Perampanel Serum Concentrations in Adults With Epilepsy: Effect of Dose, Age, Sex, and Concomitant Anti-Epileptic Drugs

BACKGROUND: Perampanel (PMP), a noncompetitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) glutamate receptor antagonist, is a novel anti-epileptic drug (AED) licensed for the adjunctive treatment of focal and generalized epilepsy. There is limited information on PMP's pharmacokinetics and drug interaction characteristics with concomitant AEDs. We have investigated the effects of PMP dose, age, sex, and coprescribed AEDs on serum PMP concentrations. METHODS: We used the database of a therapeutic drug monitoring unit at a tertiary epilepsy referral center to identify patients who had PMP as part of their treatment and extracted clinical information from their medical notes. Sera PMP concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography/mass spectroscopy. RESULTS: In total, 160 sera from 107 patients (66 females) aged 18-70 years and weighing 40-125 kg were identified. They were prescribed a median PMP dose of 6 mg/d (range 2-12 mg/d) and were coprescribed a variety of AEDs, including enzyme-inducing [carbamazepine (CBZ) and oxcarbazepine (OXC)] and enzyme-inhibiting (valproic acid) AEDs. A linear relationship was observed between PMP dose and serum concentrations (r = 0.714, P < 0.0005). Sex and age were found not to influence PMP serum concentration. Enzyme-inducing AEDs dose-dependently decreased PMP concentrations, with CBZ and OXC decreasing mean values by 69% and 37%, respectively. In contrast, although topiramate and phenytoin also decreased mean PMP concentrations by 18% and 13%, respectively, these changes did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: PMP exhibits a linear dose-concentration relationship, with serum PMP concentrations being age and sex independent. CBZ and OXC can significantly decrease PMP concentrations, probably through an induction of CYP3A4-mediated metabolism

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs in Epilepsy: A 2018 Update

Background: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the mainstay of epilepsy treatment. Since 1989, 18 new AEDs have been licensed for clinical use and there are now 27 licensed AEDs in total for the treatment of patients with epilepsy. Furthermore, several AEDs are also used for the management of other medical conditions, for example, pain and bipolar disorder. This has led to an increasingly widespread application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of AEDs, making AEDs among the most common medications for which TDM is performed. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the indications for AED TDM, to provide key information for each individual AED in terms of the drug's prescribing indications, key pharmacokinetic characteristics, associated drug–drug pharmacokinetic interactions, and the value and the intricacies of TDM for each AED. The concept of the reference range is discussed as well as practical issues such as choice of sample types (total versus free concentrations in blood versus saliva) and sample collection and processing. / Methods: The present review is based on published articles and searches in PubMed and Google Scholar, last searched in March 2018, in addition to references from relevant articles. / Results: In total, 171 relevant references were identified and used to prepare this review. / Conclusions: TDM provides a pragmatic approach to epilepsy care, in that bespoke dose adjustments are undertaken based on drug concentrations so as to optimize clinical outcome. For the older first-generation AEDs (carbamazepine, ethosuximide, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, and valproic acid), much data have accumulated in this regard. However, this is occurring increasingly for the new AEDs (brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, piracetam, pregabalin, rufinamide, stiripentol, sulthiame, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide)

Reduction of Steady-State Valproate Levels by Other Antiepileptic Drugs

Steady-state plasma valproate (VPA) levels were analyzed in 37 children after 6 weeks of VPA therapy. Twenty-six patients were receiving other antiepileptic drugs in addition to VPA (experimental group). Eleven patients who received VPA alone served as controls. The mean VPA dose was not statistically different for the two groups (experimental group, 35.4 mg/kg/ day, 11.6 SD; control group, 31.1 mg/kg/day, SD 6.6) The mean plasma VPA level was significantly lower for the experimental group (63.0 Μg/m1, SD 21.8) than for the control (99.3 Μg/m1), SD 23.3) ( p < 0.01). VPA levelrdose ratio (LDR) was also reduced in the experimental group (1.92, SD 0.75) as compared to controls (3.26, SD 0.65) ( p < 0.01). Within the experimental group the VPA levels and VPA LDR were significantly reduced in patients receiving either phenytoin or phenobarbital. The data suggest that other antiepileptic drugs significantly alter the steady-state level to dose relationship for VPA. RÉSUMÉ Le taux plasmatique À l'Équilibre du valproate de sodium (VPA) a ÉtÉÉtudiÉ chez 37 enfants aprÈs 6 semaines de thÉrapeutique. Vingt six patients reÇoivent d'autres mÉdicaments antiÉpileptiques associÉs au VPA (groupe expÉrimental) alors que 11 sujets tÉmoins ne reÇoivent que le VPA seul. La posologie moyenne du VPA n'est pas significativement diffÉrente entre les deux groupes (35,4 mg/kg/jour ± 11,6 centre 31,1 mg/kg/jour ± 6,6). Le taux plasmatique de VPA est significativement plus bas dans le groupe experimental (63,0 Μg/ml ± 21,8) contre 99,3 Μg/ml ± 23,3 dans le groupe tÉmoin ( p < 0,01). Le rapport taux plasmatique/posologie (LDR) a ÉtÉ diminuÉ dans le groupe expÉrimental (1,92 ± 0,75) par rapport au groupe tÉmoin (3,26 ± 0,65), p < 0,01 en particulier chez les malades recevant de la phÉnytoÏne ou du phÉnobarbital. La posologie moyenne du VPA n'Étant pas significativement diffÉrente dans les deux groupes, les faits observÉs suggÈrent que l'addition d'autres antiÉpileptiques est capable de modifier le taux À l'Équilibre du VPA plasmatique en fonction de la dose administrÉe. RESUMEN Se analizaron los niveles estables de valproato en plasma (VPA) en 37 niÑos despuÉs de 6 semanas de terapia con VPA. Ventiseis pacientes recibÍan otros fÁrmacos ademÁs de VPA (grupo experimental) y once sÓlo tomaban VPA y sirvieron como controles. La dosis media de VPA no fue significativamente distinta en los dos grupos (grupo experimental: 35,4 mg/kg/dÍa, DS 11,6; grupo control: 31.1 mg/kg/dÍa, DS 6,6). El nivel plasmÁtico medio de VPA fue significativamente inferior en el grupo experimental (63,0 Μg/ml, DS 21,8) que en el control (99,3 Μg/ml, DS 23,3), p < 0,01. La relaciÓn nivel de VPA: dosis (LDR) estaba tambiÉn reducida en el grupo experimental (1,92, DS 0,75) al compararla con los controles (3,26, DS 0,65), p < 0,01. Dentro del grupo experimental los niveles de VPA y la LDR estaban significativamente reducidos en pacientes que tomaban fenitoÍna o fenobarbital. La dosis media no fue diferente entre los grupos experimental y control. Estos datos sugieren que la ingestiÓn de otros fÁrmacos alteran de modo significativo los niveles estables de VPA en relaciÓn con la dosis. ZUSAMMENFASSUNG In steady-state befindliche Plasma Valproatspiegel (VPA) wurden bei 37 Kindern nach 6 wÖchiger VPA-Therapie analysiert. 26 Patienten erhielten zusÄtzlich zum VPA andere Antiepileptika (experimentelle Gruppe). 11 Patienten, die VPA alleine bekamen, dienten als Kontrollen. Die mittlere VPA-Dosis war in beiden Gruppen nicht signifikant Vunterschiedlich (experimentelle Gruppe 35,4 mg/kg pro Tag, 11,6 SD; Kontrollgruppe 31,1 mg/kg pro Tag, SD 6,6). Der mittlere Plasma VPA-Spiegel war signifikant niedriger in der experimentellen Gruppe (63,0 Μg/ml, SD 21,8) als in der Kontrollgruppe (99,3 Μg/m1, SD 23,3), p < 0.01. Das VerhÄltnis VPA-Spiegel: Dosis (LDR) war in der experimentellen Gruppe ebenfalls reduziert (1,92, SD 0,75) gegenuber der Kontrollgruppe (3,26, SD 0,65), p < 0.01. Innerhalb der experimentellen Gruppe waren die VPA-Spiegel und die VPA/LDR bei Patienten, die entweder Phenytoin oder Phenobarbital bekamen, signifikant erniedrigt. Die mittlere VPA-Dosis war nicht signifikant unterschiedlich in der experimentellen und in der Kontrollgruppe. Diese Daten lassen vermuten, daß andere Antiepileptika signifikanterweise den Steady-state-Spiegel im Hinblick auf die verabfolgte Dosis VPA Ändern.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66058/1/j.1528-1157.1981.tb06154.x.pd

Brand-to-generic levetiracetam switch in patients with epilepsy in a routine clinical setting

Purpose: The therapeutic equivalence of generic and brand antiepileptic drugs, based on studies performed on healthy volunteers, has been questioned. We compare, in a routine clinical setting, brand versus generic levetiracetam (LEV) bioequivalence in patients with epilepsy and also the clinical efficacy and tolerability of the substitution. / Methods: A prospective, open-label, non-randomized, steady-state, multiple-dose, bioequivalence study was conducted in 12 patients with epilepsy (5 females), with a mean age of 38.4 ± 16.2 years. Patients treated with the brand LEV (Keppra; UCB Pharma) were closely followed for a four-week period and subsequently switched to a generic LEV (Pharmaten) and followed for another four-week period. Blood samples were collected at the end of each 4-week period, during a dose interval for each formulation, for LEV concentration measurements by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Steady-state area under the curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) data were subjected to conventional average bioequivalence analysis. Secondary clinical outcomes, including seizure frequency and adverse events, were recorded. / Results: Patients had epilepsy for a mean period of 14.1 ± 10.6 years and the mean daily LEV dose was 2583.3 ± 763.7 mg. The mean AUC ± SD and Cmax ± SD was 288.4 ± 86.3 (mg/L) h and 37.8 ± 10.4 mg/L respectively for brand LEV and 319.2 ± 104.7 (mg/L) h and 41.6 ± 12.3 mg/L respectively for the generic LEV. Statistic analysis showed no statistical significant difference in bioequivalence. Also, no change in seizures frequency and/or adverse events was recorded. / Conclusions: In our clinical setting, generic LEV was determined to be bioequivalent to brand LEV. Furthermore, seizures frequency or/and adverse events were not affected upon switching from brand to generic LEV

Clinical decision support of therapeutic drug monitoring of phenytoin: measured versus adjusted phenytoin plasma concentrations

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Therapeutic drug monitoring of phenytoin by measurement of plasma concentrations is often employed to optimize clinical efficacy while avoiding adverse effects. This is most commonly accomplished by measurement of total phenytoin plasma concentrations. However, total phenytoin levels can be misleading in patients with factors such as low plasma albumin that alter the free (unbound) concentrations of phenytoin. Direct measurement of free phenytoin concentrations in plasma is more costly and time-consuming than determination of total phenytoin concentrations. An alternative to direct measurement of free phenytoin concentrations is use of the Sheiner-Tozer equation to calculate an adjusted phenytoin that corrects for the plasma albumin concentration. Innovative medical informatics tools to identify patients who would benefit from adjusted phenytoin calculations or from laboratory measurement of free phenytoin are needed to improve safety and efficacy of phenytoin pharmacotherapy. The electronic medical record for an academic medical center was searched for the time period from August 1, 1996 to November 30, 2010 for patients who had total phenytoin and free phenytoin determined on the same blood draw, and also a plasma albumin measurement within 7 days of the phenytoin measurements. The measured free phenytoin plasma concentration was used as the gold standard.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In this study, the standard Sheiner-Tozer formula for calculating an estimated (adjusted) phenytoin level more frequently underestimates than overestimates the measured free phenytoin relative to the respective therapeutic ranges. Adjusted phenytoin concentrations provided superior classification of patients than total phenytoin measurements, particularly at low albumin concentrations. Albumin plasma concentrations up to 7 days prior to total phenytoin measurements can be used for adjusted phenytoin concentrations.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The results suggest that a measured free phenytoin should be obtained where possible to guide phenytoin dosing. If this is not feasible, then an adjusted phenytoin can supplement a total phenytoin concentration, particularly for patients with low plasma albumin.</p

Safety and feasibility of switching from phenytoin to levetiracetam monotherapy for glioma-related seizure control following craniotomy: a randomized phase II pilot study

Seizures are common in patients with gliomas, and phenytoin (PHT) is frequently used to control tumor-related seizures. PHT, however, has many undesirable side effects (SEs) and drug interactions with glioma chemotherapy. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a newer antiepileptic drug (AED) with fewer SEs and essentially no drug interactions. We performed a pilot study testing the safety and feasibility of switching patients from PHT to LEV monotherapy for postoperative control of glioma-related seizures. Over a 13-month period, 29 patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to initiate LEV therapy within 24 h of surgery or to continue PHT therapy. 6 month follow-up data were available for 15 patients taking LEV and for 8 patients taking PHT. In the LEV group, 13 patients (87%) were seizure-free. In the PHT group, 6 patients (75%) were seizure-free. Reported SEs at 6 months was as follows (%LEV/%PHT group): dizziness (0/14), difficulty with coordination (0/29), depression (7/14) lack of energy or strength (20/43), insomnia (40/43), mood instability (7/0). The pilot data presented here suggest that it is safe to switch patients from PHT to LEV monotherapy following craniotomy for supratentorial glioma. A large-scale, double-blinded, randomized control trial of LEV versus PHT is required to determine seizure control equivalence and better assess differences in SEs

Polymorphic variants of SCN1A and EPHX1 influence plasma carbamazepine concentration, metabolism and pharmacoresistance in a population of Kosovar Albanian epileptic patients

Aim The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of gene variants in key genes influencing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic of carbamazepine (CBZ) on the response in patients with epilepsy. Materials & Methods Five SNPs in two candidate genes influencing CBZ transport and metabolism, namely ABCB1 or EPHX1, and CBZ response SCN1A (sodium channel) were genotyped in 145 epileptic patients treated with CBZ as monotherapy and 100 age and sex matched healthy controls. Plasma concentrations of CBZ, carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide (CBZE) and carbamazepine-10,11-trans dihydrodiol (CBZD) were determined by HPLC-UV-DAD and adjusted for CBZ dosage/kg of body weight. Results The presence of the SCN1A IVS5-91G>A variant allele is associated with increased epilepsy susceptibility. Furthermore, carriers of the SCN1A IVS5-91G>A variant or of EPHX1 c.337T>C variant presented significantly lower levels of plasma CBZ compared to carriers of the common alleles (0.71±0.28 vs 1.11±0.69 μg/mL per mg/Kg for SCN1A IVS5-91 AA vs GG and 0.76±0.16 vs 0.94±0.49 μg/mL per mg/Kg for EPHX1 c.337 CC vs TT; PG showed a reduced microsomal epoxide hydrolase activity as reflected by a significantly decreased ratio of CBZD to CBZ (0.13±0.08 to 0.26±0.17, pT SNP and SCN1A 3148A>G variants were not associated with significant changes in CBZ pharmacokinetic. Patients resistant to CBZ treatment showed increased dosage of CBZ (657±285 vs 489±231 mg/day; P<0.001) but also increased plasma levels of CBZ (9.84±4.37 vs 7.41±3.43 μg/mL; P<0.001) compared to patients responsive to CBZ treatment. CBZ resistance was not related to any of the SNPs investigated. Conclusions The SCN1A IVS5-91G>A SNP is associated with susceptibility to epilepsy. SNPs in EPHX1 gene are influencing CBZ metabolism and disposition. CBZ plasma levels are not an indicator of resistance to the therapy

Requirements for generic anti-epileptic medicines: a regulatory perspective

Contains fulltext : 81660.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access

International Veterinary Epilepsy Task Force consensus proposal: Medical treatment of canine epilepsy in Europe

In Europe, the number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) licensed for dogs has grown considerably over the last years. Nevertheless, the same questions remain, which include, 1) when to start treatment, 2) which drug is best used initially, 3) which adjunctive AED can be advised if treatment with the initial drug is unsatisfactory, and 4) when treatment changes should be considered. In this consensus proposal, an overview is given on the aim of AED treatment, when to start long-term treatment in canine epilepsy and which veterinary AEDs are currently in use for dogs. The consensus proposal for drug treatment protocols, 1) is based on current published evidence-based literature, 2) considers the current legal framework of the cascade regulation for the prescription of veterinary drugs in Europe, and 3) reflects the authors’ experience. With this paper it is aimed to provide a consensus for the management of canine idiopathic epilepsy. Furthermore, for the management of structural epilepsy AEDs are inevitable in addition to treating the underlying cause, if possible