new diagnostic (MRI or multidetector CT enterography) and therapeutic (Push-and-pull enteroscopy) techniques will lead to earlier diagnosis and treatment of these neoplasms, ultimately resulting in a survival advantage and in cost savings, remains to be determined through carefully-designed studies
    • 

    corecore